Should Obama Visit Tehran?

[georgephillip]

Are you making the argument that he should visit a country that hangs and murders gays in the streets? Why should he represent the united states in that capacity which in essence shows that is in agreement with Iran?

Are you saying US Presidents should avoid going to Saudi Arabia?
Obama visiting Iran doesn't imply he approves of hanging gays; it shows he's concerned with eliminating unnecessary war mongering for the benefit of defense contractors in this country and Israel.

And here we see the troll thread Jew-hater coming out. Yes, it's all about Israel. George would be happy for Iran to nuke Tel Aviv.

Israel has dozens of nuclear weapons, and Iran has none.
Who's most likely to nuke the other?
Unlike some hired killers on this thread, I would be happy to tax killing into extinction.

 

[velvtacheeze]

He needs to take military action off the table. No more stupid wars of choice.

If he took military threats off the table, Iran would no longer feel the need to obtain a nuclear weapon.

We invaded their neighbors, parked our navy right next to them, sanctioned their economy in recession, conservatives consistently call for bombing Iran....

...but we're to believe that Iran is the problem and the aggressor? Waht?

Because Iran has no history of starting wars or promoting terrorism, right, Sparky?

They haven't started a war in centuries.

America has though, in Iraq. What a mistake that was. Conservatives want to repeat that mistake in Iran.

 

[The T]

He has already dropped his pants and bent over for Iran so yeah why not.

But Americans including our soldiers have been getting it up the ass because of Obama's incompetence.

 

[The T]

He needs to take military action off the table. No more stupid wars of choice.

If he took military threats off the table, Iran would no longer feel the need to obtain a nuclear weapon.

We invaded their neighbors, parked our navy right next to them, sanctioned their economy in recession, conservatives consistently call for bombing Iran....

...but we're to believe that Iran is the problem and the aggressor? Waht?

Because Iran has no history of starting wars or promoting terrorism, right, Sparky?

They haven't started a war in centuries.

America has though, in Iraq. What a mistake that was. Conservatives want to repeat that mistake in Iran.

NO but they are fighting by PROXY, aren't they? YOU are BLIND.

 

[velvtacheeze]

Because Iran has no history of starting wars or promoting terrorism, right, Sparky?

They haven't started a war in centuries.

America has though, in Iraq. What a mistake that was. Conservatives want to repeat that mistake in Iran.

NO but they are fighting by PROXY, aren't they? YOU are BLIND.

Against the US? No, they're not.

 

[velvtacheeze]

He has already dropped his pants and bent over for Iran so yeah why not.

What should the US have done? Let me guess. More War.

 

[The Rabbi]

Are you saying US Presidents should avoid going to Saudi Arabia?
Obama visiting Iran doesn't imply he approves of hanging gays; it shows he's concerned with eliminating unnecessary war mongering for the benefit of defense contractors in this country and Israel.

And here we see the troll thread Jew-hater coming out. Yes, it's all about Israel. George would be happy for Iran to nuke Tel Aviv.

Israel has dozens of nuclear weapons, and Iran has none.
Who's most likely to nuke the other?
Unlike some hired killers on this thread, I would be happy to tax killing into extinction.

Because Israel has threatened to wipe Iran off the map repeatedly, right? Oh, wait.
You are such a retard. No wonder you hate Jews.

 

[mamooth]

Further sanctions look dead in the senate. Senator "I love the NSA!" Feinstein apparently embarrassed the agents of Israel in the senate enough to silence them. Looks like she's not completely worthless after all.

Now, if we could only get the Israel-groupies elsewhere in the USA to back off. Time to use the same tactics of embarrassment, and point out that loyal US citizens shouldn't be urging the USA to fight wars on behalf of Bebe and the Israeli right wing.

 

[The Rabbi]

He needs to take military action off the table. No more stupid wars of choice.

If he took military threats off the table, Iran would no longer feel the need to obtain a nuclear weapon.

We invaded their neighbors, parked our navy right next to them, sanctioned their economy in recession, conservatives consistently call for bombing Iran....

...but we're to believe that Iran is the problem and the aggressor? Waht?

Because Iran has no history of starting wars or promoting terrorism, right, Sparky?

They haven't started a war in centuries.

America has though, in Iraq. What a mistake that was. Conservatives want to repeat that mistake in Iran.

We didnt start the war in Iraq.
And Iran has been a sponsor of terrorism for ages.

 

[FJO]

Are you saying US Presidents should avoid going to Saudi Arabia?
Obama visiting Iran doesn't imply he approves of hanging gays; it shows he's concerned with eliminating unnecessary war mongering for the benefit of defense contractors in this country and Israel.

And here we see the troll thread Jew-hater coming out. Yes, it's all about Israel. George would be happy for Iran to nuke Tel Aviv.

Israel has dozens of nuclear weapons, and Iran has none.
Who's most likely to nuke the other?
Unlike some hired killers on this thread, I would be happy to tax killing into extinction.

Iran has no nuclear weapons because they want to develop nuclear energy strictly for peaceful purposes. YEAH, RIGHT!! And, of course, Jay Leno has dozens of vintage cars and I have only one minivan.

On the other hand, Israel never declared that they want to wipe Iran off the face of the Earth, as Iran PLANS to do with Israel.

I would think that a country who just wants to be left alone is less likely to attack than the one that has not only desire but intention to annihilate the other.

Please explain your last sentence.

 

[georgephillip]

If Obama had any sense, which of course he hasn't, he should immediately cease all communications and increase sanctions .... let alone visit Iran!

He is such a fool that he doesn't want to realize Iran is only taking advantage of his smug weakness!

What threat to global peace does Iran present?
They haven't invaded another country in more than two hundred years.
Unlike the US which has completely destabilized the Middle East in the last decade.

 

[The Rabbi]

If Obama had any sense, which of course he hasn't, he should immediately cease all communications and increase sanctions .... let alone visit Iran!

He is such a fool that he doesn't want to realize Iran is only taking advantage of his smug weakness!

What threat to global peace does Iran present?
They haven't invaded another country in more than two hundred years.
Unlike the US which has completely destabilized the Middle East in the last decade.

They have sent their creature Hesbollah into Lebanon and Syria. They are the most destabilizing force in the ME.

 

[velvtacheeze]

If Obama had any sense, which of course he hasn't, he should immediately cease all communications and increase sanctions .... let alone visit Iran!

He is such a fool that he doesn't want to realize Iran is only taking advantage of his smug weakness!

Sanctions don't work. Iranians don't blame their government for them. They blame the West, especially America. They would rather have a nuclear program with sanctions, then not have one without sanctions. It's about their dignity and pride. They would rather get bombed then give up their enrichment rights.

Thank goodness McCain and Romney lost. We'd be so mired in Middle East wars of choice by now.

 

[velvtacheeze]

Because Iran has no history of starting wars or promoting terrorism, right, Sparky?

They haven't started a war in centuries.

America has though, in Iraq. What a mistake that was. Conservatives want to repeat that mistake in Iran.

We didnt start the war in Iraq.
And Iran has been a sponsor of terrorism for ages.

Bush did, in 2003. His father was so much smarter in not invading and occupying Iraq. What a fiasco the Iraq War was. We can't repeat it with another stupid war of choice in Iran.

Instead, we can contain a nuclear armed Iran.

 

[S.J.]

Which side should he be on if not the side of peace?

"Obama said the interim deal, negotiated with Iran by the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany, would provide space for a longer-ranging agreement to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions, which Tehran says are peaceful.

"The president said he viewed the likelihood of a satisfactory 'end state' as a 50/50 proposition, and repeated that all options remained on the table if Iran did not follow through with its obligations.

"'If we cannot get the kind of comprehensive end state that satisfies us and the world community ... then the pressure that we've been applying on them and the options that I have made clear I can avail myself of, including a military option, is one that we would consider and prepare for,' he said."

Obama defends interim Iran deal, seeks to assure Israel | Reuters

He's not on the side of peace, otherwise he would not be running interference for them while they build their nuclear weapons.

Do you have evidence Iran is building nuclear weapons?

Besides the fact that they're enriching uranium beyond what they need for their stated purposes, are hiding their enrichment facilities, not allowing inspectors in to verify they are not building them, building new missiles that are designed to carry nukes, and vowing to wipe Israel off the map, then no I don't have proof (not that it would matter to you).

 

[The T]

They haven't started a war in centuries.

America has though, in Iraq. What a mistake that was. Conservatives want to repeat that mistake in Iran.

NO but they are fighting by PROXY, aren't they? YOU are BLIND.

Against the US? No, they're not.

YES they are...Remember IRAQ?

See the state of that place lately? YOU are an idiot, and remain BLIND as well as stupid.

 

[mudwhistle]

Maybe they'll arrest him for being a spy......

 

[The Rabbi]

If Obama had any sense, which of course he hasn't, he should immediately cease all communications and increase sanctions .... let alone visit Iran!

He is such a fool that he doesn't want to realize Iran is only taking advantage of his smug weakness!

Sanctions don't work. Iranians don't blame their government for them. They blame the West, especially America. They would rather have a nuclear program with sanctions, then not have one without sanctions. It's about their dignity and pride. They would rather get bombed then give up their enrichment rights.

Thank goodness McCain and Romney lost. We'd be so mired in Middle East wars of choice by now.

Of course they were working. That's why the Iranians agreed to negotiations.

 

[velvtacheeze]

NO but they are fighting by PROXY, aren't they? YOU are BLIND.

Against the US? No, they're not.

YES they are...Remember IRAQ?

See the state of that place lately? YOU are an idiot, and remain BLIND as well as stupid.

Yes, the state of Iraq is a mess. The mistake that led to what's happening now happened in 2003, and the President who made the mistake was George Dumbya Boosh, the War Monkey.

 

[mudwhistle]

I don't care what Obama does.

He's a liar and nothing he does will change that.