Should it be a crime to express racist beliefs?

[DGS49]

A major aspect of this discussion was raised, perhaps inadvertently, by the "Reverend" Louis Farrakhan many years ago. He opined that - not a verbatim quote - "An anti-Semite used to be someone who didn't like Jews; now it refers to someone whom Jews don't like."

And so it is with "Racist." It used to refer to someone who "didn't Iike" POC's, but now it basically refers to anyone whom any POC does not Iike. ANYONE can be caIIed a "racist" today; there is basically no defense to the charge.

Any time you say anything bad about any POC, you open yourself up to vitriolic accusations of racism, just as Our BeIoved President is caIIed a misogynist for bad-mouthing Rosie O'DonneII.

When anyone on this board cites facts about BIack crime, iIlegitimacy, drug abuse, academic apathy, disproportionate reliance on public assistance - let alone average IQ - it doesn't matter that they are facts, they are deemed racist by a couple of our correspondents (e.g., IM2). As Ben Shapiro often says, "Facts don't care about your feelings," and in fact, facts don't care about your opinions.

So **** it, pay no attention to the sIanders. They are meaningless.

 

[westwall]

My thoughts are that racism has been pretty much soundly rejected by society, except for an uneducated fringe. Slavery has been abolished, and both the Republican and Democratic Party have people of various colors serving under them. And we all know that you can't be a racist and be a Christian. Jesus was a Jew and preached a message of love for all of humanity.

So, if we just made it a crime to express racist beliefs, we might be able to render the last vestiges of racism in our society obsolete. Seems like a win-win to me, and no one would miss the racists.

Here are some examples of what we could make illegal:

*Expressing hatred or violence toward people based on their race or skin color

*Expressing conspiracy theories about people of a certain racial group (e.x. Jews controlling the media)

*Expressing the belief that one race is superior or inferior to another.

No. Free speech is free speech. If you want to show the world that you are an idiot I am fully in support of it.

 

[westwall]

Should it be a crime to continually post stupid questions?

Stupid is, as stupid does...

 

[westwall]

A society is not free if it does not protect the expression of offensive / unpopular opinions.

Ah. You want the state to round up and murder people you do not like.

You should have figured that out about the little shit a long time ago.

 

[westwall]

You really hate America don't you.

He's a Marxist. What do you expect?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Whites as a group are being dehumanized and have been de humanized for the past couple decades.

View attachment 1143961View attachment 1143962

Preppies Protecting Their Pet Pit Bulls

No other group has the overwhelming power to push this pseudo-egalitarian fantasy. RichKids believe they were born into a separate and superior race and have to put other Whites in their place through "the enemy of our enemy is our friend."

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

You're incompatible with a free society. Take your bullshit back to Reddit, Democratic Underground, or whatever rock you slithered out from underneath.

Swarms of Genzees

USMB gets n00bi's who are booby's.

 

[DStar777]

Here are some examples of what we could make illegal:

*Expressing hatred or violence toward people based on their race or skin color

*Expressing conspiracy theories about people of a certain racial group (e.x. Jews controlling the media)

*Expressing the belief that one race is superior or inferior to another.

It's already illegal to discriminate against people because of their race or color.. and.. it's already illegal to initiate force or violence against anyone. Why would it be necessary to censor unpopular ideas?

 

[ThisIsMe]

I didnt claim or imply that. I said he pandered to racists to get elected. Be they voters or patrons that helped his campaign.

And apparently it did help.

So there you have it.

Which racist did he pander to?

 

[Grau]

My thoughts are that racism has been pretty much soundly rejected by society, except for an uneducated fringe. Slavery has been abolished, and both the Republican and Democratic Party have people of various colors serving under them. And we all know that you can't be a racist and be a Christian. Jesus was a Jew and preached a message of love for all of humanity.

So, if we just made it a crime to express racist beliefs, we might be able to render the last vestiges of racism in our society obsolete. Seems like a win-win to me, and no one would miss the racists.

Here are some examples of what we could make illegal:

*Expressing hatred or violence toward people based on their race or skin color

*Expressing conspiracy theories about people of a certain racial group (e.x. Jews controlling the media)

*Expressing the belief that one race is superior or inferior to another.

Why start down such a dangerous slippery slope?

You can get locked up and fined in about 13 "Democracies" for so called "Holocaust Denial" in an excellent exemplification of the reality that:

“If you would know who controls you see who you may not criticise.”

― Tacitus
A quote by Publius Cornelius Tacitus

Meanwhile, only about 1/3 of the world's population is gullible enough to fall for the fraudulent embellishments and exaggerations churned out by the equally fraudulent multi Billion dollar Holocaust Industry. (1), (2)

Therefore, attempting to criminalize "hate speech" or "Holocaust denial" is a "fool's errand" and fails to do anything but galvanize existing enmity toward chronically offended individuals who are incapable of supporting their beliefs in open and honest public discussions.


”THE WORLD IS FULL OF HOLOCAUST DENIERS”

The World Is Full of Holocaust Deniers

A new survey suggests that many Asians, Africans, Middle Easterners, young people, Muslims, and Hindus believe that facts about the genocide have been distorted.

www.theatlantic.com

EXCERPT “Only a third of the world's population believe the genocide has been accurately described in historical accounts.

Some said they thought the number of people who died has been exaggerated; others said they believe it's a myth.

- Thirty percent of respondents said it's probably true that "Jews still talk too much about what happened to them in the Holocaust."

- Hindus were most likely to believe that the number of Holocaust deaths has been exaggerated.

- people younger than 65 were much more likely to say they believe that facts about the Holocaust have been distorted” CONTINUED


The less censorship, the better.

Thanks,



(1). "17 CHARGED IN $42 MILLION HOLOCAUST FRAUD CASE"
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/40093058/...ed-million-holocaust-fraud-case/#.XU62pSMwi_U

EXCERPT "Federal prosecutors said Tuesday they have broken up a long-running scam in which people falsely claimed to be victims of the Nazi persecution so they could get money out of a fund that pays Holocaust reparations."CONTINUED


(2). "HOLOCAUST CLAIMS CONFERENCE FRAUD LIKELY ‘MUCH HIGHER’ THAN $57 MILLION"

Holocaust Claims Conference fraud likely ‘much higher’ than $57 million | The Jerusalem Post

For over a decade, a criminal ring within the organization embezzled tens of millions of dollars through false restitution claims.

www.jpost.com

EXCERPT "For over a decade, a criminal ring within the organization embezzled tens of millions of dollars through false restitution claims.

Writing to the Claims Conference’s board last week, recently terminated ombudsman Shmuel Hollander asserted that, while reports had said organizational insiders had siphoned off $57 million in German taxpayer funds meant for survivors, “the final sum is in all probability much higher.” CONTINUED

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Well, those people vote.

And they get old and die. Just like the people who started a war over slavery. Just like the people who perpetrated violence because blacks were going to be allowed to shit in the same toilets as them.

What we are seeing is tyranny of the.minority. thanks to our embarrassing voter protection laws, gerrymandering, and sleepy Americans NOT voting.

It will run its course. Hopefully without a nuclear war.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

A major aspect of this discussion was raised, perhaps inadvertently, by the "Reverend" Louis Farrakhan many years ago. He opined that - not a verbatim quote - "An anti-Semite used to be someone who didn't like Jews; now it refers to someone whom Jews don't like."

Anti Semitic assholes have been dusting off that turd for decades.



So was that before or after he said Hitler was a great man, and that Jews have subhuman nature?

Nothing new under the sun, here. Might as well pick up a neonazi flyer off the ground in 1972.