Should Iran Be Allowed To Have Nuclear Weapons?

[kyzr]

Of course, no. It's just more deeply leads us into WW3.

Not sure how that happens if countries focus on their economies instead of advanced weapons.

As if the USA has "real allies".

Touche'

No. Unprovoked and illegal attack on a non-nuclear state means that Iran, as well as other countries will be forced to acquire nukes.

Not a peaceful non-nuclear state, but a vicious state sponsor of terrorism on a global scale. NFW they can be allowed to have nuclear weapons because they would certainly use them.

Actually, all those fights means on another side of planet may cause economic problems, migrations, terroristic acts and even incoming warheads.

They can "slap leather" any time they want to die.

 

[Zavulon]

Not sure how that happens if countries focus on their economies instead of advanced weapons.

It's simple. In the lawless world of unprovoked US aggressions anyone who "focus on their economies instead of advanced weapons" won't become "rich". He will become "dead".

Touche'

Not a peaceful non-nuclear state, but a vicious state sponsor of terrorism on a global scale. NFW they can be allowed to have nuclear weapons because they would certainly use them.

And who is not a sponsor of terrorism (from someone's point of view)?

They can "slap leather" any time they want to die.

That's how the deterrence works. If you are determined to kill them they can take some of you with them. You know it, and you prefer not to attack them.

 

[Lisa558]

Which seven idiots think a deranged Islamic Terrorist Regime that threatens to anniliate other countries should have nuclear weapons?

 

[Delldude]

As if the USA has "real allies".

They've boxed themselves in with the mistake they made letting the Middle East into their countries. That's why they're reluctant to get involved in Iran.

 

[kyzr]

It's simple. In the lawless world of unprovoked US aggression anyone who "focus on their economies instead of advanced weapons" won't become "rich". He will become "dead".

Like who? I call bullshit. The JCPOA proved Iran was bad.

And who is not a sponsor of terrorism (from someone's point of view)?

That's how the deterrence works. If you are determined to kill them they can take some of you with them. You know it, and you prefer not to attack them.

We don't "kill" we might do a regime change if an evil regime becomes problematic, like Maduro's, Qaddafi's, Saddam's, Assad's, Iran's, etc. You see any other vicious dictatorships that need attention?

 

[Lisa558]

They've boxed themselves in with the mistake they made letting the Middle East into their countries. That's why they're reluctant to get involved in Iran.

Exactly. They’ve been overrun with Muslims, and now are afraid to go against an Islamic regime that hates America, and Jews.

 

[JoeB131]

Exactly. They’ve been overrun with Muslims, and now are afraid to go against an Islamic regime that hates America, and Jews.

Or maybe they are just sick of American arrogance and Israeli genocide.

Poor Europe has been getting a major guilt trip for the last 80 years over what it did when Austrian Mustasche Man was running things.

Only to watch the Zionists engage in the same behavior.

The problem is, there's no good reason for this war. Iran was complying with JCPOA before Trump tore it up.

 

[Delldude]

Or maybe they are just sick of American arrogance and Israeli genocide.

Get real. They have a huge muzzie problem.

Iran was complying with JCPOA before Trump tore it up.

That's not true. Obama looked the other way on non-compliance issues.
Can't have the second black presidents 'signature' accomplishment blemished.

 

[JoeB131]

Get real. They have a huge muzzie problem.

Not really.

That's not true. Obama looked the other way on non-compliance issues.
Can't have the second black presidents 'signature' accomplishment blemished.

JCPOA was far from perfect, but it a far sight better than an ineffective war that has radicalized the Mullahs.

 

[kyzr]

Not really.

Your graphic is wrong. Germany has more than 20% foreign born. May not all be muzzie, but its a culture problem.

JCPOA was far from perfect, but it a far sight better than an ineffective war that has radicalized the Mullahs.

The JCPOA failed, period. Trump's war is not ineffective yet. Stay tuned to see how it turns out.

 

[Lisa558]

Or maybe they are just sick of American arrogance and Israeli genocide.

Poor Europe has been getting a major guilt trip for the last 80 years over what it did when Austrian Mustasche Man was running things.

Only to watch the Zionists engage in the same behavior.

The problem is, there's no good reason for this war. Iran was complying with JCPOA before Trump tore it up.

^^^ why does this antisemite continue to lie about Jews committing “genocide,” when the Islamists he supports are murdering 50,000 of their own citizens? And Nigeria Muslims are murdering Christians?

Oh right…..can’t blame Da Joos for those.