Churchill
Platinum Member
We were discussing nuclear weapons, you accused me of having no morals, unabe to distinguish good and evil. I'd already asked you to define the terms, you refused. You compared "Iranian leaders" of being backward savages and insinuated suicide bombing was immoral whereas Western bombing of schools, hospitals, civilains etc is moral.Wow. You sure flipped the switch. What did I say to suddenly cause this reaction?
I sought clarification but none was forthcoming. You referred to law, right, wrong, etc then asserted that adhering to international law was irrelevant and whatever the US chooses to do militarily is - by defintion - right even if it violated the law.
That is a characteristic of fascism, your entire position is that whatever the US does is "right" and who ever opposes that is "wrong".
Accusing a person of being immoral, arguing that some nations are good and some are evil, yet repeatedly shying away from defining those terms is also intellectual cowardice and frankly, boring.