That's what I'm asking.
So what say you?
No you aren't. You are asking if he should be plaesed with himself, which implies you think he shouldn't. I see no reason for you to reach that conclusion, unless you are a partisan hack who never acknowledges that anyone from the other side is ever right.
Actually, that question doesn't really imply anything, it's simply asking do you (or whoever) thinks that Rumsfeld should be pleased w/himself. And if so, then state the reasons why.
With that stated, no...I do not believe that Rumsfeld should be pleased with himself at all. In fact he should feel nothing but total shame. The bastard was on the chopping block TWICE before he was finally canned for his total incompetence. The bastard was making crap up as he went along...talking some nonsense about the "known unknowns" and other such nonsensical double-speak. The bastard told the public, actually he PROMISED the public that this war would last a couple weeks. Turns out that was COMPLETELY wrong.
We lost how many COUNTLESS American lives, then added the MONEY lost, money spent sending to Iraq's government that was TOTALLY squandered...paying $175.00 to do soldier's laundry and all kinds of F--CKRY that you RW bastards WILLFULLY closed your eyes to when the reports were coming out. Now you b!tches want to scream about spending for our OWN people and healthcare after the Bush Regime SQUANDERED BILLIONS in an UNNECESSARY war!?!?!? WTF!!!!
Again, I ask you sir...WHAT does Rumsfeld have to be pleased about.
SPELL IT OUT!!