Should Democratics "Man up" and stop obsessing over Sarah Palin?

[Liability]

Yeah, retardean. Good point. You fucking always dishonest pinhead.

It's one thing to "shed a tear". It's another for your face to crumple up like wadded tin foil.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDDEhLw1PVI&feature[/ame]

LOL! Crumple up like that last vestige of your hoped for credibility you just crushed and tossed away?

You are a joke, retardean.

 

[rdean]

Yeah, retardean. Good point. You fucking always dishonest pinhead.

It's one thing to "shed a tear". It's another for your face to crumple up like wadded tin foil.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDDEhLw1PVI&feature[/ame]

LOL! Crumple up like that last vestige of your hoped for credibility you just crushed and tossed away?

You are a joke, retardean.

You're just grumpy because you didn't have your nap. You'll feel better tomorrow.

 

[Liability]

It's one thing to "shed a tear". It's another for your face to crumple up like wadded tin foil.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDDEhLw1PVI&feature

LOL! Crumple up like that last vestige of your hoped for credibility you just crushed and tossed away?

You are a joke, retardean.

You're just grumpy because you didn't have your nap. You'll feel better tomorrow.

Grumpy? I'm having a blast exposing your lack of credibility.

You went from defending the mocking of Boehner (because he does tend to cry too often) to making irrationally petty (but pointless) distinctions over the facial expressions (ah yes! THAT's what matters) of those who cry!

You are a joke, retardean.

 

[Annie]

How's about Sarah Palin and tea parties don't go together? Another smear from the left.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Should Democratics "Man up" and stop obsessing over Sarah Palin?

Just a thought.

If she runs and that constitutes a "problem" for the GOP, wouldn't that be a problem just for the Republicans? In fact, wouldn't that be a boon to the Democratics?

On the other hand, if she runs and it's not a problem for the GOP, then isn't that still not the concern of the Democratics? Wouldn't their needs be better served by finding the candidates who could most readily defeat Palin while most effectively addressing their own socialist agenda?

Why fubars like leftwingshitflinger find it so endlessly necessary to offer their unsolicited and un-valued "counsel" to the GOP remains a mystery, either way.

I think if the media stopped hyping her, her 15 would have run out long ago.

But instead of not caring, they hounded her through the courts. Which made her popular
They vetted her book harder than they vetted obama. Which made her more popular.
One of these morons moved in next door, that's stalking, if your honest. And that made her even more popular

The comedy routines, the rants on tv, etc, etc,,,, All have served to make her more and more popular.

They get like crack addicts. They just have to have it.

 

[Liability]

Should Democratics "Man up" and stop obsessing over Sarah Palin?

Just a thought.

If she runs and that constitutes a "problem" for the GOP, wouldn't that be a problem just for the Republicans? In fact, wouldn't that be a boon to the Democratics?

On the other hand, if she runs and it's not a problem for the GOP, then isn't that still not the concern of the Democratics? Wouldn't their needs be better served by finding the candidates who could most readily defeat Palin while most effectively addressing their own socialist agenda?

Why fubars like leftwingshitflinger find it so endlessly necessary to offer their unsolicited and un-valued "counsel" to the GOP remains a mystery, either way.

I think if the media stopped hyping her, her 15 would have run out long ago.

But instead of not caring, they hounded her through the courts. Which made her popular
They vetted her book harder than they vetted obama. Which made her more popular.
One of these morons moved in next door, that's stalking, if your honest. And that made her even more popular

The comedy routines, the rants on tv, etc, etc,,,, All have served to make her more and more popular.

They get like crack addicts. They just have to have it.

I pretty much agree. I remain very much a non-fan of hers. As much as I know Couric was trying to get a "gotchya" moment in her interview of Gov. Palin, I also know that asking her about which paper she regularly reads should never have been one of those questions. Asking her to name a SCOTUS decision of which she disapproved ALSO should never have turned out to have been a "gotchya" question. Gov. Palin did that to herself.

My view of her is that some of her political instincts are just fine. She seems to get the idea that we are SUPPOSED to live within the bounds of our Constitutionally LIMITED Government and that we don't come close. She's right on the money about that.

On the other hand, I see her as FAR too uninformed of matters of international relevance to American foreign policy. She should have taken a year off just to read every past issue (moving forward) and every new issue of U.S. News and World Report. She seriously needs to get fully grounded in names, places, groups, conflicts, antagonisms, regional issues the world over. This could be time to get the kind of education from experts she is lacking.

Instead, she continues to press for name recognition. And the lib media and the libs here feed into that. I think her effort to keep her name out front is a big mistake she's making. She is not anywhere near dumb. THAT slam against her is just a liberal canard. But she does suffer from some pretty fundamental ignorance. That can be remedied. But until she does so, fully in earnest, I don't want her on any GOP ticket.

 

[rdean]

Should Democratics "Man up" and stop obsessing over Sarah Palin?

Just a thought.

If she runs and that constitutes a "problem" for the GOP, wouldn't that be a problem just for the Republicans? In fact, wouldn't that be a boon to the Democratics?

On the other hand, if she runs and it's not a problem for the GOP, then isn't that still not the concern of the Democratics? Wouldn't their needs be better served by finding the candidates who could most readily defeat Palin while most effectively addressing their own socialist agenda?

Why fubars like leftwingshitflinger find it so endlessly necessary to offer their unsolicited and un-valued "counsel" to the GOP remains a mystery, either way.

I think if the media stopped hyping her, her 15 would have run out long ago.

But instead of not caring, they hounded her through the courts. Which made her popular
They vetted her book harder than they vetted obama. Which made her more popular.
One of these morons moved in next door, that's stalking, if your honest. And that made her even more popular

The comedy routines, the rants on tv, etc, etc,,,, All have served to make her more and more popular.

They get like crack addicts. They just have to have it.

I pretty much agree. I remain very much a non-fan of hers. As much as I know Couric was trying to get a "gotchya" moment in her interview of Gov. Palin, I also know that asking her about which paper she regularly reads should never have been one of those questions. Asking her to name a SCOTUS decision of which she disapproved ALSO should never have turned out to have been a "gotchya" question. Gov. Palin did that to herself.

My view of her is that some of her political instincts are just fine. She seems to get the idea that we are SUPPOSED to live within the bounds of our Constitutionally LIMITED Government and that we don't come close. She's right on the money about that.

On the other hand, I see her as FAR too uninformed of matters of international relevance to American foreign policy. She should have taken a year off just to read every past issue (moving forward) and every new issue of U.S. News and World Report. She seriously needs to get fully grounded in names, places, groups, conflicts, antagonisms, regional issues the world over. This could be time to get the kind of education from experts she is lacking.

Instead, she continues to press for name recognition. And the lib media and the libs here feed into that. I think her effort to keep her name out front is a big mistake she's making. She is not anywhere near dumb. THAT slam against her is just a liberal canard. But she does suffer from some pretty fundamental ignorance. That can be remedied. But until she does so, fully in earnest, I don't want her on any GOP ticket.

Palin totally represents the intellectual curiosity of the Republican Party. They like her because they identify with her.

 

[Liability]

I think if the media stopped hyping her, her 15 would have run out long ago.

But instead of not caring, they hounded her through the courts. Which made her popular
They vetted her book harder than they vetted obama. Which made her more popular.
One of these morons moved in next door, that's stalking, if your honest. And that made her even more popular

The comedy routines, the rants on tv, etc, etc,,,, All have served to make her more and more popular.

They get like crack addicts. They just have to have it.

I pretty much agree. I remain very much a non-fan of hers. As much as I know Couric was trying to get a "gotchya" moment in her interview of Gov. Palin, I also know that asking her about which paper she regularly reads should never have been one of those questions. Asking her to name a SCOTUS decision of which she disapproved ALSO should never have turned out to have been a "gotchya" question. Gov. Palin did that to herself.

My view of her is that some of her political instincts are just fine. She seems to get the idea that we are SUPPOSED to live within the bounds of our Constitutionally LIMITED Government and that we don't come close. She's right on the money about that.

On the other hand, I see her as FAR too uninformed of matters of international relevance to American foreign policy. She should have taken a year off just to read every past issue (moving forward) and every new issue of U.S. News and World Report. She seriously needs to get fully grounded in names, places, groups, conflicts, antagonisms, regional issues the world over. This could be time to get the kind of education from experts she is lacking.

Instead, she continues to press for name recognition. And the lib media and the libs here feed into that. I think her effort to keep her name out front is a big mistake she's making. She is not anywhere near dumb. THAT slam against her is just a liberal canard. But she does suffer from some pretty fundamental ignorance. That can be remedied. But until she does so, fully in earnest, I don't want her on any GOP ticket.

Palin totally represents the intellectual curiosity of the Republican Party. They like her because they identify with her.

Prove what you just said. No 'appeal to your own opinion' bullshit. Back it up, you hack. Give us a link or three.

You won't though, because you can't. You are just being your typical douche-bag self, spouting off your utterly worthless opinions as though you had some factual basis for the tripe you say.

Ironically, it is YOU who lacks intellectual curiosity, retardean. We know this because you rely entirely on comic book stereotypes. You have read them a lot. You buy into them. You repeat them endlessly. It doesn't even dawn on you that you are relying exclusively on stereotypes.

You are vapid, trite and mindless; but on the bright side, you are completely lacking in ANY ability to persuade anybody of anything.

 

[logical4u]

Conservative....Republican....you can't proide a single leader who has more clout right now than Palin.

I've come out and said Palin is the power broker in the party and among conservatives. You seem to have no problem saying I am wrong but have been unable to proide a single name of someone with more influence right now..

I'll help you..

Rush?
Romney?
Boehner?
McConnell?
Steele?
Murdoch?
Paul?

Give me a name

You assume Gov. Palin has "clout." Baseless assumption. Instead, Gov. Palin is merely in step with the mood of the electorate. Many other folks are more responsible for raising the political awareness of the American people than Gov. Palin is. She deserves some credit, though, for adding her voice to that ongoing process and for being a part of it.

It is also curious that you are so focused on who has "more clout" in the Party that you are not part of. Your dishonest username notwithstanding, you are a left winger. You left wingers identify -- for obvious reasons -- much more closely with the statist Democrat Parody than you ever will with the slightly more conservative Republican Party. Your concern for how Republicans or conservatives may act is touching, but kind of disingenuous.

If President Obama chooses not to seek a second term (or if someone within the standard liberal ranks of the Democrat Parody takes him on in a primary battle and defeats President Obama's effort to secure his re-nomination) which "leader" of the Democrat Parody do you imagine is the most suitable candidate with the best prospect of defeating the eventual Republican opponent?

That's a question you liberals should start contemplating. For if you believe that President Obama's re-nomination OR re-election is a shoe-in, you might be in for some surprises in the next dozen or so months.

And you hope that's true don't you? A Black (half White) man has no business being the President of the United States of America. What in the world has this country come to? It should be nobody but White men sitting in the oval office and directing where this country should go. Afterall, only the White men (not women) have the knowledge given to them by God (you are the chosen ppl) to lead this country in the direction it should go. Am I right?

The man is taking the country toward socialism (that would be away from individual rights). I don't care if he is white, black, brown, yellow, red, green, blue or covered with any colored hair. It is the wrong way to take this country. Are individual rights important to you? Do you think that private property should be legally protected? Do you think people ought to be able to choose what field they go into? Do you think people should be able to start their own business? Do you think the government exists to make "outcomes" fair or "opportunities" fair? Do you think the government should allow this country to be overrun with those that disagree with our way of life and would love to oppress the American worker for their own purposes?

 

[rikules]

Who knew USArmyRetired was a Democrat....

A stupid response from boredtoseeya. Not unexpected.

It makes sense for a fan of hers to obsess over her -- especially when they are likely to be in a position to vote for her if that scenario arises.

It makes damn little sense for Democratics to obsess over her since they don't get to choose their opponents.

I wish you would stop dictating to other people what they should or should NOT be worried about.

democrats understand that there is a great possibility that palin will run for president in 2012

it makes MUCH more sense for them to try and derail her NOW than to wait until she's in the white house

 

[Liability]

Conservative....Republican....you can't proide a single leader who has more clout right now than Palin.

I've come out and said Palin is the power broker in the party and among conservatives. You seem to have no problem saying I am wrong but have been unable to proide a single name of someone with more influence right now..

I'll help you..

Rush?
Romney?
Boehner?
McConnell?
Steele?
Murdoch?
Paul?

Give me a name

You assume Gov. Palin has "clout." Baseless assumption. Instead, Gov. Palin is merely in step with the mood of the electorate. Many other folks are more responsible for raising the political awareness of the American people than Gov. Palin is. She deserves some credit, though, for adding her voice to that ongoing process and for being a part of it.

It is also curious that you are so focused on who has "more clout" in the Party that you are not part of. Your dishonest username notwithstanding, you are a left winger. You left wingers identify -- for obvious reasons -- much more closely with the statist Democrat Parody than you ever will with the slightly more conservative Republican Party. Your concern for how Republicans or conservatives may act is touching, but kind of disingenuous.

If President Obama chooses not to seek a second term (or if someone within the standard liberal ranks of the Democrat Parody takes him on in a primary battle and defeats President Obama's effort to secure his re-nomination) which "leader" of the Democrat Parody do you imagine is the most suitable candidate with the best prospect of defeating the eventual Republican opponent?

That's a question you liberals should start contemplating. For if you believe that President Obama's re-nomination OR re-election is a shoe-in, you might be in for some surprises in the next dozen or so months.

And you hope that's true don't you? A Black (half White) man has no business being the President of the United States of America. What in the world has this country come to? It should be nobody but White men sitting in the oval office and directing where this country should go. Afterall, only the White men (not women) have the knowledge given to them by God (you are the chosen ppl) to lead this country in the direction it should go. Am I right?

You dishonest uber-libs are incapable of engaging in any discussion on matters of politicla disagreement without relying on your dishonest claim that your opponents are concerend ("really") about race. Yet almost every time, it is you fubars who interject the matter of race into the equation.

casper, you are dishonest. And your contribution to any discussion is illegitimized precisely to the extent that you rely on that uber-lib canard of playing the race card.

It looks like YOU are the one concerned about race.

Are you such a complete moron that you actually imagine that because of his racial background President Obama should be immune to criticism of his leadership?

This is why you libs are rejected by the majority of Americans.

 

[Liability]

Who knew USArmyRetired was a Democrat....

A stupid response from boredtoseeya. Not unexpected.

It makes sense for a fan of hers to obsess over her -- especially when they are likely to be in a position to vote for her if that scenario arises.

It makes damn little sense for Democratics to obsess over her since they don't get to choose their opponents.

I wish you would stop dictating to other people what they should or should NOT be worried about.

democrats understand that there is a great possibility that palin will run for president in 2012

it makes MUCH more sense for them to try and derail her NOW than to wait until she's in the white house

Bullshit. You do that crap in the guise of offering "advice" to your opposition. You guys are thoroughly transparent.

(A) nobody on the other side of the aisle fails to note your self-interest.

(B) nobody on the right side of the political spectrum should give any credence to the "advice" offered by you entirely "objective" libs.

(C) there is an ancient expression which you might have heard. It suggests that before you attempt to take a mote out of your brother's eye, it would be good to take the beam out of your own eye. So why not give that some thought? When the best YOU guys can come up with is the Marxist wannabe presently infesting the Oval Office, you guys don't have any spare credibility.

(D) stop whining. I haven't "dictated" anything. I have registered my complaint. There's not one of you dopes on the far left who is obliged to adhere to that advice, so it obviously isn't a matter of dictating anything. Don't be such a dork.

 

[(R)IGHTeous 1]

Should Democratics "Man up" and stop obsessing over Sarah Palin?

Just a thought.

If she runs and that constitutes a "problem" for the GOP, wouldn't that be a problem just for the Republicans? In fact, wouldn't that be a boon to the Democratics?

On the other hand, if she runs and it's not a problem for the GOP, then isn't that still not the concern of the Democratics? Wouldn't their needs be better served by finding the candidates who could most readily defeat Palin while most effectively addressing their own socialist agenda?

Why fubars like leftwingshitflinger find it so endlessly necessary to offer their unsolicited and un-valued "counsel" to the GOP remains a mystery, either way.

It got so asinine, their BS slander, libel, and lies, that I had go to and coin "Palin Derangement Syndrome"

They quite obviously are scared of her, a good, common sense woman who is SELF-MADE and aint rise to power on her shady husband's coat tails.

She can clearly relate to the average American, won't take their BS, and rightfully calls out the "Lamestream" (lol I love that) MSM.

When the left hates someone THIS much, you KNOW THEY'RE doin somethin RIGHT.

 

[mdn2000]

Should Democratics "Man up" and stop obsessing over Sarah Palin?

Just a thought.

If she runs and that constitutes a "problem" for the GOP, wouldn't that be a problem just for the Republicans? In fact, wouldn't that be a boon to the Democratics?

On the other hand, if she runs and it's not a problem for the GOP, then isn't that still not the concern of the Democratics? Wouldn't their needs be better served by finding the candidates who could most readily defeat Palin while most effectively addressing their own socialist agenda?

Why fubars like leftwingshitflinger find it so endlessly necessary to offer their unsolicited and un-valued "counsel" to the GOP remains a mystery, either way.

I think if the media stopped hyping her, her 15 would have run out long ago.

But instead of not caring, they hounded her through the courts. Which made her popular
They vetted her book harder than they vetted obama. Which made her more popular.
One of these morons moved in next door, that's stalking, if your honest. And that made her even more popular

The comedy routines, the rants on tv, etc, etc,,,, All have served to make her more and more popular.

They get like crack addicts. They just have to have it.

I pretty much agree. I remain very much a non-fan of hers. As much as I know Couric was trying to get a "gotchya" moment in her interview of Gov. Palin, I also know that asking her about which paper she regularly reads should never have been one of those questions. Asking her to name a SCOTUS decision of which she disapproved ALSO should never have turned out to have been a "gotchya" question. Gov. Palin did that to herself.

My view of her is that some of her political instincts are just fine. She seems to get the idea that we are SUPPOSED to live within the bounds of our Constitutionally LIMITED Government and that we don't come close. She's right on the money about that.

On the other hand, I see her as FAR too uninformed of matters of international relevance to American foreign policy. She should have taken a year off just to read every past issue (moving forward) and every new issue of U.S. News and World Report. She seriously needs to get fully grounded in names, places, groups, conflicts, antagonisms, regional issues the world over. This could be time to get the kind of education from experts she is lacking.

Instead, she continues to press for name recognition. And the lib media and the libs here feed into that. I think her effort to keep her name out front is a big mistake she's making. She is not anywhere near dumb. THAT slam against her is just a liberal canard. But she does suffer from some pretty fundamental ignorance. That can be remedied. But until she does so, fully in earnest, I don't want her on any GOP ticket.

From a headline on U.S. News and World Report, sounds like Palin is a good choice, they give ten so I cherry picked a ripe one.

2. Military Hawk: 10 Reasons Sarah Palin Would Make a Good President - US News & World Report

The mother of a soldier in Iraq, Palin is becoming a military hawk. She has repeatedly threatened Iran with sharp language, and some think threats work. And don't forget that she can shoot an elk at 400 yards, so she can back up those threats