Should Democratics "Man up" and stop obsessing over Sarah Palin?

[Liability]

Your inability to name a single GOP member with the clout of Palin is not surprising. Call her a leader, call her a powerbroker or call her a stupid bitch with a large following no other Republican has the power to influence Party decisions right now.
if there was, you would have named them by now

Why not just Conservative? But hyperpartisans as you cannot understand the distinction.

Conservative....Republican....you can't proide a single leader who has more clout right now than Palin.

I've come out and said Palin is the power broker in the party and among conservatives. You seem to have no problem saying I am wrong but have been unable to proide a single name of someone with more influence right now..

I'll help you..

Rush?
Romney?
Boehner?
McConnell?
Steele?
Murdoch?
Paul?

Give me a name

You assume Gov. Palin has "clout." Baseless assumption. Instead, Gov. Palin is merely in step with the mood of the electorate. Many other folks are more responsible for raising the political awareness of the American people than Gov. Palin is. She deserves some credit, though, for adding her voice to that ongoing process and for being a part of it.

It is also curious that you are so focused on who has "more clout" in the Party that you are not part of. Your dishonest username notwithstanding, you are a left winger. You left wingers identify -- for obvious reasons -- much more closely with the statist Democrat Parody than you ever will with the slightly more conservative Republican Party. Your concern for how Republicans or conservatives may act is touching, but kind of disingenuous.

If President Obama chooses not to seek a second term (or if someone within the standard liberal ranks of the Democrat Parody takes him on in a primary battle and defeats President Obama's effort to secure his re-nomination) which "leader" of the Democrat Parody do you imagine is the most suitable candidate with the best prospect of defeating the eventual Republican opponent?

That's a question you liberals should start contemplating. For if you believe that President Obama's re-nomination OR re-election is a shoe-in, you might be in for some surprises in the next dozen or so months.

 

[casper4020322]

Why not just Conservative? But hyperpartisans as you cannot understand the distinction.

Conservative....Republican....you can't proide a single leader who has more clout right now than Palin.

I've come out and said Palin is the power broker in the party and among conservatives. You seem to have no problem saying I am wrong but have been unable to proide a single name of someone with more influence right now..

I'll help you..

Rush?
Romney?
Boehner?
McConnell?
Steele?
Murdoch?
Paul?

Give me a name

You assume Gov. Palin has "clout." Baseless assumption. Instead, Gov. Palin is merely in step with the mood of the electorate. Many other folks are more responsible for raising the political awareness of the American people than Gov. Palin is. She deserves some credit, though, for adding her voice to that ongoing process and for being a part of it.

It is also curious that you are so focused on who has "more clout" in the Party that you are not part of. Your dishonest username notwithstanding, you are a left winger. You left wingers identify -- for obvious reasons -- much more closely with the statist Democrat Parody than you ever will with the slightly more conservative Republican Party. Your concern for how Republicans or conservatives may act is touching, but kind of disingenuous.

If President Obama chooses not to seek a second term (or if someone within the standard liberal ranks of the Democrat Parody takes him on in a primary battle and defeats President Obama's effort to secure his re-nomination) which "leader" of the Democrat Parody do you imagine is the most suitable candidate with the best prospect of defeating the eventual Republican opponent?

That's a question you liberals should start contemplating. For if you believe that President Obama's re-nomination OR re-election is a shoe-in, you might be in for some surprises in the next dozen or so months.

And you hope that's true don't you? A Black (half White) man has no business being the President of the United States of America. What in the world has this country come to? It should be nobody but White men sitting in the oval office and directing where this country should go. Afterall, only the White men (not women) have the knowledge given to them by God (you are the chosen ppl) to lead this country in the direction it should go. Am I right?

 

[SwordofDamocles]

Should Democratics "Man up" and stop obsessing over Sarah Palin?

Just a thought.

If she runs and that constitutes a "problem" for the GOP, wouldn't that be a problem just for the Republicans? In fact, wouldn't that be a boon to the Democratics?

On the other hand, if she runs and it's not a problem for the GOP, then isn't that still not the concern of the Democratics? Wouldn't their needs be better served by finding the candidates who could most readily defeat Palin while most effectively addressing their own socialist agenda?

Why fubars like leftwingshitflinger find it so endlessly necessary to offer their unsolicited and un-valued "counsel" to the GOP remains a mystery, either way.

We all know liberal women are pathetic looking, pug-nosed, wart-wearing slags who only wish they could look like a strong GOP woman. Envy is one of the seven deadly sins and clearly is a large reason why the liberal cunnys lost in Nov..choke it down bitches....we'll have more for you in 2012

 

[rightwinger]

Why not just Conservative? But hyperpartisans as you cannot understand the distinction.

Conservative....Republican....you can't proide a single leader who has more clout right now than Palin.

I've come out and said Palin is the power broker in the party and among conservatives. You seem to have no problem saying I am wrong but have been unable to proide a single name of someone with more influence right now..

I'll help you..

Rush?
Romney?
Boehner?
McConnell?
Steele?
Murdoch?
Paul?

Give me a name

You assume Gov. Palin has "clout." Baseless assumption. Instead, Gov. Palin is merely in step with the mood of the electorate. Many other folks are more responsible for raising the political awareness of the American people than Gov. Palin is. She deserves some credit, though, for adding her voice to that ongoing process and for being a part of it.

It is also curious that you are so focused on who has "more clout" in the Party that you are not part of. Your dishonest username notwithstanding, you are a left winger. You left wingers identify -- for obvious reasons -- much more closely with the statist Democrat Parody than you ever will with the slightly more conservative Republican Party. Your concern for how Republicans or conservatives may act is touching, but kind of disingenuous.

If President Obama chooses not to seek a second term (or if someone within the standard liberal ranks of the Democrat Parody takes him on in a primary battle and defeats President Obama's effort to secure his re-nomination) which "leader" of the Democrat Parody do you imagine is the most suitable candidate with the best prospect of defeating the eventual Republican opponent?

That's a question you liberals should start contemplating. For if you believe that President Obama's re-nomination OR re-election is a shoe-in, you might be in for some surprises in the next dozen or so months.

Palin= $$$$$
$$$$$= clout

I see you still can't name someone with more clout than Palin
"other people" is the best ya got?????

 

[Liability]

Conservative....Republican....you can't proide a single leader who has more clout right now than Palin.

I've come out and said Palin is the power broker in the party and among conservatives. You seem to have no problem saying I am wrong but have been unable to proide a single name of someone with more influence right now..

I'll help you..

Rush?
Romney?
Boehner?
McConnell?
Steele?
Murdoch?
Paul?

Give me a name

You assume Gov. Palin has "clout." Baseless assumption. Instead, Gov. Palin is merely in step with the mood of the electorate. Many other folks are more responsible for raising the political awareness of the American people than Gov. Palin is. She deserves some credit, though, for adding her voice to that ongoing process and for being a part of it.

It is also curious that you are so focused on who has "more clout" in the Party that you are not part of. Your dishonest username notwithstanding, you are a left winger. You left wingers identify -- for obvious reasons -- much more closely with the statist Democrat Parody than you ever will with the slightly more conservative Republican Party. Your concern for how Republicans or conservatives may act is touching, but kind of disingenuous.

If President Obama chooses not to seek a second term (or if someone within the standard liberal ranks of the Democrat Parody takes him on in a primary battle and defeats President Obama's effort to secure his re-nomination) which "leader" of the Democrat Parody do you imagine is the most suitable candidate with the best prospect of defeating the eventual Republican opponent?

That's a question you liberals should start contemplating. For if you believe that President Obama's re-nomination OR re-election is a shoe-in, you might be in for some surprises in the next dozen or so months.

Palin= $$$$$
$$$$$= clout

I see you still can't name someone with more clout than Palin
"other people" is the best ya got?????

The faux "formula, "Palin= $$$$$ $$$$$= clout" is just a mindless reiteration of your completely baseless contention. Palin does not equal money. And money alone does not equal clout, anyway. Simplistic liberal sophistry is not actual argument.

And as for your latter "question," since all you've done is dodge the point I had made, there is obviously no purpose served in trying to correct you again. I not only don't care about the question (in addition to wondering why you offer such unsupported and unsupportable "premises"), I remind you that the question itself is irrelevant.

You liberoidal types need to focus on which one of your liberoidal Democrat Parody mutts you think is the best candidate when the time comes. You worry about the libtards. Those on the right will worry about the conservatives and/or the Republicans.

 

[rightwinger]

You assume Gov. Palin has "clout." Baseless assumption. Instead, Gov. Palin is merely in step with the mood of the electorate. Many other folks are more responsible for raising the political awareness of the American people than Gov. Palin is. She deserves some credit, though, for adding her voice to that ongoing process and for being a part of it.

It is also curious that you are so focused on who has "more clout" in the Party that you are not part of. Your dishonest username notwithstanding, you are a left winger. You left wingers identify -- for obvious reasons -- much more closely with the statist Democrat Parody than you ever will with the slightly more conservative Republican Party. Your concern for how Republicans or conservatives may act is touching, but kind of disingenuous.

If President Obama chooses not to seek a second term (or if someone within the standard liberal ranks of the Democrat Parody takes him on in a primary battle and defeats President Obama's effort to secure his re-nomination) which "leader" of the Democrat Parody do you imagine is the most suitable candidate with the best prospect of defeating the eventual Republican opponent?

That's a question you liberals should start contemplating. For if you believe that President Obama's re-nomination OR re-election is a shoe-in, you might be in for some surprises in the next dozen or so months.

Palin= $$$$$
$$$$$= clout

I see you still can't name someone with more clout than Palin
"other people" is the best ya got?????

The faux "formula, "Palin= $$$$$ $$$$$= clout" is just a mindless reiteration of your completely baseless contention. Palin does not equal money. And money alone does not equal clout, anyway. Simplistic liberal sophistry is not actual argument.

And as for your latter "question," since all you've done is dodge the point I had made, there is obviously no purpose served in trying to correct you again. I not only don't care about the question (in addition to wondering why you offer such unsupported and unsupportable "premises"), I remind you that the question itself is irrelevant.

You liberoidal types need to focus on which one of your liberoidal Democrat Parody mutts you think is the best candidate when the time comes. You worry about the libtards. Those on the right will worry about the conservatives and/or the Republicans.

Until you are capable of naming a Republican with more clout than Palin, Palin remains number 1

 

[Liability]

Palin= $$$$$
$$$$$= clout

I see you still can't name someone with more clout than Palin
"other people" is the best ya got?????

The faux "formula, "Palin= $$$$$ $$$$$= clout" is just a mindless reiteration of your completely baseless contention. Palin does not equal money. And money alone does not equal clout, anyway. Simplistic liberal sophistry is not actual argument.

And as for your latter "question," since all you've done is dodge the point I had made, there is obviously no purpose served in trying to correct you again. I not only don't care about the question (in addition to wondering why you offer such unsupported and unsupportable "premises"), I remind you that the question itself is irrelevant.

You liberoidal types need to focus on which one of your liberoidal Democrat Parody mutts you think is the best candidate when the time comes. You worry about the libtards. Those on the right will worry about the conservatives and/or the Republicans.

Until you are capable of naming a Republican with more clout than Palin, Palin remains number 1

Facially invalid "logic." Whether I could or choose to name them has no bearing on whether they exist.

More importantly, you are perfectly free to spend all day everyday worrying about who is the Republican with the most clout. Zzzz. Who cares? That's not YOUR concern, anyway, since YOU are not a Republican or a conservative. Despite your deliberately dishonest username, you are just another liberal drone. So you ought to worry about who is leading the liberal Democrat Parody -- other than Soros, I mean.

 

[rightwinger]

The faux "formula, "Palin= $$$$$ $$$$$= clout" is just a mindless reiteration of your completely baseless contention. Palin does not equal money. And money alone does not equal clout, anyway. Simplistic liberal sophistry is not actual argument.

And as for your latter "question," since all you've done is dodge the point I had made, there is obviously no purpose served in trying to correct you again. I not only don't care about the question (in addition to wondering why you offer such unsupported and unsupportable "premises"), I remind you that the question itself is irrelevant.

You liberoidal types need to focus on which one of your liberoidal Democrat Parody mutts you think is the best candidate when the time comes. You worry about the libtards. Those on the right will worry about the conservatives and/or the Republicans.

Until you are capable of naming a Republican with more clout than Palin, Palin remains number 1

Facially invalid "logic." Whether I could or choose to name them has no bearing on whether they exist.

More importantly, you are perfectly free to spend all day everyday worrying about who is the Republican with the most clout. Zzzz. Who cares? That's not YOUR concern, anyway, since YOU are not a Republican or a conservative. Despite your deliberately dishonest username, you are just another liberal drone. So you ought to worry about who is leading the liberal Democrat Parody -- other than Soros, I mean.

Sure its my concern...this is a political message board and we are free to discuss all parties

The inability of you or anyone to name anyone in the Republican or Conserative Parties more powerful today than Palin proves my point. Your incessant whining "your not allowed to talk about Republicans" is moronic

 

[Stephanie]

Poor Rush Limbaugh, he's been kicked to the curb by mediamatters lefties as the BRAINS and Power OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY for Sarah Palin.

I bet he's crushed.

 

[rightwinger]

Poor Rush Limbaugh, he's been kicked to the curb by mediamatters lefties as the BRAINS and Power OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY for Sarah Palin.

I bet he's crushed.

Well we have seen what happens with political candidates backed by Rush...they go nowhere. Rush is still a bully but lacks the ability to draw contributions and set policy that Palin now has

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Palin makes Liberal "men" suffer penis envy; she hunts, she fishes, she can field dress a kill and what do Lib men have in response, their Starbucks frequent buyer card?

I thought Reagan was the most hated Republican but its clear the American Communist Party has made Palin their Public Enemy #1 because they know that she is one of the few Republicans who will actually roll back the Progressive Jihad on America.

Palin 2012, she will win the vast majority of our 57 states.

 

[rightwinger]

Palin makes Liberal "men" suffer penis envy; she hunts, she fishes, she can field dress a kill and what do Lib men have in response, their Starbucks frequent buyer card?

I thought Reagan was the most hated Republican but its clear the American Communist Party has made Palin their Public Enemy #1 because they know that she is one of the few Republicans who will actually roll back the Progressive Jihad on America.

Palin 2012, she will win the vast majority of our 57 states.

Only the ones that have "Real Americans" in them

 

[daveman]

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Palin makes Liberal "men" suffer penis envy; she hunts, she fishes, she can field dress a kill and what do Lib men have in response, their Starbucks frequent buyer card?

I thought Reagan was the most hated Republican but its clear the American Communist Party has made Palin their Public Enemy #1 because they know that she is one of the few Republicans who will actually roll back the Progressive Jihad on America.

Palin 2012, she will win the vast majority of our 57 states.

Only the ones that have "Real Americans" in them

Socialists aren't "Real Americans"

Just deal with it

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Who will Obama ask to speak for him when he has to speak about Palin, Clinton again?

 

[Liability]

Who will Obama ask to speak for him when he has to speak about Palin, Clinton again?

President Obama is in a quandry, I suspect:

Part of him (his massive narcissistic ego) WANTS to run for re-election. He is invested in being the Obamessiah. "I ARE the President of these 57 States and Alaska!"

But part of him (oddly enough, it is related to his massive narcissistic ego) does NOT want to run for re-election. It would suck to go down not only as the worst President in our history, bumping Jimmah up one stinking notch, but to do that in a way that repeats the failure of Jimmah: He doesn't want to lose his general election bid to get re-elected.

He likes the pomp and circumstance of being a President (People stand up when he enters the room, they call him "Mr. President," the military types salute his ass, he gets to fly around in Air Force One and those Kobe steaks are pretty cool, too). But beyond that, he doesn't seem to actually care much for the job. He seems to only dabble in it, diffidently.

So when President Obama snuck out for a date with the First Lady the other day and had disgraced and impeached former President Clinton address the Press Conference, my hunch is that the President was tipping his hand. I maintain that there is a reasonably good chance that the President is going to find some way to gracefully decline the seeking of a second term.

 

[TrojanMonkey]

For some reason the press has made Palin one of the faces of the party and the left seems to love obsessing on her. I don't think she creates or really drives conservative ideology. Charles Krauthammer, Thomas Sowell, Newt, Rush, Christie, Pawlenty, and Huckabee all define conservatism more than Palin.

 

[rdean]

Yea, those Democrats. What a bunch of crybabies. They need to "man up".

 

[Liability]

Yeah, retardean. Good point. You fucking always dishonest pinhead.

 

[rdean]

Yeah, retardean. Good point. You fucking always dishonest pinhead.

It's one thing to "shed a tear". It's another for your face to crumple up like wadded tin foil.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDDEhLw1PVI&feature[/ame]