What rule of law was broken that was not stood up against? Not your opinion, but facts?LOl! The court didn't need to hide in fear. It was such an embarrassing case for the supreme court to even hear, a court isn't that stupid to rule on a non-case. Get your fucking head out of the sand. What an embarrassment.The supreme court ruling has nothing to do with being lawless. And you are too weak and uninformed to prove the decision wrong or lawless. Who are you going to kill? Those people who you failed to make a lawless case against? LOl! dude, you are a sore, sour loser who has shown weakness by suggesting a gun should fix your grievances that have no legs. You really are a pathetic human being.
The Supreme Court didn't make a ruling.
The court hid in fear of leftist violence and allowed the utterly lawless left to go unchallenged.
Kim Jong Newsom in California is highly unpopular - no doubt he will declare an emergency due to drought before the 22' election to ensure he isn't booted from power. And why not? Governors and judges can change election law on a whim. Codified laws (that mean "written" for the democrats reading this) and constitutions mean nothing.
The threat of violence (and the very real violence of the democrats 9 month long Kristalnacht) is the only thing the court considered.
What the court ruled is there is no law other than violence. That the violence of the democrat Brown Shirts overrules the Constitution of the United States.
Patriots MUST accept this ruling for exactly what it is.
The court NEEDED to stand up for the rule of law and the Constitution - but failed to do so.
View attachment 429507