Should Congress pass legislation to make drug companies liable for vaccine damage? If the vaccines are “safe and effective”, no need for immunity.

I thought you said it was nothing, like the flu?

I said it was nothing?

Link to that post. I do not recall saying it was nothing.

Not sure what that has to do with drug companies being immune from liability
 
These lefties who fellate BIG CORPORATIONS are so funny to me.

Defend BIG PHARMA over the vax injured. Fucking bizarre.
 
All the drug companies have immunity from liability from vax damage, while claiming all vaccines are “safe and effective”.
I see the Covid anti-vax hoax is alive and well.



No vaccine is 100 percent safe. There is always a very tiny minority which suffers varying degrees of side effects.




Some side effects from the vaccine:

  • Soreness, redness, and/or swelling from the shot
  • Headache
  • Fever
  • Nausea
  • Muscle aches

Signs of a severe allergic reaction can include:

  • Difficulty breathing
  • Hoarseness or wheezing
  • Swelling around the eyes or lips
  • Hives
  • Paleness
  • Weakness
  • A fast heart beat or dizziness
 
This profound ignorance about vaccines is like saying seat belts kill.

Millions of deaths and injuries have been prevented by seat belts.

The anti-vaxxers are like the tards who find a couple people who died because their car caught on fire and they couldn't get out of their seat belts fast enough.
 
Among my favorite deaths WITH COVID was the guy who died in a motorcycle crash….FROM COVID.

:laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301:

If the shot is SAFE AND EFFECTIVE…why are drug companies immune from liability?

Merck paid billions for Vioxx deaths and injuries.
 
Why is it like pulling teeth to ask a poster to prove it when they accuse you of posting something?

“You said (blank)”

Ok, link to the post…..

…..crickets.
 
Is the flu potentially lethal?

Where did I say it was nothing? You claimed I posted it, so link that post.
SO if Covid (particularly the early strains) had a good chance of hospitalizing or killing you, a drug that eliminated or reduced the effect of Covid would be efficacious yes?

And if you didn't want to take said drug, thats on you. Leave the rest of us alone.
 
Companies should be liable for the damage their products cause.

If I kill someone with a chainsaw, Echo is not liable for the death.

If the chainsaw has a manufacturing defect and the user gets injured or killed, Echo is liable.

A child can understand this. Why is it necessary to explain to grown adults?
 
You haven't described the defect.
Drugs have side effects. Those are detailed. Thats not a defect.

But if you want an iron lung, by all means don't take any vaccines. If leeches were good enough for King George, they are good enough for you.
 
So you agree Covid was a potentially lethal illness.
0.36% of those who contracted it died after becoming severe to critical . 6% of all infected got that sick and of that 6% there was a death rated of 6%(0.36% total of all infected). 50,000 people under 55 and in good health died from it. Vast majority of cases were mild to moderate, sine moderate to severe, very small portion severe to critical to dead.
 
Colonel Angus is lying.

The vax is very effective, but Angus has the right not to take it.

He has no right to prevent anyone from taking it.
The vax admitted by every single authority who came clean did not prevent catching it nor transmitting it . Where is did help is in the 6%if all infected who became severe to critical the death rate from the 6% was reduced from 20% to 6-7%
 
0.36% of those who contracted it died after becoming severe to critical . 6% of all infected got that sick and of that 6% there was a death rated of 6%(0.36% total of all infected). 50,000 people under 55 and in good health died from it. Vast majority of cases were mild to moderate, sine moderate to severe, very small portion severe to critical to dead.
500,000 died in year one. Almost no one who was vaccinated in year 1 died.
The majority of those who died in year 2 did not take the shot or booster.

Unless 500,000 died from the Covid shot its a positive trade off, so stuff it Comrade.
 
Colonel Angus is lying.

The vax is very effective, but Angus has the right not to take it.

He has no right to prevent anyone from taking it.
The liar and math and fact avoider is thee
 
It should be done! Absolutely!:clap2:


Should Congress pass legislation to make drug companies liable for vaccine damage? If the vaccines are “safe and effective”, no need for immunity.​

 
500,000 died in year one. Almost no one who was vaccinated in year 1 died.
The majority of those who died in year 2 did not take the shot or booster.

Unless 500,000 died from the Covid shot its a positive trade off, so stuff it Comrade.
All lies
94% of all deaths were 60 and older with no less than two preexisting severe to critical prexisting conditions
You avoided the facts but eventually the CDC and others admitted that the vax helped no one other than the 6% of all infected that were severe to critical
It is now public that it had zero positive effect on catching or transmitting . It did help some very sick to not die.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom