Should any prior 'agreement' with Democrats be honored by the GOP? This is full-blown war and there are no rules in real war.

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
128,585
Reaction score
22,018
Points
2,180
Wasn't that ole' keep it civil and cordial bullshit thrown out the window long ago? Do the democrats deserve ANY honor or respect?
This is not a full-blown anything. trump has created a hatred in our country that will take years to unravel.
That hate was always there, douchebag. The left has always hated people who love this country. Trump is simply the first president who failed to grovel before leftwing hatred of our country.
 

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
128,585
Reaction score
22,018
Points
2,180
Okay. Dittos, Rush.
Your party damn near nominated a socialist...to run for President...TWICE.

BLM...avowed Maxists.

Antifa...socialists.

AOC...hero to the Democrats...card carrying socialist.

Get your head out off the sand man.

Your "we're going to fundamentally transform evil America" tribe is a cancer.

I want a civil war less than you do...but my wants become ever more subservient to the reality of that which is necessary. Team crazy rioting, violent democrats has completely gone off the rails.

As I've told you before...I think you're an intelligent person...but you are letting your ideology blind you to the reality...we are not on the precipice of civil war due to the actions of Trump or the Republicans.

The left has brought us here. They believe they can win politically through violence. That belief is going to lead to a cataclysmic reckoning.

You need to direct your ire on the residents of your own glass house before they foment a disaster that brings it crashing down around your ears.
White supremacists are not violent? They are right in the middle of the violent protests causing trouble. trump promotes violence, yes? trump calls it "a beautiful thing" when there is violence against anybody opposing him. The 17 yr old kid who shot 2 people is a beautiful thing to trump when he
should be wondering what the hell a 17 yr old is doing with an AR15 anyway. Maybe trump will pardon the kid, yes?
97% of protests are not violent, but trump scores points with his ignorant minions by making it appear to be everywhere. Will there be violence if trump loses? Probably. Then what?
There were no "white supremacists" burning down buildings in Portland and Seattle. That's purely a leftwing propaganda meme. The violence is purely coming from the left.

You're a fucking douchebag.
 

Dayton3

Gold Member
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
264
Reaction score
85
Points
178
Why do Democrats seem to think that the Judge Garland thing justifies anything they want to do regarding the Supreme Court now?
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
16,821
Reaction score
4,593
Points
150
Especially when the repubs were so accommodating to Obama for eight years.
Yeah, they tend to forget that.

I'm the first to admit that I really don't understand a lot of this stuff. But it makes no sense to me that, in essentially a 50/50 country, either side thinks it's going to "beat" the other.

I guess grabbing the courts is the closest thing to longer term control. I do find that interesting, since the Right has been whining for years that the Left depends on judges.

Lots of collateral damage in wars, but that doesn't seem to matter. We certainly have much more evolving to do as a species.
what did obama want that he didn't get?
Especially when the repubs were so accommodating to Obama for eight years.
Yeah, they tend to forget that.

I'm the first to admit that I really don't understand a lot of this stuff. But it makes no sense to me that, in essentially a 50/50 country, either side thinks it's going to "beat" the other.

I guess grabbing the courts is the closest thing to longer term control. I do find that interesting, since the Right has been whining for years that the Left depends on judges.

Lots of collateral damage in wars, but that doesn't seem to matter. We certainly have much more evolving to do as a species.
what did obama want that he didn't get?
I can answer this one.

Obama wanted his nominees to the DC Circuit court to have a vote on the floor of the Senate. Republicans (then a minority) filibustered every nominee to the DC Circuit. It wasn't about the qualifications of the nominee, they promised to uphold every appointee regardless as they (again, as a minority) had taken it upon themselves to determine that there were just too many judges on the DC Circuit and therefore the empty seats did not need filling. Now, the Senate can reduce the number of seats on the DC Circuit, but it requires passing legislation to make this happen. In essence, the minority party was usurping legislative power.

That's what started this fight.
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
86,214
Reaction score
19,479
Points
2,180
Location
in between
Lots of collateral damage in wars, but that doesn't seem to matter. We certainly have much more evolving to do as a species.
Lots of collateral damage in treating cancer...but when the end result is a slow painful death, you do whatcha gotta do. You may hate what must be done, fear the pain you must inflict on your body and loathe every negative short term ramification...you really have no choice.

Socialism is a cancer, critical race theory is a cancer, propagandistic leftist dominated media is a cancer, left wing socialist dominated higher education is a cancer. Leftist rioting is a cancer. We can treat it simply now...perhaps within the limits to our current cold war...or catastrophically later.

IMO...sooner is better than later.

We aren't giving one inch ever again.

You wanted a fight...now you've got one.

When your tribe takes it to next level...we'll be 100% ready to make you wish you'd never been born.
But I don't want socialism.

You're terribly mal-informed, and you lack the fundamental intellectual curiosity to remedy that.

You've been conned.
It is a bi-polar political illusion. If you aren’t on their side you socialism. And most of time they throw tbe word around like confetti.
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
86,214
Reaction score
19,479
Points
2,180
Location
in between
Why do Democrats seem to think that the Judge Garland thing justifies anything they want to do regarding the Supreme Court now?
Why did Republicans pull that stunt to begin with? Ye reap what you sow. In the last few decades we have seen an alarming number of precedents set by both parties, both branches. Now you are saying, hey...I don’t like this! Stop the train! I don’t like it either but it is kind of late to stop it.
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
61,436
Reaction score
11,016
Points
2,040
Location
Kazmania
Why do Democrats seem to think that the Judge Garland thing justifies anything they want to do regarding the Supreme Court now?
Why did Republicans pull that stunt to begin with? Ye reap what you sow. In the last few decades we have seen an alarming number of precedents set by both parties, both branches. Now you are saying, hey...I don’t like this! Stop the train! I don’t like it either but it is kind of late to stop it.
OK, so dish. Name who ever said that a party wouldn't confirm it's own nominee in an election year. Go ...

This is just stupid, bitter, partisan shit. No one ever said that. Not Biden, not McConnell. Grow the fuck up
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
86,214
Reaction score
19,479
Points
2,180
Location
in between
White supremacists are not violent?
Show me the white supremacists rioting, looting and killing.

And it you could, which you can't...I will 100% disavow them...and DEMAND Law Enforcement and the National Guard be deployed immediately to protect the community.
It has been shown repeatedly that far right groups (white supremacists) have been responsible for killing people. There is a reason why tbe FBI is concerned about them.
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
61,436
Reaction score
11,016
Points
2,040
Location
Kazmania
White supremacists are not violent?
Show me the white supremacists rioting, looting and killing.

And it you could, which you can't...I will 100% disavow them...and DEMAND Law Enforcement and the National Guard be deployed immediately to protect the community.
It has been shown repeatedly that far right groups (white supremacists) have been responsible for killing people. There is a reason why tbe FBI is concerned about them.
Far more blacks are killed in Chicago than white supremacists kill of all races nationally. Obviously this is a made up standard.

Also, government doesn't count government loving leftists groups as leftists. Go figure.

And another point you won't address. Where do you get that white extremists are "right wing?" You think white supremacists are all about free markets? Yeah, sure they are
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
86,214
Reaction score
19,479
Points
2,180
Location
in between
White supremacists are not violent?
Show me the white supremacists rioting, looting and killing.

And it you could, which you can't...I will 100% disavow them...and DEMAND Law Enforcement and the National Guard be deployed immediately to protect the community.
It has been shown repeatedly that far right groups (white supremacists) have been responsible for killing people. There is a reason why tbe FBI is concerned about them.
Far more blacks are killed in Chicago than white supremacists kill nationally. Obviously this is a made up standard.

Also, government doesn't count leftists groups as leftists. Go figure.

And another point you won't address. Where do you get that white extremists are "right wing?" You think white supremacists are all about free markets? Yeah, sure they are
It is not a made up standards.

White supremacists represent a specific ideology. Comparing them to generic crime is an apples and oranges argument.

White supremacists are rightwing. Deal with it and stop trying to redefine them.
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
61,436
Reaction score
11,016
Points
2,040
Location
Kazmania
White supremacists are not violent?
Show me the white supremacists rioting, looting and killing.

And it you could, which you can't...I will 100% disavow them...and DEMAND Law Enforcement and the National Guard be deployed immediately to protect the community.
It has been shown repeatedly that far right groups (white supremacists) have been responsible for killing people. There is a reason why tbe FBI is concerned about them.
Far more blacks are killed in Chicago than white supremacists kill nationally. Obviously this is a made up standard.

Also, government doesn't count leftists groups as leftists. Go figure.

And another point you won't address. Where do you get that white extremists are "right wing?" You think white supremacists are all about free markets? Yeah, sure they are
It is not a made up standards.

White supremacists represent a specific ideology. Comparing them to generic crime is an apples and oranges argument.

White supremacists are rightwing. Deal with it and stop trying to redefine them.
Ah, white supremacists are right wing because you said so. Well, there you go.

And yes, they are made up standards. You melt down about one black death when it politically suits you, but then you're indifferent to thousands of black deaths when it doesn't. Inner cities are shooting galleries. But you have this ... made up ... standard that black deaths only matter when you benefit politically.

You can't refute that because it's true
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
86,214
Reaction score
19,479
Points
2,180
Location
in between
White supremacists are not violent?
Show me the white supremacists rioting, looting and killing.

And it you could, which you can't...I will 100% disavow them...and DEMAND Law Enforcement and the National Guard be deployed immediately to protect the community.
It has been shown repeatedly that far right groups (white supremacists) have been responsible for killing people. There is a reason why tbe FBI is concerned about them.
Far more blacks are killed in Chicago than white supremacists kill nationally. Obviously this is a made up standard.

Also, government doesn't count leftists groups as leftists. Go figure.

And another point you won't address. Where do you get that white extremists are "right wing?" You think white supremacists are all about free markets? Yeah, sure they are
It is not a made up standards.

White supremacists represent a specific ideology. Comparing them to generic crime is an apples and oranges argument.

White supremacists are rightwing. Deal with it and stop trying to redefine them.
Ah, white supremacists are right wing because you said so. Well, there you go.

And yes, they are made up standards. You melt down about one black death when it politically suits you, but then you're indifferent to thousands of black deaths when it doesn't. Inner cities are shooting galleries. But you have this ... made up ... standard that black deaths only matter when you benefit politically.

You can't refute that because it's true
Nothing to do with what I do or do not say. Unlike you, I don’t make up my own definitions, I go by the established definitions. You simp,y want to heap everything onto the left.
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
61,436
Reaction score
11,016
Points
2,040
Location
Kazmania
White supremacists are not violent?
Show me the white supremacists rioting, looting and killing.

And it you could, which you can't...I will 100% disavow them...and DEMAND Law Enforcement and the National Guard be deployed immediately to protect the community.
It has been shown repeatedly that far right groups (white supremacists) have been responsible for killing people. There is a reason why tbe FBI is concerned about them.
Far more blacks are killed in Chicago than white supremacists kill nationally. Obviously this is a made up standard.

Also, government doesn't count leftists groups as leftists. Go figure.

And another point you won't address. Where do you get that white extremists are "right wing?" You think white supremacists are all about free markets? Yeah, sure they are
It is not a made up standards.

White supremacists represent a specific ideology. Comparing them to generic crime is an apples and oranges argument.

White supremacists are rightwing. Deal with it and stop trying to redefine them.
Ah, white supremacists are right wing because you said so. Well, there you go.

And yes, they are made up standards. You melt down about one black death when it politically suits you, but then you're indifferent to thousands of black deaths when it doesn't. Inner cities are shooting galleries. But you have this ... made up ... standard that black deaths only matter when you benefit politically.

You can't refute that because it's true
Nothing to do with what I do or do not say. Unlike you, I don’t make up my own definitions, I go by the established definitions. You simp,y want to heap everything onto the left.
OK, so state this definition then. What makes a white supremacists "right wing?" I call bull shit to that.

The right is about free markets and consumer choice. White supremacy is completely counter to that.

You've provided nothing to back up your assertion that it is.

So again, white supremacists support free markets? Where do you get that exactly? Elitist leftist academics told you? Well, since you are repeating them, you should be able to explain it
 

westwall

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
67,349
Reaction score
20,474
Points
2,250
Location
Nevada
This is why the Division Pimps have convinced their tribes that they're "at war".

The perfect excuse for no rules, no responsibility, no honor, no honesty, ignore any agreements.

Kinda like Jihadis.
fake impeachments kill any agreements and did start a war
are you ready?
Illustrating my point.
fuck you you have no point but your head.
fake political motivated impeachments don't help you just starts a war.
Those of you who have allowed yourselves to be convinced that you're really in a "war" have been conned.
If not "war", what would you call it?
There is a long list of terms that could be used. If you really can't think of anything, there is nothing I can do.

But I'm not surprised.
so it's a war that you think we'll ignore while you and your leftist's friends try to get behind us and do more damage?
Huh?

It's only a "war" in minds of zealots.
Nonsense. It is a significant power struggle between two opposing governing philosophies - one American, one not. Any common ground that may have existed between them has been erased by the behavior of the entire Democratic Party since 2016.
I know. It's all the other tribe's fault. You are not responsible for any of this.

They tell me the same thing.





Tell us the last time a Repub president spied on his political opponents. Tell us the last time a repub administration weaponized the intel and judicial apparatus to try and destroy that political opponent.

So, in answer to your question, yeah, it IS only one tribe that is at fault.
So those are the only sins committed. That's it. And they were both by the other tribe. Your tribe is faultless.

Sometimes I underestimate the severity of the talk radio-induced intellectual paralysis under which you people operate.





Those are the ONLY signs that matter you feckless twat. THOSE are the actions of a fucking dictator in a banana Republic. Those were the actions of ONE side. And you sit there and whine about both sides


Well, here's the deal sweetcheeks, both sides didn't break the law like that
ONE side did that. YOUR side.
 

westwall

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
67,349
Reaction score
20,474
Points
2,250
Location
Nevada
This is why the Division Pimps have convinced their tribes that they're "at war".

The perfect excuse for no rules, no responsibility, no honor, no honesty, ignore any agreements.

Kinda like Jihadis.
Once you start using the language of war, everything changes. We can thank Newt Gringrich for this.

Calling it a war just gives the zealots an excuse to lie, their natural impulse.
It changes the dynamics of how we deal with each other. Political opponents become traitors, enemies of America instead of colleagues. That means you can not compromise With them, and everything must have a winner and a loser. Win-win situations imply appeasement. It is a very bad spot we have gotten ourselves into. One of the things that gives me hope is this veterans group committed to putting up veterans to run and one of the things they do is pledge to work bipartisanly.
One of the many excuses they like to make is that "there is no finding common ground". First of all, finding common ground doesn't have to mean finding areas of 100% agreement. We can bend a little bit, if we can just get past our childish egos.

And more importantly, what the zealots can't see is that communication and collaboration can lead to INNOVATION, creating something new together. America used to be able to do that. True story. Starting with the Constitution. But we've lost that skill, and the zealots may never have had it.

We could innovate, back when we were great.
There comes a time when one's opponent becomes so removed from the bigger picture you once agreed upon that compromise equates to capitulation, undermining the very thing you swore to defend.

The Democrats slipped off the American cracker long ago. Time to make an end.
You simply lack the capacity to communicate, collaborate and innovate.

So you give up. Now you want to destroy.




It's YOUR side chanting to burn it down you fucking retard
 

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
128,585
Reaction score
22,018
Points
2,180
White supremacists are not violent?
Show me the white supremacists rioting, looting and killing.

And it you could, which you can't...I will 100% disavow them...and DEMAND Law Enforcement and the National Guard be deployed immediately to protect the community.
It has been shown repeatedly that far right groups (white supremacists) have been responsible for killing people. There is a reason why tbe FBI is concerned about them.
Far more blacks are killed in Chicago than white supremacists kill nationally. Obviously this is a made up standard.

Also, government doesn't count leftists groups as leftists. Go figure.

And another point you won't address. Where do you get that white extremists are "right wing?" You think white supremacists are all about free markets? Yeah, sure they are
It is not a made up standards.

White supremacists represent a specific ideology. Comparing them to generic crime is an apples and oranges argument.

White supremacists are rightwing. Deal with it and stop trying to redefine them.
Ah, white supremacists are right wing because you said so. Well, there you go.

And yes, they are made up standards. You melt down about one black death when it politically suits you, but then you're indifferent to thousands of black deaths when it doesn't. Inner cities are shooting galleries. But you have this ... made up ... standard that black deaths only matter when you benefit politically.

You can't refute that because it's true
Nothing to do with what I do or do not say. Unlike you, I don’t make up my own definitions, I go by the established definitions. You simp,y want to heap everything onto the left.
What's the definition of "gender?" How about "diversity?"
 

Billy_Kinetta

Paladin of the Lost Hour
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
50,309
Reaction score
17,861
Points
2,280
This is why the Division Pimps have convinced their tribes that they're "at war".

The perfect excuse for no rules, no responsibility, no honor, no honesty, ignore any agreements.

Kinda like Jihadis.
Once you start using the language of war, everything changes. We can thank Newt Gringrich for this.

Calling it a war just gives the zealots an excuse to lie, their natural impulse.
It changes the dynamics of how we deal with each other. Political opponents become traitors, enemies of America instead of colleagues. That means you can not compromise With them, and everything must have a winner and a loser. Win-win situations imply appeasement. It is a very bad spot we have gotten ourselves into. One of the things that gives me hope is this veterans group committed to putting up veterans to run and one of the things they do is pledge to work bipartisanly.
One of the many excuses they like to make is that "there is no finding common ground". First of all, finding common ground doesn't have to mean finding areas of 100% agreement. We can bend a little bit, if we can just get past our childish egos.

And more importantly, what the zealots can't see is that communication and collaboration can lead to INNOVATION, creating something new together. America used to be able to do that. True story. Starting with the Constitution. But we've lost that skill, and the zealots may never have had it.

We could innovate, back when we were great.
There comes a time when one's opponent becomes so removed from the bigger picture you once agreed upon that compromise equates to capitulation, undermining the very thing you swore to defend.

The Democrats slipped off the American cracker long ago. Time to make an end.
“...that compromise equates to capitulation...”. That is the word I was looking for, capitulation. But I don’t agree with what you are saying. I think you are just echoing what the your media keeps feeding you.
:auiqs.jpg:

I watch 'way more of your media than I do "mine".

There are areas of compromise where both sides come out with something. That is what politics used to be. When you can only have a total winner and a total loser...there is not much of a gain.
I don't agree with what you're saying.
 

Missourian

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2008
Messages
22,085
Reaction score
8,828
Points
900
Location
Missouri
White supremacists are not violent?
Show me the white supremacists rioting, looting and killing.

And it you could, which you can't...I will 100% disavow them...and DEMAND Law Enforcement and the National Guard be deployed immediately to protect the community.
It has been shown repeatedly that far right groups (white supremacists) have been responsible for killing people. There is a reason why tbe FBI is concerned about them.
And we shun them for that reason.

But the Democrats have embraced these domestic terrorists. They hang like an albatross around your neck.

I think you are a decent person, and I think your heart is in the right place...but l also think you have some ideological blindspots that are distorting your view of the situation. We aren't seeing white supremacist rioting, loooting, burning down cities and calling for violence. No rightwing mobs are showing up at politicians, police officers and journalist homes.

The leftwing is off the rails...and it's up to YOU to put them back on track...cuz they ain't gonna listen to us.

Understand this...and this is coming from a former Military Intelligence Officer and expert in low intensity conflict. What we are seeing today arr classic signs of a brewing civil uprising. And it is going to go very badly for your side if it comes to that.

That's not a threat...it's a demonstrable fact. The young leftist think what all young people think...that they are immortal and indestructible. They are LARPing. They have no idea the despair and destruction that will be rain down upon them if they continue on this path.
 

Mac1958

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
73,777
Reaction score
18,144
Points
2,210
Location
Opposing Authoritarian Ideological Fundamentalism.
Putin and Xi would be very proud of you. Your post is one only our adversaries could love.
Indeed, our adversaries must be loving this. America has largely split itself into two separate realities, two different universes.

All they had to do, really, was watch us do this to ourselves. None of any meddling they've done was strong enough to cause this.
stop putting your hand in the cookie jar and lying that it wasn't you doing it.
America is divided because leftists went far left while trying to pull America to them No fucking way will I allow that I'll burn the country down myself if I have to leaving nothing for you and your buddies Putin and Xi.
I know you believe every word of that.
 

Mac1958

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
73,777
Reaction score
18,144
Points
2,210
Location
Opposing Authoritarian Ideological Fundamentalism.
Lots of collateral damage in wars, but that doesn't seem to matter. We certainly have much more evolving to do as a species.
Lots of collateral damage in treating cancer...but when the end result is a slow painful death, you do whatcha gotta do. You may hate what must be done, fear the pain you must inflict on your body and loathe every negative short term ramification...you really have no choice.

Socialism is a cancer, critical race theory is a cancer, propagandistic leftist dominated media is a cancer, left wing socialist dominated higher education is a cancer. Leftist rioting is a cancer. We can treat it simply now...perhaps within the limits to our current cold war...or catastrophically later.

IMO...sooner is better than later.

We aren't giving one inch ever again.

You wanted a fight...now you've got one.

When your tribe takes it to next level...we'll be 100% ready to make you wish you'd never been born.
But I don't want socialism.

You're terribly mal-informed, and you lack the fundamental intellectual curiosity to remedy that.

You've been conned.
It is a bi-polar political illusion. If you aren’t on their side you socialism. And most of time they throw tbe word around like confetti.
Well, they're burned "socialism" out, so they went with "Marxism" for a while. Now they're on to "commie", like modern-day Archie Bunkers.

One of them is thinking out of the box, though, calling anyone who isn't an obedient Trumpster the "Khmer Rouge", which gets points for out-of-the-box thinking.

An ugly, ugly time. First time in my life that I'm worried about my country and its future.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top