Should a County be mailing out

No such procedure exists

1645224142223.png



1645224186865.png




WW
 
View attachment 603191


View attachment 603192



WW
That still does not contend that most states or really Any state reviews each ballot as to verify the authenticity of the signature matched to other things that the addressed and legitimate voting part has signed. It does not happen
As usual with you all what you cited is not the answer to the question in dispute. It’s a long, circular, rambling account of how they randomly at times May look into authenticating a questionable signature in some states. It comes no where near stating authentication for most signatures In most states . It does reference something like 30% of states have a process for very random and very very small sample authentication.
 
That still does not contend that most states or really Any state reviews each ballot as to verify the authenticity of the signature matched to other things that the addressed and legitimate voting part has signed. It does not happen
As usual with you all what you cited is not the answer to the question in dispute. It’s a long, circular, rambling account of how they randomly at times May look into authenticating a questionable signature in some states. It comes no where near stating authentication for most signatures In most states . It does reference something like 30% of states have a process for very random and very very small sample authentication.

1645273055409.png



Again you said there is no procedure to cure signatures (which are not on a ballot but are on the security envelope).

That is incorrect.

As the previous link supplied showed there are at least 15 states with cure procedures if a signature is missing or defective.

WW
 
View attachment 603435


Again you said there is no procedure to cure signatures (which are not on a ballot but are on the security envelope).

That is incorrect.

As the previous link supplied showed there are at least 15 states with cure procedures if a signature is missing or defective.

WW
The link does not show what my contention is. You have offered up a sample that does not address signature authentication for anything other than a very small number of ballots in a handful of states. You all want to flood and overwhelm the mail in system.
 
The link does not show what my contention is. You have offered up a sample that does not address signature authentication for anything other than a very small number of ballots in a handful of states. You all want to flood and overwhelm the mail in system.

1645297423018.png


Here is the quote again.

You so no such procedures exists. I posted evidence that in fact 15 states attempt to "cure" signature problems on the security envelop when received prior to election day and when such curing of deficient signatures can be addressed under the laws of that state.

So, ya - there are procedures that exist. They may or may not exist in your state, but that wasn't the question.

WW
 
View attachment 603598

Here is the quote again.

You so no such procedures exists. I posted evidence that in fact 15 states attempt to "cure" signature problems on the security envelop when received prior to election day and when such curing of deficient signatures can be addressed under the laws of that state.

So, ya - there are procedures that exist. They may or may not exist in your state, but that wasn't the question.

WW
You are still dodging. They do not review ballots for signature authentication systemically. They review ballots that have drawn their attention due to other issues.
There is no authentication process in most states nor every state to determine that Louise Jones signature matches other things she previously has signed . That process requires expert analysis which is too expensive and time consuming. There are no “ordinary Joes” permitted to review ballots and decide what to accept or not . There is No random and consistent review. Please stop offering troll response which does not address the issue.
 
You are still dodging. They do not review ballots for signature authentication systemically. They review ballots that have drawn their attention due to other issues.
There is no authentication process in most states nor every state to determine that Louise Jones signature matches other things she previously has signed . That process requires expert analysis which is too expensive and time consuming. There are no “ordinary Joes” permitted to review ballots and decide what to accept or not . There is No random and consistent review. Please stop offering troll response which does not address the issue.


1645299800713.png


Here is a state-by-state breakdown of the returned mail-in ballot packed and security envelope are checked.

WW
 

Forum List

Back
Top