- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,856
- 4,783
- 265
Yep he was not there and his expertise is destroyed by the experts who conducted the autopsyNope! Try again, Skippy.That would be the doctor who wasn't even there?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yep he was not there and his expertise is destroyed by the experts who conducted the autopsyNope! Try again, Skippy.That would be the doctor who wasn't even there?
First of all thank you for providing a link in which your own source states unequivocally that President Kennedy was shotHere, I'm going to do something you NEVER do because you can't support your lies with evidence.
First, please read this from the House Select Committee on Assassinations:
showDoc.html
And, this is why you shouldn't get your information from conspiracy theory sites. The sources are just as stupid and dishonest as you:
DOCTOR`S ROLE IN JFK CASE QUESTIONED
not from behind but from the front making all your childish insults and insolent ignorance moot.
"In ''JFK: Conspiracy of Silence,'' the semiretired head of surgery at John Peter Smith Hospital writes that ''bullets'' hit President John Kennedy`s head from the front, not one in the back of the head as the Warren Commission found."
Whether Crenshaw was one of the main care givers for Kennedy or not is irrelevant. Malcom Perry who seems to want to cast some doubts on Crenshaw's role when JFK was brought into the ER freely admits Crenshaw may have well
had a look at the severe head wound that all the other doctors attested to as being in the rear of the head.
So what is the point? What are you trying to establish and once more, thanks for undermining your own
ignorant and erroneous take on the JFK killing.
Your House Select Committee link, much like your whole take on the coup and cover up of JFK's killing, doesn't work
by the way.
Stupid, dishonest and incompetent? That's you. In short, you are ridiculous and clueless.
Nope! Try again, Skippy.That would be the doctor who wasn't even there?
Even if you were right, which you cannotJust shut up and delete your account. You know I didn't say the bullet traveled backwards. I said look at the bullet from the back end or the base. Here's a picture of it:
https://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/images/1/11/Photo_ce399_base.jpg
Notice how it's disfigured and mashed out of shape? Because it was not traveling straight, but was tumbling after the first contact with the President's body.
https://www.quora.com/Why-does-a-bullet-tumble
Now's the time to stop digging. Your hole is deep enough now.
possibly confirm, there still isn't nearly enough damage to the "magic bullet" to make anyone believe it traveled through two bodies, 17 layers of fabric and smashed into wrist and rib bones, and just fell out of John Connolly's body on his stretcher (magically....it was just laying there as if dropped off by some helpful unseen hand....wink).
Go fuck yourself...you got nothing! And you're a rude prick to boot.
Sure you did.....jackass!I used one of your own conspiracy theory sites to show what a liar you are and you want to call me names? Thanks for the laugh.
Very convincing argument you put forward, loser.Liar.
They did not all make that claim you are lying about that'Sure you did.....jackass!I used one of your own conspiracy theory sites to show what a liar you are and you want to call me names? Thanks for the laugh.
Of course you did, you dumb fuck!
After telling me not to use "conspiracy theory" sites you yourself, all on your own, chose to cite one yourself trying to discredit Dr. Crenshaw even though all ER doctors at Parkland hospital all witnessed and agreed that JFK had a fist sized hole in the back of his head (Abraham Zapruder said the "side of JFK's head opened up" in his film). Not a shot from behind JFK, was it. Dr. Malcolm Perry told the press three times that day that the wound to the president's throat was an entry wound. An entry wound.
And again, I must thank you for the quote that says JFK was not shot from behind. You make this easy.
If it was a "conspiracy theory site" how did it show I am a liar and why didn't you point out where it proved I was a liar if you knew what you were doing?
And you have the guts to try and bluff your way through your stupid error? I think not.
No. People who try to insult my intelligence by lying to me make me angry. It shows they think I'm as stupid as they are and nothing could be further from the truth, as you have proved.Awww, did I hurt your feelings by showing you're stupid and wrong? Too bad.
I've provided lots of links, moron. You want me to take your hand and show you?I notice YOU didn't provide a link to prove anything. Because, as I said, you're wrong, you know you're wrong and you're just trying to get attention. Sad for you.
Of course the shot came from behind him... the spray went forward...Sure you did.....jackass!I used one of your own conspiracy theory sites to show what a liar you are and you want to call me names? Thanks for the laugh.
Of course you did, you dumb fuck!
After telling me not to use "conspiracy theory" sites you yourself, all on your own, chose to cite one yourself trying to discredit Dr. Crenshaw even though all ER doctors at Parkland hospital all witnessed and agreed that JFK had a fist sized hole in the back of his head (Abraham Zapruder said the "side of JFK's head opened up" in his film). Not a shot from behind JFK, was it. Dr. Malcolm Perry told the press three times that day that the wound to the president's throat was an entry wound. An entry wound.
And again, I must thank you for the quote that says JFK was not shot from behind. You make this easy.
If it was a "conspiracy theory site" how did it show I am a liar and why didn't you point out where it proved I was a liar if you knew what you were doing?
And you have the guts to try and bluff your way through your stupid error? I think not.
And all your links massively fail yo provide evidence and you have been pwned and debunkedNo. People who try to insult my intelligence by lying to me make me angry. It shows they think I'm as stupid as they are and nothing could be further from the truth, as you have proved.Awww, did I hurt your feelings by showing you're stupid and wrong? Too bad.
I've provided lots of links, moron. You want me to take your hand and show you?I notice YOU didn't provide a link to prove anything. Because, as I said, you're wrong, you know you're wrong and you're just trying to get attention. Sad for you.
Sure you did.....jackass!I used one of your own conspiracy theory sites to show what a liar you are and you want to call me names? Thanks for the laugh.
Of course you did, you dumb fuck!
After telling me not to use "conspiracy theory" sites you yourself, all on your own, chose to cite one yourself trying to discredit Dr. Crenshaw even though all ER doctors at Parkland hospital all witnessed and agreed that JFK had a fist sized hole in the back of his head (Abraham Zapruder said the "side of JFK's head opened up" in his film). Not a shot from behind JFK, was it. Dr. Malcolm Perry told the press three times that day that the wound to the president's throat was an entry wound. An entry wound.
And again, I must thank you for the quote that says JFK was not shot from behind. You make this easy.
If it was a "conspiracy theory site" how did it show I am a liar and why didn't you point out where it proved I was a liar if you knew what you were doing?
And you have the guts to try and bluff your way through your stupid error? I think not.
Very convincing argument you put forward, loser.Liar.
No. People who try to insult my intelligence by lying to me make me angry. It shows they think I'm as stupid as they are and nothing could be further from the truth, as you have proved.Awww, did I hurt your feelings by showing you're stupid and wrong? Too bad.
I've provided lots of links, moron. You want me to take your hand and show you?I notice YOU didn't provide a link to prove anything. Because, as I said, you're wrong, you know you're wrong and you're just trying to get attention. Sad for you.
Warren Commission Report: High Level Coverup Of JFK Assassination?
Here's a good over view though I doubt you have the mental wherewithal to comprehend it.
You are just determined to be ignorant and a dupe.
That's funny coming from a weak putrid coward who can't even find the guts to stand up for his own fucked up beliefs and views (as stupid and wrong as they may be).That's not a link. That's a scam put forward to draw in stupid people. Guess they caught you. Which proves the only person that is insulting your intelligence is you. And, unless you can post a link to a reputable source that supports your idea, you'll get no more responses or attention. You are completely and thoroughly debunked.
The more you lose the more you insult and make yourself a pathetic coward.Much better than yours, stainboy, because you've been proven to be a liar.
That's funny coming from a weak putrid coward who can't even find the guts to stand up for his own fucked up beliefs and views (as stupid and wrong as they may be).That's not a link. That's a scam put forward to draw in stupid people. Guess they caught you. Which proves the only person that is insulting your intelligence is you. And, unless you can post a link to a reputable source that supports your idea, you'll get no more responses or attention. You are completely and thoroughly debunked.
You don't get to just dismiss my link, which you asked for, as a "scam" without cause or justification.
You intellectually lazy dishonest fuck! Your cowardly and transparent avoidance of the facts are noted.
The more you lose the more you insult and make yourself a pathetic coward.Much better than yours, stainboy, because you've been proven to be a liar.
Who knows, not like assassinations are not part and parcel of what both the FBI and CIA have engaged in. And he was saying some things, as did King, that the power structure wasn’t on board with. And the truth in american society is kinda like a puddle of mercury.
One consistent "revelation" throughout this entire thread.....
Fascists will always defend Big Government....regardless of who and how many may be at risk.
It's what fascists do....never expect otherwise.