Failzero
Diamond Member
The ones mentioned earlier who played in the 20th Centuryok.....who are they?....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The ones mentioned earlier who played in the 20th Centuryok.....who are they?....
Taking away his first 3 years, gives him 5 years with a average of .285. Not much of any difference. Sill milles away from the top hitters of MLB history.you are going by their first 8 years?....well you will have to give ohtani 3-4 more years then....his first 3 he wasnt a full time player...
even Ted Williams said its hard to judge players from different eras....players get better and conditions change.....when Ohtani has 18 years in lets see what he looks like then....Taking away his first 3 years, gives him 5 years with a average of .285. Not much of any difference. Sill milles away from the top hitters of MLB history.
Sure, but then let's not call him a "great hitter". Actually, his very mediocre batting average of .282 or .285 spans 8 years , so he woud really have to hit abouot .400 every year for 10 years, to come up to the career batting average levels of Williams, Musial, Ruth, Gehrig, etc.even Ted Williams said its hard to judge players from different eras....players get better and conditions change.....when Ohtani has 18 years in lets see what he looks like then....
i like how you pick the cream of the crop to compare him to....not to many players even back then compared to those guys...and a .280 batting avg aint considered "mediocre" in MLB....that would be below .250 which is about Avg for many players.....280 is considered pretty good.....Sure, but then let's not call him a "great hitter". Actually, his very mediocre batting average of .282 or .285 spans 8 years , so he woud really have to hit abouot .400 every year for 10 years, to come up to the career batting average levels of Williams, Musial, Ruth, Gehrig, etc.
That's not gonna happen.
Trea Turner who got the NL batting title hit .304 ffs.i like how you pick the cream of the crop to compare him to....not to many players even back then compared to those guys...and a .280 batting avg aint considered "mediocre" in MLB....that would be below .250 which is about Avg for many players.....280 is considered pretty good.....
Carl Yastremski hit .301 in 68 and led the league...what you going to do?...Trea Turner who got the NL batting title hit .304 ffs.
they have done a lot of things over the years....i saw i video about the history of the baseball over the years from 1871 on....in the 1800's they would use the same ball until the ******* cover came off....thats the way it was when the neighborhood kids were playing...in the dead ball era they would use the same ball until the cover was ready to come off,so they played half the game with a lumpy beat up ball...the so called dead ball....good thing they changed that shit in 1920....They lowered the mound.
I compare him to the cream of the crop (Musial, Williams, Ruth Gehrig), because the topic (and title) of the thread is > "i like how you pick the cream of the crop to compare him to....not to many players even back then compared to those guys...and a .280 batting avg aint considered "mediocre" in MLB....that would be below .250 which is about Avg for many players.....280 is considered pretty good.....
Are you attempting to shame Ohtani?Game 4, 5th inning - Ohtani struck out looking. As George H Bush would say > Bad! Bad!
I believe Ruth was THE best baseball player ever, in any era. And I agree that Ohtani is the best current player.View attachment 1178462
Number 9, look at #9 in the entire AL in1927.
9 HR's for the entire year.
Ruth hit more HR's by himself than 23 OTHER MLB entire Team.
Now in todays game, there are players consistently hitting 9 HR's in the first month.
That is how dominant Ruth was, along with the Iron Man.
BTW, Ohtani is dominate, the current BEST player in MLB.
Thoughts by bluzman61 ?
Not hardly. At a batting averag of .282, Ohtani was 25th in batting, 24 guys higher than him. His .282 avg was 49 points lower than the MLB leader, Aaron Judge at .331.BTW, Ohtani is dominate, the current BEST player in MLB.
So what exactly is your point?Not hardly. At a batting averag of .282, Ohtani was 25th in batting, 24 guys higher than him. His .282 avg was 49 points lower than the MLB leader, Aaron Judge at .331.
How is that possible when his batting average is 49 points lower than the mlb leader ? He's a power hitter that doesn't even approach hitting .300. Ruth, Judge, Mantle hit 50 something HRS, but they hit for high batting averages at the same time.I believe Ruth was THE best baseball player ever, in any era. And I agree that Ohtani is the best current player.
That is corrrect. I already defended it in post # 78So what exactly is your point?
Let me guess, you don't think Ohtani is currently the BEST player in MLB 2025 season.
Am I right?
So defend your choice.
So your choice is Judge?That is corrrect. I already defended it in post # 78