"She’s on tape. The beautiful thing about modern technology is when you say something, you’re screwed if it’s bad.” - Trump

[martybegan]

You are a low information twat whose mind is "open" to fringe conspiracy theories.

People like you act this way because you're too afraid to live in reality. If you can't convince yourself of the fringe theory, the next best option is to pretend like there's no way to know.

If you don't believe in anything, then everything is possible.

I am far more informed that you are, or will probably ever be.

Reality? The one where women can have penises, not prosecuting crime lowers crime, and open borders aren't really open?

I believe in reality, and in clear lines between good, ambivalent, idiotic, and evil.

 

[Marener]

I am far more informed that you are, or will probably ever be.

Reality? The one where women can have penises, not prosecuting crime lowers crime, and open borders aren't really open?

I believe in reality, and in clear lines between good, ambivalent, idiotic, and evil.

Low information twats living on twitter think they’re well informed but when you’re pumped full of fact free alternate realities, you’re not really informed.

You’re misinformed.

 

[martybegan]

Low information twats living on twitter think they’re well informed but when you’re pumped full of fact free alternate realities, you’re not really informed.

You’re misinformed.

I read far more than twitter. And I'm not misinformed, I just think your opinions are garbage.

 

[Marener]

I read far more than twitter. And I'm not misinformed, I just think your opinions are garbage.

Your choice of what you read (or more importantly what you believe given you're conditioned to disbelieve any legitimate news organizations that don't tell you what you want to hear) also leads to your chronic misinformation.

The right wing media ecosystem is self-reinforcing.

 

[martybegan]

Your choice of what you read (or more importantly what you believe given you're conditioned to disbelieve any legitimate news organizations that don't tell you what you want to hear) also leads to your chronic misinformation.

The right wing media ecosystem is self-reinforcing.

I check CNN all the time to see fake news from the left, I used to go to Daily Kos, but CNN went so nanners they are an acceptable substitute.

 

[Marener]

I check CNN all the time to see fake news from the left, I used to go to Daily Kos, but CNN went so nanners they are an acceptable substitute.

Doesn’t matter what you read if you allow your conditioning to prevent you from giving it serious consideration.

You are a good little twat who labels anything you don’t want to believe as “fake news”.

 

[martybegan]

Doesn’t matter what you read if you allow your conditioning to prevent you from giving it serious consideration.

You are a good little twat who labels anything you don’t want to believe as “fake news”.

I just don't give your worthless opinions serious consideration, like many on this board.

Only for your sides fake news, and actual fake news, you good wibble prog lemming.

 

[Marener]

I just don't give your worthless opinions serious consideration, like many on this board.

Only for your sides fake news, and actual fake news, you good wibble prog lemming.

Thanks for proving my point.

Anything outside your narrative is "worthless". The only value in information is whether it supports the narrative.

Good little low information twat. The only difference is that you don't have an excuse for it. You choose to be low information.

 

[martybegan]

Thanks for proving my point.

Anything outside your narrative is "worthless". The only value in information is whether it supports the narrative.

Good little low information twat. The only difference is that you don't have an excuse for it. You choose to be low information.

No, just items from you in this thread.

More pee-wee herman debating, and using the same thing I call you. Bush league.

 

[Marener]

No, just items from you in this thread.

More pee-wee herman debating, and using the same thing I call you. Bush league.

Your attack on me as a "low information twat" was false given I was aware that the original account labeled it parody. This was an attempt to deflect from the real criticism that this information is hidden from anyone who simply sees Musk's tweet with the video embedded.

Sorry if the label fits someone like yourself better. Your continual denial of reality continues to exemplify a major problem in American politics.

 

[martybegan]

Your attack on me as a "low information twat" was false given I was aware that the original account labeled it parody. This was an attempt to deflect from the real criticism that this information is hidden from anyone who simply sees Musk's tweet with the video embedded.

Sorry if the label fits someone like yourself better. Your continual denial of reality continues to exemplify a major problem in American politics.

It's an opinion so it's whatever I think you are, and all the evidence points to you just regurgitating lefty talking points.

I doubt you were aware of it. your posts reek of making it up as you go along when confronted with new information.

Stop using denial of reality, Dems are the champions at that. it comes from their Marxist roots.

 

[Marener]

It's an opinion so it's whatever I think you are, and all the evidence points to you just regurgitating lefty talking points.

I doubt you were aware of it. your posts reek of making it up as you go along when confronted with new information.

Stop using denial of reality, Dems are the champions at that. it comes from their Marxist roots.

You think saying it's just an "opinion" is a magic word that takes away any need for your statements to be substantiated by any reliable or reasonable facts. It's not. Not all opinions are equal and it doesn't protect you from being a low information twat.

When confronted with new information, people should be able to change their minds. When you are confronted with new information, you don't change your mind. You ignore the information or label it "fake news". Right wing orthodoxy these days does not allow anyone to admit they were wrong. It started decades ago with the term "flip flopper" and was severely exacerbated under Trump. MAGA views changing ones mind or admitting they're wrong as weakness and being weak is one of if not the greatest sin one could commit.

Which is why when the attacker of Paul Pelosi confessed in court to his crimes, the right winger twats said he could have been paid off. Which is why they will never admit their bullshit about the election is wrong. Which is why they cling to repeated falsehood after repeated falsehood.

 

[martybegan]

You think saying it's just an "opinion" is a magic word that takes away any need for your statements to be substantiated by any reliable or reasonable facts. It's not. Not all opinions are equal and it doesn't protect you from being a low information twat.

When confronted with new information, people should be able to change their minds. When you are confronted with new information, you don't change your mind. You ignore the information or label it "fake news". Right wing orthodoxy these days does not allow anyone to admit they were wrong. It started decades ago with the term "flip flopper" and was severely exacerbated under Trump. MAGA views changing ones mind or admitting they're wrong as weakness and being weak is one of if not the greatest sin one could commit.

Which is why when the attacker of Paul Pelosi confessed in court to his crimes, the right winger twats said he could have been paid off. Which is why they will never admit their bullshit about the election is wrong. Which is why they cling to repeated falsehood after repeated falsehood.

What actual facts do you ever bring to the table?

When confronted with bullshit information, only idiots like you would change their minds.

Plenty of people have confessed in courts without telling the truth about what happened. Ever hear of the Moscow show trials?

 

[Marener]

What actual facts do you ever bring to the table?

When confronted with bullshit information, only idiots like you would change their minds.

Plenty of people have confessed in courts without telling the truth about what happened. Ever hear of the Moscow show trials?

Do you think our court system is comparable to that in Russia?

Honestly.

Do you?

 

[martybegan]

Do you think our court system is comparable to that in Russia?

Honestly.

Do you?

I think the events in NYC with trump show they are sure as hell on their way.

 

[Marener]

I think the events in NYC with trump show they are sure as hell on their way.

Of course you think that. It's right wing narrative. The facts of the case are not relevant to someone like you.

Hell, Trump's defense was that he never had sex with Clifford and had nothing to do with the NDA. Good luck with that story.

 

[martybegan]

Of course you think that. It's right wing narrative. The facts of the case are not relevant to someone like you.

Hell, Trump's defense was that he never had sex with Clifford and had nothing to do with the NDA. Good luck with that story.

The facts are in the civil case she didn't remember when it happened, and in the criminal case the laws in question were mutilated more than that poor I am Jazz kid.

 

[Marener]

The facts are in the civil case she didn't remember when it happened, and in the criminal case the laws in question were mutilated more than that poor I am Jazz kid.

Of course you think that. It's the right wing narrative. But can you explain what that means? Probably not.

Lots of liberals agree that the case was weak and probably unnecessary. But by strict reading of the laws (which is what you losers are so obsessed with), justifiable.

Not sure what you mean by "didn't remember when it happened" because she most definitely did. You're probably confused. Don't tell me you're one of those low information twats who believes Trump never had sex with her and never had any idea about the NDA?

Inside the Payoff to a Porn Star That Could Lead to Trump’s Indictment (Published 2023)

Manhattan prosecutors investigating a payout to Stormy Daniels may be poised to make Donald J. Trump the first former president ever to be criminally indicted.

www.nytimes.com

Ms. Daniels, born Stephanie Gregory and raised mostly in a ramshackle ranch house in Baton Rouge, La., was 27 in July 2006, when she met Mr. Trump, then 60, at the celebrity golf tournament in Nevada.

 

[22lcidw]

Sure did.

If Kamala said she would consider signing a fracking ban 4 years ago (which, she did), you would be right here saying that's what she wants.

Oh wait... you are.

Trump told you what he supports on abortion.

 

[martybegan]

Of course you think that. It's the right wing narrative. But can you explain what that means? Probably not.

Lots of liberals agree that the case was weak and probably unnecessary. But by strict reading of the laws (which is what you losers are so obsessed with), justifiable.

Not sure what you mean by "didn't remember when it happened" because she most definitely did. You're probably confused. Don't tell me you're one of those low information twats who believes Trump never had sex with her and never had any idea about the NDA?

Inside the Payoff to a Porn Star That Could Lead to Trump’s Indictment (Published 2023)

Manhattan prosecutors investigating a payout to Stormy Daniels may be poised to make Donald J. Trump the first former president ever to be criminally indicted.

www.nytimes.com

Ms. Daniels, born Stephanie Gregory and raised mostly in a ramshackle ranch house in Baton Rouge, La., was 27 in July 2006, when she met Mr. Trump, then 60, at the celebrity golf tournament in Nevada.

it was only justifiable as a political hit job, and the sad thing is it failed spectacularly.

I doubt he actually had sex with her. She never gave the date it actually happened because she didn't remember it.

Um the civil trial in question wasn't about Stormy Daniels. get your political hit jobs straight.