Sex with willing same-sex children won't 'cost' so much in California now

Well there is a bright side. There is already tons of jokes to use out there on this. Just switch "Catholic Priest" with "Democrat"

But most U.S. Catholic priests are republicans.
Really, prove it, provide citation demonstrating that most catholic priests are republican????
Lol no one wants to claim the catholic priests. But this california law is probably an attempt by the dems to get their vote.
 
Well there is a bright side. There is already tons of jokes to use out there on this. Just switch "Catholic Priest" with "Democrat"

But most U.S. Catholic priests are republicans.
Really, prove it, provide citation demonstrating that most catholic priests are republican????
Lol no one wants to claim the catholic priests. But this california law is probably an attempt by the dems to get their vote.
Democrats make catholic priest look like saints.
 
The law is not new it is an existing law that was changed so the penalties are the same for same sex and opposite sex.
Let's be clear: The new law equates anal and oral penetration by the adult with consensual vaginal sex. There is a difference between them. The former are for the sole sexual gratification of the (up to 10 years older) adult, whereas vaginal sex involves mutual gratification. The old law recognized this distinction, but the new law does not.
 
Another step to legalizing pedophilia in California.

Not ALL Leftist participate in this abuse of children but, ALL Leftist support it .....

Knowingly or not is irrelevant.

Support is support.
 
The law is not new it is an existing law that was changed so the penalties are the same for same sex and opposite sex.
Let's be clear: The new law equates anal and oral penetration by the adult with consensual vaginal sex. There is a difference between them. The former are for the sole sexual gratification of the (up to 10 years older) adult, whereas vaginal sex involves mutual gratification. The old law recognized this distinction, but the new law does not.
1) do you think only same sex partners have oral or anal sex?
2)do you think the law is concerned with whether the underage parties involved received gratification from the sex they had?
 
The law is not new it is an existing law that was changed so the penalties are the same for same sex and opposite sex.
Let's be clear: The new law equates anal and oral penetration by the adult with consensual vaginal sex. There is a difference between them. The former are for the sole sexual gratification of the (up to 10 years older) adult, whereas vaginal sex involves mutual gratification. The old law recognized this distinction, but the new law does not.
Calling any sex between an adult and a minor consensual is wrong. That is why it is called the AGE OF CONSENT. Kids do things adults tell them not because they want to but because they are raised to trust and respect adults. We teach them to be vulnerable to predators to make them easier to raise and that should be looked at. They are not consenting they are complying.
 
Essentially, they legalized pedophilia. They can burn to the ground and float off into the Pacific. I won't shed a tear.
Please explain how this essentially legalized pedophilia.

24 year old with a 14 year old. Pretty simple to me.

It didn't make those relationships legal. It only changed the punishments to match those given to adults who engage in sexual acts with opposite sex minors. Unless you are saying that pedophilia was legal for offenders who had sex with opposite sex minors, I don't see how bringing the punishments for those who have same sex relations with a minor in line could be legalizing pedophilia.

Of course, this doesn't even cover that the law isn't about pedophilia, since it doesn't apply to children under 14.
 

Forum List

Back
Top