Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Look asshole, I posted an article. I never said it was a NASA article. That article said the tonnage. I never said NASA said that this was the amount of CO2 emissions.
I said I believe NASA when NASA claims that climate change is real & than man is primarily responsible.
Quit blaming me because your puny, uninformed, uneducated mind can't keep this straight.
Furthermore, you ignore the amount of CO2 that is naturally removed from the atmosphere.
Yes ... you did post that article ... and the article is lying ... why are you posting lies and then claim NASA's got your back ...
Yes ... aeronautical engineers are the right people to ask about climate ... look at the cool rockets they use ...
Yes ... over half human's CO2 emissions just disappear into nature ... nice, what's to worry about? ...
So everyone is lying but assfuck you.
Only a total idiot on the atmosphere would claim that the Earth does not naturally absorb CO2.
Jesus fuck, you are the dumbest person on the fucking planet.
How did we get the "hockey stick, you fucking moron? Did our emissions overtake the planet's absorption ability? Do ya think.
Jesus Fuck, STFU. You know nothing.
Hey, Davey, ONE more time - Climate Change = WEATHER. That's ALL you need to know. Thank you.Look asshole, I posted an article. I never said it was a NASA article. That article said the tonnage. I never said NASA said that this was the amount of CO2 emissions.
I said I believe NASA when NASA claims that climate change is real & than man is primarily responsible.
Quit blaming me because your puny, uninformed, uneducated mind can't keep this straight.
Furthermore, you ignore the amount of CO2 that is naturally removed from the atmosphere.
Yes ... you did post that article ... and the article is lying ... why are you posting lies and then claim NASA's got your back ...
Yes ... aeronautical engineers are the right people to ask about climate ... look at the cool rockets they use ...
Yes ... over half human's CO2 emissions just disappear into nature ... nice, what's to worry about? ...
So everyone is lying but assfuck you.
Only a total idiot on the atmosphere would claim that the Earth does not naturally absorb CO2.
Jesus fuck, you are the dumbest person on the fucking planet.
How did we get the "hockey stick, you fucking moron? Did our emissions overtake the planet's absorption ability? Do ya think.
Jesus Fuck, STFU. You know nothing.
I rejected your fake analysis.
Sorry. NASA overt a dumbass internet pretend scientist.I read NASA & other reliable sources. So go fuck yourself & your phony posts.My eyes are open.As long as you keep your eyes closed, you can claim you've never been shown anything ...
They can identify crazy assed morons who think they are climate experts.
how...you clearly don’t read the science...you can’t provide any peer reviewed, published science which supports what you believe...you apparently have no idea what experts are publishing and reject anything that doesn’t conform to your belief.
You keep referencing nasa....what you read at nasa isn't anything more than blogs from their public relations department...not peer reviewed, not cited, not containing evidence....just boilerplate from the alarmist community....that isn't science.
NASA has 13 data stations on the Antarctic Peninsula and all 13 of them show a cooling trend over the past 21 years...does your "nasa literature" tell you stuff like that or do they tell you that the antarctic is melting?
And I have seen nothing else from you that could rightly be construed as science and since you are only posting up what you are looking at, and material that you consider to be good, it is more than clear that you don't read the science..since you have never posted any up.
How pitiful that that was the best defense you could come up with...I answer al your questions, and you don't even attempt any sort of rebuttal...quite simply because you can't rebut them...all you can do is drag up some impotent name calling and logical fallacies.
Same old Dave!Sorry. NASA overt a dumbass internet pretend scientist.I read NASA & other reliable sources. So go fuck yourself & your phony posts.My eyes are open.
They can identify crazy assed morons who think they are climate experts.
how...you clearly don’t read the science...you can’t provide any peer reviewed, published science which supports what you believe...you apparently have no idea what experts are publishing and reject anything that doesn’t conform to your belief.
You keep referencing nasa....what you read at nasa isn't anything more than blogs from their public relations department...not peer reviewed, not cited, not containing evidence....just boilerplate from the alarmist community....that isn't science.
NASA has 13 data stations on the Antarctic Peninsula and all 13 of them show a cooling trend over the past 21 years...does your "nasa literature" tell you stuff like that or do they tell you that the antarctic is melting?
And I have seen nothing else from you that could rightly be construed as science and since you are only posting up what you are looking at, and material that you consider to be good, it is more than clear that you don't read the science..since you have never posted any up.
How pitiful that that was the best defense you could come up with...I answer al your questions, and you don't even attempt any sort of rebuttal...quite simply because you can't rebut them...all you can do is drag up some impotent name calling and logical fallacies.
I do not know what NASA says on this.Sorry. NASA overt a dumbass internet pretend scientist.
Still hating on NASA ... why are you picking on poor aeronautical engineers? ...
Where does NASA claim 40 billion tons emissions? ...
Are you denying the number?
Still fighting for truth, Justice and the American way.Same old Dave!Sorry. NASA overt a dumbass internet pretend scientist.I read NASA & other reliable sources. So go fuck yourself & your phony posts.how...you clearly don’t read the science...you can’t provide any peer reviewed, published science which supports what you believe...you apparently have no idea what experts are publishing and reject anything that doesn’t conform to your belief.
You keep referencing nasa....what you read at nasa isn't anything more than blogs from their public relations department...not peer reviewed, not cited, not containing evidence....just boilerplate from the alarmist community....that isn't science.
NASA has 13 data stations on the Antarctic Peninsula and all 13 of them show a cooling trend over the past 21 years...does your "nasa literature" tell you stuff like that or do they tell you that the antarctic is melting?
And I have seen nothing else from you that could rightly be construed as science and since you are only posting up what you are looking at, and material that you consider to be good, it is more than clear that you don't read the science..since you have never posted any up.
How pitiful that that was the best defense you could come up with...I answer al your questions, and you don't even attempt any sort of rebuttal...quite simply because you can't rebut them...all you can do is drag up some impotent name calling and logical fallacies.
Look asshole, I posted an article. I never said it was a NASA article. That article said the tonnage. I never said NASA said that this was the amount of CO2 emissions.
I said I believe NASA when NASA claims that climate change is real & than man is primarily responsible.
Quit blaming me because your puny, uninformed, uneducated mind can't keep this straight.
Furthermore, you ignore the amount of CO2 that is naturally removed from the atmosphere.
Because the FEDERALLY managed forests were not raked.The stuff it lists are either lies or bogus measurements of global warming, like the number of wild fires in California, which is the result of making it illegal for homeowners to clear brush near their homes, and the cost of hurricanes, which goes up because the value of real estate in FL goes up every year.I bet my savings there is no mention of the earths tilt or its wobble or the fact that it goes through a cyclical cycle over and over. How bout volcanism? Sun spots? Solar flares? Shifts in the magnetic field? Pole flips? Etc...In this link, there are seven statistics that demonstrate that we are already experiencing effects from AGW.
7 Numbers Show How Dire Climate Change Got This Decade | HuffPost
Too bad our President & his followers are too stupid to acknowledge its existence let alone take action.
Republicans are sacrificing their children's future to bow down to their orange god.
Did you know the Sahara desert used to be tropical?
Thanks, I hadn't bothered to go to the link...knowing that they are using lies like the California wildfires just shows how dishonest they are...it is their policies that create the out of control nature of those fires........
Yep, we heard that one already.
So everyone is lying but assfuck you.
Only a total idiot on the atmosphere would claim that the Earth does not naturally absorb CO2.
Jesus fuck, you are the dumbest person on the fucking planet.
How did we get the "hockey stick, you fucking moron? Did our emissions overtake the planet's absorption ability? Do ya think.
Jesus Fuck, STFU. You know nothing.
More fertilizers in the water - more ocean's ability to absorb CO_2 (and more fish to feed people). Some types of "pollution" can be useful, but the greenheads will never agree with it.
More fertilizers in the water - more ocean's ability to absorb CO_2 (and more fish to feed people). Some types of "pollution" can be useful, but the greenheads will never agree with it.
I rejected your phony analysis. Your claims are hysterical & rejected by real climatologists.I rejected your fake analysis.
One trick pony strikes again....makes hysterical claims, then rejects all science used to rebut those claims and provides nothing upon which a rejection might be seen as a rational answer....you forgot the impotent name calling after you fail to defend your claims...I like the impotent name calling.
Is that all you have? You reject my answer? Based on what exactly? You certainly haven't shown any evidence at all that anything I put there was wrong...and it wasn't "my" analysis...it was peer reviewed, published paper after paper...the fact that you have absolutely nothing to offer up which suggests that any of it is wrong and yet you still reject it says all that needs to be said about you.
You are a walking talking puppet...incapable of any sort of independent thought at all....a mere tool of people who have a political agenda and not nearly bright enough to see your situation.
Sorry assfuck. You lost. You totally ignored the CO2 absorbed by plants, oceans. etc.So everyone is lying but assfuck you.
In your whole life, have you ever replied to any question with something other than a logical fallacy or name calling? Ever?
Either you can demonstrate that they are not lying by producing empirical evidence which shows that they are not lying, or you have to accept the fact that they just might be lying...in which case you look for a reasonable motive for lying...lets see...political power and multiple trillions of dollars. You lie for free dave....what sorts of lies would you tell in order to get a little piece of a multi trillion dollar pie?
Only a total idiot on the atmosphere would claim that the Earth does not naturally absorb CO2.
Now you are just flailing around for anything that makes sense...and failing. What natural CO2 sinks exist and how much CO2 do they absorb?
Jesus fuck, you are the dumbest person on the fucking planet.
And yet, he is making a jabbering baboon out of you...how stupid does that make you.
When someone ties your claims into knots and leaves you unable to do anything but tell more lies and call names, you imply that they must be some sort of evil genius to be able to get over on you like that...you don't claim that they are stupid...after all, they are getting the best of you so how much more stupid does that make you?
How did we get the "hockey stick, you fucking moron? Did our emissions overtake the planet's absorption ability? Do ya think.
What exactly is the planet earth's CO2 absorption ability....did nasa give you that number? If they did, what is it based on?
Jesus Fuck, STFU. You know nothing.
You are losing this bad dave...bad as i have ever seen anyone lose...mindless, impotent name calling and that is the best you have..
