Settlers burn houses with children inside

What a pity that Fred has chosen to exaggerate and misrepresent the few hateful individuals among the 'settlers'.....

"The mainstream settler leadership disavows the vandals in their midst .."
 
Last edited:
LOL - after repeatedly falsely accusing Israel of seeking to get the US to do her fighting, the self-proclaimed 'America firster' now imagines that the US should send troops *against* Israeli vandals......
 
LOL - after repeatedly falsely accusing Israel of seeking to get the US to do her fighting, the self-proclaimed 'America firster' now imagines that the US should send troops *against* Israeli vandals......

Oh yea, falsely accused Israel...Just open a newspaper, its filled with Israeli drumbeating for an attack on Iran! Iraq, was no different.
 
LOL - after repeatedly falsely accusing Israel of seeking to get the US to do her fighting, the self-proclaimed 'America firster' now imagines that the US should send troops *against* Israeli vandals......

Oh yea, falsely accused Israel...Just open a newspaper, its filled with Israeli drumbeating for an attack on Iran! Iraq, was no different.

More idiotic exaggeration and false allegations. You appear to have forgotten that Saddam invaded Kuwait.......
 
LOL - after repeatedly falsely accusing Israel of seeking to get the US to do her fighting, the self-proclaimed 'America firster' now imagines that the US should send troops *against* Israeli vandals......

Oh yea, falsely accused Israel...Just open a newspaper, its filled with Israeli drumbeating for an attack on Iran! Iraq, was no different.

More idiotic exaggeration and false allegations. You appear to have forgotten that Saddam invaded Kuwait.......

Boy, its hard to believe that you boldface come on these boards proudly distorting the OP by bringing in the 91 war with GHW Bush and totally disregard the more recent war when Israel and the Pro Israeli PNAC Neo-cons hyped Bush Junior and Congress to attack Sadam Hussain, to give Iraq democracy...We got 4,000 dead American soldiers and Inspired Jihadist wars everywhere including the Arab Spring...

Just curious, why did you mention 91 and Kuwait? Did you want to fool us with the usual Zionist deceptions?


http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/john-mearsheimer/the-israel-lobby
Memories from the Twentieth Century by Luigi Pintor


At a key meeting with Bush at Camp David on 15 September, Wolfowitz advocated attacking Iraq before Afghanistan, even though there was no evidence that Saddam was involved in the attacks on the US and bin Laden was known to be in Afghanistan. Bush rejected his advice and chose to go after Afghanistan instead, but war with Iraq was now regarded as a serious possibility and on 21 November the president charged military planners with developing concrete plans for an invasion.

Other neo-conservatives were meanwhile at work in the corridors of power. We don’t have the full story yet, but scholars like Bernard Lewis of Princeton and Fouad Ajami of Johns Hopkins reportedly played important roles in persuading Cheney that war was the best option, though neo-conservatives on his staff – Eric Edelman, John Hannah and Scooter Libby, Cheney’s chief of staff and one of the most powerful individuals in the administration – also played their part. By early 2002 Cheney had persuaded Bush; and with Bush and Cheney on board, war was inevitable.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Oh yea, falsely accused Israel...Just open a newspaper, its filled with Israeli drumbeating for an attack on Iran! Iraq, was no different.

More idiotic exaggeration and false allegations. You appear to have forgotten that Saddam invaded Kuwait.......

Boy, its hard to believe that you boldface come on these boards proudly distorting the OP by bringing in the 91 war with GHW Bush and totally disregard the more recent war when Israel and the Pro Israeli PNAC Neo-cons hyped Bush Junior and Congress to attack Sadam Hussain, to give Iraq democracy...We got 4,000 dead American soldiers and Inspired Jihadist wars everywhere including the Arab Spring...

Just curious, why did you mention 91 and Kuwait? Did you want to fool us with the usual Zionist deceptions?


John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt · The Israel Lobby: the Israel Lobby · LRB 23 March 2006
Memories from the Twentieth Century by Luigi Pintor


At a key meeting with Bush at Camp David on 15 September, Wolfowitz advocated attacking Iraq before Afghanistan, even though there was no evidence that Saddam was involved in the attacks on the US and bin Laden was known to be in Afghanistan. Bush rejected his advice and chose to go after Afghanistan instead, but war with Iraq was now regarded as a serious possibility and on 21 November the president charged military planners with developing concrete plans for an invasion.

Other neo-conservatives were meanwhile at work in the corridors of power. We don’t have the full story yet, but scholars like Bernard Lewis of Princeton and Fouad Ajami of Johns Hopkins reportedly played important roles in persuading Cheney that war was the best option, though neo-conservatives on his staff – Eric Edelman, John Hannah and Scooter Libby, Cheney’s chief of staff and one of the most powerful individuals in the administration – also played their part. By early 2002 Cheney had persuaded Bush; and with Bush and Cheney on board, war was inevitable.
Sooner or later we had to go after Saddam. Better sooner than later. End of story.
 
More idiotic exaggeration and false allegations. You appear to have forgotten that Saddam invaded Kuwait.......

Boy, its hard to believe that you boldface come on these boards proudly distorting the OP by bringing in the 91 war with GHW Bush and totally disregard the more recent war when Israel and the Pro Israeli PNAC Neo-cons hyped Bush Junior and Congress to attack Sadam Hussain, to give Iraq democracy...We got 4,000 dead American soldiers and Inspired Jihadist wars everywhere including the Arab Spring...

Just curious, why did you mention 91 and Kuwait? Did you want to fool us with the usual Zionist deceptions?


John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt · The Israel Lobby: the Israel Lobby · LRB 23 March 2006
Memories from the Twentieth Century by Luigi Pintor


At a key meeting with Bush at Camp David on 15 September, Wolfowitz advocated attacking Iraq before Afghanistan, even though there was no evidence that Saddam was involved in the attacks on the US and bin Laden was known to be in Afghanistan. Bush rejected his advice and chose to go after Afghanistan instead, but war with Iraq was now regarded as a serious possibility and on 21 November the president charged military planners with developing concrete plans for an invasion.

Other neo-conservatives were meanwhile at work in the corridors of power. We don’t have the full story yet, but scholars like Bernard Lewis of Princeton and Fouad Ajami of Johns Hopkins reportedly played important roles in persuading Cheney that war was the best option, though neo-conservatives on his staff – Eric Edelman, John Hannah and Scooter Libby, Cheney’s chief of staff and one of the most powerful individuals in the administration – also played their part. By early 2002 Cheney had persuaded Bush; and with Bush and Cheney on board, war was inevitable.
Sooner or later we had to go after Saddam. Better sooner than later. End of story.

End of your Story, the American/Israeli Neo-cons worked for Israeli interests first and Americans lost our young soldiers...Saddam was on Israel's hit list for openly supporting _Palestinians Issues and donating money to them...

Tell us why did we needed to remove him. Tell us of our interest? Especially tell us what we gained?
 
Last edited:
What a pity that Fred has chosen to exaggerate and misrepresent the few hateful individuals among the 'settlers'.....

"The mainstream settler leadership disavows the vandals in their midst .."

Let me get this right.

Israeli extremists are a handful of hateful individuals and nothing to do with Israel in general but Muslim extremists are mainstream Islam.

Is that what you're saying?
 
And the very same thing happened to a Jewish family a couple of weeks ago by arab terrorists. It is not always one-sided. Remember that.
 
The Israeli illegal settler terrorists are doing their best to murder more children...again.
This time, they've been burning down houses with young kids inside, in an attempt to murder as many people as possible.

Settlers torch Palestinian home after Israeli soldier killed | Reuters

Israeli terrorists strike again.

Idiotic unhuman action:mad:

Whoever did this should be highly and severely punished. This is not the face of the people of Israel.

They desecrate the memory of our dear soldier, the protest against Palestinian terror should never cost the lives of innocent children.

Hope justice will be served.
 
The Israeli illegal settler terrorists are doing their best to murder more children...again.
This time, they've been burning down houses with young kids inside, in an attempt to murder as many people as possible.

Settlers torch Palestinian home after Israeli soldier killed | Reuters

Israeli terrorists strike again.

The UN should send forces to protect civilians, preferably US Marines, with big cojones and guns.

As long as it is not civilians at one side only.

You volunteer? or will it be easier sending others
 
Boy, its hard to believe that you boldface come on these boards proudly distorting the OP by bringing in the 91 war with GHW Bush and totally disregard the more recent war when Israel and the Pro Israeli PNAC Neo-cons hyped Bush Junior and Congress to attack Sadam Hussain, to give Iraq democracy...We got 4,000 dead American soldiers and Inspired Jihadist wars everywhere including the Arab Spring...

Just curious, why did you mention 91 and Kuwait? Did you want to fool us with the usual Zionist deceptions?


John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt · The Israel Lobby: the Israel Lobby · LRB 23 March 2006
Memories from the Twentieth Century by Luigi Pintor


At a key meeting with Bush at Camp David on 15 September, Wolfowitz advocated attacking Iraq before Afghanistan, even though there was no evidence that Saddam was involved in the attacks on the US and bin Laden was known to be in Afghanistan. Bush rejected his advice and chose to go after Afghanistan instead, but war with Iraq was now regarded as a serious possibility and on 21 November the president charged military planners with developing concrete plans for an invasion.

Other neo-conservatives were meanwhile at work in the corridors of power. We don’t have the full story yet, but scholars like Bernard Lewis of Princeton and Fouad Ajami of Johns Hopkins reportedly played important roles in persuading Cheney that war was the best option, though neo-conservatives on his staff – Eric Edelman, John Hannah and Scooter Libby, Cheney’s chief of staff and one of the most powerful individuals in the administration – also played their part. By early 2002 Cheney had persuaded Bush; and with Bush and Cheney on board, war was inevitable.
Sooner or later we had to go after Saddam. Better sooner than later. End of story.

End of your Story, the American/Israeli Neo-cons worked for Israeli interests first and Americans lost our young soldiers...Saddam was on Israel's hit list for openly supporting _Palestinians Issues and donating money to them...

Tell us why did we needed to remove him. Tell us of our interest? Especially tell us what we gained?

It is clearly Ironic, that goading the USA to take out Saddam, we created a power vacuum in the region for Saddam's enemy Iran to fill it to this day...

Divine Justice.
 
The Israeli illegal settler terrorists are doing their best to murder more children...again. This time, they've been burning down houses with young kids inside, in an attempt to murder as many people as possible. Israeli terrorists strike again.
Ah, palistanian settlers making stuff up.
 
The UN should send forces to protect civilians, preferably US Marines, with big cojones and guns.
And bagloads of cash to pay for fuel, accomodations, provisions, airport facilities, seaport facilities, power supply, did I forget anything?
 
The UN should send forces to protect civilians, preferably US Marines, with big cojones and guns.
And bagloads of cash to pay for fuel, accomodations, provisions, airport facilities, seaport facilities, power supply, did I forget anything?

The Corps brings everything it needs to accomplish its mission plus some. Mausers are no match for us.
 
The UN should send forces to protect civilians, preferably US Marines, with big cojones and guns.
And bagloads of cash to pay for fuel, accomodations, provisions, airport facilities, seaport facilities, power supply, did I forget anything?
The Corps brings everything it needs to accomplish its mission plus some. Mausers are no match for us.
Excellent. When do they start laying an underwater power cable to Israel, build seaports and airfields and bring bagloads of cash to pay rent, ie actively boost israeli economy?
 

Forum List

Back
Top