- Sep 27, 2012
- 91,943
- 53,440
- 2,605
Over 20K laws. WE HAVE GUN CONTROLView attachment 667216
We need gun control
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Over 20K laws. WE HAVE GUN CONTROLView attachment 667216
We need gun control
Nope, read all about it. Just not sure which parts you find Draconian
If your boyfriend or girlfriend can't legally buy a gun, you can't either? Seriously? I find that to be a serious violation of the 2nd Amendment. What's next, you can't drive if your boyfriend or girlfriend has a suspended license?
This is the relevant quote from the article on this bill. "it’s been received as an important, incremental step toward further progress on gun control"
If the guy is talking and explaining what he did in detail, why are the police not releasing his motive?
A simple question would have been asked of him "why did you do this"? The police would have been given a response. This response has not been conveyed to the public. Why not?
When you don't have transparency you open the door to theories that help no one, just look at my country.
. They want to only talk about the guns.
Thanks, I have to admit I did not really know what the "boyfriend loophole" was.
The current law already applies to spouses of people convicted of domestic abuse, it has been widened to reflect the fact fewer people are getting married.
If the current law was not a serious violation of the 2nd Amendment, then neither would be the new version.
Though I would agree both versions are. I wonder if they have been challenged in court.
View attachment 667216
We need gun control
I have no idea but I can't imagine either being upheld by the SC.
No, it has nothing to do with guns. It has to do with a morally depraved society and it will only get worse as this country continues to shake its fist at God.
Draconian? Think not, Just the weakest tiny attempt supported by Republicans because they were getting so much back lash over tiny children being killed in there class rooms.Congress just passed,and Brandon just signed Draconian Style Gun control.
Isn't it too early for anything more? Or did the legislation last month just whet the liberals' taste for even more crazy gun control, proving beyond doubt the "Slippery Slope" theorem?
Which one?
The only one there is. That one.
A lot of people say there is only one, but they disagree on which one that is.
Save your appeals to emotion for somebody who is not asking the right question.Draconian? Think not, Just the weakest tiny attempt supported by Republicans because they were getting so much back lash over tiny children being killed in there class rooms.
We make less of an effort there than we do for gun controlWe don't need gun control, we need crazy people control.
^^^ a lie.We make less of an effort there than we do for gun control
Due to opposition from the same group of people
BullshitWe make less of an effort there than we do for gun control
Due to opposition from the same group of people