Serious questions: What is "White Supremacy" and Why is it "wrong"?

DGS49
I believe that "white people," whom I describe as Caucasians whose ancestry came from Great Britain and northern Europe, were and are responsible for the bulk of what makes this country great.

How can that be when it was black people who built this country ?

DGS49
The science and technology, art, music, architecture, literature, philosophy (political, economic, moral, religious), our civil and criminal justice systems, and just as important, the "middle class work ethic." Certainly there have been significant contributions by others - more so in recent years - but most of what makes America great is the work product of white people, mainly white men.

99.99% of white people have invented nothing.


It is pretty widely acknowledged that virtually no basic technologies were strictly speaking invented in Europe or the United States. Instead, European societies aggregated technologies. Metalwork, the plow, hydrocarbon fuels, higher mathematics, paper, wind-powered sea navigation, the compass, gun powder, and steam engines all came from elsewhere. In terms of the crucial agricultural products that feed everyone in the modern world, too, none originated in Europe.

So western contributions are not because white people are so much smarter than everyone else but because progress in science and invention is built on what has gone before.

The more science you know the more science you can discover.The more inventions you have at hand. The more new inventions you can come up with. That is why the progress is exponential. It comes from the nature of science and technology, not from the nature of white intelligence.

You forget that you live at only one point in history, that other points in history were different. 700 years ago the Chinese could have ran around bragging how smart they were. After all whites would be nowhere without four Chinese inventions:

1) Gunpowder
2) The compass
3) Paper
4) The printing press.

Their rise to world power was built on these.

If our fates were written in our genes, then little in the world would change. Anglos would have been on top not only since the Battle of Waterloo in 1815 but for most of history. Instead for most of history they were backwards.

No one in his right mind in 1500 would have thought that some day English would become a world language, a respected language of learning, science and business. If you said that in 1500 people would have thought you had too much to drink.

DGS49
There is bad stuff as well, but no worse here than anyplace else in the world, and the good manifestly outweighs the bad.

The everyone does it argument.

DGS49
This belief doesn't cause me to honor any particular white men (or myself) because everyone is an individual,
DGS49
"white people," mainly men, are and have been responsible for most of the good stuff that makes America great.

I mean, if you can’t see the irony embedded in both of these remarks –after all, to say that you're not honoring white men in your 1st statement then honoring white men in your second statement is the epitome of self-contradiction – then you’re probably not prepared to enter a dialogue about much of anything.
 
Last edited:
DGS49
I don't personally take credit for anything (or take he blame for anything) done by "white" people who are not me.

So why do a post claiming white people are the greatest thing to walk this earth ?

DGS49
I'm just pointing out that white people are responsible for most of what is good in America and its culture.

Good for who ? For white people yeah sure living under a system of racism - white supremacy is good. Good for black people ?

DGS49
People from around the world want to come and live in America, but when they think of where they want to live in America, it is the white suburbs and city neighborhoods.

It's not that blk people want to so badly live with white people

It's that finding prosperous suburbs in the USA with little to no white people living there is a tough task.

Sure a rich black person could live around blks (and many do) the problem is they will typically find themselves limited to the poorest, most crowded areas of town because whites have a system which ensures that those areas are the most poorest and most crowded areas of town.

Where as white people have a system which makes sure that sizeable % of white people get access to those prosperous areas with the help of mortgage discrimination, redlining, zoning laws and so-called “market forces” pricing many blacks out of the better housing markets

(even though whites only got into those markets because of government subsidies and preferences, both private and public).

DGS49
They want to go to the universities that have been founded and developed by white people; they want to work for the companies that were created by white people. They want to take advantage of the economy that was developed by white people. And on and on.

You forget your history because this is how your European ancestors came to the USA.

1_affua13zzcw-ms8debrx8g-jpeg-jpg.434779


The winners never get on the boat. The winners stay put, probably because of that winning.

The people who are living well in Haiti, Sierra Leone, Albania or Liberia aren't risking life and limb to transport themselves to a country 1000s of miles away.

It's always the losers who leave.

And there is no shame in that.

Thats an act of resilience, willingness to risk everything for a new beginning.

But just as there was no shame when you're European ancestors who came to the USA did it. So too must there be no shame when people from other lands do it.

Also the reasons why some poor blk people come to the USA and Europe is a function of the very inequalities guys like you demand be kept in place.

The solution is very simple but you're not going to like it.

A massive investment in opportunities for black people for schooling and jobs, globally.

But of course, guys like you will never call for wealthy nations to invest more in expanding opportunities for black people, even though this would “solve” your stupid migration fears.

Likewise, you would never support a more equitable distribution of global resources to poorer nations, even though doing so would slow the migration patterns to so-called white countries, which are a function of global economic inequalities
 
Last edited:
White supremacy just means any political system in which whites are dominant. In China, there is Han supremacy. In Japan, there is Japanese supremacy. In Rwanda, there is Tutsi supremacy. In the US, there was white supremacy. Now we live under Jewish supremacy. That's how we got the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, signed into law in New York on October 3, 1965. That night, there were great celebrations across New York City of this magnificent victory by the Jews over the gentiles. If you as a white person don't know this, that's because you don't live in a white supremacist country. The 1965 act was an act of genocide, and it will soon pay off for the Jews against their hated Christian victims.
YT supremacy is a marxist term. What it really means is the constitution, system of government, laws, etc. So when the leftists say YT supremacy is terrible......they never say what they are going to replace it with. Of course we know what they want as a replacement that being a communistic NWO system.
 
DGS49
I don't personally take credit for anything (or take he blame for anything) done by "white" people who are not me.

So why do a post claiming white people are the greatest thing to walk this earth ?

DGS49
I'm just pointing out that white people are responsible for most of what is good in America and its culture.

Good for who ? For white people yeah sure living under a system of racism - white supremacy is good. Good for black people ?

DGS49
People from around the world want to come and live in America, but when they think of where they want to live in America, it is the white suburbs and city neighborhoods.

It's not that blk people want to so badly live with white people

It's that finding prosperous suburbs in the USA with little to no white people living there is a tough task.

Sure a rich black person could live around blks (and many do) the problem is they will typically find themselves limited to the poorest, most crowded areas of town because whites have a system which ensures that those areas are the most poorest and most crowded areas of town.

Where as white people have a system which makes sure that sizeable % of white people get access to those prosperous areas with the help of mortgage discrimination, redlining, zoning laws and so-called “market forces” pricing many blacks out of the better housing markets

(even though whites only got into those markets because of government subsidies and preferences, both private and public).

DGS49
They want to go to the universities that have been founded and developed by white people; they want to work for the companies that were created by white people. They want to take advantage of the economy that was developed by white people. And on and on.

You forget your history because this is how your European ancestors came to the USA.

1_affua13zzcw-ms8debrx8g-jpeg-jpg.434779


The winners never get on the boat. The winners stay put, probably because of that winning.

The people who are living well in Haiti, Sierra Leone, Albania or Liberia aren't risking life and limb to transport themselves to a country 1000s of miles away.

It's always the losers who leave.

And there is no shame in that.

Thats an act of resilience, willingness to risk everything for a new beginning.

But just as there was no shame when you're European ancestors who came to the USA did it. So too must there be no shame when people from other lands do it.

Also the reasons why some poor blk people come to the USA and Europe is a function of the very inequalities guys like you demand be kept in place.

The solution is very simple but you're not going to like it.

A massive investment in opportunities for black people for schooling and jobs, globally.

But of course, guys like you will never call for wealthy nations to invest more in expanding opportunities for black people, even though this would “solve” your stupid migration fears.

Likewise, you would never support a more equitable distribution of global resources to poorer nations, even though doing so would slow the migration patterns to so-called white countries, which are a function of global economic inequalities
You sound like you believe blacks have no agency at all.
 

Forum List

Back
Top