Serious Question: What Do Trump-Haters Want Him To Do About 'Russian Hacking?'
- Thread starter Dschrute3
- Start date
frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 54,968
- 15,128
- 2,180
You mean, apart from put the interests of the US first rather than the interests of Trump?
frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 54,968
- 15,128
- 2,180
But the Republicans weren't exposed for being corrupt. If you think the Democrats are one of the most corrupt institutions on earth, you need to get out more.
Metzor
VIP Member
- Dec 7, 2009
- 129
- 33
- 86
Democrats have aligned themselves with the media. Everything, including intelligence, is now political and nothiing coming from the left can be trusted. Trump has no choice. Democrats must be flushed from government and the media must be ignored. You guys got caught ******* a goat.First off
Take your hands off your ears and stop shouting
Nya....Nya...Nya....I CAN'T HEAR YOU
Wow, that's it? That's all you haters got? Pretty embarrassing.
Trump's response to all this has been embarrassing
Calling claims false without any substantiation, screaming ignore this....nothing to see here
Calling everyone else a liar
He is like a child getting news he does not like
Bingo.
It's fine to challenge intelligence agencies, but do so in private, don't ridicule in public without any evidence. We can't have a working government if our president refuses to listen to the people tasked with keeping him informed.
Trump thinks he knows everything, which is a YUGE problem for all of us. Because he might be the least-informed president we've ever inaugurated.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using USMessageBoard.com mobile app
EverCurious
Gold Member
Partisan hacks amuse me so. It's like all reality goes out the window.
You folks want to get /serious/ about cyber security, then what we need to do is revamp our internet security training and procedures;
Never trust a link in an email - instead go to the necessary site directly. (The /only/ real exception for this is in the cases of email validation links when you've just signed up for some website - something that our government employees shouldn't be doing.)
Ensure that you're using the most secure software - for example make sure all updates are done immediately (90% of software updates [of programs that get hacked] are closing loopholes that hackers have figured out).
Ensure every computer is running anti-virus and that it is updated /daily/ no excuses, no pushing off the update for this or that, if an update comes immediately install it.
Ensure that all employees dealing with sensitive data know the differences between a "strong" password and a "weak" one.
Rigidly enforce a rule that /all/ government work - be that emails, documents, images, etc. - are handled on a separate system (and if you want my opinion, that system should be a non-mobile pc that stays in the office at all times. None of this colluding with cell phones and personal business crap. Yes it's a bit of an inconvenience - deal with it, it's not a big enough inconvenience to risk national security/sensitive information over.)
Any and all data syncing (and by that I mean only the shit that's absolutely necessary) should be done through a specific entity/agency/program that checks the data on the non-secure device (aka the cell phone or laptop seeking to sync with the non-mobile "secure" system.
----
The shitty part is that even if we do all of this we're still probably going to get hacked once in a while. It's the dirty reality of software design, one careless line of code out of thousands can open up a security gap that hackers can take advantage of. And that's not even getting into the failure of the government workers themselves to actually follow the rules given to them (aka Hillary's server and Podesta clicking links,) nor does it address the lock down of information leaks that intentionally bypass information security protocols.
The truth is there is no 100% secure system, it will never exist if there are humans involved in it. The best we can hope for is to cut down on hacking - which actually means a complete overhaul and 'homogenization' of all software being used by government employees. To example, no more using notepad instead of Word because that's what you're comfortable with. No using Firefox instead of Internet Explorer because you prefer it. No more using build in web browser PDF viewers instead of Adobe PDF Viewer. (*Note these are just randomly recalled programs, the gov would have to do some kind of study to find out which programs are most secure and staying on top of hacker vulnerabilities and such.)
You folks want to get /serious/ about cyber security, then what we need to do is revamp our internet security training and procedures;
Never trust a link in an email - instead go to the necessary site directly. (The /only/ real exception for this is in the cases of email validation links when you've just signed up for some website - something that our government employees shouldn't be doing.)
Ensure that you're using the most secure software - for example make sure all updates are done immediately (90% of software updates [of programs that get hacked] are closing loopholes that hackers have figured out).
Ensure every computer is running anti-virus and that it is updated /daily/ no excuses, no pushing off the update for this or that, if an update comes immediately install it.
Ensure that all employees dealing with sensitive data know the differences between a "strong" password and a "weak" one.
Rigidly enforce a rule that /all/ government work - be that emails, documents, images, etc. - are handled on a separate system (and if you want my opinion, that system should be a non-mobile pc that stays in the office at all times. None of this colluding with cell phones and personal business crap. Yes it's a bit of an inconvenience - deal with it, it's not a big enough inconvenience to risk national security/sensitive information over.)
Any and all data syncing (and by that I mean only the shit that's absolutely necessary) should be done through a specific entity/agency/program that checks the data on the non-secure device (aka the cell phone or laptop seeking to sync with the non-mobile "secure" system.
----
The shitty part is that even if we do all of this we're still probably going to get hacked once in a while. It's the dirty reality of software design, one careless line of code out of thousands can open up a security gap that hackers can take advantage of. And that's not even getting into the failure of the government workers themselves to actually follow the rules given to them (aka Hillary's server and Podesta clicking links,) nor does it address the lock down of information leaks that intentionally bypass information security protocols.
The truth is there is no 100% secure system, it will never exist if there are humans involved in it. The best we can hope for is to cut down on hacking - which actually means a complete overhaul and 'homogenization' of all software being used by government employees. To example, no more using notepad instead of Word because that's what you're comfortable with. No using Firefox instead of Internet Explorer because you prefer it. No more using build in web browser PDF viewers instead of Adobe PDF Viewer. (*Note these are just randomly recalled programs, the gov would have to do some kind of study to find out which programs are most secure and staying on top of hacker vulnerabilities and such.)
/---- They don't expect him to do anything except offer some toothless sanctions like Obozo did. Their real goal is to promote Trump's presidency as illegitimate and undermine his agenda. They will fail.
Iceweasel
Diamond Member
You need to pop your head out of your safe space. The RNC wasn't running the games the DNC was. They didn't even want Trump. Educating you retards isn't possible, it's like teaching a dog to sing. I'll just make fun of you instead.
Iceweasel
Diamond Member
All good advice but Podesta wasn't working for the government, the DNC is a private organization.
I'm on Linux so don't have the virus/update problem. I think the government should switch to it, it's free so it would save us a bundle, better than Windows in my experience. There may be some programs that need MS but most what government does can be done with it.
EverCurious
Gold Member
True, but if it now falls under the us governments "opinion" of things "justice must be meted out for," it must therefore also fall under the category of things such policies the us government would both cover and enforce. -- personally I'm not keen on that idea, I'd much rather DC dropped their bullshit about the DNC email hack having jack shit to do with national cyber security, but they don't seem too inclined to do that now do they? Of course, that means the government will see first hand their corruption, but then again perhaps they (the Obama Administration) did and didn't give a shit, rather like their base.
Linux is a lot safer, it's far more like MSDOS - base coding and execution procedure. On the other hand, even if you're on linux you're still (most likely) using the vulnerable software's - like internet browsers and such. Its just less likely any hack program could "take over your system" and send out secret data for example. Certainly more secure, but alas not foolproof enough for all the various idiots in government employee heh
Linux is a lot safer, it's far more like MSDOS - base coding and execution procedure. On the other hand, even if you're on linux you're still (most likely) using the vulnerable software's - like internet browsers and such. Its just less likely any hack program could "take over your system" and send out secret data for example. Certainly more secure, but alas not foolproof enough for all the various idiots in government employee heh
frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 54,968
- 15,128
- 2,180
I answered it. Did you not understand?
The interests of the US are that no one interferes with US elections. If someone does then they should do whatever they can to make sure it doesn't happen.
What should the president of a country do that has been attacked by another?
frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 54,968
- 15,128
- 2,180
My party? Which is my party exactly?
Iceweasel
Diamond Member
You need facts before you bust down doors with guns blazing. Kapich?
frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 54,968
- 15,128
- 2,180
No.
Too many people with too many assumptions... You'd think people would ask BEFORE they make a fool of themselves, wouldn't you?
Oh, before you decide that everyone's either Republican or Democrat, I'm neither, see, saved you the hassle of doing it again.
The Sage of Main Street
Platinum Member
We Don't Need No Stinking Badgers
Your ilk putting in a good word for the Wisconsin Whiskbroom is all the more reason Trump should unSpeaker Paulie RINO and put in his own man, Kevin McCarthy, as the head of Household.
Lucy Hamilton
Diamond Member
- Oct 30, 2015
- 38,422
- 15,183
- 1,590
- Banned
- #400
You'd probably let him rape yoi too...
Jim you need to just don the leather chaps and the feather boa, your Homo fantasy now isn't just about Putin, it's about Julian Assange also.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
-
BREAKING: Protesters in Cuba attack Communist Party office in rare riot over blackouts
- Started by Thethingsz
- Replies: 0
