Roudy
Diamond Member
- Mar 16, 2012
- 63,001
- 20,214
- 2,250
Jews have every right to have their own country, culture, and ethnicity as do all other nations and peoples. Sometimes the religion is also part of the history culture and ethnicity of the nation. As for example with Spain and Italy.So all you have are opinions of morons like yourself, as opposed to official classifications.Um no. Since when are textbooks considered 100% accurate anyway. This is argument not history class. If forced to choose in a binary universe, Israel is a theocracy. Separation of temple and state are essential for moving forward imo.
Of course no one will like this source but here is a more recent article exploring this topic:
"As the winds of change blow across Iran, secular democrats in Israel have been losing ground to religious and right-wing extremists who feel comfortable openly attacking the United States, Israel’s strongest ally. In recent months, Israel’s defense minister, Moshe Yaalon, called Secretary of State John Kerry “obsessive and messianic,” while Naftali Bennett, Israel’s economy minister, labeled Mr. Kerry a “mouthpiece” for anti-Semitic elements attempting to boycott Israel." http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/12/opinion/sunday/are-iran-and-israel-trading-places.html?_r=0
That means if some dipshit writes an article stating that "USA is a fascist state" we'll all stick our fingers in the air and see which way the wind blows to determine if it's correct. Ha ha ha.
Brother, I don't want to fight you. I appreciate the machismo in a good Spartan like yourself, but really, imperviousness to ideas is not necessary.
I'll leave you with another article just published this week -- in foreign policy magazine edited by now clearly former Zionist Jewish American -- David Rothkopf. It is a series of letters between him and his former college roommate: Michael Oren, former American and ambassador to the US from Israel:
'A' Jewish State vs. 'The' Jewish State
"In this moment, the Rothkopf character comes into his own. He tells us what he really thinks and he’s the thoughtful and secure one, Oren is provincial. Zionism is “exactly the wrong” response to history, Rothkopf says, and delivers a speech about history that brings everyone to their feet:
History is the story of the human catastrophe that results when states promote religious ends or use religious criteria to guide their governance. As we have often seen, the embrace of religion into the identity of a nation, while being sold to the people as something unifying and elevating, is often something else. It is exclusionary. It is about finding a way to achieve cultural and ethnic "purity." It is an idea that should be more anathema to Jews, given our history, than to any other group. I find the response of Zionism to be exactly the wrong one. It suggests we have seen how others have abused religion by intermingling it with governance and national identity and the only protection is to do the same thing ourselves.
The best protection (as the United States has demonstrated) is to institutionalize the concept of tolerance and diversity and to work tirelessly to ensure that the powerful impulses to segregate and divide are quashed. It is not easy. But it has made the United States the most successful experiment in cultural diversity in history — though only after a series of horrific errors, including slavery and the genocide against Native Americans and the devaluing of the role of women, were ultimately remedied. We’re not there yet."
In other words. Let it go.
Regards,
You either do not know the definition of a theocracy, or just plain ignorant of current and past history and civilization to know the difference. Israel is considered a democratic secular nation OFFICIALLY, as a matter of fact a considerable number of Israelis consider themselves atheists, and some even serve in the government.
Last edited: