Palestinian ambassador to the UK, Husam Zomlot, tells Maira Butt that the biggest obstacle to peace in Middle East is Israel’s treatment Palestinians

Not a tabloid headline.

Show me where it's stated in the law.

I already did. And the law is in litigation for exactly singling out the PLO when the PLO (Sunnis) has been more than reasonable while Hamas (Shia) is a friggin terror throughout the world. You ignorance is way past ignorant. It surpassed stupid long ago. Now go read up on things before you open your mouth (keyboard) and prove to us just how really stupid you are.
 
I already did. And the law is in litigation for exactly singling out the PLO when the PLO (Sunnis) has been more than reasonable while Hamas (Shia) is a friggin terror throughout the world. You ignorance is way past ignorant. It surpassed stupid long ago. Now go read up on things before you open your mouth (keyboard) and prove to us just how really stupid you are.
Can you provide a link to the full text of the Amendment?
 
I already did. And the law is in litigation for exactly singling out the PLO when the PLO (Sunnis) has been more than reasonable while Hamas (Shia) is a friggin terror throughout the world. You ignorance is way past ignorant. It surpassed stupid long ago. Now go read up on things before you open your mouth (keyboard) and prove to us just how really stupid you are.

Every law is in litigation, that normal democratic procedure.

But it doesn't mention neither the PLO nor Hamas.
Applies to all foreign nationals, inc. Canadians,
in the case of security offence.
 
Last edited:
You know that doesnt really make your case.
Actually, it does make his case. Israel has only responded to those countries which attacked it. Iran, on the other hand, is a belligerent aggressor against states who have not committed aggressions.
 

Can we not exploit the deaths of young mothers as a method of demonizing Israel?

This video shows the unintentional killing of Wouroud Kanju, a 28-year-old Lebanese woman who was tragically caught in the crossfire between rival Palestinian drug gangs in Beirut on June 1, 2020 (source).

It took me about 2 minutes of research to discover the truth. If Israel warrants demonizing why fabricate stories? In fact, one would think that if your goal is to "criticize" Israel and her actions, it would serve your interests to ensure there is clear evidence it was Israel that committed the act. Otherwise, you look not only foolish, but intentional in your fabricated demonization.

I have been asked repeatedly how "the whole world can be wrong about Israel". This is how. This fabricated story posted on X now has 1.7 million views on the original post alone, never mind the number of shares and reposts. That's millions of people who believe this woman was "shot point blank in the head by the IDF". That's how millions of people can be wrong about Israel.
 
Can you provide a link to the full text of the Amendment?

It's not out to the general public right now. It's under litigation. Now, please stop with this childish MAGAt game. When it passes and the courts uphold it then it becomes a law. I gave you enough information for you to do your own research. Now, pull your head out of Drumphs ass and do your own research.
 
It's not out to the general public right now.
Oh, I know. That's how I also knew that you hadn't read the text. And why you shouldn't be accusing people of not reading a text that isn't available. How much of the rest of Israel's Penal Code have you read, out of curiosity?
 
Oh, I know. That's how I also knew that you hadn't read the text. And why you shouldn't be accusing people of not reading a text that isn't available. How much of the rest of Israel's Penal Code have you read, out of curiosity?

I read and presented the unofficial "Official" presented law. So you think you found a "Gotcha". Well, cupcake, Bibi and Drumph aren't going to come out of this unscathed. There is a Hague Court waiting for all of them including Putin.
 
I read and presented the unofficial "Official" presented law.
You read and presented a news article. We can all read from the same article, including the limited quotes from the actual Amendment.

For anyone other than a Palestinian, there is no death penalty. Remember, Israel doesn't have a Death Penalty but for one group of people and one type of infraction.
Your claim is that there is no death penalty, except for Palestinians. (You are incorrect about this, btw. There is a death penalty in Israel for certain other acts.)

Rylah and I (correctly) claim that Palestinians are not singled out by nationality, religion, or ethnicity by this law. The law applies to everyone who commits a specific crime. The quotes presented in the news article support our claim, not yours.
 
‘What happens in Gaza, will happen everywhere’: Palestinian ambassador to the UK warns Israel will not stop

Palestinian ambassador to the UK, Husam Zomlot, tells Maira Butt that the biggest obstacle to peace in the Middle East is Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians

Remote : Sat, 28 Mar 2026 09:17:03 GMT
Local : 2026-03-28(Saturday) 10 : 17 : 03
Found via Nicer.App WebOS homepage

but sir Zomlot, after oct 7th and the clear pre-meditation of such levels of futile aggression against the Israelis, we may well have to go a lot further.
we may have to install an actual moderate government that follows our guidelines of education of all Muslim youths, for the next five-hundred or more years!
One might argue that Palestinians lobbing missiles and so forth at a civilian populations, in Israel, MIGHT qualify as more of an impediment.
 
You read and presented a news article. We can all read from the same article, including the limited quotes from the actual Amendment.


Your claim is that there is no death penalty, except for Palestinians. (You are incorrect about this, btw. There is a death penalty in Israel for certain other acts.)

Rylah and I (correctly) claim that Palestinians are not singled out by nationality, religion, or ethnicity by this law. The law applies to everyone who commits a specific crime. The quotes presented in the news article support our claim, not yours.

The Palistinians (Sunnis) were directly name. Meanwhile, the Shia are raising hell. In case you have never learned or stepped in a history class, you would not that the Hamas, Hezzbula and Iran are Shia and through their own religious doctrine, they are to reestablish the Caliphate through violence against any and all no believers. What you do with the Shia, I could care less but the PLO are Sunni's and are directly against the Shias and have been since 632 AD.
 
The Palistinians (Sunnis) were directly name.
Sigh. In the article. Not in the quotes from the text of the Amendment. Here are all the quotes from the Amendment that are included in the article (and these are NOT verified, as none of us have actually seen the Amendment text, except maybe rylah in Hebrew):

"establish the death penalty for terrorists who carried out murderous terror attacks, as part of the fight against terrorism."

"a person who intentionally causes the death of another with the aim of harming a citizen or resident of Israel, with the intent of rejecting the existence of the State of Israel — his sentence shall be death or life imprisonment, and only one of these penalties."

"... his sentence shall be death, and this penalty only."


See anything about "Palestinians"? No. You don't. Because it isn't there.

You DO understand the difference between quote text and narrative text, yes? We USE quote text on USMB all the time.
 
I read and presented the unofficial "Official" presented law. So you think you found a "Gotcha". Well, cupcake, Bibi and Drumph aren't going to come out of this unscathed. There is a Hague Court waiting for all of them including Putin.
The Palistinians (Sunnis) were directly name.

Look it's quiet obvious you didn't care to take 2 minutes to research the subject, which is at least strange considering the seriousness of it. Nor familiar with the basics of legislation in a democratic society, where every bill and even the discussions during legislation are publicly available.

So at this point, your choice is to either join the choir of pretzels making up easily refutable claims, or demonstrate the unique talent of critical thinking and good will, and learn something from the whole exercise.

Here's the public link to all preliminary discussions,
variations of the bill and the final legislated law:

 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom