Separation of Temple and State

All faiths should be allowed on to the Temple Mount, and if they want to pray, if it truly is all the same god. The muslims might want to protect the Al Aqsa mosque from damage by fixing the wall underneath it before a large quake causes it all to fall down. It should be safe for all visitors to enter and appreciate; the faith, the culture, the people, the fact that there is more similarity than difference between people if they give peace a chance to accept the fact.

1) why should all faiths be allowed on the temple mount?
2) if that were the goal, perhaps they shouldn't have tossed a mosque on top of the holy of holies.

Dome of the Rock was a sight of pilgrimage for jews, christians and muslims. Al Aqsa was built in the corner of the mount for the muslims. During the time of both Saladin and Suleiman, jews were allowed to visit the mount and pray. Rambam and other wrote about their visits and how moving it was for them to pray on the mount.

The mount is the navel of god, the presumed sight of Abraham's offering of his son. The sight of Solomon's and Herod's temples. The house of the Arc, god's house and the holy words of the commandments.
True or not, from Zoroaster to Buddha, there are claims of family lines to Abraham and his other six children and therefore to the same god.
 
All faiths should be allowed on to the Temple Mount, and if they want to pray, if it truly is all the same god. The muslims might want to protect the Al Aqsa mosque from damage by fixing the wall underneath it before a large quake causes it all to fall down. It should be safe for all visitors to enter and appreciate; the faith, the culture, the people, the fact that there is more similarity than difference between people if they give peace a chance to accept the fact.

1) why should all faiths be allowed on the temple mount?
2) if that were the goal, perhaps they shouldn't have tossed a mosque on top of the holy of holies.

Dome of the Rock was a sight of pilgrimage for jews, christians and muslims. Al Aqsa was built in the corner of the mount for the muslims. During the time of both Saladin and Suleiman, jews were allowed to visit the mount and pray. Rambam and other wrote about their visits and how moving it was for them to pray on the mount.

The mount is the navel of god, the presumed sight of Abraham's offering of his son. The sight of Solomon's and Herod's temples. The house of the Arc, god's house and the holy words of the commandments.
True or not, from Zoroaster to Buddha, there are claims of family lines to Abraham and his other six children and therefore to the same god.

Jerusalem was not mentioned in any muslim book. and because something is a "pilgrammage" spot, does not make it common property.

or should new York city be an international city because a lot of tourists come here?
 
1) why should all faiths be allowed on the temple mount?
2) if that were the goal, perhaps they shouldn't have tossed a mosque on top of the holy of holies.

Dome of the Rock was a sight of pilgrimage for jews, christians and muslims. Al Aqsa was built in the corner of the mount for the muslims. During the time of both Saladin and Suleiman, jews were allowed to visit the mount and pray. Rambam and other wrote about their visits and how moving it was for them to pray on the mount.

The mount is the navel of god, the presumed sight of Abraham's offering of his son. The sight of Solomon's and Herod's temples. The house of the Arc, god's house and the holy words of the commandments.
True or not, from Zoroaster to Buddha, there are claims of family lines to Abraham and his other six children and therefore to the same god.

Jerusalem was not mentioned in any muslim book. and because something is a "pilgrammage" spot, does not make it common property.

or should new York city be an international city because a lot of tourists come here?

muslims claim decent to Abraham, or at least Mohammed does through Ishmael.
 
Under it's domestic law Israel can call itself what it likes but international law does not recognise it as a Jewish state just as it does not recognise any other state by it's religion even if that religion is mentioned in the name.

Int'l law applies to all religions and none.


But it applies to all races and as Jew is a race and the UN drew up a resolution that was passed granting the race of Jews a JEWISH HOMELAND

proof from the ISLAMONAZIS FAVOURITE MAP shows that the UN were talking a JEWISH STATE

289px-UN_Palestine_Partition_Versions_1947.jpg



The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal developed by the United Nations, which recommended a partition with Economic Union of Mandatory Palestine to follow the termination of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the U.N. General Assembly adopted a resolution recommending the adoption and implementation of the Plan as Resolution 181(II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and the Special International Regime for the City of Jerusalem.


United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well, actually it was supposed to look like this before the Arab animals attacked.

truncatedmap.jpg




That was just one of the revisions demanded by the anti Semitic British. The original plan was for the Jews to get trans Jordan as well as Jewish Palestine. And what did they end up with the worst land being mostly barren desert and an indefensible state. Now they have the most productive farm land in the area and are the envy of the arab states.
 
But it applies to all races and as Jew is a race and the UN drew up a resolution that was passed granting the race of Jews a JEWISH HOMELAND

proof from the ISLAMONAZIS FAVOURITE MAP shows that the UN were talking a JEWISH STATE

289px-UN_Palestine_Partition_Versions_1947.jpg



The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal developed by the United Nations, which recommended a partition with Economic Union of Mandatory Palestine to follow the termination of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the U.N. General Assembly adopted a resolution recommending the adoption and implementation of the Plan as Resolution 181(II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and the Special International Regime for the City of Jerusalem.


United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well, actually it was supposed to look like this before the Arab animals attacked.

truncatedmap.jpg




That was just one of the revisions demanded by the anti Semitic British. The original plan was for the Jews to get trans Jordan as well as Jewish Palestine. And what did they end up with the worst land being mostly barren desert and an indefensible state. Now they have the most productive farm land in the area and are the envy of the arab states.
It's amazing what you can achieve when you focus on creativity, education, and progress rather than killing, oppressing, and backward ass Islamic barbarism. :clap2:
 
i Israel is considered a democratic secular nation OFFICIALL

No, it is a theocracy just as much as Iran is. It is a Jewish state, Iran is an Islamic state.



Wrong again child as according to INTERNATIONAL LAW Israel is a Jewish nation and can not be anything else. So even if your demographics come to fruit the muslims cant alter the status of Israel and make in an Islamic nation.

You are really a dimwit. There is no "International Law" that makes Israel a Jewish state. No International law promotes a theocracy.

What about a law allowing self definition? Or is that only Islamofascists that deserve that?
 
Well, a state can declare itself a White State, but if there are non-Whites that ruled over that are equal in number to the Whites, it would be racist, don't you think?
 
Well, a state can declare itself a White State, but if there are non-Whites that ruled over that are equal in number to the Whites, it would be racist, don't you think?



And if a Palestinian state was to have it as part of their charter to kill all the Jews and destroy Israel then that also would be racist, and a crime against humanity.........
 
Well, a state can declare itself a White State, but if there are non-Whites that ruled over that are equal in number to the Whites, it would be racist, don't you think?

"Judaism" is not a race, smartypants.

And laws apply for Jews and non-Jews alike.

So your argument is slim.

Actually, it's a non-exist one:eusa_hand:
 
Well, a state can declare itself a White State, but if there are non-Whites that ruled over that are equal in number to the Whites, it would be racist, don't you think?

"Judaism" is not a race, smartypants.

And laws apply for Jews and non-Jews alike.

So your argument is slim.

Actually, it's a non-exist one:eusa_hand:

"Judaism" is not a race, smartypants.


Racism:

"definitions of racism also include discriminatory behaviors and beliefs based on cultural, national, ethnic, caste, or religious stereotypes"

Racism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And laws apply for Jews and non-Jews alike.

No, Israel has discriminatory laws against non-Jews, about 50 of them. They concern, citizenship, marriage, ownership of property and many others.

It is your response that is "slim", in fact it is bullshit.
 
Well, a state can declare itself a White State, but if there are non-Whites that ruled over that are equal in number to the Whites, it would be racist, don't you think?

"Judaism" is not a race, smartypants.

And laws apply for Jews and non-Jews alike.

So your argument is slim.

Actually, it's a non-exist one:eusa_hand:

"Judaism" is not a race, smartypants.


Racism:

"definitions of racism also include discriminatory behaviors and beliefs based on cultural, national, ethnic, caste, or religious stereotypes"

Racism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And laws apply for Jews and non-Jews alike.

No, Israel has discriminatory laws against non-Jews, about 50 of them. They concern, citizenship, marriage, ownership of property and many others.

It is your response that is "slim", in fact it is bullshit.
Buuuuullshit! Is that why Arab Muslims citizens of Israel prefer to live in Israel over ANY Arab country? More lies and false propaganda.
 
But it applies to all races and as Jew is a race and the UN drew up a resolution that was passed granting the race of Jews a JEWISH HOMELAND

proof from the ISLAMONAZIS FAVOURITE MAP shows that the UN were talking a JEWISH STATE

289px-UN_Palestine_Partition_Versions_1947.jpg



The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal developed by the United Nations, which recommended a partition with Economic Union of Mandatory Palestine to follow the termination of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the U.N. General Assembly adopted a resolution recommending the adoption and implementation of the Plan as Resolution 181(II).[2]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and the Special International Regime for the City of Jerusalem.


United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well, actually it was supposed to look like this before the Arab animals attacked.

truncatedmap.jpg




That was just one of the revisions demanded by the anti Semitic British. The original plan was for the Jews to get trans Jordan as well as Jewish Palestine. And what did they end up with the worst land being mostly barren desert and an indefensible state. Now they have the most productive farm land in the area and are the envy of the arab states.
Yup, the greedy Arabs kept getting more and more, until it became evident that they simply could not accept ANY type of Jewish nation. Talk about RACISTS.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom