EyeBRollin
Gold Member
Conservatives are traitors. Traitors are enemies of this country.Thank you for the further demonstration of your hyper-partisan bigotry.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Conservatives are traitors. Traitors are enemies of this country.Thank you for the further demonstration of your hyper-partisan bigotry.
And thus, further demonstration of your hyper-partisan bigotry.Conservatives are traitors. Traitors are enemies of this country.
8-1?Like allowing the Texas abortion law to stand
Blatantly unconstitutional
Conservatives are traitors. Traitors are enemies of this country.And thus, further demonstration of your hyper-partisan bigotry.
And thus, further demonstration of your hyper-partisan bigotry.Conservatives are traitors. Traitors are enemies of this country.
The court has already been packed unfairly.IOW, the system worked as designed and the people accepted the results as they still have some faith in the way it works. Keep changing the rules, for example, by packing the court and people will move closer to not accepting the results any more.
The hyper-partisan and the ignorant believe the court should have struck the law, in a ruling on whether or not a lawsuit in a lawer court regarding said law could proceed.8-1?
^^^The court has already been packed unfairly.
Most USSC decisions are 7-2, 8-1, or 9-0.My preference is a more evenly distributed court, It may lean more conservative or more liberal, The better the balance is the better the chance that they will draw nonpartisan conclusions that work best for all of us.
The last YEAR of his Presidency.Are you talking about not allowing Obama to appoint an SCJ in the last few months of his presidency? What other rules were bent and broken?
And he'd immediately lose the credibility of the court. Every single case would be viewed as a partisan power grab, not a reasoned judicial decision and you'd see a lot more civil disobedience. But, hey, you'd feel better, until the Republicans one up you and pack it for themselves.Biden should pack the hell out of the court. I’d add 4 justices immediately. Make it 7-6. Come on Biden, do it!
Further proof that you do not understand the difference between what happened in 2016 and in 2020.The last YEAR of his Presidency.
And when was Barrett appointed? In the last two MONTHS of Trump's Presidency?
And if Quid Pro has the same opportunity, he'll do the same thing. Where's the beef?The last YEAR of his Presidency.
And when was Barrett appointed? In the last two MONTHS of Trump's Presidency?
Nope, each Justice was appointed and confirmed according to existing law.The court has already been packed unfairly.
Argumentum ad absurdum.Let's add 100. If the Democrats don't cheat and we get another Republican president, he can add 1000. Then Democrats can add another 10,000. You see my little ignorant fool, diluting the SC diminishes their power and thus the entire point of the court and thus the entire judicial branch of our government.
That's speculationAnd if Quid Pro has the same opportunity, he'll do the same thing. Where's the beef?
That credibility has already been lostAnd he'd immediately lose the credibility of the court.
It is alreadyEvery single case would be viewed as a partisan power grab,
The Supreme Court has no credibility.And he'd immediately lose the credibility of the court. Every single case would be viewed as a partisan power grab, not a reasoned judicial decision and you'd see a lot more civil disobedience. But, hey, you'd feel better, until the Republicans one up you and pack it for themselves.
You're right -- the 8-1 decision that allowed the TX abortion lawsuits to proceed?The Supreme Court has no credibility.