Senator Warren wants to pack 4 more judges on the Supreme Court

[EyeBRollin]

Thank you for the further demonstration of your hyper-partisan bigotry.

Conservatives are traitors. Traitors are enemies of this country.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Conservatives are traitors. Traitors are enemies of this country.

And thus, further demonstration of your hyper-partisan bigotry.

 

[theHawk]

Like allowing the Texas abortion law to stand
Blatantly unconstitutional

8-1?

 

[EyeBRollin]

And thus, further demonstration of your hyper-partisan bigotry.

Conservatives are traitors. Traitors are enemies of this country.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Conservatives are traitors. Traitors are enemies of this country.

And thus, further demonstration of your hyper-partisan bigotry.

 

[sartre play]

IOW, the system worked as designed and the people accepted the results as they still have some faith in the way it works. Keep changing the rules, for example, by packing the court and people will move closer to not accepting the results any more.

The court has already been packed unfairly.

 

[M14 Shooter]

8-1?

The hyper-partisan and the ignorant believe the court should have struck the law, in a ruling on whether or not a lawsuit in a lawer court regarding said law could proceed.
They do not understand how the court works; or they do understand and choose to lie.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The court has already been packed unfairly.

^^^
This is a statement of ignorance and/or dishonesty.

 

[sartre play]

My preference is a more evenly distributed court, It may lean more conservative or more liberal, The better the balance is the better the chance that they will draw nonpartisan conclusions that work best for all of us.

 

[M14 Shooter]

My preference is a more evenly distributed court, It may lean more conservative or more liberal, The better the balance is the better the chance that they will draw nonpartisan conclusions that work best for all of us.

Most USSC decisions are 7-2, 8-1, or 9-0.
The court is only "partisan" when it rules opposite to Democrat dogma.

 

[Lesh]

Are you talking about not allowing Obama to appoint an SCJ in the last few months of his presidency? What other rules were bent and broken?

The last YEAR of his Presidency.

And when was Barrett appointed? In the last two MONTHS of Trump's Presidency?

 

[hadit]

Biden should pack the hell out of the court. I’d add 4 justices immediately. Make it 7-6. Come on Biden, do it!

And he'd immediately lose the credibility of the court. Every single case would be viewed as a partisan power grab, not a reasoned judicial decision and you'd see a lot more civil disobedience. But, hey, you'd feel better, until the Republicans one up you and pack it for themselves.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The last YEAR of his Presidency.
And when was Barrett appointed? In the last two MONTHS of Trump's Presidency?

Further proof that you do not understand the difference between what happened in 2016 and in 2020.
If you did you'd understand your apples/oranges argument has no merit
Not that you'd admit it.
And in any case - as this does not equate to "packing the court", you speak from ignorance or dishonesty.

 

[hadit]

The last YEAR of his Presidency.

And when was Barrett appointed? In the last two MONTHS of Trump's Presidency?

And if Quid Pro has the same opportunity, he'll do the same thing. Where's the beef?

 

[hadit]

The court has already been packed unfairly.

Nope, each Justice was appointed and confirmed according to existing law.

 

[Lesh]

Let's add 100. If the Democrats don't cheat and we get another Republican president, he can add 1000. Then Democrats can add another 10,000. You see my little ignorant fool, diluting the SC diminishes their power and thus the entire point of the court and thus the entire judicial branch of our government.

Argumentum ad absurdum.

The use of ridiculous hyperbole in the absence of a coherent argument

 

[Lesh]

And if Quid Pro has the same opportunity, he'll do the same thing. Where's the beef?

That's speculation

As opposed to the FACT that Republicans DID do just that

 

[Lesh]

And he'd immediately lose the credibility of the court.

That credibility has already been lost

Every single case would be viewed as a partisan power grab,

It is already

 

[EyeBRollin]

And he'd immediately lose the credibility of the court. Every single case would be viewed as a partisan power grab, not a reasoned judicial decision and you'd see a lot more civil disobedience. But, hey, you'd feel better, until the Republicans one up you and pack it for themselves.

The Supreme Court has no credibility.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The Supreme Court has no credibility.

You're right -- the 8-1 decision that allowed the TX abortion lawsuits to proceed?
Absolute horseshit.