Senator Warren wants to pack 4 more judges on the Supreme Court

I read in a history book or three (years ago) about the tawdry attempt by the Democrat Party to arrange for some “court packing.” It got shot the fuck down, then. (Fuck you, FDR.)
Now, Senator ‘Blizzurd’ Pocahontas (D), having no knowledge about history, wants to try that shit again. She can go fuck herself.
Further evidence that when Demcorats lose, they whine and cry and want to change the rules.
 
Republican justices do not vote in lockstep as often as the Democratic justices. Case in point, Roberts strayed from the other Republican justices with regards to ObamaCare. When is the last time a Democratic justice did so in such a consequential case?
Has thomas ever cast a vote outside of the conservative silo?
 
I'm more concerned for a Justice cast a vote that stands with the Constitution
and not politics.
How does that work with the texas anti-abortion law the conservative wing let stand? Where in the Constitution can I find the part that allows citizen vigilantes the power to enforce law for money?
 
^^^^
This is a lie.
The TX constitutionality of the TX abortion law was not the question before the court.
Why do you - continue - to lie about this?
So, the court didn't let the texas law remain in force?

It's not longer a texas law...
 
So, the court didn't let the texas law remain in force?
It's not longer a texas law...
You -choose- to not understand what happened in the 8-1 decision that allowed the lawsuits against the TX abortion law to continue.
You -choose- to misrepresent the facts
That is, you -choose- to lie.
 
How does that work with the texas anti-abortion law the conservative wing let stand? Where in the Constitution can I find the part that allows citizen vigilantes the power to enforce law for money?
Where in the Constitution did it say that it's a federal issue?
It's a state issue and not a federal issue.
 
Further evidence that when Demcorats lose, they whine and cry and want to change the rules.
This is so true! They want to ban the Electoral College, they want to impeach the prez that won despite them, they want to pack the Court, they want to gerrymander all the districts to force out Republicans, they want to imprison basically everybody ever worked in the previous administration.

I'm amazed how dishonorable they are. Completely unable to abide by the rules.
 
Elizabeth Warren has said 'it's time' to start packing the Supreme Court, claiming that the current set of judges 'threaten the democratic foundations of our nation.'
She said she supported expanding the high court by at least four seats and urged Congress to act after the 'extremist' justices upheld the 'racist Muslim ban' and 'threatened to eliminate Roe v. Wade.'

Comment:
Warren is a delusional far left extremist.
There was no "Muslim ban" and Muslims are not a race.
Reversing Roe v Wade would just make abortion a State issue.
The real threat to our democracy are the corrupt Democrat Party's abuses of power.
Obama illegally used the IRS, CIA, FBI, DOJ and FISA court as political weapons, and he got away with it.
The corrupt Democrat Senator Adam Schiff is fabricating evidence in a 110% political witch hunt.
The corrupt Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton illegally destroyed incriminating evidence, and she got away with it.
The Democrat Party's crazy Russian Collusion conspiracy and the Mueller Report was a thinly veiled coup attempt against President Trump.
Pelosi's two bogus impeachments against Trump were a blow against our democracy.
The Democrats are using the Tech Giants to censor political opinions.
Blocking Voter ID laws and mandating Mail-In ballots are a threat to legitimate secure elections and a threat to our democracy.
But finally, packing the Supreme Court with far left extremist judges does not girder our democracy, it does the opposite.
The Voters of MA should be ashamed of themselves.
30 Red States: Great America
20 Blue States: Ingrate America


Granny the Nanny can have her "our country" after we patriots secede.
 
Does anyone else not see the problem with what is being argued here? The mere fact that we fight over the political leanings of the scotus justices should be an indicator that something needs to change.

Justice should be for justices' sake, not for politics.
Bury Marbury

Judicial review is arbitrary autocratic self-serving tyranny. Who made justice the Justices' "Just Us"? They declared that power themselves, and we, the people, should declare it null and void ourselves.

They committed the logical fallacy of Begging the Question when they interpreted the Constitution as giving them the right to interpret the Constitution.
 

Forum List

Back
Top