Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
HEY REPUBLICANS
Why don't you tell us what your replacement is before you take away insurance from 30 million people?
When the liberals start crying about the millions that are dying in the street when its repealed, can we just refer to that as shovel ready jobs?
Replacing the ACA is fine with me.If you bother to check, you will see that the coverage and availability features of the ACA are wildly supported by Republicans as well as Dems.A purely partisan accusation was made, and I pointed out that the accusation was bs.There is no legitimate justification for asking that question in regard to forming a committee on health care coverage solutions.
But, yes, every thinking Dem knows there are things that would improve the ACA.
The problem has been that the GOP has been unwilling to consider doing that. There have been a few improvements that Republicans have allowed to pass, but very few.
Oh quit trying to blame Republicans and Bush all the time. When are you leftists going to accept responsibility for once in your lives?
Again: Every single Republican voted against Commie Care. No if's, and's, or but's about it. It was not only a failure, but YOUR failure.
So, your point is just more pure partisan hackery.
And, if someone makes a partisan complaint that is BS, I WILL CALL THEM ON IT.
I don't see the ACA as being a failure AT ALL. In fact, it is functioning today, improving health care coverage for America, even though there has been far less modification to it than there has been to any other program anywhere nearly as significant.
Pure BS. It's unaffordable and terrible insurance to boot. It was successful in one way, to create as many new government dependents as possible. That was the only goal from the beginning. The more government dependents, the more likely Democrat voters.
Right, that's why they voted against it and even brought repeals of it to DumBama multiple times which of course he refused to sign.
how would returning things to how they were (perfectly working) just a few years ago before the disaster ACA was forced on the workers, bring us back decades? seriously, did the passing of the ACA cause some sort of shift in time that changed history too?Replacing the ACA is fine with me.If you bother to check, you will see that the coverage and availability features of the ACA are wildly supported by Republicans as well as Dems.A purely partisan accusation was made, and I pointed out that the accusation was bs.Oh quit trying to blame Republicans and Bush all the time. When are you leftists going to accept responsibility for once in your lives?
Again: Every single Republican voted against Commie Care. No if's, and's, or but's about it. It was not only a failure, but YOUR failure.
So, your point is just more pure partisan hackery.
And, if someone makes a partisan complaint that is BS, I WILL CALL THEM ON IT.
I don't see the ACA as being a failure AT ALL. In fact, it is functioning today, improving health care coverage for America, even though there has been far less modification to it than there has been to any other program anywhere nearly as significant.
Pure BS. It's unaffordable and terrible insurance to boot. It was successful in one way, to create as many new government dependents as possible. That was the only goal from the beginning. The more government dependents, the more likely Democrat voters.
Right, that's why they voted against it and even brought repeals of it to DumBama multiple times which of course he refused to sign.
Killing the ACA, leaving in place no health care coverage system is criminally irresponsible.
That would set us back by a good number of decades, obviously.
Replacing the ACA is fine with me.If you bother to check, you will see that the coverage and availability features of the ACA are wildly supported by Republicans as well as Dems.A purely partisan accusation was made, and I pointed out that the accusation was bs.Oh quit trying to blame Republicans and Bush all the time. When are you leftists going to accept responsibility for once in your lives?
Again: Every single Republican voted against Commie Care. No if's, and's, or but's about it. It was not only a failure, but YOUR failure.
So, your point is just more pure partisan hackery.
And, if someone makes a partisan complaint that is BS, I WILL CALL THEM ON IT.
I don't see the ACA as being a failure AT ALL. In fact, it is functioning today, improving health care coverage for America, even though there has been far less modification to it than there has been to any other program anywhere nearly as significant.
Pure BS. It's unaffordable and terrible insurance to boot. It was successful in one way, to create as many new government dependents as possible. That was the only goal from the beginning. The more government dependents, the more likely Democrat voters.
Right, that's why they voted against it and even brought repeals of it to DumBama multiple times which of course he refused to sign.
Killing the ACA, leaving in place no health care coverage system is criminally irresponsible.
That would set us back by a good number of decades, obviously.
they might have to give something up in their life to do it. That's not fair to ask these people to cut back on some non-essential spending in order to provide for their families.Replacing the ACA is fine with me.If you bother to check, you will see that the coverage and availability features of the ACA are wildly supported by Republicans as well as Dems.A purely partisan accusation was made, and I pointed out that the accusation was bs.
So, your point is just more pure partisan hackery.
And, if someone makes a partisan complaint that is BS, I WILL CALL THEM ON IT.
I don't see the ACA as being a failure AT ALL. In fact, it is functioning today, improving health care coverage for America, even though there has been far less modification to it than there has been to any other program anywhere nearly as significant.
Pure BS. It's unaffordable and terrible insurance to boot. It was successful in one way, to create as many new government dependents as possible. That was the only goal from the beginning. The more government dependents, the more likely Democrat voters.
Right, that's why they voted against it and even brought repeals of it to DumBama multiple times which of course he refused to sign.
Killing the ACA, leaving in place no health care coverage system is criminally irresponsible.
That would set us back by a good number of decades, obviously.
Why? Those people can't go out and buy a policy without Commie Care?
Another far left debunked narrative, even the CBO said after the full implantation of Obamacare that 20 million people would still be with out insurance.
Yea and the sky is down
If Republicans ever succeeded in repealing Obamacare, the U.S. budget deficit would soar by as much as $353 billion over 10 years and 24 million people would lose their health insurance, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said Friday.
Obamacare Repeal Would Raise Deficit, Cost People Insurance, Report Finds
See how the far left grips with religious dogma..
That is assuming that no one can get insurance after the repeal, once again a failed far left drone post!
There is no need to assume at all, all we have to do is LOOK AT THE UNINSURANCE RATE BEFORE OBAMACARE took effect.
See that far left thinks that after the repeal that people will not be able to get insurance!
They are pushing yet another debunked religious narrative!
The left are pissed. Not only did they lose all the free shit Hillary was promising them, now Trump and the GOP are taking away the free shit Obama promised them. Poor libs
???how would returning things to how they were (perfectly working) just a few years ago before the disaster ACA was forced on the workers, bring us back decades? seriously, did the passing of the ACA cause some sort of shift in time that changed history too?Replacing the ACA is fine with me.If you bother to check, you will see that the coverage and availability features of the ACA are wildly supported by Republicans as well as Dems.A purely partisan accusation was made, and I pointed out that the accusation was bs.
So, your point is just more pure partisan hackery.
And, if someone makes a partisan complaint that is BS, I WILL CALL THEM ON IT.
I don't see the ACA as being a failure AT ALL. In fact, it is functioning today, improving health care coverage for America, even though there has been far less modification to it than there has been to any other program anywhere nearly as significant.
Pure BS. It's unaffordable and terrible insurance to boot. It was successful in one way, to create as many new government dependents as possible. That was the only goal from the beginning. The more government dependents, the more likely Democrat voters.
Right, that's why they voted against it and even brought repeals of it to DumBama multiple times which of course he refused to sign.
Killing the ACA, leaving in place no health care coverage system is criminally irresponsible.
That would set us back by a good number of decades, obviously.
The system of health insurance that actually worked well before the ACA was not done through legislation, it was private business.???how would returning things to how they were (perfectly working) just a few years ago before the disaster ACA was forced on the workers, bring us back decades? seriously, did the passing of the ACA cause some sort of shift in time that changed history too?Replacing the ACA is fine with me.If you bother to check, you will see that the coverage and availability features of the ACA are wildly supported by Republicans as well as Dems.Pure BS. It's unaffordable and terrible insurance to boot. It was successful in one way, to create as many new government dependents as possible. That was the only goal from the beginning. The more government dependents, the more likely Democrat voters.
Right, that's why they voted against it and even brought repeals of it to DumBama multiple times which of course he refused to sign.
Killing the ACA, leaving in place no health care coverage system is criminally irresponsible.
That would set us back by a good number of decades, obviously.
When you kill the ACA it doesn't mean some OTHER legislation that was killed suddenly comes back into existence.
That's not how legislation works.
Also, remember that our law, and health care in general has moved on from that, including the edges related to how health care interacts with other law that has also changed.
If we are to get a new system, it's going to have to be designed, written into law, and a transition plan will be required.
Ryan knows that.
BTW: People are very clear about how losing the features of the ACA is NOT what they want. Read the polls. Just going back to what we had before will be seen as a disaster.
Yea and the sky is down
If Republicans ever succeeded in repealing Obamacare, the U.S. budget deficit would soar by as much as $353 billion over 10 years and 24 million people would lose their health insurance, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said Friday.
Obamacare Repeal Would Raise Deficit, Cost People Insurance, Report Finds
See how the far left grips with religious dogma..
That is assuming that no one can get insurance after the repeal, once again a failed far left drone post!
There is no need to assume at all, all we have to do is LOOK AT THE UNINSURANCE RATE BEFORE OBAMACARE took effect.
See that far left thinks that after the repeal that people will not be able to get insurance!
They are pushing yet another debunked religious narrative!
The left are pissed. Not only did they lose all the free shit Hillary was promising them, now Trump and the GOP are taking away the free shit Obama promised them. Poor libs
Thing is it was never free. Obamacare has cost families alot of money
??Replacing the ACA is fine with me.If you bother to check, you will see that the coverage and availability features of the ACA are wildly supported by Republicans as well as Dems.A purely partisan accusation was made, and I pointed out that the accusation was bs.
So, your point is just more pure partisan hackery.
And, if someone makes a partisan complaint that is BS, I WILL CALL THEM ON IT.
I don't see the ACA as being a failure AT ALL. In fact, it is functioning today, improving health care coverage for America, even though there has been far less modification to it than there has been to any other program anywhere nearly as significant.
Pure BS. It's unaffordable and terrible insurance to boot. It was successful in one way, to create as many new government dependents as possible. That was the only goal from the beginning. The more government dependents, the more likely Democrat voters.
Right, that's why they voted against it and even brought repeals of it to DumBama multiple times which of course he refused to sign.
Killing the ACA, leaving in place no health care coverage system is criminally irresponsible.
That would set us back by a good number of decades, obviously.
Why? Those people can't go out and buy a policy without Commie Care?
The system of health insurance that actually worked well before the ACA was not done through legislation, it was private business.???how would returning things to how they were (perfectly working) just a few years ago before the disaster ACA was forced on the workers, bring us back decades? seriously, did the passing of the ACA cause some sort of shift in time that changed history too?Replacing the ACA is fine with me.If you bother to check, you will see that the coverage and availability features of the ACA are wildly supported by Republicans as well as Dems.
Right, that's why they voted against it and even brought repeals of it to DumBama multiple times which of course he refused to sign.
Killing the ACA, leaving in place no health care coverage system is criminally irresponsible.
That would set us back by a good number of decades, obviously.
When you kill the ACA it doesn't mean some OTHER legislation that was killed suddenly comes back into existence.
That's not how legislation works.
Also, remember that our law, and health care in general has moved on from that, including the edges related to how health care interacts with other law that has also changed.
If we are to get a new system, it's going to have to be designed, written into law, and a transition plan will be required.
Ryan knows that.
BTW: People are very clear about how losing the features of the ACA is NOT what they want. Read the polls. Just going back to what we had before will be seen as a disaster.
nothing has to be brought back, those companies are there, they still have clients buying their product through means other than the ACA, and those companies are going to be more than willing to write a fair policy for anyone that needs or wants one.
Not sure you have a complete grasp on how these things work.
False. There was extensive health care regulation on providers, insurers, and employers - before the ACA.The system of health insurance that actually worked well before the ACA was not done through legislation, it was private business.???how would returning things to how they were (perfectly working) just a few years ago before the disaster ACA was forced on the workers, bring us back decades? seriously, did the passing of the ACA cause some sort of shift in time that changed history too?Replacing the ACA is fine with me.If you bother to check, you will see that the coverage and availability features of the ACA are wildly supported by Republicans as well as Dems.
Right, that's why they voted against it and even brought repeals of it to DumBama multiple times which of course he refused to sign.
Killing the ACA, leaving in place no health care coverage system is criminally irresponsible.
That would set us back by a good number of decades, obviously.
When you kill the ACA it doesn't mean some OTHER legislation that was killed suddenly comes back into existence.
That's not how legislation works.
Also, remember that our law, and health care in general has moved on from that, including the edges related to how health care interacts with other law that has also changed.
If we are to get a new system, it's going to have to be designed, written into law, and a transition plan will be required.
Ryan knows that.
BTW: People are very clear about how losing the features of the ACA is NOT what they want. Read the polls. Just going back to what we had before will be seen as a disaster.
nothing has to be brought back, those companies are there, they still have clients buying their product through means other than the ACA, and those companies are going to be more than willing to write a fair policy for anyone that needs or wants one.
Not sure you have a complete grasp on how these things work.
Also, corporations that have coverage today will need time to figure out what they will offer their employees. Most employers that have well paid positions will probably offer something, as it is a way to be competitive in attracting employees. But, others may drop coverage and I'd bet most will have some amount of change.The system of health insurance that actually worked well before the ACA was not done through legislation, it was private business.???how would returning things to how they were (perfectly working) just a few years ago before the disaster ACA was forced on the workers, bring us back decades? seriously, did the passing of the ACA cause some sort of shift in time that changed history too?Replacing the ACA is fine with me.Right, that's why they voted against it and even brought repeals of it to DumBama multiple times which of course he refused to sign.
Killing the ACA, leaving in place no health care coverage system is criminally irresponsible.
That would set us back by a good number of decades, obviously.
When you kill the ACA it doesn't mean some OTHER legislation that was killed suddenly comes back into existence.
That's not how legislation works.
Also, remember that our law, and health care in general has moved on from that, including the edges related to how health care interacts with other law that has also changed.
If we are to get a new system, it's going to have to be designed, written into law, and a transition plan will be required.
Ryan knows that.
BTW: People are very clear about how losing the features of the ACA is NOT what they want. Read the polls. Just going back to what we had before will be seen as a disaster.
nothing has to be brought back, those companies are there, they still have clients buying their product through means other than the ACA, and those companies are going to be more than willing to write a fair policy for anyone that needs or wants one.
Not sure you have a complete grasp on how these things work.
I think they could bring things back to when employers provided that benefit. But in order to do that, Trump and the Republicans would have to offer some sort of incentive. The companies that dropped coverage will not go back to providing it just because Commie Care was repealed.
well if that's all then go for it.False. There was extensive health care regulation on providers, insurers, and employers - before the ACA.The system of health insurance that actually worked well before the ACA was not done through legislation, it was private business.???how would returning things to how they were (perfectly working) just a few years ago before the disaster ACA was forced on the workers, bring us back decades? seriously, did the passing of the ACA cause some sort of shift in time that changed history too?Replacing the ACA is fine with me.Right, that's why they voted against it and even brought repeals of it to DumBama multiple times which of course he refused to sign.
Killing the ACA, leaving in place no health care coverage system is criminally irresponsible.
That would set us back by a good number of decades, obviously.
When you kill the ACA it doesn't mean some OTHER legislation that was killed suddenly comes back into existence.
That's not how legislation works.
Also, remember that our law, and health care in general has moved on from that, including the edges related to how health care interacts with other law that has also changed.
If we are to get a new system, it's going to have to be designed, written into law, and a transition plan will be required.
Ryan knows that.
BTW: People are very clear about how losing the features of the ACA is NOT what they want. Read the polls. Just going back to what we had before will be seen as a disaster.
nothing has to be brought back, those companies are there, they still have clients buying their product through means other than the ACA, and those companies are going to be more than willing to write a fair policy for anyone that needs or wants one.
Not sure you have a complete grasp on how these things work.
Such regulation has existed for decades - the ACA just added regulation, such as requiring insurers to offer their policies to all (regardless of age, gender, preexisting conditions, etc.)
Replacing the ACA is fine with me.If you bother to check, you will see that the coverage and availability features of the ACA are wildly supported by Republicans as well as Dems.A purely partisan accusation was made, and I pointed out that the accusation was bs.Oh quit trying to blame Republicans and Bush all the time. When are you leftists going to accept responsibility for once in your lives?
Again: Every single Republican voted against Commie Care. No if's, and's, or but's about it. It was not only a failure, but YOUR failure.
So, your point is just more pure partisan hackery.
And, if someone makes a partisan complaint that is BS, I WILL CALL THEM ON IT.
I don't see the ACA as being a failure AT ALL. In fact, it is functioning today, improving health care coverage for America, even though there has been far less modification to it than there has been to any other program anywhere nearly as significant.
Pure BS. It's unaffordable and terrible insurance to boot. It was successful in one way, to create as many new government dependents as possible. That was the only goal from the beginning. The more government dependents, the more likely Democrat voters.
Right, that's why they voted against it and even brought repeals of it to DumBama multiple times which of course he refused to sign.
Killing the ACA, leaving in place no health care coverage system is criminally irresponsible.
That would set us back by a good number of decades, obviously.
Not our problem you like skyrocketing healthcare costs for less service with doctors you don't know.A purely partisan accusation was made, and I pointed out that the accusation was bs.There is no legitimate justification for asking that question in regard to forming a committee on health care coverage solutions.I have no idea. Is there a Democrat who has acknowledged changes are required?How many Democrats will be part of the committee that designs ACA changes or replacement?Dufus wants to pin Obamacare on Republicans.
The desperation is hilarious.
But, yes, every thinking Dem knows there are things that would improve the ACA.
The problem has been that the GOP has been unwilling to consider doing that. There have been a few improvements that Republicans have allowed to pass, but very few.
Oh quit trying to blame Republicans and Bush all the time. When are you leftists going to accept responsibility for once in your lives?
Again: Every single Republican voted against Commie Care. No if's, and's, or but's about it. It was not only a failure, but YOUR failure.
So, your point is just more pure partisan hackery.
And, if someone makes a partisan complaint that is BS, I WILL CALL THEM ON IT.
I don't see the ACA as being a failure AT ALL. In fact, it is functioning today, improving health care coverage for America, even though there has been far less modification to it than there has been to any other program anywhere nearly as significant.
Democrats created the mess. Do you want Bush involved in what to do in the Middle East?There is no legitimate justification for asking that question in regard to forming a committee on health care coverage solutions.I have no idea. Is there a Democrat who has acknowledged changes are required?How many Democrats will be part of the committee that designs ACA changes or replacement?Dufus wants to pin Obamacare on Republicans.Your comment here is BS in that there were a fair number of Republicans in the House and Senate committees that created the ACA.Here America, come and get a copy and give us your feedback in the next 20 minutes.
There is good reason Democrats are now irrelevant in American politics.
View attachment 105246
Your suggestion that GOP legislators didn't know what was in the bill is BS, because THEY helped create it.
The only part they had any limited time to read were the changes made in conference, where the last few differences between the House and Senate versions were resolved. And, by the rules of congress, those changes could not be major or it would have required a full vote of both sides of congress.
The desperation is hilarious.
But, yes, every thinking Dem knows there are things that would improve the ACA.
The problem has been that the GOP has been unwilling to consider doing that. There have been a few improvements that Republicans have allowed to pass, but very few.
The system of health insurance that actually worked well before the ACA was not done through legislation, it was private business.
nothing has to be brought back, those companies are there, they still have clients buying their product through means other than the ACA, and those companies are going to be more than willing to write a fair policy for anyone that needs or wants one.
Not sure you have a complete grasp on how these things work.
Hopeycare is a tax and it's being repealed.The system of health insurance that actually worked well before the ACA was not done through legislation, it was private business.
nothing has to be brought back, those companies are there, they still have clients buying their product through means other than the ACA, and those companies are going to be more than willing to write a fair policy for anyone that needs or wants one.
Not sure you have a complete grasp on how these things work.
We had private companies that sold policies with pages and pages of fine print that would cap your policy at lifetime payouts, kick you off whenever they felt you are getting too expensive and lock out people with pre-existing conditions. And people with low income could never afford health insurance unless their employer covered it. All of this while medical costs and healthcare spending in general was spiraling out of control for 30 years.
This is your "worked really well"? What you are saying is somewhere between ignorant and delusional.
