Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So what? Neither did Johnson's nor Clinton's. It's still a stain on a presidency that can't be washed away.And it went nowhere. Twice. Deal with it.Twice Impeached Trump's already been impeached while he was president, dumbfuck.According to the Constitution, it does. Impeachment is for a President, not a former President.What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.
He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.
Get stuffed.
As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.
The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional
There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.
I suggest you send your evidence of a crime to the FBI, Dummy.
All you got Assflap? Why do you even bother posting?The voter fraud took place in six swing states. Witnesses and data prove the fraud. You are lying, I am not.Then tell me exactly what massive voter fraud took place, in at least 3 to 4 of these contentious battle ground, that would have been enough, to over turn that state's election.There truly and honestly was no massive voter fraud. You've been convinced there was... I can see that...but you've been conned, by a bunch of con artists...God as my witness!You defrauded Trump. There was massive fraud and now a massive cover up that has failed.We did beat him, by a landslide...7 million plus votes and 306 to 232 electoral votes.Why are they so scared of one man? This much fuss you can bet he was working for the people. That is not done in DC. He had to be doing something right and that is not done in DC either.There are two separate votes required to complete a Senate impeachment trial.You cannot remove what is not there. Democrats have conducted a four year sideshow. If anybody embarrasses this country it is those assholes.What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.
He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.
Get stuffed.
As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.
The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional
There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.
One VOTE to convict and remove from office or not. Takes 2/3s voting to convict.
And the second, separate vote required, which only requires a majority vote, not the 2/3s vote, is whether or not to strip those impeached, from ever holding office again.
You can't vote to strip him from holding office again, without the impeachment trial, and that vote cast...
Thus, his holding office or not, matters naught....
You have admitted fraud by hiding evidence and censorship of the topic. You know you cannot beat him in a fair election. That is what you are admitting now. How is that serving the people like the government should?
Trump concocted the Big Lie, that the election was stolen from him months before the election was held, when his internal polling told him he was going to lose big-time to Biden.No. There was truly and honestly massive fraud. Biden is a BOGUS POTUS.There truly and honestly was no massive voter fraud.
There have been so many bogus claims that truly have been debunked, many because procedures were just misunderstood and even twisted to appear bad, when they weren't.
But if there are any that I may not have researched yet, I'd like to know them...So I can dig in to the details.
The Trump team of lawyers have act u ally not brought any actual fraud cases to court. All those cases that dems remind trumpets they lost in court were not fraud cases, but election law procedural issues... and they brought the same procedural issues to as many as ten states, losing in all of them, because the relief they were asking in every one of those cases, was to invalidate ALL absentee ballots in a county with a big city, and mostly minority voters, legally and constitutionally granted the rig h t to vote...because a handful of absentee ballot envelopes May have had a signature not checked, and things like that...and the case Judges basically said, ARE YOU CRAZY? to the Trump lawyers.
No cases of vote switching, or Dominion voting machine irregularities, or milktary swat teams capturing voter servers in Germany, or ballot stuffing, or any of the accusations made by Giuliani and team, in your right wing media was brought to court, by Giuliani and team....not one....ask yourself why not even one?
My bet is the law teams know if they presented a known bogus claim to the court, they could lose their law licences or censured in the least.
---------
Trump has to overturn too many states, to even come close to winning enough electoral votes... It's an impossible task, imo.
hey Asshole, Give me the quote of Trump calling for violence in DC! You can't so STFUThe problem we have here is that the Senate members who want to have a trial, like their House counterparts, are mentally unbalanced and consumed by hate. There is no logic in what they do. They are obsessed with hurting Trump in any way they can because they fear him. They fear the crooked form of government that they have devised to enrich themselves will be dismantled in favor of one that our constitution and founders envisioned. Trump haters are America haters.
Trump called down an angry mob of supporters on Congress. They have pretty darned good reasons to fear him.
Oh STFU, you liar.Sure, the Constitution has been completely ignored starting March 2020....
Oh? How else were they supposed to "fight like hell" to save Twice Impeached Trump's "electoral victory" that Congress was handing to Biden?Actually it turned violent because it was "their only hope"
Thank you for your own PERSONAL OPINION, which - once again, is all Democrats have to attempt Impeachment again.
Who needs more than that in response to your lunacy?All you got Assflap? Why do you even bother posting?The voter fraud took place in six swing states. Witnesses and data prove the fraud. You are lying, I am not.Then tell me exactly what massive voter fraud took place, in at least 3 to 4 of these contentious battle ground, that would have been enough, to over turn that state's election.There truly and honestly was no massive voter fraud. You've been convinced there was... I can see that...but you've been conned, by a bunch of con artists...God as my witness!You defrauded Trump. There was massive fraud and now a massive cover up that has failed.We did beat him, by a landslide...7 million plus votes and 306 to 232 electoral votes.Why are they so scared of one man? This much fuss you can bet he was working for the people. That is not done in DC. He had to be doing something right and that is not done in DC either.There are two separate votes required to complete a Senate impeachment trial.You cannot remove what is not there. Democrats have conducted a four year sideshow. If anybody embarrasses this country it is those assholes.What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.
He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.
Get stuffed.
As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.
The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional
There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.
One VOTE to convict and remove from office or not. Takes 2/3s voting to convict.
And the second, separate vote required, which only requires a majority vote, not the 2/3s vote, is whether or not to strip those impeached, from ever holding office again.
You can't vote to strip him from holding office again, without the impeachment trial, and that vote cast...
Thus, his holding office or not, matters naught....
You have admitted fraud by hiding evidence and censorship of the topic. You know you cannot beat him in a fair election. That is what you are admitting now. How is that serving the people like the government should?
Trump concocted the Big Lie, that the election was stolen from him months before the election was held, when his internal polling told him he was going to lose big-time to Biden.No. There was truly and honestly massive fraud. Biden is a BOGUS POTUS.There truly and honestly was no massive voter fraud.
There have been so many bogus claims that truly have been debunked, many because procedures were just misunderstood and even twisted to appear bad, when they weren't.
But if there are any that I may not have researched yet, I'd like to know them...So I can dig in to the details.
The Trump team of lawyers have act u ally not brought any actual fraud cases to court. All those cases that dems remind trumpets they lost in court were not fraud cases, but election law procedural issues... and they brought the same procedural issues to as many as ten states, losing in all of them, because the relief they were asking in every one of those cases, was to invalidate ALL absentee ballots in a county with a big city, and mostly minority voters, legally and constitutionally granted the rig h t to vote...because a handful of absentee ballot envelopes May have had a signature not checked, and things like that...and the case Judges basically said, ARE YOU CRAZY? to the Trump lawyers.
No cases of vote switching, or Dominion voting machine irregularities, or milktary swat teams capturing voter servers in Germany, or ballot stuffing, or any of the accusations made by Giuliani and team, in your right wing media was brought to court, by Giuliani and team....not one....ask yourself why not even one?
My bet is the law teams know if they presented a known bogus claim to the court, they could lose their law licences or censured in the least.
---------
Trump has to overturn too many states, to even come close to winning enough electoral votes... It's an impossible task, imo.
Did they? How does that prove anything?Where does it say they are Trump supporters?
They said or tweeted that they were in DC at the president's request.
When did any member of the Democrat Reich ever do the right thing even if they lost the next election?Actually the 1/6 DC protest saw little violence and by far the worst of that was perpetrated by the Capitol police. The left wing riots over that last couple of years have been far more violent. Politicizing? Biden's Bitches have been doing their utmost to generate mass hysteria over a minor event to provide an excuse to militarize DC as a means to terrorize and dominate citizens and seize control of public and private property indefinitely. And of course use the China Flu hysteria to control and manipulate people nationwide. If anybody else were doing it it would be considered fear mongering. One instance of violence deserves equal attention as does the same level of violence occurring elsewhere regardless of any political considerations. But that not what we are seeing. Not near. You are the "attacker," dumbazz, as well as a massive hypocrite with suicidal tendencies.
You should read Profiles in Courage. Its about doing the right thing even if you lose your next election.
Do you consider yourself a patriot or just a Trumpie?
The lunacy is accepting a senile career politician who is thoroughly corrupt defrauding his way into office.Who needs more than that in response to your lunacy?All you got Assflap? Why do you even bother posting?The voter fraud took place in six swing states. Witnesses and data prove the fraud. You are lying, I am not.Then tell me exactly what massive voter fraud took place, in at least 3 to 4 of these contentious battle ground, that would have been enough, to over turn that state's election.There truly and honestly was no massive voter fraud. You've been convinced there was... I can see that...but you've been conned, by a bunch of con artists...God as my witness!You defrauded Trump. There was massive fraud and now a massive cover up that has failed.We did beat him, by a landslide...7 million plus votes and 306 to 232 electoral votes.Why are they so scared of one man? This much fuss you can bet he was working for the people. That is not done in DC. He had to be doing something right and that is not done in DC either.There are two separate votes required to complete a Senate impeachment trial.You cannot remove what is not there. Democrats have conducted a four year sideshow. If anybody embarrasses this country it is those assholes.What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.
He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.
Get stuffed.
As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.
The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional
There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.
One VOTE to convict and remove from office or not. Takes 2/3s voting to convict.
And the second, separate vote required, which only requires a majority vote, not the 2/3s vote, is whether or not to strip those impeached, from ever holding office again.
You can't vote to strip him from holding office again, without the impeachment trial, and that vote cast...
Thus, his holding office or not, matters naught....
You have admitted fraud by hiding evidence and censorship of the topic. You know you cannot beat him in a fair election. That is what you are admitting now. How is that serving the people like the government should?
Trump concocted the Big Lie, that the election was stolen from him months before the election was held, when his internal polling told him he was going to lose big-time to Biden.No. There was truly and honestly massive fraud. Biden is a BOGUS POTUS.There truly and honestly was no massive voter fraud.
There have been so many bogus claims that truly have been debunked, many because procedures were just misunderstood and even twisted to appear bad, when they weren't.
But if there are any that I may not have researched yet, I'd like to know them...So I can dig in to the details.
The Trump team of lawyers have act u ally not brought any actual fraud cases to court. All those cases that dems remind trumpets they lost in court were not fraud cases, but election law procedural issues... and they brought the same procedural issues to as many as ten states, losing in all of them, because the relief they were asking in every one of those cases, was to invalidate ALL absentee ballots in a county with a big city, and mostly minority voters, legally and constitutionally granted the rig h t to vote...because a handful of absentee ballot envelopes May have had a signature not checked, and things like that...and the case Judges basically said, ARE YOU CRAZY? to the Trump lawyers.
No cases of vote switching, or Dominion voting machine irregularities, or milktary swat teams capturing voter servers in Germany, or ballot stuffing, or any of the accusations made by Giuliani and team, in your right wing media was brought to court, by Giuliani and team....not one....ask yourself why not even one?
My bet is the law teams know if they presented a known bogus claim to the court, they could lose their law licences or censured in the least.
---------
Trump has to overturn too many states, to even come close to winning enough electoral votes... It's an impossible task, imo.
The Constitution says two things about impeachment — it is a tool to remove the officeholder, and it must be presided over by the chief justice of the Supreme Court.
Neither one of those things will happen. President Trump is gone, and Justice John Roberts, properly noticing the absence of an officeholder being impeached, is declining to preside.
That settles it for me.
thehill.com
So don't accept him then.The lunacy is accepting a senile career politician who is thoroughly corrupt defrauding his way into office.Who needs more than that in response to your lunacy?All you got Assflap? Why do you even bother posting?The voter fraud took place in six swing states. Witnesses and data prove the fraud. You are lying, I am not.Then tell me exactly what massive voter fraud took place, in at least 3 to 4 of these contentious battle ground, that would have been enough, to over turn that state's election.There truly and honestly was no massive voter fraud. You've been convinced there was... I can see that...but you've been conned, by a bunch of con artists...God as my witness!You defrauded Trump. There was massive fraud and now a massive cover up that has failed.We did beat him, by a landslide...7 million plus votes and 306 to 232 electoral votes.Why are they so scared of one man? This much fuss you can bet he was working for the people. That is not done in DC. He had to be doing something right and that is not done in DC either.There are two separate votes required to complete a Senate impeachment trial.You cannot remove what is not there. Democrats have conducted a four year sideshow. If anybody embarrasses this country it is those assholes.What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.
He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.
Get stuffed.
As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.
The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional
There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.
One VOTE to convict and remove from office or not. Takes 2/3s voting to convict.
And the second, separate vote required, which only requires a majority vote, not the 2/3s vote, is whether or not to strip those impeached, from ever holding office again.
You can't vote to strip him from holding office again, without the impeachment trial, and that vote cast...
Thus, his holding office or not, matters naught....
You have admitted fraud by hiding evidence and censorship of the topic. You know you cannot beat him in a fair election. That is what you are admitting now. How is that serving the people like the government should?
Trump concocted the Big Lie, that the election was stolen from him months before the election was held, when his internal polling told him he was going to lose big-time to Biden.No. There was truly and honestly massive fraud. Biden is a BOGUS POTUS.There truly and honestly was no massive voter fraud.
There have been so many bogus claims that truly have been debunked, many because procedures were just misunderstood and even twisted to appear bad, when they weren't.
But if there are any that I may not have researched yet, I'd like to know them...So I can dig in to the details.
The Trump team of lawyers have act u ally not brought any actual fraud cases to court. All those cases that dems remind trumpets they lost in court were not fraud cases, but election law procedural issues... and they brought the same procedural issues to as many as ten states, losing in all of them, because the relief they were asking in every one of those cases, was to invalidate ALL absentee ballots in a county with a big city, and mostly minority voters, legally and constitutionally granted the rig h t to vote...because a handful of absentee ballot envelopes May have had a signature not checked, and things like that...and the case Judges basically said, ARE YOU CRAZY? to the Trump lawyers.
No cases of vote switching, or Dominion voting machine irregularities, or milktary swat teams capturing voter servers in Germany, or ballot stuffing, or any of the accusations made by Giuliani and team, in your right wing media was brought to court, by Giuliani and team....not one....ask yourself why not even one?
My bet is the law teams know if they presented a known bogus claim to the court, they could lose their law licences or censured in the least.
---------
Trump has to overturn too many states, to even come close to winning enough electoral votes... It's an impossible task, imo.
When did any member of the Democrat Reich ever do the right thing even if they lost the next election?
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Me, and about 100 million others do not accept him. Never will.So don't accept him then.The lunacy is accepting a senile career politician who is thoroughly corrupt defrauding his way into office.Who needs more than that in response to your lunacy?All you got Assflap? Why do you even bother posting?The voter fraud took place in six swing states. Witnesses and data prove the fraud. You are lying, I am not.Then tell me exactly what massive voter fraud took place, in at least 3 to 4 of these contentious battle ground, that would have been enough, to over turn that state's election.There truly and honestly was no massive voter fraud. You've been convinced there was... I can see that...but you've been conned, by a bunch of con artists...God as my witness!You defrauded Trump. There was massive fraud and now a massive cover up that has failed.We did beat him, by a landslide...7 million plus votes and 306 to 232 electoral votes.Why are they so scared of one man? This much fuss you can bet he was working for the people. That is not done in DC. He had to be doing something right and that is not done in DC either.There are two separate votes required to complete a Senate impeachment trial.You cannot remove what is not there. Democrats have conducted a four year sideshow. If anybody embarrasses this country it is those assholes.What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.
He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.
Get stuffed.
As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.
The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional
There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.
One VOTE to convict and remove from office or not. Takes 2/3s voting to convict.
And the second, separate vote required, which only requires a majority vote, not the 2/3s vote, is whether or not to strip those impeached, from ever holding office again.
You can't vote to strip him from holding office again, without the impeachment trial, and that vote cast...
Thus, his holding office or not, matters naught....
You have admitted fraud by hiding evidence and censorship of the topic. You know you cannot beat him in a fair election. That is what you are admitting now. How is that serving the people like the government should?
Trump concocted the Big Lie, that the election was stolen from him months before the election was held, when his internal polling told him he was going to lose big-time to Biden.No. There was truly and honestly massive fraud. Biden is a BOGUS POTUS.There truly and honestly was no massive voter fraud.
There have been so many bogus claims that truly have been debunked, many because procedures were just misunderstood and even twisted to appear bad, when they weren't.
But if there are any that I may not have researched yet, I'd like to know them...So I can dig in to the details.
The Trump team of lawyers have act u ally not brought any actual fraud cases to court. All those cases that dems remind trumpets they lost in court were not fraud cases, but election law procedural issues... and they brought the same procedural issues to as many as ten states, losing in all of them, because the relief they were asking in every one of those cases, was to invalidate ALL absentee ballots in a county with a big city, and mostly minority voters, legally and constitutionally granted the rig h t to vote...because a handful of absentee ballot envelopes May have had a signature not checked, and things like that...and the case Judges basically said, ARE YOU CRAZY? to the Trump lawyers.
No cases of vote switching, or Dominion voting machine irregularities, or milktary swat teams capturing voter servers in Germany, or ballot stuffing, or any of the accusations made by Giuliani and team, in your right wing media was brought to court, by Giuliani and team....not one....ask yourself why not even one?
My bet is the law teams know if they presented a known bogus claim to the court, they could lose their law licences or censured in the least.
---------
Trump has to overturn too many states, to even come close to winning enough electoral votes... It's an impossible task, imo.
The lunacy is accepting a senile career politician who is thoroughly corrupt defrauding his way into office.
What a crock of shit.
The Constitution clearly states the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court “SHALL” preside over impeachment trials of a President.
what about “SHALL” confuses you?
Fuckstick Leahy isn’t on the Supreme Court.
The chief justice shall preside over impeachment trials of a president.
Just FYI, Trump isn't president, that position is currently held by Joseph R. Biden.
You're half right. Impeachments are for President/Vice President, and officers of the US only.It is, Dummy.
Show me where impeachment is for former Presidents.
Impeachment trials are not for former Presidents either, Halfwit.
You lose again.
It ended when he left office, Stupid. Congress has no power to put a private citizen on trial.LOLIt is, Dummy.LOLThe Constitution says nothing about the Senate holding an impeachment trial for a private citizen Moron.Twice Impeached Trump's already been impeached while he was president, dumbfuck.According to the Constitution, it does. Impeachment is for a President, not a former President.What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.
He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.
Get stuffed.
As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.
The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional
There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.
I suggest you send your evidence of a crime to the FBI, Dummy.
Dumbfuck, your complaint was, "impeachment is for a President, not a former President."
Twice Impeached Trump was impeached while he was president.
Show me where impeachment is for former Presidents.
Impeachment trials are not for former Presidents either, Halfwit.
You lose again.
He was impeached while he was president, dumbfuck. A pity you still don't know that.
Not according to the Constitution. Try reading it.You're half right. Impeachments are for President/Vice President, and officers of the US only.It is, Dummy.
Show me where impeachment is for former Presidents.
Impeachment trials are not for former Presidents either, Halfwit.
You lose again.
Impeachment trials are for anybody who was impeached.
