Senate cannot try a private citizen !!!

[Nostra]

The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.

He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.

Get stuffed.

Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.

As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.

The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.



The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.

They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.

Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional

What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?

There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.

I never said it did...But, EVERY American is afforded due process....where was that?

And, now even though it is expressed that the Chief Justice “SHALL” preside. Roberts wants nothing to do with this Kangaroo lynch mob of yours, so, they are installing Patrick Lehey....Are you freakin serious?

Pelosi, and Democrats, as well as anyone supporting this crap are anti American assholes.

So sue Justice Roberts. Take it to the Supreme Court. I'm sure they'll take the case. LOL

Elections have consequences, right?

Of coirse you miss the point. The Chief Justice of SCOTUS SHALL preside. Not may, or “we can put the slobbering Leahy in there”. SHALL. Roberts has already shot down your bullshit and said it isn’t legal. Go ahead and embarrass yourselves more. See moron, they would take the case. And you would lose.

Roberts is no fan of Trump, but he knows this Shampeachment is a farce, and a trial would be unconstitutional.

Why do you keep repeating the same BS about Roberts?

Because facts don’t change.

 

[Nostra]

They went from the trump rally to the Capitol, darling. Stop deflecting.

So what, 'darling'? In the transcripts of President Trump's speech you can read (or can you?) where the President Trump talks about marching PEACEFULLY down to the Capitol and CHEERING ON GOP politicians?

I am guessing you can NOT read worth a damn or that your reading comprehension skills are literally non-existent, as I have pointed this out numerous times to you and you still don't seem to get it AND how the transcripts of his speech are readily available for anyone to read. Either you have reading them and can't comprehend what the words mean, or you choose to make up your own false narrative.

Your president incited the riot with his rhetoric. He is a pugnacious mother fucker
and wanted the coup attempt to succeed, just like you did. He called Marc Levin
one week before the insurrection and asked Levin to be at photo op rally and lead mob to Capitol, where Trump would meet him on the steps(according to Levin).

Link to this rhetoric that incited a riot?

 

[Nostra]

Roberts is no fan of Trump, but he knows this Shampeachment is a farce, and a trial would be unconstitutional.

Why do you keep repeating the same BS about Roberts?

He keeps spewing bull, because that's all he knows.
Roberts knows he doesn't have to be there because that's only for Presidents, where the vice president would be holding the trial. And it would be a conflict for the vice president to decide matters about the president, as he would inherit the office if the president is convicted.

Since the vice president Harris has no skin in the game, they don't need to bring in the Chief Justice.

What a crock of shit.

The Constitution clearly states the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court “SHALL” preside over impeachment trials of a President.

what about “SHALL” confuses you?

Fuckstick Leahy isn’t on the Supreme Court.

 

[Nostra]

The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.

He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.

Get stuffed.

Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.

As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.

The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.



The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.

They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.

Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional

What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?

There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.

According to the Constitution, it does. Impeachment is for a President, not a former President.

I suggest you send your evidence of a crime to the FBI, Dummy.

Twice Impeached Trump's already been impeached while he was president, dumbfuck.

The Constitution says nothing about the Senate holding an impeachment trial for a private citizen Moron.

 

[Faun]

The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.

He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.

Get stuffed.

Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.

As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.

The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.



The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.

They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.

Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional

What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?

There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.

According to the Constitution, it does. Impeachment is for a President, not a former President.

I suggest you send your evidence of a crime to the FBI, Dummy.

Twice Impeached Trump's already been impeached while he was president, dumbfuck.

The Constitution says nothing about the Senate holding an impeachment trial for a private citizen Moron.

LOL

Dumbfuck, your complaint was, "impeachment is for a President, not a former President."

Twice Impeached Trump was impeached while he was president.

 

[Faun]

Roberts is no fan of Trump, but he knows this Shampeachment is a farce, and a trial would be unconstitutional.

Why do you keep repeating the same BS about Roberts?

He keeps spewing bull, because that's all he knows.
Roberts knows he doesn't have to be there because that's only for Presidents, where the vice president would be holding the trial. And it would be a conflict for the vice president to decide matters about the president, as he would inherit the office if the president is convicted.

Since the vice president Harris has no skin in the game, they don't need to bring in the Chief Justice.

What a crock of shit.

The Constitution clearly states the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court “SHALL” preside over impeachment trials of a President.

what about “SHALL” confuses you?

Fuckstick Leahy isn’t on the Supreme Court.

Dumbfuck, so either the Chief Justice will preside over the trial since Twice Impeached Trump was president when he was impeached ... or ... the Chief Justice won't preside over the trial because he's no longer president. The Senate will sort that out -- but there will still be a trial.

 

[Nostra]

The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.

He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.

Get stuffed.

Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.

As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.

The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.



The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.

They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.

Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional

What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?

There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.

According to the Constitution, it does. Impeachment is for a President, not a former President.

I suggest you send your evidence of a crime to the FBI, Dummy.

Twice Impeached Trump's already been impeached while he was president, dumbfuck.

The Constitution says nothing about the Senate holding an impeachment trial for a private citizen Moron.

LOL

Dumbfuck, your complaint was, "impeachment is for a President, not a former President."

Twice Impeached Trump was impeached while he was president.

It is, Dummy.

Show me where impeachment is for former Presidents.

Impeachment trials are not for former Presidents either, Halfwit.

You lose again.

 

[Nostra]

Roberts is no fan of Trump, but he knows this Shampeachment is a farce, and a trial would be unconstitutional.

Why do you keep repeating the same BS about Roberts?

He keeps spewing bull, because that's all he knows.
Roberts knows he doesn't have to be there because that's only for Presidents, where the vice president would be holding the trial. And it would be a conflict for the vice president to decide matters about the president, as he would inherit the office if the president is convicted.

Since the vice president Harris has no skin in the game, they don't need to bring in the Chief Justice.

What a crock of shit.

The Constitution clearly states the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court “SHALL” preside over impeachment trials of a President.

what about “SHALL” confuses you?

Fuckstick Leahy isn’t on the Supreme Court.

Dumbfuck, so either the Chief Justice will preside over the trial since Twice Impeached Trump was president when he was impeached ... or ... the Chief Justice won't preside over the trial because he's no longer president. The Senate will sort that out -- but there will still be a trial.

It will be unconstitutional, but then Dimwingers are never concerned with that.

 

[toobfreak]

The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.

He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.

Get stuffed.

Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.

As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.

The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.



The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.

They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.

Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional

What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?

There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.

According to the Constitution, it does. Impeachment is for a President, not a former President.

I suggest you send your evidence of a crime to the FBI, Dummy.

Twice Impeached Trump's already been impeached while he was president, dumbfuck.

The Constitution says nothing about the Senate holding an impeachment trial for a private citizen Moron.

It EXPRESSLY STATES officers of the government.

If they go forward and convict Trump, it will just go farther to prove to me laws in this country mean NOTHING except when they WANT them to. They screwed the Indian out of his land left and right, and they let huge crimes go unpunished by powerful people while locking poor people up for years on petty crimes.

 

[Lastamender]

The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.

He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.

Get stuffed.

Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.

As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.

The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.



The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.

They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.

Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional

What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?

There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.

You cannot remove what is not there. Democrats have conducted a four year sideshow. If anybody embarrasses this country it is those assholes.

There are two separate votes required to complete a Senate impeachment trial.

One VOTE to convict and remove from office or not. Takes 2/3s voting to convict.

And the second, separate vote required, which only requires a majority vote, not the 2/3s vote, is whether or not to strip those impeached, from ever holding office again.

You can't vote to strip him from holding office again, without the impeachment trial, and that vote cast...

Thus, his holding office or not, matters naught....

Why are they so scared of one man? This much fuss you can bet he was working for the people. That is not done in DC. He had to be doing something right and that is not done in DC either.

You have admitted fraud by hiding evidence and censorship of the topic. You know you cannot beat him in a fair election. That is what you are admitting now. How is that serving the people like the government should?

We did beat him, by a landslide...7 million plus votes and 306 to 232 electoral votes.

Trump concocted the Big Lie, that the election was stolen from him months before the election was held, when his internal polling told him he was going to lose big-time to Biden.

You defrauded Trump. There was massive fraud and now a massive cover up that has failed.

There truly and honestly was no massive voter fraud. You've been convinced there was... I can see that...but you've been conned, by a bunch of con artists...God as my witness!

There truly and honestly was no massive voter fraud.

No. There was truly and honestly massive fraud. Biden is a BOGUS POTUS.

Then tell me exactly what massive voter fraud took place, in at least 3 to 4 of these contentious battle ground, that would have been enough, to over turn that state's election.

There have been so many bogus claims that truly have been debunked, many because procedures were just misunderstood and even twisted to appear bad, when they weren't.

But if there are any that I may not have researched yet, I'd like to know them...So I can dig in to the details.

The Trump team of lawyers have act u ally not brought any actual fraud cases to court. All those cases that dems remind trumpets they lost in court were not fraud cases, but election law procedural issues... and they brought the same procedural issues to as many as ten states, losing in all of them, because the relief they were asking in every one of those cases, was to invalidate ALL absentee ballots in a county with a big city, and mostly minority voters, legally and constitutionally granted the rig h t to vote...because a handful of absentee ballot envelopes May have had a signature not checked, and things like that...and the case Judges basically said, ARE YOU CRAZY? to the Trump lawyers.

No cases of vote switching, or Dominion voting machine irregularities, or milktary swat teams capturing voter servers in Germany, or ballot stuffing, or any of the accusations made by Giuliani and team, in your right wing media was brought to court, by Giuliani and team....not one....ask yourself why not even one?

My bet is the law teams know if they presented a known bogus claim to the court, they could lose their law licences or censured in the least.

---------

Trump has to overturn too many states, to even come close to winning enough electoral votes... It's an impossible task, imo.

The voter fraud took place in six swing states. Witnesses and data prove the fraud. You are lying, I am not.

 

[Faun]

The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.

He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.

Get stuffed.

Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.

As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.

The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.



The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.

They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.

Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional

What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?

There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.

According to the Constitution, it does. Impeachment is for a President, not a former President.

I suggest you send your evidence of a crime to the FBI, Dummy.

Twice Impeached Trump's already been impeached while he was president, dumbfuck.

The Constitution says nothing about the Senate holding an impeachment trial for a private citizen Moron.

LOL

Dumbfuck, your complaint was, "impeachment is for a President, not a former President."

Twice Impeached Trump was impeached while he was president.

It is, Dummy.

Show me where impeachment is for former Presidents.

Impeachment trials are not for former Presidents either, Halfwit.

You lose again.

LOL

He was impeached while he was president, dumbfuck. A pity you still don't know that.

 

[Circe]

They have zero constitutional power or right to do so
Trying T on fake charges is only a “ Soviet show trial “

Huh. I think you are making quite a good point!

I'd like to see that one be explored in the op-eds soon.

Congrats.

 

[Faun]

Roberts is no fan of Trump, but he knows this Shampeachment is a farce, and a trial would be unconstitutional.

Why do you keep repeating the same BS about Roberts?

He keeps spewing bull, because that's all he knows.
Roberts knows he doesn't have to be there because that's only for Presidents, where the vice president would be holding the trial. And it would be a conflict for the vice president to decide matters about the president, as he would inherit the office if the president is convicted.

Since the vice president Harris has no skin in the game, they don't need to bring in the Chief Justice.

What a crock of shit.

The Constitution clearly states the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court “SHALL” preside over impeachment trials of a President.

what about “SHALL” confuses you?

Fuckstick Leahy isn’t on the Supreme Court.

Dumbfuck, so either the Chief Justice will preside over the trial since Twice Impeached Trump was president when he was impeached ... or ... the Chief Justice won't preside over the trial because he's no longer president. The Senate will sort that out -- but there will still be a trial.

It will be unconstitutional, but then Dimwingers are never concerned with that.

Nope, it will not as the Constitution says the Senate will try impeachment and Twice Impeached Trump was Constitutionally impeached while he was president.

 

[Circe]

There are a lot of things Socialists aren't SUPPOSED to be able to do, based on our Constitution and our laws. If you haven't noticed, however, our Constitution and our laws are not even a 'speed bump' for preventing these criminals from doing anything they want to do.

Sure, the Constitution has been completely ignored starting March 2020, and was a lot ignored earlier than that. I'm glad I'm not the only one who has noticed this.

 

[Circe]

You want him egging on his followers with the hope that he might come back?

That's an interesting point. That's the one on which the Dems are hanging hopes they can get Republicans to vote with them for impeachment ---- that Trump in exile but electable could prevent younger men/women from a candidacy.

I don't think the GOP will follow them into impeachment. I could be wrong, but I don't think so.

 

[Faun]

The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.

He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.

Get stuffed.

Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.

As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.

The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.



The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.

They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.

Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional

What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?

There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.

According to the Constitution, it does. Impeachment is for a President, not a former President.

I suggest you send your evidence of a crime to the FBI, Dummy.

Twice Impeached Trump's already been impeached while he was president, dumbfuck.

The Constitution says nothing about the Senate holding an impeachment trial for a private citizen Moron.

It EXPRESSLY STATES officers of the government.

If they go forward and convict Trump, it will just go farther to prove to me laws in this country mean NOTHING except when they WANT them to. They screwed the Indian out of his land left and right, and they let huge crimes go unpunished by powerful people while locking poor people up for years on petty crimes.

Wrong, moron. It states a president, VP, and civil officers "shall be removed from office" on impeachment conviction. That only means if Twice Impeached Trump is convicted, he can't be thrown out of office.

 

[easyt65]

Actually it turned violent because it was "their only hope"

Thank you for your own PERSONAL OPINION, which - once again, is all Democrats have to attempt Impeachment again.

 

[9thIDdoc]

The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.

He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.

Get stuffed.

Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.

As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.

The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.



The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.

They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.

Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional

What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?

There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.

According to the Constitution, it does. Impeachment is for a President, not a former President.

I suggest you send your evidence of a crime to the FBI, Dummy.

Twice Impeached Trump's already been impeached while he was president, dumbfuck.

And it went nowhere. Twice. Deal with it.

 

[Faun]

The Senate has already impeached and tried an office holder, the secretary of war, after he no longer held the seat.

He was not the president, the constitution specifically enumerates the president and assigns him special powers and privileges and this conviction will be fought fiercely, especially when the charge is specious and gratuitous. There was no insurrection, not even the people actually ARRESTED there are being charged as such and Trump had no hand, conscious or otherwise in directing them.

Get stuffed.

Trump had everything to do with it.... He seeded the big lie, and egged it on.

As far as your c l aim the President is different than the vp and office holders......your claim, has no legs.

The constitution's impeachment clause is written with all three positions are held equally, in the same sentence regarding impeachment.



The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Very nice. Trump is no longer in office. They are scared he will run again and it will be much harder to defraud him a second time. That is the truth, try admitting it.

They are most certainly trying to strip him from being able to run for any office, ever again. It's the sole purpose for the impeachment, even after he no longer held the office. No one is hiding that purpose.

Then that would fail since this process is unconstitutional

What process is unconstitutional? Impeachment?

There is no Mulligan for a President or any office holder, committing an abusive or criminal act, 2 weeks from leaving office.... impeachment does not just disappear because the abuse took place two weeks from leaving.

You cannot remove what is not there. Democrats have conducted a four year sideshow. If anybody embarrasses this country it is those assholes.

There are two separate votes required to complete a Senate impeachment trial.

One VOTE to convict and remove from office or not. Takes 2/3s voting to convict.

And the second, separate vote required, which only requires a majority vote, not the 2/3s vote, is whether or not to strip those impeached, from ever holding office again.

You can't vote to strip him from holding office again, without the impeachment trial, and that vote cast...

Thus, his holding office or not, matters naught....

Why are they so scared of one man? This much fuss you can bet he was working for the people. That is not done in DC. He had to be doing something right and that is not done in DC either.

You have admitted fraud by hiding evidence and censorship of the topic. You know you cannot beat him in a fair election. That is what you are admitting now. How is that serving the people like the government should?

We did beat him, by a landslide...7 million plus votes and 306 to 232 electoral votes.

Trump concocted the Big Lie, that the election was stolen from him months before the election was held, when his internal polling told him he was going to lose big-time to Biden.

You defrauded Trump. There was massive fraud and now a massive cover up that has failed.

There truly and honestly was no massive voter fraud. You've been convinced there was... I can see that...but you've been conned, by a bunch of con artists...God as my witness!

There truly and honestly was no massive voter fraud.

No. There was truly and honestly massive fraud. Biden is a BOGUS POTUS.

Then tell me exactly what massive voter fraud took place, in at least 3 to 4 of these contentious battle ground, that would have been enough, to over turn that state's election.

There have been so many bogus claims that truly have been debunked, many because procedures were just misunderstood and even twisted to appear bad, when they weren't.

But if there are any that I may not have researched yet, I'd like to know them...So I can dig in to the details.

The Trump team of lawyers have act u ally not brought any actual fraud cases to court. All those cases that dems remind trumpets they lost in court were not fraud cases, but election law procedural issues... and they brought the same procedural issues to as many as ten states, losing in all of them, because the relief they were asking in every one of those cases, was to invalidate ALL absentee ballots in a county with a big city, and mostly minority voters, legally and constitutionally granted the rig h t to vote...because a handful of absentee ballot envelopes May have had a signature not checked, and things like that...and the case Judges basically said, ARE YOU CRAZY? to the Trump lawyers.

No cases of vote switching, or Dominion voting machine irregularities, or milktary swat teams capturing voter servers in Germany, or ballot stuffing, or any of the accusations made by Giuliani and team, in your right wing media was brought to court, by Giuliani and team....not one....ask yourself why not even one?

My bet is the law teams know if they presented a known bogus claim to the court, they could lose their law licences or censured in the least.

---------

Trump has to overturn too many states, to even come close to winning enough electoral votes... It's an impossible task, imo.

The voter fraud took place in six swing states. Witnesses and data prove the fraud. You are lying, I am not.

 

[Desperado]

This is not a criminal trial.

It is an impeachment trial, which is political.

If convicted it only means he cannot hold public office so the Dems eliminate any future Trump Threat to make America free again