Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How are you defining (58 million) little people?Funny, I would have titled this thread something like "Asshole politician attempts to infringe on rights of little people." I guess that is an indication of the difference between a liberal and a progressive, one sides with individuals, the other sides with the asshole politicians.
From February 2012don't attack the source (deflect from the OP) Toro, only the argument
You praised him for being outside "the left/right paradigm."
An anti-Semite twoofer usually is.
"Warrens statement on Israel consumes far more space than any other foreign policy issue on the page (she makes no mention of China, Latin America, or Africa).
"To justify what she calls the 'unbreakable bond' between the US and Israel, Warren repeats the thoughtless cant about 'a natural partnership resting on our mutual commitment to democracy and freedom and on our shared values.'
"She then declares that the United States must reject any Palestinian plans to pursue statehood outside of negotiations with Israel. While the US can preach to the Palestinians about how and when to demand the end of their 45-year-long military occupation, Warren says the US 'cannot dictate the terms' to Israel.
"Warren goes on to describe Iran as a significant threat to the United States, echoing a key talking point of fear-mongering pro-war forces.
"She calls for 'strong sanctions' and declares that the United States must take the necessary steps to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon a veiled endorsement of a military strike if Iran crosses the constantly shifting American 'red lines.'
"Perhaps the only option Warren does not endorse or implicitly support is diplomacy. Her foreign policy views are hardly distinguishable from those of her Republican rival, who also marches in lockstep with AIPAC."
Surprise-- courageous Elizabeth Warren is craven on Israel lobby
Possibly Elizabeth's thoughts on Iran have changed in the last six months.
Israel is an authentic "third rail" for almost all elected Republicans AND Democrats.
We can only hope she runs and gets the Dem nomination!Liz who lied about her heritage to get ahead is railing against people who have succeeded legitimately
She should run for the Dem Nomination in 2016
She's PERFECT
"Yes, now tell me what this is about?From February 2012You praised him for being outside "the left/right paradigm."
An anti-Semite twoofer usually is.
"Warrens statement on Israel consumes far more space than any other foreign policy issue on the page (she makes no mention of China, Latin America, or Africa).
"To justify what she calls the 'unbreakable bond' between the US and Israel, Warren repeats the thoughtless cant about 'a natural partnership resting on our mutual commitment to democracy and freedom and on our shared values.'
"She then declares that the United States must reject any Palestinian plans to pursue statehood outside of negotiations with Israel. While the US can preach to the Palestinians about how and when to demand the end of their 45-year-long military occupation, Warren says the US 'cannot dictate the terms' to Israel.
"Warren goes on to describe Iran as a significant threat to the United States, echoing a key talking point of fear-mongering pro-war forces.
"She calls for 'strong sanctions' and declares that the United States must take the necessary steps to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon a veiled endorsement of a military strike if Iran crosses the constantly shifting American 'red lines.'
"Perhaps the only option Warren does not endorse or implicitly support is diplomacy. Her foreign policy views are hardly distinguishable from those of her Republican rival, who also marches in lockstep with AIPAC."
Surprise-- courageous Elizabeth Warren is craven on Israel lobby
Possibly Elizabeth's thoughts on Iran have changed in the last six months.
Israel is an authentic "third rail" for almost all elected Republicans AND Democrats.
Leave it up to George. The subject could be why is the sky blue and George will find a way to bring the Jews into it.
"Yes, now tell me what this is about?From February 2012
"Warrens statement on Israel consumes far more space than any other foreign policy issue on the page (she makes no mention of China, Latin America, or Africa).
"To justify what she calls the 'unbreakable bond' between the US and Israel, Warren repeats the thoughtless cant about 'a natural partnership resting on our mutual commitment to democracy and freedom and on our shared values.'
"She then declares that the United States must reject any Palestinian plans to pursue statehood outside of negotiations with Israel. While the US can preach to the Palestinians about how and when to demand the end of their 45-year-long military occupation, Warren says the US 'cannot dictate the terms' to Israel.
"Warren goes on to describe Iran as a significant threat to the United States, echoing a key talking point of fear-mongering pro-war forces.
"She calls for 'strong sanctions' and declares that the United States must take the necessary steps to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon a veiled endorsement of a military strike if Iran crosses the constantly shifting American 'red lines.'
"Perhaps the only option Warren does not endorse or implicitly support is diplomacy. Her foreign policy views are hardly distinguishable from those of her Republican rival, who also marches in lockstep with AIPAC."
Surprise-- courageous Elizabeth Warren is craven on Israel lobby
Possibly Elizabeth's thoughts on Iran have changed in the last six months.
Israel is an authentic "third rail" for almost all elected Republicans AND Democrats.
Leave it up to George. The subject could be why is the sky blue and George will find a way to bring the Jews into it.
Surprise-- courageous Elizabeth Warren is craven on Israel lobby
How are you defining (58 million) little people?Funny, I would have titled this thread something like "Asshole politician attempts to infringe on rights of little people." I guess that is an indication of the difference between a liberal and a progressive, one sides with individuals, the other sides with the asshole politicians.
"'If we made no changes at all to Social Security,' Warren said, 'it would continue to make payments at the current level for about 20 years,' meaning there is no immediate crisis facing the program, which assists some 58 million Americans. 'Modest adjustments," she added, "will make certain we could increase benefits for those who need it most.' [...]
"In the interview, Warren emphasized that Third Way, as well as many in Congress and the media, are framing the debate over Social Security in the wrong way. 'We should stop having a conversation about cutting Social Security a little bit or a lot,' she said."
Do you think Elizabeth's view on Social Security represent an infringement of (58,000,000) individual or (Wall Street) corporate rights?
Daily Kos: Elizabeth Warren still firing back against Wall Street*Democrats
What are you full of, "Toro?""DINOs," eh?
There are a whole bunch of nutty right wingers here. There are few nutty left wingers. George is one.
What were the Jews role in 9/11?
good pointHow are you defining (58 million) little people?Funny, I would have titled this thread something like "Asshole politician attempts to infringe on rights of little people." I guess that is an indication of the difference between a liberal and a progressive, one sides with individuals, the other sides with the asshole politicians.
"'If we made no changes at all to Social Security,' Warren said, 'it would continue to make payments at the current level for about 20 years,' meaning there is no immediate crisis facing the program, which assists some 58 million Americans. 'Modest adjustments," she added, "will make certain… we could increase benefits for those who need it most.' [...]
"In the interview, Warren emphasized that Third Way, as well as many in Congress and the media, are framing the debate over Social Security in the wrong way. 'We should stop having a conversation about cutting Social Security a little bit or a lot,' she said."
Do you think Elizabeth's view on Social Security represent an infringement of (58,000,000) individual or (Wall Street) corporate rights?
Daily Kos: Elizabeth Warren still firing back against Wall Street*Democrats
Tell me about your obsession with Jews. Were you bitch slapped by a Jewish girl in 6th grade?
USMB cons are always a little nervous about 6th grade Jewish girls and their delusions of manhood. I suspect a woman of Elizabeth Warren's character who stands up to Wall Street's Masters of Mankind poses a sort of primal threat to their "Heroes."good pointHow are you defining (58 million) little people?Funny, I would have titled this thread something like "Asshole politician attempts to infringe on rights of little people." I guess that is an indication of the difference between a liberal and a progressive, one sides with individuals, the other sides with the asshole politicians.
"'If we made no changes at all to Social Security,' Warren said, 'it would continue to make payments at the current level for about 20 years,' meaning there is no immediate crisis facing the program, which assists some 58 million Americans. 'Modest adjustments," she added, "will make certain we could increase benefits for those who need it most.' [...]
"In the interview, Warren emphasized that Third Way, as well as many in Congress and the media, are framing the debate over Social Security in the wrong way. 'We should stop having a conversation about cutting Social Security a little bit or a lot,' she said."
Do you think Elizabeth's view on Social Security represent an infringement of (58,000,000) individual or (Wall Street) corporate rights?
Daily Kos: Elizabeth Warren still firing back against Wall Street*Democrats
Tell me about your obsession with Jews. Were you bitch slapped by a Jewish girl in 6th grade?
Heres a better idea: Why don't you stick to the OP or find another thread to hurl ad hominems in deflection boi
Well, if there were a civil war in the dem party, it would take years to match the one now going on between the tea party repubs and the mainstream repubs. I think you are just exhibiting wishful thinking.I'm getting the popcorn, there is a civil war a brewing in the Democrat party
should start getting good the closer to elections...way to go Dear Leader and OfailScam
Well, if there were a civil war in the dem party, it would take years to match the one now going on between the tea party repubs and the mainstream repubs. I think you are just exhibiting wishful thinking.I'm getting the popcorn, there is a civil war a brewing in the Democrat party
should start getting good the closer to elections...way to go Dear Leader and OfailScam
Maybe you're not in the loop?What are you full of, "Toro?"
What were the Jews role in 9/11?
I also didn't get the memo.
From February 2012don't attack the source (deflect from the OP) Toro, only the argument
You praised him for being outside "the left/right paradigm."
An anti-Semite twoofer usually is.
"Warrens statement on Israel consumes far more space than any other foreign policy issue on the page (she makes no mention of China, Latin America, or Africa).
"To justify what she calls the 'unbreakable bond' between the US and Israel, Warren repeats the thoughtless cant about 'a natural partnership resting on our mutual commitment to democracy and freedom and on our shared values.'
"She then declares that the United States must reject any Palestinian plans to pursue statehood outside of negotiations with Israel. While the US can preach to the Palestinians about how and when to demand the end of their 45-year-long military occupation, Warren says the US 'cannot dictate the terms' to Israel.
"Warren goes on to describe Iran as a significant threat to the United States, echoing a key talking point of fear-mongering pro-war forces.
"She calls for 'strong sanctions' and declares that the United States must take the necessary steps to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon a veiled endorsement of a military strike if Iran crosses the constantly shifting American 'red lines.'
"Perhaps the only option Warren does not endorse or implicitly support is diplomacy. Her foreign policy views are hardly distinguishable from those of her Republican rival, who also marches in lockstep with AIPAC."
Surprise-- courageous Elizabeth Warren is craven on Israel lobby
Possibly Elizabeth's thoughts on Iran have changed in the last six months.
Israel is an authentic "third rail" for almost all elected Republicans AND Democrats.
What did you know, and when did you know it?From February 2012You praised him for being outside "the left/right paradigm."
An anti-Semite twoofer usually is.
"Warrens statement on Israel consumes far more space than any other foreign policy issue on the page (she makes no mention of China, Latin America, or Africa).
"To justify what she calls the 'unbreakable bond' between the US and Israel, Warren repeats the thoughtless cant about 'a natural partnership resting on our mutual commitment to democracy and freedom and on our shared values.'
"She then declares that the United States must reject any Palestinian plans to pursue statehood outside of negotiations with Israel. While the US can preach to the Palestinians about how and when to demand the end of their 45-year-long military occupation, Warren says the US 'cannot dictate the terms' to Israel.
"Warren goes on to describe Iran as a significant threat to the United States, echoing a key talking point of fear-mongering pro-war forces.
"She calls for 'strong sanctions' and declares that the United States must take the necessary steps to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon a veiled endorsement of a military strike if Iran crosses the constantly shifting American 'red lines.'
"Perhaps the only option Warren does not endorse or implicitly support is diplomacy. Her foreign policy views are hardly distinguishable from those of her Republican rival, who also marches in lockstep with AIPAC."
Surprise-- courageous Elizabeth Warren is craven on Israel lobby
Possibly Elizabeth's thoughts on Iran have changed in the last six months.
Israel is an authentic "third rail" for almost all elected Republicans AND Democrats.
She, like the Jews, probably knew of 9/11 in advance.
IF she stays free of corporate ownership, she might make a good candidate in '16
