Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Very TrueWhat did Trump do? McConnell blocked Obama from filling seats and then packed the courts with young Conservatives
Republicans won and there was nothing Democrat’s could do. Mitch McConnell trampled on years of Senate protocol and precedence to pack his court.
Stepped on a lot of toes and burnt all bridges of cooperation.
Democrats are in a mood to retaliate.
Packing the court and ending filibuster are likely retaliations
all you scum of the demonrat party do is whine, whine, whine, when it dont go your way. thats real helpful. if that dont work, pig-lousy threatens, thats adult like. the biggest problem within your party is the douchebag pig-lousy. this twat thinks you owe it. as soon as this piece of garbage is disposed of, maybe the 2 could work together.After 8 years of Republican gridlock under Obama, a new form of politics was in play.Everything in life has Consequences
Those consequences could be adding judges to the court or ending the filibuster
Another consequence will be an end of cooperation with Republicans
When were Democrats “cooperating” with Republicans in the past 4 years?
Republicans had done nothing to earn cooperation, they didn’t get any
<crickets>Quote him...Republicans refused to cooperate with Obama and did not support a single piece of legislation
After he told them to sit in the back of the bus.
and you are a crazy demonrat who has no issues with extortion, pedophilia, crackheads, and lying ....Because it would be stupid and appear to the centrists to be a open move to grasp political power at any cost. That would cost the Democrats in the next election in 2022.Elections have consequences.
If Trump wins and Republicans retain control of the Senate we can pack the court and Dems won't oppose it?
They will need the House also
If Dems take all three, why should they not use their power?
You think appointing Barrett doesn't look like an open move to grasp political power?
It looks like another HUGE win for president Trump to me!
Sure, but you are a crazy Trump supporter, and not a centrist.
My gut feeling is that this court will not deliver the decisions expected by ConservativesI don’t think Biden supports packing the court and there are moderate Dem Senators who oppose it.
If the Conservative Court acts like a traditional court, I doubt Dems will try to add seats.
But if the Conservative Court becomes a rubber stamp for an extreme Conservative agenda, I think the Dems hand will be forced.
Let’s see how they rule on Obamacare and Roe
My take on the PRESENT supreme court is----they are not a bunch of reactionary NUTS. Obamacare
NEEDS modification and my impression is---beyond allowing organizations to OPT OUT of
financial support thereof for "religion" or
"spiritual" reasons-----nothing much is going to
happen to Roe v Wade. For the record----doctors should NOT be forced to do non medically indicated abortions and bakers should not be
FORCED to top wedding cakes with two gentleman. A professional has rights too.
Your side already ended the fillbusters moron..........Your side started this.........And had you been in with these appointments you would have done it again.Democrats are in a mood to retaliate.
Packing the court and ending filibuster are likely retaliations
Pardon me when we say up yours......NOT.
My gut feeling is that this court will not deliver the decisions expected by ConservativesI don’t think Biden supports packing the court and there are moderate Dem Senators who oppose it.
If the Conservative Court acts like a traditional court, I doubt Dems will try to add seats.
But if the Conservative Court becomes a rubber stamp for an extreme Conservative agenda, I think the Dems hand will be forced.
Let’s see how they rule on Obamacare and Roe
My take on the PRESENT supreme court is----they are not a bunch of reactionary NUTS. Obamacare
NEEDS modification and my impression is---beyond allowing organizations to OPT OUT of
financial support thereof for "religion" or
"spiritual" reasons-----nothing much is going to
happen to Roe v Wade. For the record----doctors should NOT be forced to do non medically indicated abortions and bakers should not be
FORCED to top wedding cakes with two gentleman. A professional has rights too.
They may nibble at the edges and allow more restrictions on Roe while they rule on funding the mandate not Obamacare as a whole.
Their leaning will be obvious in the first few decisions
^^^ another idiot.Democrats have always cooperated with Republicans, at least in their own view. Unfortunately, their view of cooperation is that Republicans give fifty percent while Democrats take fifty percent.Everything in life has Consequences
Those consequences could be adding judges to the court or ending the filibuster
Another consequence will be an end of cooperation with Republicans
What cooperation commie? It has to start before it can end.
.
Democrats cooperated with George Bush
Republicans refused to cooperate with Obama and did not support a single piece of legislation
You dumbasses had a super majority in the first two years, and you squandered it with a do nothing President that was happy to tell us to get in the back of the bus....now you don’t like it...tough shit.
DNC party of we hate the 2nd Amendment..........except those 2 dozen armed security guards we have protecting us...............tax the shit out of anything that moves.........Open borders for the votes because we have to import voters because most of America really hates us............and say we protect the environment as we EXPORT the enviro damage from Solar Power to Asia and Africa and say how great we are.....and ignore the strip mining and pollution there for so called clean energy.Only filibusters of presidential decisions
Ending the Senate filibuster entirely will allow Dems to put limits on guns, repeal tax cuts on the wealthy, pass immigration reform, protect the environment.
anyone want to know what a Biden win would mean------spend some time in New York City
Irony.They just don’t seem to get it.That is a horrible idea, no natter which side does it.Didn't block anything. Just didn't call a vote. His right.Because it would be stupid and appear to the centrists to be a open move to grasp political power at any cost. That would cost the Democrats in the next election in 2022.Elections have consequences.
If Trump wins and Republicans retain control of the Senate we can pack the court and Dems won't oppose it?
They will need the House also
If Dems take all three, why should they not use their power?
You think appointing Barrett doesn't look like an open move to grasp political power?
It looks like another HUGE win for president Trump to me!
What did Trump do?
McConnell blocked Obama from filling seats and then packed the courts with young Conservatives
And it will be the Democrat's right to add more members to the court.
I can’t stress that enough.
McConnell blocking all those Obama appointments and leaving them for Trump to fill was a horrible idea. Now that your party set the precedent, it's a little late for you to start whining about what your party set in motion.
McConnell blocking all those Obama appointments and leaving them for Trump to fill was a horrible idea.
How many did he block?
Now that your party set the precedent,
You think 2015-2016 was the first time a Senate controlled by an opposing party has left some
court seats open at the end of a President's term? LOL!
Then they take their perceived slight, and think “well then we will do this!” And plan to do something incredibly stupid (pack the court.
Despite me saying repeatedly that I would be opposed to anyone doing it, and telling them it’s an absolutely horrible road to go down, they keep responding like bitter little partisans.
Hey clowns, ITS A HORRIBLE IDEA NO MATTER WHO DOES IT!!!
You understand this is an anonymous chat board, and nobody gives a shit what you say, don't you?
They ended judicial filibusters because Republicans were blocking most of Obama's nominees. They were abusing filibusters...Your side already ended the fillbusters moron..........Your side started this.........And had you been in with these appointments you would have done it again.Democrats are in a mood to retaliate.
Packing the court and ending filibuster are likely retaliations
Pardon me when we say up yours......NOT.
Why support a Socialist, anti-America agenda?True. Kerry, Clinton, Edwards, Schumer and Biden all voted to go to war with Iraq.Democrats have always cooperated with Republicans, at least in their own view. Unfortunately, their view of cooperation is that Republicans give fifty percent while Democrats take fifty percent.Everything in life has Consequences
Those consequences could be adding judges to the court or ending the filibuster
Another consequence will be an end of cooperation with Republicans
What cooperation commie? It has to start before it can end.
.
Democrats cooperated with George Bush
Republicans refused to cooperate with Obama and did not support a single piece of legislation
They supported the President
Democrats also supported Bush on No Child left Behind, Medicare Part D, Afghanistan, Homeland Security, Patriot Act, TARP
Republicans refused to support Obama on anything
Very TrueWhat did Trump do? McConnell blocked Obama from filling seats and then packed the courts with young Conservatives
Republicans won and there was nothing Democrat’s could do. Mitch McConnell trampled on years of Senate protocol and precedence to pack his court.
Stepped on a lot of toes and burnt all bridges of cooperation.
Democrats are in a mood to retaliate.
Packing the court and ending filibuster are likely retaliations
dailycaller.com
Do you ever get tired of being proven wrong, idiot?Very TrueWhat did Trump do? McConnell blocked Obama from filling seats and then packed the courts with young Conservatives
Republicans won and there was nothing Democrat’s could do. Mitch McConnell trampled on years of Senate protocol and precedence to pack his court.
Stepped on a lot of toes and burnt all bridges of cooperation.
Democrats are in a mood to retaliate.
Packing the court and ending filibuster are likely retaliations
^^^ another idiot.Democrats have always cooperated with Republicans, at least in their own view. Unfortunately, their view of cooperation is that Republicans give fifty percent while Democrats take fifty percent.Everything in life has Consequences
Those consequences could be adding judges to the court or ending the filibuster
Another consequence will be an end of cooperation with Republicans
What cooperation commie? It has to start before it can end.
.
Democrats cooperated with George Bush
Republicans refused to cooperate with Obama and did not support a single piece of legislation
You dumbasses had a super majority in the first two years, and you squandered it with a do nothing President that was happy to tell us to get in the back of the bus....now you don’t like it...tough shit.
G'head, see if you could do what other rightards could not... quote Obama telling you to get in back of the bus...
www.c-span.org
My gut feeling is that this court will not deliver the decisions expected by ConservativesI don’t think Biden supports packing the court and there are moderate Dem Senators who oppose it.
If the Conservative Court acts like a traditional court, I doubt Dems will try to add seats.
But if the Conservative Court becomes a rubber stamp for an extreme Conservative agenda, I think the Dems hand will be forced.
Let’s see how they rule on Obamacare and Roe
My take on the PRESENT supreme court is----they are not a bunch of reactionary NUTS. Obamacare
NEEDS modification and my impression is---beyond allowing organizations to OPT OUT of
financial support thereof for "religion" or
"spiritual" reasons-----nothing much is going to
happen to Roe v Wade. For the record----doctors should NOT be forced to do non medically indicated abortions and bakers should not be
FORCED to top wedding cakes with two gentleman. A professional has rights too.
They may nibble at the edges and allow more restrictions on Roe while they rule on funding the mandate not Obamacare as a whole.
Their leaning will be obvious in the first few decisions
yes----something like that. SO?
My gut feeling is that this court will not deliver the decisions expected by ConservativesI don’t think Biden supports packing the court and there are moderate Dem Senators who oppose it.
If the Conservative Court acts like a traditional court, I doubt Dems will try to add seats.
But if the Conservative Court becomes a rubber stamp for an extreme Conservative agenda, I think the Dems hand will be forced.
Let’s see how they rule on Obamacare and Roe
My take on the PRESENT supreme court is----they are not a bunch of reactionary NUTS. Obamacare
NEEDS modification and my impression is---beyond allowing organizations to OPT OUT of
financial support thereof for "religion" or
"spiritual" reasons-----nothing much is going to
happen to Roe v Wade. For the record----doctors should NOT be forced to do non medically indicated abortions and bakers should not be
FORCED to top wedding cakes with two gentleman. A professional has rights too.
They may nibble at the edges and allow more restrictions on Roe while they rule on funding the mandate not Obamacare as a whole.
Their leaning will be obvious in the first few decisions
yes----something like that. SO?
Sooooooooo.......
If the Conservative Court does not become a rubber stamp for the Conservative agenda, I think Dems will refrain from packing the court.
