Seeing a pattern here?

[BackAgain]

Gym is not just a homophone you stupid fuck, it is done to mock his role in covering up abuse at OSU while he was there as a coach.

Are you really this fucking stupid?

Jim and gym are homophones, you dildo.

You will later deny that you misunderstood the difference between “homophone” and “homophobe.”

 

[kaz]

He is

You two are like watching Bevis and Butthead arguing about who's the most stupid

 

[kaz]

Jim and gym are homophones, you dildo.

You will later deny that you misunderstood the difference between “homophone” and “homophobe.”

It is incredible. Nicely put

 

[kaz]

He is

That's hilarious. You thought homophone meant homophobe and agreed that "he" is stupid. Nice job, that's some funny shit. At your own expense, still ...

 

[OKTexas]

Here's Gym Jordan admitting he will use his position in Congress to "frame up" the 2024 race.



And who can forget Kev McCarthy spilling the beans on the purpose of the Benghazi hearings?



As Michael Douglas, playing the prez, said in the "American President, "we have serious problems to solve and we need serious people to solve them."

House Repubs have no interest in solving problems, they ARE the problem.

Poor thing, stop crying about republicans using your tactics.

.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

That you see "no evidence" is proof of what you are

Yes, smart.

 

[kaz]

Yes, smart.

If smart means "mindless drone" that's true

 

[Hutch Starskey]

And this is different how than what Democrats have been doing for the last six years?

Umm…
The very things that the Dems investigated Trump for have become 4 criminal indictments with 92 separate felony counts.

IOW. What the Dems were investigating was real.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

If smart means "mindless drone" that's true

Smart enough to see that you’re being fooled once again.

Can’t wait for the melt down phase that always follows.

 

[Independent thinker]

Umm…
The very things that the Dems investigated Trump for have become 4 criminal indictments with 92 separate felony counts.

IOW. What the Dems were investigating was real.

Of course they have because Democrats have weaponized law enforcement, abusing their power for the political purpose of getting Trump. None of these people doing these things sit on the fence.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Of course they have because Democrats have weaponized law enforcement, abusing their power for the political purpose of getting Trump. None of these people doing these things sit on the fence.

Ah yes.
The feckless cry of the loserati.
“Fraud…Fraud”!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You two are like watching Bevis and Butthead arguing about who's the most stupid

You are, there is no argument at all.

 

[kaz]

Of course they have because Democrats have weaponized law enforcement, abusing their power for the political purpose of getting Trump. None of these people doing these things sit on the fence.

Yes, Democrats could come up with 30 or 40 fake indictments, but 92? That must be true.

It's the problem with democracy, stupid people voting. You can't stop them from voting or you aren't a democracy and you can't let them vote because they are too stupid to maintain it, like Hutch Starskey . He believes whatever Democrats tell him to believe. I mean literally anything. It doesn't work

 

[Independent thinker]

Ah yes.
The feckless cry of the loserati.
“Fraud…Fraud”!

Name one of these prosecutors who are not democrats and not biased.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yes, Democrats could come up with 30 or 40 fake indictments, but 92? That must be true.

It's the problem with democracy, stupid people voting. You can't stop them from voting or you aren't a democracy and you can't let them vote because they are too stupid to maintain it, like Hutch Starskey . He believes whatever Democrats tell him to believe. I mean literally anything. It doesn't work

I believe reality. Facts. Demonstrable evidence.
Those are required to find cause for indictment.

You have none of those. You have only deranged supposition driven by malignant feels.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Name one of these prosecutors who are not democrats and not biased.

There it is again.

 

[kaz]

I believe reality. Facts. Demonstrable evidence.
Those are required to find cause for indictment.

You have none of those. You have only deranged supposition driven by malignant feels.

Yes, Democrats are putting your political opposition in prison, you're fascists. Just the facts, Maam

 

[lantern2814]

I don't see evidence because there is none.

July 2023: Comer’s Supposed Star Witness Fails To Prove That President Biden Did Anything Wrong. In late July 2023, the day before Trump was indicted for a third time on charges related to the January 6th insurrection at the U.S. Capitol in 2021, a business associate of Hunter Biden appeared before the Oversight Committee to testify at the invitation of James Comer. For weeks in advance, Comer hyped the upcoming interview as bombshell testimony and declared the testimony evidence of a quid pro quo. But Archer’s testimony failed to produce a shred of evidence of a single conflict of interest of President Biden ever doing anything in connection or in relation to Hunter Biden’s business ventures. As ABC reported: “Archer testified that Joe Biden's interactions with Hunter Biden's associates were ‘not related to commercial business,’ that Joe Biden had no involvement with Burisma, the Ukrainian oil conglomerate on whose board both Archer and Hunter Biden served; that the elder Biden never took any actions to benefit Burisma or Hunter Biden; and that Hunter Biden never asked his father to take any actions that would help his clients, according to the fully transcribed interview with the committee.” Comer also hyped a portion of testimony by Hunter Biden’s business associate Devon Archer suggesting that Joe Biden supposedly joined Hunter on speakerphone while speaking with business associates up to 20 times. The reality, however, was that Archer’s testimony referred to approximately 20 instances over the span of a decade in which Hunter indicated Joe Biden was merely present; Archer did not testify that President Biden was directly involved in business discussions beyond “the brand” – only that he held casual conversations about “the weather”and “fishing.”

No, you see no evidence because you and the morons who agree with you simply refuse to even look at it. Bank records, over 100 transactions flagged as suspiciously like money laundering, wire transfers, emails, phone records, whistleblower testimony, the list goes on. But keep your eyes closed and scream “nuh-uh!” like a good little sheep.

 

[Lesh]

Yes, Democrats are putting your political opposition in prison, you're fascists. Just the facts, Maam

You mean prosecuting criminals?

Yeah that

 

[22lcidw]

I believe reality. Facts. Demonstrable evidence.
Those are required to find cause for indictment.

You have none of those. You have only deranged supposition driven by malignant feels.

Freedom is correct. Freedom based on massive taxes is not correct. It leads to Democracy. After the election the ruling party runs roughshod on the constitution and is appalled if anyone complains. Progs are near totally controlled, and Republicans are controlled by a good percentage. People are economic slaves. At least those not privileged.