As far as the Israelis not wanting peace with the Palestinians, a canard that has been around for decades, that is belied by the fact that Israel offered to make concessions to the Palestinians for decades, gave back the Sinai for peace with Egypt, and exited Gaza in the hope that the Palestinians would make peace.
In February 2017, Michael Herzog, a member of various Israeli negotiating teams since 1993, pointed out that talks between the Israelis and Palestinians broke down in 2013-14 because of Kerry and the intransigence of the Palestinians.
(full article online)
John Kerry Issues Another Huge Lie: Israel Doesn't Want Peace
As far as the Israelis not wanting peace with the Palestinians, a canard that has been around for decades, that is belied by the fact that Israel offered to make concessions to the Palestinians for decades, gave back the Sinai for peace with Egypt, and exited Gaza in the hope that the Palestinians would make peace.
In February 2017, Michael Herzog, a member of various Israeli negotiating teams since 1993, pointed out that talks between the Israelis and Palestinians broke down in 2013-14 because of Kerry and the intransigence of the Palestinians.
(full article online)
John Kerry Issues Another Huge Lie: Israel Doesn't Want Peace
Once yet again I regret to inform you that your argument is with the principal architects of Zionism...review the contents of Plan-D and explain how a value like 'peace' plays any minor role...read the public statements of 20th century Zionists or the conspiratorial aims of Jabotinsky...the last thing that Israelis want is peace...they want land and money!!!! The steal the land from the Palestinians and the money to build on it from U.S. taxpayers!!!
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! maybe you can explain that to the men who conspired to steal it from the ( imaginary ) Palestinians?
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! maybe you can explain that to the men who conspired to steal it from the ( imaginary ) Palestinians?
Honestly has anyone encountered stupidity to compare with some of these comments?
At least you do acknowledge that they are not from "Palestine" and have only been residing in "Palestine" for about 13 centuries.
Oh c'mon Einstein!!!! Even a budding scholar like you should know that the Arab pronunciation was "Filastin"...didn't alter the overwhelming Arab majority or their 13 century residency rights!!!!
At least you do acknowledge that they are not from "Palestine" and have only been residing in "Palestine" for about 13 centuries.
Oh c'mon Einstein!!!! Even a budding scholar like you should know that the Arab pronunciation was "Filastin"...didn't alter the overwhelming Arab majority or their 13 century residency rights!!!!
Which explains why it is Palestine, the region, and not Filastin.
Why it was the Palestine Mandate and not the Filastin Mandate.
But, being in a region for 13 centuries, or five (as with the Americas) does not give the late immigrants, even if they are a majority, the rights over the indigenous inhabitants they took the land from.
And that is true anywhere in the world where Muslim or Christian
conquest and immigration has happened for the past 1700 years.
The Indigenous people always have first rights to the land they inhabited before the invaders came. Which is why we cannot find any Greeks, Romans, Europeans or Turks demanding that those lands are theirs, and no longer belong to the indigenous people they invaded no matter who far back in time. Even if those indigenous people now lack sovereignty over it.
That is how it has been. That is how it will continue to be.
Arabs are from Arabia.
Jews are from Judea and Samaria.
The problem here is that you have fallen Hook, Line and Sinker into the recent myth, as recent as 1967, that "Israeli Jews are genetically related to Turks, Mongols, etc, etc.....At least you do acknowledge that they are not from "Palestine" and have only been residing in "Palestine" for about 13 centuries.
Oh c'mon Einstein!!!! Even a budding scholar like you should know that the Arab pronunciation was "Filastin"...didn't alter the overwhelming Arab majority or their 13 century residency rights!!!!
Which explains why it is Palestine, the region, and not Filastin.
Why it was the Palestine Mandate and not the Filastin Mandate.
But, being in a region for 13 centuries, or five (as with the Americas) does not give the late immigrants, even if they are a majority, the rights over the indigenous inhabitants they took the land from.
And that is true anywhere in the world where Muslim or Christian
conquest and immigration has happened for the past 1700 years.
The Indigenous people always have first rights to the land they inhabited before the invaders came. Which is why we cannot find any Greeks, Romans, Europeans or Turks demanding that those lands are theirs, and no longer belong to the indigenous people they invaded no matter who far back in time. Even if those indigenous people now lack sovereignty over it.
That is how it has been. That is how it will continue to be.
Arabs are from Arabia.
Jews are from Judea and Samaria.
Whoa!!!!! Just how stupid are you low-brow? What part of '13 centuries' eludes your tiny atrophied brain? The problem with your retarded lesson in history is that 97% of Israeli Jews are genetically related to the Turks...Mongols...Poles and Russians...so much for "Jews are from Judea and Samaria" Moron...
The problem here is that you have fallen Hook, Line and Sinker into the recent myth, as recent as 1967, that "Israeli Jews are genetically related to Turks, Mongols, etc, etc.....At least you do acknowledge that they are not from "Palestine" and have only been residing in "Palestine" for about 13 centuries.
Oh c'mon Einstein!!!! Even a budding scholar like you should know that the Arab pronunciation was "Filastin"...didn't alter the overwhelming Arab majority or their 13 century residency rights!!!!
Which explains why it is Palestine, the region, and not Filastin.
Why it was the Palestine Mandate and not the Filastin Mandate.
But, being in a region for 13 centuries, or five (as with the Americas) does not give the late immigrants, even if they are a majority, the rights over the indigenous inhabitants they took the land from.
And that is true anywhere in the world where Muslim or Christian
conquest and immigration has happened for the past 1700 years.
The Indigenous people always have first rights to the land they inhabited before the invaders came. Which is why we cannot find any Greeks, Romans, Europeans or Turks demanding that those lands are theirs, and no longer belong to the indigenous people they invaded no matter who far back in time. Even if those indigenous people now lack sovereignty over it.
That is how it has been. That is how it will continue to be.
Arabs are from Arabia.
Jews are from Judea and Samaria.
Whoa!!!!! Just how stupid are you low-brow? What part of '13 centuries' eludes your tiny atrophied brain? The problem with your retarded lesson in history is that 97% of Israeli Jews are genetically related to the Turks...Mongols...Poles and Russians...so much for "Jews are from Judea and Samaria" Moron...
Just remember where you have been reading that myth. What the sources are.
Most Jews DO trace their origins from the Land of Israel.
And THAT is no myth
