Second amendment, should felons be allowed to own guns?

[Jitss617]

I think the question is whether or not the felony conviction was for violent crimes.

Multiple violent felonies would show you should not be allowed to own a modern firearm.

Why Not what the constitution says

According to the US Supreme Court, the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution can still be regulated.

You support them? I Lynched a nicca in roslindale tonight, I followed him, he talked shit, I took him
Out,, what do you gotta say?

I simply stated a fact. And it has been upheld from multiple US Supreme Court decisions, from the act that restricted automatic weapons in the 1930s, through the Gun Control Act of 1968. And the 1st amendment has seen restrictions too. Such as laws against inciting to riot ect.

As for your claims of lynching someone? What do I have to say? I'd say it was just like your claim that you have been trained to hold an M230 chaingun in each hand and fire them at the same time. Or that you have a special federal permit to carry weapons most people can't own. I'd say it is bullshit.

Jitler, I see that you reacted with the laughing icon. I agree. Your claims have been good for laughs.

Your anti Frontier justice is funny

"anti Frontier justice"? lol Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

If you had to go drop into Afghanistan and you had 2 side arms to chose, which one?

Either a sig 226 or a 1911 single stack. Those are your choices.

Decisions I have to make

I chose to carry a few more mags for my M14 the first time, and my M4 on the rest of my vacations there. They seemed to be more useful, IMO.

Yes I belong to this security group I can carry over there but not on my own land. Stupid

What company?

Academi

 

[Jitss617]

I think the question is whether or not the felony conviction was for violent crimes.

Multiple violent felonies would show you should not be allowed to own a modern firearm.

Why Not what the constitution says

According to the US Supreme Court, the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution can still be regulated.

You support them? I Lynched a nicca in roslindale tonight, I followed him, he talked shit, I took him
Out,, what do you gotta say?

I simply stated a fact. And it has been upheld from multiple US Supreme Court decisions, from the act that restricted automatic weapons in the 1930s, through the Gun Control Act of 1968. And the 1st amendment has seen restrictions too. Such as laws against inciting to riot ect.

As for your claims of lynching someone? What do I have to say? I'd say it was just like your claim that you have been trained to hold an M230 chaingun in each hand and fire them at the same time. Or that you have a special federal permit to carry weapons most people can't own. I'd say it is bullshit.

Jitler, I see that you reacted with the laughing icon. I agree. Your claims have been good for laughs.

Your anti Frontier justice is funny

"anti Frontier justice"? lol Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

If you had to go drop into Afghanistan and you had 2 side arms to chose, which one?

Either a sig 226 or a 1911 single stack. Those are your choices.

Decisions I have to make

I chose to carry a few more mags for my M14 the first time, and my M4 on the rest of my vacations there. They seemed to be more useful, IMO.

Yes I belong to this security group I can carry over there but not on my own land. Stupid

What company?

He'll say he can't tell you. If pressed for any details, the stupid little fiction will become more and more ridiculous and obvious. It's all the troll EVER does.

Why do you have a transsexual as your profile picture

 

[Unkotare]

I think the question is whether or not the felony conviction was for violent crimes.

Multiple violent felonies would show you should not be allowed to own a modern firearm.

Why Not what the constitution says

According to the US Supreme Court, the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution can still be regulated.

You support them? I Lynched a nicca in roslindale tonight, I followed him, he talked shit, I took him
Out,, what do you gotta say?

I simply stated a fact. And it has been upheld from multiple US Supreme Court decisions, from the act that restricted automatic weapons in the 1930s, through the Gun Control Act of 1968. And the 1st amendment has seen restrictions too. Such as laws against inciting to riot ect.

As for your claims of lynching someone? What do I have to say? I'd say it was just like your claim that you have been trained to hold an M230 chaingun in each hand and fire them at the same time. Or that you have a special federal permit to carry weapons most people can't own. I'd say it is bullshit.

Jitler, I see that you reacted with the laughing icon. I agree. Your claims have been good for laughs.

Your anti Frontier justice is funny

"anti Frontier justice"? lol Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

If you had to go drop into Afghanistan and you had 2 side arms to chose, which one?

Either a sig 226 or a 1911 single stack. Those are your choices.

Decisions I have to make

I chose to carry a few more mags for my M14 the first time, and my M4 on the rest of my vacations there. They seemed to be more useful, IMO.

Yes I belong to this security group I can carry over there but not on my own land. Stupid

What company?

He'll say he can't tell you. If pressed for any details, the stupid little fiction will become more and more ridiculous and obvious. It's all the troll EVER does.

Why do you have a transsexual as your profile picture

I don't.

 

[freyasman]

I think the question is whether or not the felony conviction was for violent crimes.

Multiple violent felonies would show you should not be allowed to own a modern firearm.

Why Not what the constitution says

According to the US Supreme Court, the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution can still be regulated.

You support them? I Lynched a nicca in roslindale tonight, I followed him, he talked shit, I took him
Out,, what do you gotta say?

I simply stated a fact. And it has been upheld from multiple US Supreme Court decisions, from the act that restricted automatic weapons in the 1930s, through the Gun Control Act of 1968. And the 1st amendment has seen restrictions too. Such as laws against inciting to riot ect.

As for your claims of lynching someone? What do I have to say? I'd say it was just like your claim that you have been trained to hold an M230 chaingun in each hand and fire them at the same time. Or that you have a special federal permit to carry weapons most people can't own. I'd say it is bullshit.

Jitler, I see that you reacted with the laughing icon. I agree. Your claims have been good for laughs.

Your anti Frontier justice is funny

"anti Frontier justice"? lol Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

If you had to go drop into Afghanistan and you had 2 side arms to chose, which one?

Either a sig 226 or a 1911 single stack. Those are your choices.

Decisions I have to make

I chose to carry a few more mags for my M14 the first time, and my M4 on the rest of my vacations there. They seemed to be more useful, IMO.

Yes I belong to this security group I can carry over there but not on my own land. Stupid

What company?

Academi

I know a guy who works for them, he was in the 82d and the 101st with me. Pretty sure they ain't hiring felons, even for overseas work.

 

[Jitss617]

I think the question is whether or not the felony conviction was for violent crimes.

Multiple violent felonies would show you should not be allowed to own a modern firearm.

Why Not what the constitution says

According to the US Supreme Court, the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution can still be regulated.

You support them? I Lynched a nicca in roslindale tonight, I followed him, he talked shit, I took him
Out,, what do you gotta say?

I simply stated a fact. And it has been upheld from multiple US Supreme Court decisions, from the act that restricted automatic weapons in the 1930s, through the Gun Control Act of 1968. And the 1st amendment has seen restrictions too. Such as laws against inciting to riot ect.

As for your claims of lynching someone? What do I have to say? I'd say it was just like your claim that you have been trained to hold an M230 chaingun in each hand and fire them at the same time. Or that you have a special federal permit to carry weapons most people can't own. I'd say it is bullshit.

Jitler, I see that you reacted with the laughing icon. I agree. Your claims have been good for laughs.

Your anti Frontier justice is funny

"anti Frontier justice"? lol Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

If you had to go drop into Afghanistan and you had 2 side arms to chose, which one?

Either a sig 226 or a 1911 single stack. Those are your choices.

Decisions I have to make

I chose to carry a few more mags for my M14 the first time, and my M4 on the rest of my vacations there. They seemed to be more useful, IMO.

Yes I belong to this security group I can carry over there but not on my own land. Stupid

What company?

Academi

I know a guy who works for them, he was in the 82d and the 101st with me. Pretty sure they ain't hiring felons, even for overseas work.

I got my first felony in high school but I was in ROTC for four years when I went to ship out I was denied but I was giving opportunity did you private security. Master chief coffee. Rip .. you gave me a great opportunity

 

[Jitss617]

I’m currently in Mumbai, Quick stop off before hit Sudan.. I’ll be back in a couple of weeks, wish me luck

 

[Unkotare]

I’m currently in Mumbai, Quick stop off before hit Sudan.. I’ll be back in a couple of weeks, wish me luck

No, you’re not.

 

[WinterBorn]

I think the question is whether or not the felony conviction was for violent crimes.

Multiple violent felonies would show you should not be allowed to own a modern firearm.

Why Not what the constitution says

According to the US Supreme Court, the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution can still be regulated.

You support them? I Lynched a nicca in roslindale tonight, I followed him, he talked shit, I took him
Out,, what do you gotta say?

I simply stated a fact. And it has been upheld from multiple US Supreme Court decisions, from the act that restricted automatic weapons in the 1930s, through the Gun Control Act of 1968. And the 1st amendment has seen restrictions too. Such as laws against inciting to riot ect.

As for your claims of lynching someone? What do I have to say? I'd say it was just like your claim that you have been trained to hold an M230 chaingun in each hand and fire them at the same time. Or that you have a special federal permit to carry weapons most people can't own. I'd say it is bullshit.

Jitler, I see that you reacted with the laughing icon. I agree. Your claims have been good for laughs.

Your anti Frontier justice is funny

"anti Frontier justice"? lol Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

If you had to go drop into Afghanistan and you had 2 side arms to chose, which one?

Either a sig 226 or a 1911 single stack. Those are your choices.

Decisions I have to make

I chose to carry a few more mags for my M14 the first time, and my M4 on the rest of my vacations there. They seemed to be more useful, IMO.

When I was in the Navy, the armory still had the M14. I liked it. More range and fire power.

Love that rifle, still got an M1A of my own.


Humping those steel mags full of 7.62 up and down mountains in Afghanistan was no joke though.

Yeah, I wouldn't want to carry the mags, or even the rifle, for long distances.

I have a Springfield M1A. It is a sweet rifle. Accurate as I can take advantage of and hits hard at long ranges.

Funny story, Jitsie tried to mock my M1A saying he would let his 10 year old nephew shoot it, but that it wasn't good enough for him. lol

 

[freyasman]

I think the question is whether or not the felony conviction was for violent crimes.

Multiple violent felonies would show you should not be allowed to own a modern firearm.

Why Not what the constitution says

According to the US Supreme Court, the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution can still be regulated.

You support them? I Lynched a nicca in roslindale tonight, I followed him, he talked shit, I took him
Out,, what do you gotta say?

I simply stated a fact. And it has been upheld from multiple US Supreme Court decisions, from the act that restricted automatic weapons in the 1930s, through the Gun Control Act of 1968. And the 1st amendment has seen restrictions too. Such as laws against inciting to riot ect.

As for your claims of lynching someone? What do I have to say? I'd say it was just like your claim that you have been trained to hold an M230 chaingun in each hand and fire them at the same time. Or that you have a special federal permit to carry weapons most people can't own. I'd say it is bullshit.

Jitler, I see that you reacted with the laughing icon. I agree. Your claims have been good for laughs.

Your anti Frontier justice is funny

"anti Frontier justice"? lol Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

If you had to go drop into Afghanistan and you had 2 side arms to chose, which one?

Either a sig 226 or a 1911 single stack. Those are your choices.

Decisions I have to make

I chose to carry a few more mags for my M14 the first time, and my M4 on the rest of my vacations there. They seemed to be more useful, IMO.

When I was in the Navy, the armory still had the M14. I liked it. More range and fire power.

Love that rifle, still got an M1A of my own.


Humping those steel mags full of 7.62 up and down mountains in Afghanistan was no joke though.

Yeah, I wouldn't want to carry the mags, or even the rifle, for long distances.

I have a Springfield M1A. It is a sweet rifle. Accurate as I can take advantage of and hits hard at long ranges.

Funny story, Jitsie tried to mock my M1A saying he would let his 10 year old nephew shoot it, but that it wasn't good enough for him. lol

people talk about that rifle being heavy, but it's the ammo you carry with it that really weighs you down.

 

[freyasman]

I think the question is whether or not the felony conviction was for violent crimes.

Multiple violent felonies would show you should not be allowed to own a modern firearm.

Why Not what the constitution says

According to the US Supreme Court, the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution can still be regulated.

You support them? I Lynched a nicca in roslindale tonight, I followed him, he talked shit, I took him
Out,, what do you gotta say?

I simply stated a fact. And it has been upheld from multiple US Supreme Court decisions, from the act that restricted automatic weapons in the 1930s, through the Gun Control Act of 1968. And the 1st amendment has seen restrictions too. Such as laws against inciting to riot ect.

As for your claims of lynching someone? What do I have to say? I'd say it was just like your claim that you have been trained to hold an M230 chaingun in each hand and fire them at the same time. Or that you have a special federal permit to carry weapons most people can't own. I'd say it is bullshit.

Jitler, I see that you reacted with the laughing icon. I agree. Your claims have been good for laughs.

Your anti Frontier justice is funny

"anti Frontier justice"? lol Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

If you had to go drop into Afghanistan and you had 2 side arms to chose, which one?

Either a sig 226 or a 1911 single stack. Those are your choices.

Decisions I have to make

I chose to carry a few more mags for my M14 the first time, and my M4 on the rest of my vacations there. They seemed to be more useful, IMO.

When I was in the Navy, the armory still had the M14. I liked it. More range and fire power.

Love that rifle, still got an M1A of my own.


Humping those steel mags full of 7.62 up and down mountains in Afghanistan was no joke though.

Yeah, I wouldn't want to carry the mags, or even the rifle, for long distances.

I have a Springfield M1A. It is a sweet rifle. Accurate as I can take advantage of and hits hard at long ranges.

Funny story, Jitsie tried to mock my M1A saying he would let his 10 year old nephew shoot it, but that it wasn't good enough for him. lol

I got the SOCOM.

 

[Jitss617]

 

[WinterBorn]

I think the question is whether or not the felony conviction was for violent crimes.

Multiple violent felonies would show you should not be allowed to own a modern firearm.

Why Not what the constitution says

According to the US Supreme Court, the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution can still be regulated.

You support them? I Lynched a nicca in roslindale tonight, I followed him, he talked shit, I took him
Out,, what do you gotta say?

I simply stated a fact. And it has been upheld from multiple US Supreme Court decisions, from the act that restricted automatic weapons in the 1930s, through the Gun Control Act of 1968. And the 1st amendment has seen restrictions too. Such as laws against inciting to riot ect.

As for your claims of lynching someone? What do I have to say? I'd say it was just like your claim that you have been trained to hold an M230 chaingun in each hand and fire them at the same time. Or that you have a special federal permit to carry weapons most people can't own. I'd say it is bullshit.

Jitler, I see that you reacted with the laughing icon. I agree. Your claims have been good for laughs.

Your anti Frontier justice is funny

"anti Frontier justice"? lol Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

If you had to go drop into Afghanistan and you had 2 side arms to chose, which one?

Either a sig 226 or a 1911 single stack. Those are your choices.

Decisions I have to make

I chose to carry a few more mags for my M14 the first time, and my M4 on the rest of my vacations there. They seemed to be more useful, IMO.

Yes I belong to this security group I can carry over there but not on my own land. Stupid

What company?

Academi

I know a guy who works for them, he was in the 82d and the 101st with me. Pretty sure they ain't hiring felons, even for overseas work.

Especially not a convicted felon with no military training or service. Supposedly, he learned the "skills" he claims to have (from World of Warcraft?) and when the people at Blackwater saw him in action they hired him on the spot.

Jitsie's stories are many and amazing. lol His imagination is limitless.

 

[WinterBorn]

I think the question is whether or not the felony conviction was for violent crimes.

Multiple violent felonies would show you should not be allowed to own a modern firearm.

Why Not what the constitution says

According to the US Supreme Court, the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution can still be regulated.

You support them? I Lynched a nicca in roslindale tonight, I followed him, he talked shit, I took him
Out,, what do you gotta say?

I simply stated a fact. And it has been upheld from multiple US Supreme Court decisions, from the act that restricted automatic weapons in the 1930s, through the Gun Control Act of 1968. And the 1st amendment has seen restrictions too. Such as laws against inciting to riot ect.

As for your claims of lynching someone? What do I have to say? I'd say it was just like your claim that you have been trained to hold an M230 chaingun in each hand and fire them at the same time. Or that you have a special federal permit to carry weapons most people can't own. I'd say it is bullshit.

Jitler, I see that you reacted with the laughing icon. I agree. Your claims have been good for laughs.

Your anti Frontier justice is funny

"anti Frontier justice"? lol Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

If you had to go drop into Afghanistan and you had 2 side arms to chose, which one?

Either a sig 226 or a 1911 single stack. Those are your choices.

Decisions I have to make

I chose to carry a few more mags for my M14 the first time, and my M4 on the rest of my vacations there. They seemed to be more useful, IMO.

When I was in the Navy, the armory still had the M14. I liked it. More range and fire power.

Love that rifle, still got an M1A of my own.


Humping those steel mags full of 7.62 up and down mountains in Afghanistan was no joke though.

Yeah, I wouldn't want to carry the mags, or even the rifle, for long distances.

I have a Springfield M1A. It is a sweet rifle. Accurate as I can take advantage of and hits hard at long ranges.

Funny story, Jitsie tried to mock my M1A saying he would let his 10 year old nephew shoot it, but that it wasn't good enough for him. lol

people talk about that rifle being heavy, but it's the ammo you carry with it that really weighs you down.

If you are carrying many rounds it certainly is. Luckily I never had to carry it in the field. I have a wheeled range bag for when I go to the outdoor range.

 

[WinterBorn]

I think the question is whether or not the felony conviction was for violent crimes.

Multiple violent felonies would show you should not be allowed to own a modern firearm.

Why Not what the constitution says

According to the US Supreme Court, the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution can still be regulated.

You support them? I Lynched a nicca in roslindale tonight, I followed him, he talked shit, I took him
Out,, what do you gotta say?

I simply stated a fact. And it has been upheld from multiple US Supreme Court decisions, from the act that restricted automatic weapons in the 1930s, through the Gun Control Act of 1968. And the 1st amendment has seen restrictions too. Such as laws against inciting to riot ect.

As for your claims of lynching someone? What do I have to say? I'd say it was just like your claim that you have been trained to hold an M230 chaingun in each hand and fire them at the same time. Or that you have a special federal permit to carry weapons most people can't own. I'd say it is bullshit.

Jitler, I see that you reacted with the laughing icon. I agree. Your claims have been good for laughs.

Your anti Frontier justice is funny

"anti Frontier justice"? lol Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

If you had to go drop into Afghanistan and you had 2 side arms to chose, which one?

Either a sig 226 or a 1911 single stack. Those are your choices.

Decisions I have to make

I chose to carry a few more mags for my M14 the first time, and my M4 on the rest of my vacations there. They seemed to be more useful, IMO.

When I was in the Navy, the armory still had the M14. I liked it. More range and fire power.

Love that rifle, still got an M1A of my own.


Humping those steel mags full of 7.62 up and down mountains in Afghanistan was no joke though.

Yeah, I wouldn't want to carry the mags, or even the rifle, for long distances.

I have a Springfield M1A. It is a sweet rifle. Accurate as I can take advantage of and hits hard at long ranges.

Funny story, Jitsie tried to mock my M1A saying he would let his 10 year old nephew shoot it, but that it wasn't good enough for him. lol

I got the SOCOM.

The SOCOM is a great rifle. I have looked at the Scout Squad rifle and really like it. I have the Springfield M1A Loaded. It will do me for now.

 

[Jitss617]

I think the question is whether or not the felony conviction was for violent crimes.

Multiple violent felonies would show you should not be allowed to own a modern firearm.

Why Not what the constitution says

According to the US Supreme Court, the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution can still be regulated.

You support them? I Lynched a nicca in roslindale tonight, I followed him, he talked shit, I took him
Out,, what do you gotta say?

I simply stated a fact. And it has been upheld from multiple US Supreme Court decisions, from the act that restricted automatic weapons in the 1930s, through the Gun Control Act of 1968. And the 1st amendment has seen restrictions too. Such as laws against inciting to riot ect.

As for your claims of lynching someone? What do I have to say? I'd say it was just like your claim that you have been trained to hold an M230 chaingun in each hand and fire them at the same time. Or that you have a special federal permit to carry weapons most people can't own. I'd say it is bullshit.

Jitler, I see that you reacted with the laughing icon. I agree. Your claims have been good for laughs.

Your anti Frontier justice is funny

"anti Frontier justice"? lol Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

If you had to go drop into Afghanistan and you had 2 side arms to chose, which one?

Either a sig 226 or a 1911 single stack. Those are your choices.

Decisions I have to make

I chose to carry a few more mags for my M14 the first time, and my M4 on the rest of my vacations there. They seemed to be more useful, IMO.

Yes I belong to this security group I can carry over there but not on my own land. Stupid

What company?

Academi

I know a guy who works for them, he was in the 82d and the 101st with me. Pretty sure they ain't hiring felons, even for overseas work.

Especially not a convicted felon with no military training or service. Supposedly, he learned the "skills" he claims to have (from World of Warcraft?) and when the people at Blackwater saw him in action they hired him on the spot.

Jitsie's stories are many and amazing. lol His imagination is limitless.

Haters gonna hate, i’m very stealth you don’t even realize I was in your .. never mind.. cute dog

 

[WinterBorn]

I’m currently in Mumbai, Quick stop off before hit Sudan.. I’ll be back in a couple of weeks, wish me luck

As much as you post on these forums, you can't be paying much attention to your security work.

 

[WinterBorn]

I think the question is whether or not the felony conviction was for violent crimes.

Multiple violent felonies would show you should not be allowed to own a modern firearm.

Why Not what the constitution says

According to the US Supreme Court, the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution can still be regulated.

You support them? I Lynched a nicca in roslindale tonight, I followed him, he talked shit, I took him
Out,, what do you gotta say?

I simply stated a fact. And it has been upheld from multiple US Supreme Court decisions, from the act that restricted automatic weapons in the 1930s, through the Gun Control Act of 1968. And the 1st amendment has seen restrictions too. Such as laws against inciting to riot ect.

As for your claims of lynching someone? What do I have to say? I'd say it was just like your claim that you have been trained to hold an M230 chaingun in each hand and fire them at the same time. Or that you have a special federal permit to carry weapons most people can't own. I'd say it is bullshit.

Jitler, I see that you reacted with the laughing icon. I agree. Your claims have been good for laughs.

Your anti Frontier justice is funny

"anti Frontier justice"? lol Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

If you had to go drop into Afghanistan and you had 2 side arms to chose, which one?

Either a sig 226 or a 1911 single stack. Those are your choices.

Decisions I have to make

I chose to carry a few more mags for my M14 the first time, and my M4 on the rest of my vacations there. They seemed to be more useful, IMO.

Yes I belong to this security group I can carry over there but not on my own land. Stupid

What company?

Academi

I know a guy who works for them, he was in the 82d and the 101st with me. Pretty sure they ain't hiring felons, even for overseas work.

Especially not a convicted felon with no military training or service. Supposedly, he learned the "skills" he claims to have (from World of Warcraft?) and when the people at Blackwater saw him in action they hired him on the spot.

Jitsie's stories are many and amazing. lol His imagination is limitless.

Haters gonna hate, i’m very stealth you don’t even realize I was in your .. never mind.. cute dog

LMAO!! Oh please. Even for you, pretending you saw my dog, much less were in my house, is ridiculous. Oh, and which dog?

 

[WinterBorn]

I think the question is whether or not the felony conviction was for violent crimes.

Multiple violent felonies would show you should not be allowed to own a modern firearm.

Why Not what the constitution says

According to the US Supreme Court, the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution can still be regulated.

You support them? I Lynched a nicca in roslindale tonight, I followed him, he talked shit, I took him
Out,, what do you gotta say?

I simply stated a fact. And it has been upheld from multiple US Supreme Court decisions, from the act that restricted automatic weapons in the 1930s, through the Gun Control Act of 1968. And the 1st amendment has seen restrictions too. Such as laws against inciting to riot ect.

As for your claims of lynching someone? What do I have to say? I'd say it was just like your claim that you have been trained to hold an M230 chaingun in each hand and fire them at the same time. Or that you have a special federal permit to carry weapons most people can't own. I'd say it is bullshit.

Jitler, I see that you reacted with the laughing icon. I agree. Your claims have been good for laughs.

Your anti Frontier justice is funny

"anti Frontier justice"? lol Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

If you had to go drop into Afghanistan and you had 2 side arms to chose, which one?

Either a sig 226 or a 1911 single stack. Those are your choices.

Decisions I have to make

I chose to carry a few more mags for my M14 the first time, and my M4 on the rest of my vacations there. They seemed to be more useful, IMO.

Yes I belong to this security group I can carry over there but not on my own land. Stupid

What company?

Academi

I know a guy who works for them, he was in the 82d and the 101st with me. Pretty sure they ain't hiring felons, even for overseas work.

Especially not a convicted felon with no military training or service. Supposedly, he learned the "skills" he claims to have (from World of Warcraft?) and when the people at Blackwater saw him in action they hired him on the spot.

Jitsie's stories are many and amazing. lol His imagination is limitless.

Haters gonna hate, i’m very stealth you don’t even realize I was in your .. never mind.. cute dog

And I think the word you want is "stealthy". And the dogs would have made your life hell.

 

[Jitss617]

I have pics of you sleeping

 

[freyasman]

I think the question is whether or not the felony conviction was for violent crimes.

Multiple violent felonies would show you should not be allowed to own a modern firearm.

Why Not what the constitution says

According to the US Supreme Court, the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution can still be regulated.

You support them? I Lynched a nicca in roslindale tonight, I followed him, he talked shit, I took him
Out,, what do you gotta say?

I simply stated a fact. And it has been upheld from multiple US Supreme Court decisions, from the act that restricted automatic weapons in the 1930s, through the Gun Control Act of 1968. And the 1st amendment has seen restrictions too. Such as laws against inciting to riot ect.

As for your claims of lynching someone? What do I have to say? I'd say it was just like your claim that you have been trained to hold an M230 chaingun in each hand and fire them at the same time. Or that you have a special federal permit to carry weapons most people can't own. I'd say it is bullshit.

Jitler, I see that you reacted with the laughing icon. I agree. Your claims have been good for laughs.

Your anti Frontier justice is funny

"anti Frontier justice"? lol Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

If you had to go drop into Afghanistan and you had 2 side arms to chose, which one?

Either a sig 226 or a 1911 single stack. Those are your choices.

Decisions I have to make

I chose to carry a few more mags for my M14 the first time, and my M4 on the rest of my vacations there. They seemed to be more useful, IMO.

When I was in the Navy, the armory still had the M14. I liked it. More range and fire power.

Love that rifle, still got an M1A of my own.


Humping those steel mags full of 7.62 up and down mountains in Afghanistan was no joke though.

Yeah, I wouldn't want to carry the mags, or even the rifle, for long distances.

I have a Springfield M1A. It is a sweet rifle. Accurate as I can take advantage of and hits hard at long ranges.

Funny story, Jitsie tried to mock my M1A saying he would let his 10 year old nephew shoot it, but that it wasn't good enough for him. lol

people talk about that rifle being heavy, but it's the ammo you carry with it that really weighs you down.

If you are carrying many rounds it certainly is. Luckily I never had to carry it in the field. I have a wheeled range bag for when I go to the outdoor range.

I carried one all over Afghanistan in 2003 chasing haji.