Sean Hannity & other Reich wing talk show hosts "to blame Republicans for Trump's loss"

oreo

Gold Member
Sep 15, 2008
18,102
2,924
290
rocky mountains
"It was probably inevitable that Donald Trump and his media munchkins would alight on the stab-in-the-back theory to explain his probable defeat in November. The surprise is that they are doing so with the election still three months out.

“If in 96 days Trump loses this election, I am pointing the finger directly at people like Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham and John McCain and John Kasich and Ted Cruz,” Fox News host Sean Hannity told his radio audience last week. “I have watched these Republicans be more harsh toward Donald Trump than they’ve ever been in standing up to Barack Obama and his radical agenda.”

“Establishment Republican types,” he insisted, had in effect “created Donald Trump.”

Mr. Hannity has never made a secret of his feelings for Mr. Trump, which is the love that dares to speak its name. But his comments were also a revelation, and not just that it has dawned on him that the Republican nominee is likely to lose and lose big. Like members of a cult who discover too late that their self-proclaimed messiah is mortal after all, rationalizations are required.

Mr. Trump has lately been road-testing one such rationalization, saying the election will be “rigged.” Voter fraud is a reality in American elections, but it is typical of the candidate to confuse anecdote with data and turn allegation into conspiracy. Mr. Trump also says the media is “rigged” against him, which is amusing coming from the beneficiary of the equivalent of $3 billion in free advertising.

Mr. Hannity’s excuses are even more disgraceful, combining oily self-absolution with venomous obloquy for the very conservatives who have spent the year warning that a Trump candidacy is an epic GOP disaster that all-but guarantees Hillary Clinton’s election. The habit of shifting blame and refusing to take responsibility is supposed to be the curse of the underclass and its political hucksters, but Mr. Hannity is giving Al Sharpton a run for his money.

Mr. Hannity’s other goal is to preserve the fiction—first cultivated by Ted Cruz and later adopted by the Trumpians—that a wan GOP “establishment” and its “Acela corridor” voters sat on their hands while Mr. Obama traduced the Constitution and sold us out to the enemy. “They did nothing, nothing!” the anchor fumed Thursday on his show. “All these phony votes to repeal and replace ObamaCare, show votes so they go back and keep their power and get re-elected.”

Maybe Mr. Hannity thinks that Messrs. Ryan and McConnell should have jumped the White House fence and stuck a pitchfork in the president. Or that they should have amended the Constitution to repeal Article One, Section Seven—the one that gives the president his veto. Otherwise, it’s hard to understand the constant lament about a do-nothing Congress except by wondering whether Mr. Hannity is stupid or dishonest.

Hannity to GOP leaders: ‘I’m getting a little sick and tired of all of you’
Fox News host Sean Hannity says Republican leaders will be to blame if Donald Trump loses the presidential election. The conservative pundit told listeners of his talk radio show on Wednesday that he...


  • On Thursday evening I opted to give him the benefit of the doubt by writing on Twitter that he was Fox’s “dumbest anchor.” He immediately proved my point by re-tweeting me to his 1.5 million Twitter followers—an audience I could never have reached on my own. Later, on the radio, he called me a “dumba— with his head up his a—,” demonstrating he can’t even swear competently.

But Mr. Hannity’s tantrum obscures the uglier side of what he is trying to do, which is to paint targets on the GOP’s genuine Reaganites—pro-trade, pro-immigration, pro-NATO, pro-entitlement reform—and replace them with the Party of Trump—anti-all of the above—no matter what happens to the candidate come November.

Who might help lead this Unglorious Revolution of the crass, clueless and shoulder-chipped? Those who can make themselves rich by shouting and hearing echoes of themselves even as the GOP loses one presidential election after another.

This is the reason I’ve consistently argued that the only hope for a conservative restoration is a blowout Hillary Clinton victory, held in check by a Republican majority in Congress. If Mr. Trump loses the election narrowly, the stab-in-the-back thesis will have a patina of credibility that he might have won had it not been for the opposition of people like me. But a McGovern-style defeat makes that argument impossible to sustain except among the most cretinous. We can count on Mr. Hannity for that.

Last week, I appeared on Fareed Zakaria’s CNN show opposite a Trump supporter named Emily Miller. At the end of the show, I said Americans deserve a president who can speak grammatical English. Ms. Miller retorted that it was “snobby” of me to say so.

There was a time when the conservative movement was led by the likes of Bill Buckley and Irving Kristol and Bob Bartley, men of ideas who invested the Republican Party with intellectual seriousness. Today’s GOP is on the road to self-immolation, thanks in part to the veneration of ignorance typified by Ms. Miller and Mr. Hannity. As conservatives go through their pre- and post-mortems, they should think about the damage that such veneration can do.
Sean Hannity’s Veneration of Ignorance


So here we have it folks. The Preview of the morning after the election Reich wing talk show host theme. These Reich wing talk show hosts whom have created the Frankenstein candidate, Donald Trump--are now looking to point fingers at the same people they have attacked over the last several years. Calling them every name in the book, (Rino's--Establishment, etc. etc.) These are the same people that have shattered the Republican party into pieces. There is no unity because of them. These talk show hosts have been the cheerleading squad for Donald Trump who more than once insulted Ted Cruz, John McCain and all the others, that Sean Hannity is now going to blame for the wipeout on election night, because they won't endorse his creation. Expect all the others to do the same. While they're busy helping to blow their audiences noses and drying their tears this will be repeated again, and again, and again. "It was the Rino's & Establishment Republicans fault that Trump lost the election"-LOL

tea_party_teenager.jpg

Now they want all those "Rino's & Establishment Republicans to join hands" and sing
Kum Ba Yah around what they created, their Frankenstein candidate, Donald Trump. Paybacks are hell--LOL

 
Last edited:
Hannity to GOP leaders: ‘I’m getting a little sick and tired of all of you’
Fox News host Sean Hannity says Republican leaders will be to blame if Donald Trump loses the presidential election. The conservative pundit told listeners of his talk radio show on Wednesday that he...


Amen to that.
 
Hannity was the one media player to make sure he gave ALL candidates as much time as they wanted on the show. Cruz got the most. Hannity promised his audience he would not endorse any candidate, but would support the one that received the nomination.

Sean really was honorable in the whole primary process as compared to Levin and others.

ETA: In fairness I would rate Rush as coming in a close second for not endorsing anyone. Leaned Cruz there for a while but stayed fairly neutral.
 
Last edited:
"It was probably inevitable that Donald Trump and his media munchkins would alight on the stab-in-the-back theory to explain his probable defeat in November. The surprise is that they are doing so with the election still three months out.

“If in 96 days Trump loses this election, I am pointing the finger directly at people like Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham and John McCain and John Kasich and Ted Cruz,” Fox News host Sean Hannity told his radio audience last week. “I have watched these Republicans be more harsh toward Donald Trump than they’ve ever been in standing up to Barack Obama and his radical agenda.”

“Establishment Republican types,” he insisted, had in effect “created Donald Trump.”

Mr. Hannity has never made a secret of his feelings for Mr. Trump, which is the love that dares to speak its name. But his comments were also a revelation, and not just that it has dawned on him that the Republican nominee is likely to lose and lose big. Like members of a cult who discover too late that their self-proclaimed messiah is mortal after all, rationalizations are required.

Mr. Trump has lately been road-testing one such rationalization, saying the election will be “rigged.” Voter fraud is a reality in American elections, but it is typical of the candidate to confuse anecdote with data and turn allegation into conspiracy. Mr. Trump also says the media is “rigged” against him, which is amusing coming from the beneficiary of the equivalent of $3 billion in free advertising.

Mr. Hannity’s excuses are even more disgraceful, combining oily self-absolution with venomous obloquy for the very conservatives who have spent the year warning that a Trump candidacy is an epic GOP disaster that all-but guarantees Hillary Clinton’s election. The habit of shifting blame and refusing to take responsibility is supposed to be the curse of the underclass and its political hucksters, but Mr. Hannity is giving Al Sharpton a run for his money.

Mr. Hannity’s other goal is to preserve the fiction—first cultivated by Ted Cruz and later adopted by the Trumpians—that a wan GOP “establishment” and its “Acela corridor” voters sat on their hands while Mr. Obama traduced the Constitution and sold us out to the enemy. “They did nothing, nothing!” the anchor fumed Thursday on his show. “All these phony votes to repeal and replace ObamaCare, show votes so they go back and keep their power and get re-elected.”

Maybe Mr. Hannity thinks that Messrs. Ryan and McConnell should have jumped the White House fence and stuck a pitchfork in the president. Or that they should have amended the Constitution to repeal Article One, Section Seven—the one that gives the president his veto. Otherwise, it’s hard to understand the constant lament about a do-nothing Congress except by wondering whether Mr. Hannity is stupid or dishonest.

Hannity to GOP leaders: ‘I’m getting a little sick and tired of all of you’
Fox News host Sean Hannity says Republican leaders will be to blame if Donald Trump loses the presidential election. The conservative pundit told listeners of his talk radio show on Wednesday that he...


  • On Thursday evening I opted to give him the benefit of the doubt by writing on Twitter that he was Fox’s “dumbest anchor.” He immediately proved my point by re-tweeting me to his 1.5 million Twitter followers—an audience I could never have reached on my own. Later, on the radio, he called me a “dumba— with his head up his a—,” demonstrating he can’t even swear competently.

But Mr. Hannity’s tantrum obscures the uglier side of what he is trying to do, which is to paint targets on the GOP’s genuine Reaganites—pro-trade, pro-immigration, pro-NATO, pro-entitlement reform—and replace them with the Party of Trump—anti-all of the above—no matter what happens to the candidate come November.

Who might help lead this Unglorious Revolution of the crass, clueless and shoulder-chipped? Those who can make themselves rich by shouting and hearing echoes of themselves even as the GOP loses one presidential election after another.

This is the reason I’ve consistently argued that the only hope for a conservative restoration is a blowout Hillary Clinton victory, held in check by a Republican majority in Congress. If Mr. Trump loses the election narrowly, the stab-in-the-back thesis will have a patina of credibility that he might have won had it not been for the opposition of people like me. But a McGovern-style defeat makes that argument impossible to sustain except among the most cretinous. We can count on Mr. Hannity for that.

Last week, I appeared on Fareed Zakaria’s CNN show opposite a Trump supporter named Emily Miller. At the end of the show, I said Americans deserve a president who can speak grammatical English. Ms. Miller retorted that it was “snobby” of me to say so.

There was a time when the conservative movement was led by the likes of Bill Buckley and Irving Kristol and Bob Bartley, men of ideas who invested the Republican Party with intellectual seriousness. Today’s GOP is on the road to self-immolation, thanks in part to the veneration of ignorance typified by Ms. Miller and Mr. Hannity. As conservatives go through their pre- and post-mortems, they should think about the damage that such veneration can do.
Sean Hannity’s Veneration of Ignorance


So here we have it folks. The Preview of the morning after the election Reich wing talk show host theme. These Reich wing talk show hosts whom have created the Frankenstein candidate, Donald Trump--are now looking to point fingers at the same people they have attacked over the last several years. Calling them every name in the book, (Rino's--Establishment, etc. etc.) These are the same people that have shattered the Republican party into pieces. There is no unity because of them. These talk show hosts have been the cheerleading squad for Donald Trump who more than once insulted Ted Cruz, John McCain and all the others, that Sean Hannity is now going to blame for the wipeout on election night, because they won't endorse his creation. Expect all the others to do the same. While they're busy helping to blow their audiences noses and drying their tears this will be repeated again, and again, and again. "It was the Rino's & Establishment Republicans fault that Trump lost the election"-LOL

tea_party_teenager.jpg

Now they want all those "Rino's & Establishment Republicans to join hands" and sing
Kum Ba Yah around what they created, their Frankenstein candidate, Donald Trump. Paybacks are hell--LOL
That's a fantastic cartoon you found :thup:
 
How they can even consider Hillary, who turns everything into lies, scandals, corruption and failures.... apart from her bank account... is beyond anyone's cognition.
 
How they can even consider Hillary, who turns everything into lies, scandals, corruption and failures.... apart from her bank account... is beyond anyone's cognition.


like this

a Monmouth University poll released on August 8th, only 27% of voters said Mr Trump had the right temperament to be president (61% said Mrs Clinton had it).
 
Republicans are to blame for Trump's loss. They are the ones that nominated that shithead in the first place
 
The leftwingers on this board are so naïve and cute.....The establishment is so corrupt it's beyond disgusting, but they get their welfare, so lets let the country go to fuck.....
 
Republicans are to blame for Trump's loss. They are the ones that nominated that shithead in the first place

Nah, he's a reaction to a problem of pussies that don't speak out, and don't ever get anything done that conservatives want. Free trade sounded good, until we have 300 billion deficits with one fucking country...it's insane. Tax cuts are fine, but that's about it. No entitlement reform, no term limits, no cutting of the budget, they are too afraid, so they nominated someone who wasn't afraid to say what needs to be said.....and this is coming from a Cruz supporter.
 
The leftwingers on this board are so naïve and cute.....The establishment is so corrupt it's beyond disgusting, but they get their welfare, so lets let the country go to fuck.....

wtf are you blabbering about now? .. the thread is about Hairspray Hannity ...keep up!
 
How they can even consider Hillary, who turns everything into lies, scandals, corruption and failures.... apart from her bank account... is beyond anyone's cognition.


like this

a Monmouth University poll released on August 8th, only 27% of voters said Mr Trump had the right temperament to be president (61% said Mrs Clinton had it).

Yeah, I suppose temperament is more important than actually being good president.

Not that I take these university's very seriously. According to a new study they are biased beyond belief, not that we needed a study to be able to observe an obvious fact. Only you need that...
 
This is a sad trend of blaming everyone else within the supposed party of personal responsibility. Trump takes zero responsibility, always blaming someone else. The press, rigged elections, other politicians, etc. etc. etc. The man is so arrogant he refuses to apologize, saying "I don't do that".
He is a man of such low character, it's still astonishing he's the GOP pick to lead this great nation.
 
How they can even consider Hillary, who turns everything into lies, scandals, corruption and failures.... apart from her bank account... is beyond anyone's cognition.


like this

a Monmouth University poll released on August 8th, only 27% of voters said Mr Trump had the right temperament to be president (61% said Mrs Clinton had it).

Yeah, I suppose temperament is more important than actually being good president.

Not that I take these university's very seriously. According to a new study they are biased beyond belief, not that we needed a study to be able to observe an obvious fact. Only you need that...

being well balanced is a major part of being POTUS ...
 
This is a sad trend of blaming everyone else within the supposed party of personal responsibility. Trump takes zero responsibility, always blaming someone else. The press, rigged elections, other politicians, etc. etc. etc. The man is so arrogant he refuses to apologize, saying "I don't do that".
He is a man of such low character, it's still astonishing he's the GOP pick to lead this great nation.

Yes, he blames those who have wronged. The biased media, the election rigging DNC....

You almost sound like it's Trump's fault that the DNC is biased.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Kat
Republicans are to blame for Trump's loss. They are the ones that nominated that shithead in the first place

He was better than the rest; and frankly, you take away electronic voting and Trump wins in a landslide. Crying about the candidate when the system is rigged is stupid. Americans need to take their democracy back.
 
How they can even consider Hillary, who turns everything into lies, scandals, corruption and failures.... apart from her bank account... is beyond anyone's cognition.


like this

a Monmouth University poll released on August 8th, only 27% of voters said Mr Trump had the right temperament to be president (61% said Mrs Clinton had it).

Yeah, I suppose temperament is more important than actually being good president.

Not that I take these university's very seriously. According to a new study they are biased beyond belief, not that we needed a study to be able to observe an obvious fact. Only you need that...

being well balanced is a major part of being POTUS ...

If Hillary gets back to 1600 I wonder if they'll have to chain ashtrays this round. I hear she had excellent pitching power with them last time.
 
How they can even consider Hillary, who turns everything into lies, scandals, corruption and failures.... apart from her bank account... is beyond anyone's cognition.


like this

a Monmouth University poll released on August 8th, only 27% of voters said Mr Trump had the right temperament to be president (61% said Mrs Clinton had it).

Yeah, I suppose temperament is more important than actually being good president.

Not that I take these university's very seriously. According to a new study they are biased beyond belief, not that we needed a study to be able to observe an obvious fact. Only you need that...

being well balanced is a major part of being POTUS ...

She has no political balance and her physical balance is .....how shall I put it....questionable
 

Forum List

Back
Top