SCOTUS "justice" Endorses Hillary..........HUH?........C-O-R-R-U-P-T

[Contumacious]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg talked trash about Donald Trump in an interview. Should she have?

It confirms what I have been saying all along - SCOTUS is corrupt to its core.


.

 

[Contumacious]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg 'Can't Imagine' Trump as President, Says She Wants to See Citizens United and Heller Overturned by Liberal SCOTUS

The liberal justice speaks with The New York Times.

 

[The VOR]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg talked trash about Donald Trump in an interview. Should she have?

It confirms what I have been saying all along - SCOTUS is corrupt to its core.


.

And this from the same article:

Ginsburg also told Liptak that the Senate should promptly consider President Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to replace her friend Antonin Scalia on the court. “That’s their job,” she said. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last year.”

She must be crazy! No president gets to nominate someone for a Supreme Court vacancy and have that nominee voted on in the last year of a president's term, right? Disgraceful!

And this:

She said that Garland “is about as well qualified as any nominee to this court. Super bright and very nice, very easy to deal with. And super prepared. He would be a great colleague.”

Not possible if President Obama chose him, right?

 

[NoNukes]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg talked trash about Donald Trump in an interview. Should she have?

It confirms what I have been saying all along - SCOTUS is corrupt to its core.


.

And this from the same article:

Ginsburg also told Liptak that the Senate should promptly consider President Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to replace her friend Antonin Scalia on the court. “That’s their job,” she said. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last year.”

She must be crazy! No president gets to nominate someone for a Supreme Court vacancy and have that nominee voted on in the last year of a president's term, right? Disgraceful!

And this:

She said that Garland “is about as well qualified as any nominee to this court. Super bright and very nice, very easy to deal with. And super prepared. He would be a great colleague.”

Not possible if President Obama chose him, right?

Where is it written that the Peesudent cannot do this?

 

[TNHarley]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg talked trash about Donald Trump in an interview. Should she have?

It confirms what I have been saying all along - SCOTUS is corrupt to its core.


.

And this from the same article:

Ginsburg also told Liptak that the Senate should promptly consider President Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to replace her friend Antonin Scalia on the court. “That’s their job,” she said. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last year.”

She must be crazy! No president gets to nominate someone for a Supreme Court vacancy and have that nominee voted on in the last year of a president's term, right? Disgraceful!

And this:

She said that Garland “is about as well qualified as any nominee to this court. Super bright and very nice, very easy to deal with. And super prepared. He would be a great colleague.”

Not possible if President Obama chose him, right?

Where is it written that the Peesudent cannot do this?

SC is not supposed to be political. It was the whole fucking point.

 

[Contumacious]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg talked trash about Donald Trump in an interview. Should she have?

It confirms what I have been saying all along - SCOTUS is corrupt to its core.


.

And this from the same article:

Ginsburg also told Liptak that the Senate should promptly consider President Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to replace her friend Antonin Scalia on the court. “That’s their job,” she said. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last year.”

She must be crazy! No president gets to nominate someone for a Supreme Court vacancy and have that nominee voted on in the last year of a president's term, right? Disgraceful!

And this:

She said that Garland “is about as well qualified as any nominee to this court. Super bright and very nice, very easy to deal with. And super prepared. He would be a great colleague.”

Not possible if President Obama chose him, right?

Dingle berry

SCOTUS is suppose to rule based upon the evidence and the law - Corrupt "justice" Ginsburg has already made up her mind. From her FASCIST ELITIST standpoint Americans are NOT freemen and do not have a right to defend their lives. She is not adjudicating, she is imposing her tyrannical views.


.

 

[Contumacious]

The Brandeis/Frankfurter Connection: The Secret Political Activities of Two Supreme Court Justices


.

 

[The VOR]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg talked trash about Donald Trump in an interview. Should she have?

It confirms what I have been saying all along - SCOTUS is corrupt to its core.


.

And this from the same article:

Ginsburg also told Liptak that the Senate should promptly consider President Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to replace her friend Antonin Scalia on the court. “That’s their job,” she said. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last year.”

She must be crazy! No president gets to nominate someone for a Supreme Court vacancy and have that nominee voted on in the last year of a president's term, right? Disgraceful!

And this:

She said that Garland “is about as well qualified as any nominee to this court. Super bright and very nice, very easy to deal with. And super prepared. He would be a great colleague.”

Not possible if President Obama chose him, right?

Dingle berry

SCOTUS is suppose to rule based upon the evidence and the law - Corrupt "justice" Ginsburg has already made up her mind. From her FASCIST ELITIST standpoint Americans are NOT freemen and do not have a right to defend their lives. She is not adjudicating, she is imposing her tyrannical views.


.

Hey dickhead,

How is she corrupt? Point to one fucking case that shows she ruled a certain way not based on "evidence and the law".

I won't hold my breath waiting for an answer to that

From her FASCIST ELITIST standpoint Americans are NOT freemen and do not have a right to defend their lives."

Huh? Where the fuck did that come from?

Imposing her tyrannical views instead of adjudicating".

LOL. You're fucking delusional. Again, point out an example of that. Once again, I won't hold my breath.

 

[hazlnut]

I guess you don't support Free Speech. By implying 'corruption' you believe the government should take action against her for expressing views to a news publication. In other words, the 1st Amendment should be set aside for people with views contrary to your own.

Good thing we have SCOTUS justices that will protect us from the likes of you...

 

[Contumacious]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg talked trash about Donald Trump in an interview. Should she have?

It confirms what I have been saying all along - SCOTUS is corrupt to its core.


.

And this from the same article:

Ginsburg also told Liptak that the Senate should promptly consider President Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to replace her friend Antonin Scalia on the court. “That’s their job,” she said. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last year.”

She must be crazy! No president gets to nominate someone for a Supreme Court vacancy and have that nominee voted on in the last year of a president's term, right? Disgraceful!

And this:

She said that Garland “is about as well qualified as any nominee to this court. Super bright and very nice, very easy to deal with. And super prepared. He would be a great colleague.”

Not possible if President Obama chose him, right?

Where is it written that the Peesudent cannot do this?

Mod edit : xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Watch it.......


advice and consent - Under the Constitution, presidential nominations for executive and judicial posts take effect only when confirmed by the Senate, and international treaties become effective only when the Senate approves them by a two-thirds vote.


The senate hasn't consented and they should not consent.


Fuck you now.


.

 

[Contumacious]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg talked trash about Donald Trump in an interview. Should she have?

It confirms what I have been saying all along - SCOTUS is corrupt to its core.


.

And this from the same article:

Ginsburg also told Liptak that the Senate should promptly consider President Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to replace her friend Antonin Scalia on the court. “That’s their job,” she said. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last year.”

She must be crazy! No president gets to nominate someone for a Supreme Court vacancy and have that nominee voted on in the last year of a president's term, right? Disgraceful!

And this:

She said that Garland “is about as well qualified as any nominee to this court. Super bright and very nice, very easy to deal with. And super prepared. He would be a great colleague.”

Not possible if President Obama chose him, right?

Where is it written that the Peesudent cannot do this?

SC is not supposed to be political. It was the whole fucking point.

Ginsburg's judicial politics are no secret. She became famous as the leading lawyer of the feminist movement in the 1970s; as a litigator, she won some of the biggest women's rights cases in the Supreme Court. Since her appointment to the court by Bill Clinton, in 1993, she has been its leading liberal -- a fierce defender of women's rights, including abortion rights, and a supporter of affirmative action and the traditional civil rights agenda. Her integrity -- like her intelligence and her energy -- has been beyond reproach."


.

 

[Contumacious]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg talked trash about Donald Trump in an interview. Should she have?

It confirms what I have been saying all along - SCOTUS is corrupt to its core.


.

And this from the same article:

Ginsburg also told Liptak that the Senate should promptly consider President Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to replace her friend Antonin Scalia on the court. “That’s their job,” she said. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last year.”

She must be crazy! No president gets to nominate someone for a Supreme Court vacancy and have that nominee voted on in the last year of a president's term, right? Disgraceful!

And this:

She said that Garland “is about as well qualified as any nominee to this court. Super bright and very nice, very easy to deal with. And super prepared. He would be a great colleague.”

Not possible if President Obama chose him, right?

Dingle berry

SCOTUS is suppose to rule based upon the evidence and the law - Corrupt "justice" Ginsburg has already made up her mind. From her FASCIST ELITIST standpoint Americans are NOT freemen and do not have a right to defend their lives. She is not adjudicating, she is imposing her tyrannical views.


.

Hey dickhead,

How is she corrupt? Point to one fucking case that shows she ruled a certain way not based on "evidence and the law".

I won't hold my breath waiting for an answer to that

From her FASCIST ELITIST standpoint Americans are NOT freemen and do not have a right to defend their lives."

Huh? Where the fuck did that come from?

Imposing her tyrannical views instead of adjudicating".

LOL. You're fucking delusional. Again, point out an example of that. Once again, I won't hold my breath.

Listen cum swallower

She wants Heller and Citizens United Overruled.

The historical EVIDENCE shows, you miserable piece of shit , that the Founding Fathers were creating a FREE COUNTRY, the historical EVIDENCE shows that the 2A confers no regulatory authority .


So why would the senile stupid fuck want those two cases overruled considering that as a "justice" she gets to vote on overruling those two cases.



.

 

[candycorn]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg talked trash about Donald Trump in an interview. Should she have?

It confirms what I have been saying all along - SCOTUS is corrupt to its core.


.

And this from the same article:

Ginsburg also told Liptak that the Senate should promptly consider President Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to replace her friend Antonin Scalia on the court. “That’s their job,” she said. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last year.”

She must be crazy! No president gets to nominate someone for a Supreme Court vacancy and have that nominee voted on in the last year of a president's term, right? Disgraceful!

And this:

She said that Garland “is about as well qualified as any nominee to this court. Super bright and very nice, very easy to deal with. And super prepared. He would be a great colleague.”

Not possible if President Obama chose him, right?

Where is it written that the Peesudent cannot do this?

SC is not supposed to be political. It was the whole fucking point.

Who told you that?

 

[Contumacious]

I guess you don't support Free Speech. By implying 'corruption' you believe the government should take action against her for expressing views to a news publication. In other words, the 1st Amendment should be set aside for people with views contrary to your own.

Good thing we have SCOTUS justices that will protect us from the likes of you...

Dingle Berry

The corrupt "justice" states that she will vote to overturn Citizens United and Heller.

Article III Justices are supposed to consider the EVIDENCE and then declare the law

here she states that she is prejudiced and favors disarming FREE PEOPLE.


Ruth Bader Ginsburg 'Can't Imagine' Trump as President, Says She Wants to See Citizens United and Heller Overturned by Liberal SCOTUS


.

 

[Vigilante]

We could IMPEACH her nasty, Commie ass, but we need a majority in the House and the Senate has to have balls enough to make it a simple majority of Senators voting to get rid of her!...That bitch is so crusty, she'll die soon!

 

[JBond]

Sigh... one President took the bully pulpit and ran with it. Another President displayed respect for the officers killed in the line of duty. It was a memorial, not a campaign stop. Bush isn't running.

 

[yiostheoy]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg talked trash about Donald Trump in an interview. Should she have?

It confirms what I have been saying all along - SCOTUS is corrupt to its core.
.

I normally do not agree with Ginsberg.

But I did agree with her about the 14th Amendment and also regarding her comments about Adolf Trump The Chump today.

 

[yiostheoy]

We could IMPEACH her nasty, Commie ass, but we need a majority in the House and the Senate has to have balls enough to make it a simple majority of Senators voting to get rid of her!...That bitch is so crusty, she'll die soon!

Only Paul Ryan in the US House can impeach her.

And then only Mitch McConnell in the US Senate could convict her.

YOU/WE cannot do anything.

The USA is a democratic republic NOT a democracy.

I agree that her comment was inappropriate and in bad taste, but funny though I agree with her this time.

Since McConnell and Ryan both do not like Adolf Trump either I doubt they are going to take any action agains Ginsberg.

 

[Vigilante]

We could IMPEACH her nasty, Commie ass, but we need a majority in the House and the Senate has to have balls enough to make it a simple majority of Senators voting to get rid of her!...That bitch is so crusty, she'll die soon!

Only Paul Ryan in the US House can impeach her.

And then only Mitch McConnell could convict her.

YOU/WE cannot do anything.

The USA is a democratic republic NOT a democracy.

Those 2 buffoons answer to US.... Ryan looks like he may be GONE after the Nov. Election, we have to wait 2 years to get rid of Mitch "Obuma's Bitch" McConnell!

 

[yiostheoy]

I guess you don't support Free Speech. By implying 'corruption' you believe the government should take action against her for expressing views to a news publication. In other words, the 1st Amendment should be set aside for people with views contrary to your own.

Good thing we have SCOTUS justices that will protect us from the likes of you...

SCOTUS justices should shut the fokk up about politics. Normally they do.

I can't believe that this old Jewish great grandmother opened her mouth about Adolf Trump.

I am sure she is right. But normally SCOTUS justices don't enter politics.