SCOTUS Declines To Hear Case Granting Fetal Personhood Rights

[skews13]

The justices turned away an appeal by a Catholic group and two women of a lower court’s ruling holding that fetuses lacked the proper legal standing to challenge a 2019 state law codifying the right to abortion in line with the Roe precedent. The two women, pregnant at the time when the case was first filed, sued on behalf of their fetuses and later gave birth.

U.S. Supreme Court rebuffs fetal personhood appeal — Reuters

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to decide whether fetuses are entitled to constitutional rights in light of its June ruling overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that had legalized abortion nationwide, steering clear for now of another front in America's culture...

apple.news

 

[martybegan]

The justices turned away an appeal by a Catholic group and two women of a lower court’s ruling holding that fetuses lacked the proper legal standing to challenge a 2019 state law codifying the right to abortion in line with the Roe precedent. The two women, pregnant at the time when the case was first filed, sued on behalf of their fetuses and later gave birth.

U.S. Supreme Court rebuffs fetal personhood appeal — Reuters

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to decide whether fetuses are entitled to constitutional rights in light of its June ruling overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that had legalized abortion nationwide, steering clear for now of another front in America's culture...

apple.news

Sounds like a Standings issue.

What they need to find is a man who's fetus was aborted against his wishes.

 

[theHawk]

The justices turned away an appeal by a Catholic group and two women of a lower court’s ruling holding that fetuses lacked the proper legal standing to challenge a 2019 state law codifying the right to abortion in line with the Roe precedent. The two women, pregnant at the time when the case was first filed, sued on behalf of their fetuses and later gave birth.

U.S. Supreme Court rebuffs fetal personhood appeal — Reuters

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to decide whether fetuses are entitled to constitutional rights in light of its June ruling overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that had legalized abortion nationwide, steering clear for now of another front in America's culture...

apple.news

So what happened to SCOTUS being a bunch of radical religious zealots?

They already turned the matter over to the states.

Are you still butt hurt over it?

 

[bravoactual]

The justices turned away an appeal by a Catholic group and two women of a lower court’s ruling holding that fetuses lacked the proper legal standing to challenge a 2019 state law codifying the right to abortion in line with the Roe precedent. The two women, pregnant at the time when the case was first filed, sued on behalf of their fetuses and later gave birth.

U.S. Supreme Court rebuffs fetal personhood appeal — Reuters

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to decide whether fetuses are entitled to constitutional rights in light of its June ruling overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that had legalized abortion nationwide, steering clear for now of another front in America's culture...

apple.news

And all the while, these sham believers in the Non-Existent "Right To Life" are cheering Pooty on as he kills unborn babies in Ukraine. FYI, "Right To Life" means exactly that. You do not get to pick and choose who does and does not have that right.

 

[martybegan]

And all the while, these sham believers in the Non-Existent "Right To Life" are cheering Pooty on as he kills unborn babies in Ukraine. FYI, "Right To Life" means exactly that. You do not get to pick and choose who does and does not have that right.

How Aristotelian of you, and how incorrect.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The Court doesn't want to deal with the mess it created.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

. The two women, pregnant at the time when the case was first filed, sued on behalf of their fetuses and later gave birth

Any language to dehumanize the unborn child, huh screwed?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

The justices turned away an appeal by a Catholic group and two women of a lower court’s ruling holding that fetuses lacked the proper legal standing to challenge a 2019 state law codifying the right to abortion in line with the Roe precedent. The two women, pregnant at the time when the case was first filed, sued on behalf of their fetuses and later gave birth.

U.S. Supreme Court rebuffs fetal personhood appeal — Reuters

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to decide whether fetuses are entitled to constitutional rights in light of its June ruling overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that had legalized abortion nationwide, steering clear for now of another front in America's culture...

apple.news

Butbutbutbut the crazy right wing justices! America is doomed! They hate women!
Here’s the deal leftists, the justices appointed by republicans are capable of independent thought and use the law to make decisions.

The democrat appointed justice vote rarely use independent thought and vote 99% alike. They use feelings and social change to try and make law. That is not their job.

A quick glance at the decisions of both sides proves it.

 

[notmyfault2020]

Butbutbutbut the crazy right wing justices! America is doomed! They hate women!
Here’s the deal leftists, the justices appointed by republicans are capable of independent thought and use the law to make decisions.

The democrat appointed justice vote rarely use independent thought and vote 99% alike. They use feelings and social change to try and make law. That is not their job.

A quick glance at the decisions of both sides proves it.

I agree but here's the problem:

the Justices probably made this decision (not tohear the case) BECAUSE ---and possibly ONLY because-- they wanted to be seen as... "independent [thinkers using] the law to make decisions.," as u say.

In other words, they appear to care (not judging, just saying that, at this point in my knowledge of thecase, they APPEAR to care) more about what people think, meaning leftists, than they do about MURDER

If so, that is nothing short of abominable.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Any language to dehumanize the unborn child, huh screwed?

Why does the word fetus trigger you so?

Do you need a 5th grader to explain to you what a fetus is?

 

[bodecea]

The justices turned away an appeal by a Catholic group and two women of a lower court’s ruling holding that fetuses lacked the proper legal standing to challenge a 2019 state law codifying the right to abortion in line with the Roe precedent. The two women, pregnant at the time when the case was first filed, sued on behalf of their fetuses and later gave birth.

U.S. Supreme Court rebuffs fetal personhood appeal — Reuters

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to decide whether fetuses are entitled to constitutional rights in light of its June ruling overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that had legalized abortion nationwide, steering clear for now of another front in America's culture...

apple.news

The anti-choice MAGAts want their cake and eat it too.

 

[bodecea]

Sounds like a Standings issue.

What they need to find is a man who's fetus was aborted against his wishes.

There you have it, folks....it's about men and their rights. Like we are seeing in Georgia.....anti-choicers are for abortion if it's for the con-venience of the father.

 

[martybegan]

There you have it, folks....it's about men and their rights. Like we are seeing in Georgia.....anti-choicers are for abortion if it's for the con-venience of the father.

If women have a choice to legally abort, why shouldn't men have the same right?

Ironically, if an ERA was passed, that could be a potential outcome.

 

[jbrownson0831]

The Court doesn't want to deal with the mess it created.

They correctly turned it over to the states, not their job anymore to rule on baby killing.

 

[Rogue AI]

Definitions must be legislated, it is not a judiciary function. The judiciary's function is determine if the legislated definitions fall within Constitutional constraints. This is why gay marriage will be overturned.

 

[notmyfault2020]

Definitions must be legislated, it is not a judiciary function. The judiciary's function is determine if the legislated definitions fall within Constitutional constraints. This is why gay marriage will be overturned.

Does this mean gay marriage will return to the states like Roe?

 

[airplanemechanic]

And all the while, these sham believers in the Non-Existent "Right To Life" are cheering Pooty on as he kills unborn babies in Ukraine. FYI, "Right To Life" means exactly that. You do not get to pick and choose who does and does not have that right.

Non existent?

Declaration of Independence: A Transcription

[get-content name="print-page-left" include-tag="false" /] Note: The following text is a transcription of the Stone Engraving of the parchment Declaration of Independence (the document on display in the Rotunda at the National Archives Museum.) The spelling and punctuation reflects the original.

www.archives.gov

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness"

 

[skews13]

Butbutbutbut the crazy right wing justices! America is doomed! They hate women!
Here’s the deal leftists, the justices appointed by republicans are capable of independent thought and use the law to make decisions.

The democrat appointed justice vote rarely use independent thought and vote 99% alike. They use feelings and social change to try and make law. That is not their job.

A quick glance at the decisions of both sides proves it.

There is only one side. The pregnant womans.

Nobody else has a say in the matter.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

They correctly turned it over to the states, not their job anymore to rule on baby killing.

Dobbs was wrongly decided, of course – and like all bad law it will eventually be overturned or nullified.

Meanwhile, the Court will be continuously reminded of the mess it created with idiotic nonsense such ‘fetal personhood.’

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

There is only one side. The pregnant womans.

Nobody else has a say in the matter.

Sorry skippy. The second you morons made us pay for it us taxpayers have plenty of say.

Haven’t you fools learned yet, leftism always generates the opposite of its stated intent.