SCOTUS allows Trump to finish dismantling the Department of Education

Well, that guarantees 99% of the teachers' and their families' vote next time to non-MAGA candidates.
The Federal Reserve head is renovating the Federal Reserve building for Two and a Half billion dollars. Imagine the globalist communications and security modernized through technologies in it.
 
The Federal Reserve head is renovating the Federal Reserve building for Two and a Half billion dollars. Imagine the globalist communications and security modernized through technologies in it.
Without the fed, inflation might still be 9%
 
I didn't say they did. Or anything close to that. But since you brought it up, maybe those involved with our children's education and making policy about it should include those who teach them?
Yes, I agree, but elected politicians are the ones driving education into the gutter in blue states and cities.
 
If they are Marxists they are very concerned ( don’t give Marxists Shade )
I had one liberal professor for my master's degree and he was the best liberal I have met because he respected my right to my own opinion, and he did not flinch when the teachers in his class fought him on some of his opinions. Most of my graduate professors were former classroom teachers and somewhere to the right of Attila the Hun!
 
Yes, and you forget what it was like for kids with physical and learning disabilities. They didn't attend school at all. Poor and minority kids got little to no education at all because their schools were underfunded and their teachers were unqualified. The grass is greener only on your side of the fence back then.
The government could direct funding and create programs to help parents with the very small percentage of special needs kids so that the public schools could focus all their attention and resources on the other kids to provide them with a world class education.

Same with healthcare. Instead of a one-size fits all system, the government could focus extra resources on the relatively few special situations and allow the free market to provide affordable healthcare for everybody else.

That is what happens in most states with car insurance. There are some people that are so high risk that they are almost uninsuranble. So rather than allowing those people to needlessly drive up premiums for everybody else., the state puts together an assigned risk system for the hard to insure people. Their premiums are higher as they should be but at least they can get insurance and it helps keep rates more affordable for the general public.
 
Yes, I agree, but elected politicians are the ones driving education into the gutter in blue states and cities.
The whole MAGA vision is to restore efficiency, effectiveness and government that serves the people again instead of professional politicians.

Americans can help us or fight us every inch of the way. That is everybody's choice.

Getting rid of an inefficient, ineffective, expensive Department of Education is a good start on that though.
 
Three in four Americans (75%) say it is not acceptable for members of Congress to threaten a government shutdown during budget negotiations to achieve their goals. 23% believe it is acceptable, up from 14% in a 2015 CBS/New York Times poll. Republicans (37%) are more than twice as likely as Democrats (18%) to say a shutdown can be used as a negotiation tactic
 
The government could direct funding and create programs to help parents with the very small percentage of special needs kids so that the public schools could focus all their attention and resources on the other kids to provide them with a world class education.

Same with healthcare. Instead of a one-size fits all system, the government could focus extra resources on the relatively few special situations and allow the free market to provide affordable healthcare for everybody else.

That is what happens in most states with car insurance. There are some people that are so high risk that they are almost uninsuranble. So rather than allowing those people to needlessly drive up premiums for everybody else., the state puts together an assigned risk system for the hard to insure people. Their premiums are higher as they should be but at least they can get insurance and it helps keep rates more affordable for the general public.

Oh, I'm sorry! I need to sit down for that level of bullshit! What is a small percentage? I have had classes where half of my students were on IEPs or 504 plans. Your ignorance of reality is laughable!
 
The whole MAGA vision is to restore efficiency, effectiveness and government that serves the people again instead of professional politicians.

Americans can help us or fight us every inch of the way. That is everybody's choice.

Getting rid of an inefficient, ineffective, expensive Department of Education is a good start on that though.
When did I say it wasn't? My whole beef is the with the utter ignorance that people conjure up other arguments which are based on lies and misinformation. Your comments the small number of special ed students in the previous post is prime evidence that mostly you people are clueless!

Posters on this thread have ascribed functions to the Education Department that it has never had. They simply do not understand that education is run at the local school level, despite what the media tells you to believe.
 
A Majority of the Public Worry About the Consequences of Proposed Medicaid Cuts
The latest KFF poll shows that most adults are worried significant reductions in federal Medicaid spending will lead to more uninsured people and will strain health care providers in their communities. About seven in ten adults (72%) are worried that a significant reduction in federal funding for Medicaid would lead to an increase in the share of uninsured children and adults in the U.S., including nearly half (46%) who are “very worried” and one in four (25%) who are “somewhat worried.”

Similarly, about seven in ten adults say they are worried that if the federal government significantly reduces its spending on Medicaid, there will be negative impacts on hospitals, nursing homes, and other health care providers in their communities (71%), including four in ten (42%) who are “very worried” and three in ten (28%) who are “somewhat worried.”

Over half (54%) of U.S. adults are worried that reductions in federal Medicaid spending would negatively impact their own or their family’s ability to get and pay for health care, including about three in ten who are “very worried” (29%) and one in four (26%) who are “somewhat worried.”
 
15th post
What is that meaning less BS you just posted? State departments don't work for the President, dumbass!
My god you believe that the Department of Education is not a government department

This is your level - The thread is about the Depart of education and Trump fired someone

Booze alert - cut down on it while posting

Do you realize that the this discussion is about Trump firing prople from working in a state department ?

You really should read the threads before answering

If you believe what you post then take it up with Trump
 
IMG_4089.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom