Science denialism: The problem that just won’t go away

[jc456]

pretty picture, has absolutely no value to any discussion. Still waiting on that list of scientists and the questions.

Your nonsense I use to send out more info

and absolutely no value to any discussion. Again, you think you can merely talk a talk and not walk a walk. nope.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Again, post up the number of scientists and the questions they responded to. Can you even do that?

Figure 1.Response distribution to the question, "Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?" (Source)

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

irrelevant and is apples to oranges and still not a response to the OP.

So its irrelevant he denies the science on tobacco use ? he is a paid charlatan

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

the consensus project

 

[jc456]

Again, post up the number of scientists and the questions they responded to. Can you even do that?

Figure 1.Response distribution to the question, "Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?" (Source)

I swear, you all post such irrelevant data: from your own article:

"
suggests that only 58% of the general public
would answer yes to our question 2.
The two areas of expertise in the survey
with the smallest percentage of participants
answering yes to question 2 were
economic geology with 47% (48 of 103)
and meteorology with 64% (23 of 36).
It seems that the debate on the
authenticity of global warming and the
role played by human activity is largely
nonexistent among those who understand
the nuances and scientific basis
of long-term
climate processes."

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Again, post up the number of scientists and the questions they responded to. Can you even do that?

Figure 1.Response distribution to the question, "Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?" (Source)

I swear, you all post such irrelevant data: from your own article:

"
suggests that only 58% of the general public
would answer yes to our question 2.
The two areas of expertise in the survey
with the smallest percentage of participants
answering yes to question 2 were
economic geology with 47% (48 of 103)
and meteorology with 64% (23 of 36).
It seems that the debate on the
authenticity of global warming and the
role played by human activity is largely
nonexistent among those who understand
the nuances and scientific basis
of long-term
climate processes."

"It seems that the debate on the
authenticity of global warming and the
role played by human activity is largely
nonexistent among those who understand
the nuances and scientific basis
of long-term
climate processes."

There is no debate Global warming is real

 

[Wuwei]

It seems that the debate on the
authenticity of global warming and the
role played by human activity is largely
nonexistent among those who understand
the nuances and scientific basis
of long-term
climate processes."

Your don't understand the statement you quoted. Let me interpret for you.
"It seems that the debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely nonexistent among [scientists] those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes."
the phrase "those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes" is referring to the 97% scientists. In short, the article says the debate is nonexistent because the 97% scientists prevail over the 3%.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

How does atmospheric CO2 heat the ocean 700M deep?????????

 

[jc456]

Again, post up the number of scientists and the questions they responded to. Can you even do that?

Figure 1.Response distribution to the question, "Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?" (Source)

I swear, you all post such irrelevant data: from your own article:

"
suggests that only 58% of the general public
would answer yes to our question 2.
The two areas of expertise in the survey
with the smallest percentage of participants
answering yes to question 2 were
economic geology with 47% (48 of 103)
and meteorology with 64% (23 of 36).
It seems that the debate on the
authenticity of global warming and the
role played by human activity is largely
nonexistent among those who understand
the nuances and scientific basis
of long-term
climate processes."

"It seems that the debate on the
authenticity of global warming and the
role played by human activity is largely
nonexistent among those who understand
the nuances and scientific basis
of long-term
climate processes."

There is no debate Global warming is real

there isn't one person who can deny that since the ice age the earth hasn't warmed. Can't be. what's your point? It was your lousy post that proves my point!! And you wish to take it further? Accept your fail and move on.

 

[jc456]

It seems that the debate on the
authenticity of global warming and the
role played by human activity is largely
nonexistent among those who understand
the nuances and scientific basis
of long-term
climate processes."

Your don't understand the statement you quoted. Let me interpret for you.
"It seems that the debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely nonexistent among [scientists] those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes."
the phrase "those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes" is referring to the 97% scientists. In short, the article says the debate is nonexistent because the 97% scientists prevail over the 3%.

ouch, man you're right, it is just nonexistent to every other human on the earth that isn't part of the 75.

 

[Wuwei]

ouch, man you're right, it is just nonexistent to every other human on the earth that isn't part of the 75.

You still don't understand. The debate is nonexistent to those scientists. Every other human on earth can insult each other and call it a debate if they want, but it is a non-sequitur.

 

[jc456]

ouch, man you're right, it is just nonexistent to every other human on the earth that isn't part of the 75.

You still don't understand. The debate is nonexistent to those scientists. Every other human on earth can insult each other and call it a debate if they want, but it is a non-sequitur.

but it's the rest of the population which votes and decides what is important, and today, not so much is about climate because it's all a lie. The earth proved the 75 wrong.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Again, post up the number of scientists and the questions they responded to. Can you even do that?

Figure 1.Response distribution to the question, "Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?" (Source)

I swear, you all post such irrelevant data: from your own article:

"
suggests that only 58% of the general public
would answer yes to our question 2.
The two areas of expertise in the survey
with the smallest percentage of participants
answering yes to question 2 were
economic geology with 47% (48 of 103)
and meteorology with 64% (23 of 36).
It seems that the debate on the
authenticity of global warming and the
role played by human activity is largely
nonexistent among those who understand
the nuances and scientific basis
of long-term
climate processes."

"It seems that the debate on the
authenticity of global warming and the
role played by human activity is largely
nonexistent among those who understand
the nuances and scientific basis
of long-term
climate processes."

There is no debate Global warming is real

there isn't one person who can deny that since the ice age the earth hasn't warmed. Can't be. what's your point? It was your lousy post that proves my point!! And you wish to take it further? Accept your fail and move on.

You are an an anti science zealot ...its in the Bible

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

ouch, man you're right, it is just nonexistent to every other human on the earth that isn't part of the 75.

You still don't understand. The debate is nonexistent to those scientists. Every other human on earth can insult each other and call it a debate if they want, but it is a non-sequitur.

but it's the rest of the population which votes and decides what is important, and today, not so much is about climate because it's all a lie. The earth proved the 75 wrong.

he only one proved wrong is you .,..its in the Bible

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

How does atmospheric CO2 heat the ocean 700M deep?????????

How does The Heartland Institute spend the money that Koch brothers pay them ?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

The "tobacco being dangerous to human health denialist" also denies human affected Climate change but according to the numb nuts it should not affect his credibility and has nothing to do with the OP

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

ouch, man you're right, it is just nonexistent to every other human on the earth that isn't part of the 75.

You still don't understand. The debate is nonexistent to those scientists. Every other human on earth can insult each other and call it a debate if they want, but it is a non-sequitur.

but it's the rest of the population which votes and decides what is important, and today, not so much is about climate because it's all a lie. The earth proved the 75 wrong.

"There is no ambiguity" on climate change, U.N. concludes
Source: CBS News

COPENHAGEN, Denmark - Climate change is happening, it's almost entirely man's fault and limiting its impacts may require reducing greenhouse gas emissions to zero this century, the U.N.'s panel on climate science said Sunday.

The fourth and final volume of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's giant climate assessment didn't offer any surprises, nor was it expected to since it combined the findings of three earlier reports released in the past 13 months.

But it underlined the scope of the climate challenge in stark terms. Emissions, mainly from the burning of fossil fuels, may need to drop to zero by the end of this century for the world to have a decent chance of keeping the temperature rise below a level that many consider dangerous. Failure to do so, which could require deployment of technologies that suck greenhouse gases out of the atmosphere, could lock the world on a trajectory with "irreversible" impacts on people, like altering the male-female ratio, and on the environment, the report said. Some impacts are already being observed, including rising sea levels, a warmer and more acidic ocean, melting glaciers and Arctic sea ice and more frequent and intense heat waves.

"Science has spoken. There is no ambiguity in their message. Leaders must act. Time is not on our side," U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said at the report's launch in Copenhagen.

Read more: There is no ambiguity on climate change U.N. concludes - CBS News

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

"Science has spoken. There is no ambiguity in their message. Leaders must act. Time is not on our side," U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said at the report's launch in Copenhagen.

Read more: There is no ambiguity on climate change U.N. concludes - CBS News

The above is a quote from UN Secretary General on human caused warming..Poll question

who do you think is likely correct on this issue

a)numb nuts Science deniers______

b) the UN Chief ______

 

[jc456]

so tell me how money fixes your problem?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

So climate change can no longer be denied – or ignored. The world is looking to the United States – to us – to lead. And that’s what we’re doing. We’re using more clean energy than ever before. America is number one in wind power, and every three weeks, we bring online as much solar power as we did in all of 2008. We’re taking steps to waste less energy, with more fuel-efficient cars that save us money at the pump, and more energy-efficient buildings that save us money on our electricity bills.

So thanks in part to these actions, our carbon pollution has fallen by 10 percent since 2007, even as we’ve grown our economy and seen the longest streak of private-sector job growth on record. We’ve committed to doubling the pace at which we cut carbon pollution, and China has committed, for the first time, to limiting their emissions. And because the world’s two largest economies came together, there’s new hope that, with American leadership, this year, the world will finally reach an agreement to prevent the worst impacts of climate change before it’s too late.

This is an issue that’s bigger and longer-lasting than my presidency. It’s about protecting our God-given natural wonders, and the good jobs that rely on them. It’s about shielding our cities and our families from disaster and harm. It’s about keeping our kids healthy and safe. This is the only planet we’ve got. And years from now, I want to be able to look our children and grandchildren in the eye and tell them that we did everything we could to protect it.



Transcript
Weekly Address Climate Change Can No Longer Be Ignored The White House


POTUS says "climate change can no longer be denied" and the US must lead to prevent danger ...Poll question

who has more credibility

a) POTUS ____________

b)numb nut barely literate Bible thumpin Koch snorting climate deniers_____