"Science be damned!" Let's have Oil rule our lives!

[Soupnazi630]

So the opinion of 11,000 scientists means nothing. YOU know better, right?

Your claim is those scientists is fictitious

 

[Luckyone]

You just proved my point

There is NO evidence of this doom and gloom prediction your post about

It is alramist crap and no reason to push draconian laws and regulations.

NO science is supporting your bullshit

In my case, I have given the information that 11,000 scientists have stated. That is their opinion off of their studies. It is not my opinion, given that I have no tools to study the climate, one way or the other.

Given that you say there is no evidence, there must be some proof you can show where the opinions of those thousands of scientists has been disproven. Why do you not show us that information so we too can realize what is real and what is not!

You evidently know something those scientists do now know. Show us

 

[Soupnazi630]

In my case, I have given the information that 11,000 scientists have stated. That is their opinion off of their studies. It is not my opinion, given that I have no tools to study the climate, one way or the other.

Given that you say there is no evidence, there must be some proof you can show where the opinions of those thousands of scientists has been disproven. Why do you not show us that information so we too can realize what is real and what is not!

You evidently know something those scientists do now know. Show us

No you have not

You pullsed it out of thin air

 

[Luckyone]

Your claim is those scientists is fictitious

How Scientists Arrived at This Conclusion:

• Peer-Reviewed Literature Review: A 2021 survey of 88,125 climate-related studies found that over 99.9% of peer-reviewed papers agree that climate change is primarily caused by human activities.
• Analysis of Atmospheric Evidence: Scientists found that burning fossil fuels (coal, oil, gas) increases carbon dioxide (
  CO2cap C cap O sub 2
  ) in the atmosphere.
• Greenhouse Effect Understanding: Researchers have known since the mid-19th century that certain gases trap heat; human activity has amplified this natural greenhouse effect.
• Expert Surveys: Surveys of climate experts have consistently shown that 97% to 100% agree that human activity is the main driver of global warming, with higher consensus among those with greater expertise.

Key Findings:

• Historical Consensus: Studies from 1991–2012 showed a 97% consensus, which has grown to over 99% in more recent analyses.
• Global Agreement: Scientific academies from 17+ countries, including the US, China, and the UK, have issued joint statements endorsing that rising temperatures are due to human activities.
• Independent Research: Various independent studies, including those by William Anderegg and John Cook, have confirmed this high level of consensus.

• More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change | Cornell Chronicle
  Oct 19, 2021 — According to a survey of 88,125 climate-related studies, more than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is happening
  
  
• 
  

 

[Billiejeens]

Stop using Regulatory agencies to enact regulation through the back door that should be law.

If this is so obviously needed, pass a law.

Pass a law.

 

[Hafar1014]

Your claim is those scientists is fictitious

No paid for

 

[Soupnazi630]

How Scientists Arrived at This Conclusion:

• Peer-Reviewed Literature Review: A 2021 survey of 88,125 climate-related studies found that over 99.9% of peer-reviewed papers agree that climate change is primarily caused by human activities.
• Analysis of Atmospheric Evidence: Scientists found that burning fossil fuels (coal, oil, gas) increases carbon dioxide (
  CO2cap C cap O sub 2
  ) in the atmosphere.
• Greenhouse Effect Understanding: Researchers have known since the mid-19th century that certain gases trap heat; human activity has amplified this natural greenhouse effect.
• Expert Surveys: Surveys of climate experts have consistently shown that 97% to 100% agree that human activity is the main driver of global warming, with higher consensus among those with greater expertise.

Key Findings:

• Historical Consensus: Studies from 1991–2012 showed a 97% consensus, which has grown to over 99% in more recent analyses.
• Global Agreement: Scientific academies from 17+ countries, including the US, China, and the UK, have issued joint statements endorsing that rising temperatures are due to human activities.
• Independent Research: Various independent studies, including those by William Anderegg and John Cook, have confirmed this high level of consensus.
• More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change | Cornell Chronicle
  Oct 19, 2021 — According to a survey of 88,125 climate-related studies, more than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is happening
  
  

Yes moron we have been over that

Claionming humans are affectying the climitae IS NOT gthe same as saying we are ruining the environment

Your desert planet predictions are NOT what those scientists aere saying you dumbass

 

[Luckyone]

No you have not

You pullsed it out of thin air

This is "THIN AIR"?

Cornell Chronicle Oct 19, 2021 — According to a survey of 88,125 climate-related studies, more than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is happening

More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change​

why don't you get into a debate with Cornell University instead of with me? They are the ones saying it (not me)!

 

[Soupnazi630]

This is "THIN AIR"?

Cornell Chronicle Oct 19, 2021 — According to a survey of 88,125 climate-related studies, more than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is happening

More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change​

why don't you get into a debate with Cornell University instead of with me? They are the ones saying it (not me)!

One more time you illiterate fool

CLIMITA CHANGE IS HAPPENING

does not mean

We are turning the world into a desert

You are a fudcking idiot

Those scientists DO NOT support the crap you are spewing

 

[Frankeneinstein]

If you believe you provide a source that is "clean, intelligent, and cheap" then why do you try to force restrictions on the other guy and not show yourself to the market?

Because parrots don't have ideas, just the words of others.

 

[Luckyone]

Yes moron we have been over that

Claionming humans are affectying the climitae IS NOT gthe same as saying we are ruining the environment

Your desert planet predictions are NOT what those scientists aere saying you dumbass

Let me go ONE step further and rub your nose into your own shit.

The pic I put up came from a publication called Science Alert

Here's What Earth Might Look Like in 100 Years - if We're Lucky

ScienceAlert – Bias and Credibility​

---

PRO-SCIENCE​

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

So now, you have the source of the pic I put up, meaning that IT IS WHAT THE SCIENTISTS ARE SAYING!

So now, your nose is into your own shit. Prove them wrong and prove me wrong, if you can. So far you have yet to provide on single article that supports your words.

 

[Hafar1014]

This is "THIN AIR"?

Cornell Chronicle Oct 19, 2021 — According to a survey of 88,125 climate-related studies, more than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is happening

More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change​

why don't you get into a debate with Cornell University instead of with me? They are the ones saying it (not me)!

But not caused by humans

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Let me go ONE step further and rub your nose into your own shit.

The pic I put up came from a publication called Science Alert

Here's What Earth Might Look Like in 100 Years - if We're Lucky

ScienceAlert – Bias and Credibility​

---

PRO-SCIENCE​

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.

So now, you have the source of the pic I put up, meaning that IT IS WHAT THE SCIENTISTS ARE SAYING!

So now, your nose is into your own shit. Prove them wrong and prove me wrong, if you can. So far you have yet to provide on single article that supports your words.

You've had about twenty years and none of your doomsday bullshit has happened

 

[Luckyone]

But not caused by humans

Are you totally blind. The article I gave you from Cornell University clearly stated "caused by humans"

You keep on saying that it is untrue but you NEVER supply any links to any articles that say that climate change now is a natural phenomenon. If it is, there should be MANY articles saying so! why have you not provided any?

I have done nothing but provide links to articles and studies saying that it is caused by humans.

You look like a total dimwit with these posts of yours.

 

[Hafar1014]

Are you totally blind. The article I gave you from Cornell University clearly stated "caused by humans"

You keep on saying that it is untrue but you NEVER supply any links to any articles that say that climate change now is a natural phenomenon. If it is, there should be MANY articles saying so! why have you not provided any?

I have done nothing but provide links to articles and studies saying that it is caused by humans.

You look like a total dimwit with these posts of yours.

Your post didnt in any case their results are bought and paid for. Im not the one who believes this nonesense

 

[SweetTea]

Meaning that having a "preventive" attitude is wrong. We should actually wait until something really bad happens before doing anything about it, richt. For example, we should all be eating sugar to the nth degree until we actually become diabetics before eating right, correct?

Yes, it is wrong if it harms people in the near term. Maybe it will shock you to learn that everyone is not as affluent as we are here in the United States. Using far less efficient energy sources is not tenable for many other countries.

 

[Hafar1014]

Yes, it is wrong if it harms people in the near term. Maybe it will shock you to learn that everyone is not as affluent as we are here in the United States. Using far less efficient energy sources is not tenable for many other countries.

The solutions will cause harm especially in poor nations and the problem doesnt exist in the first place

 

[Luckyone]

Your post didnt in any case their results are bought and paid for. Im not the one who believes this nonesense

then prove that it is nonsense. You NEVER are able to prove any of your statements.

You are like this meme

 

[Luckyone]

Yes, it is wrong if it harms people in the near term. Maybe it will shock you to learn that everyone is not as affluent as we are here in the United States. Using far less efficient energy sources is not tenable for many other countries.

So all countries should continue with this, right?

 

[SweetTea]

So all countries should continue with this, right?

View attachment 1217881

As opposed to dying because they can't produce enough energy? Absolutely.