Schumer's pipe dream, a trial with.....you know.....evidence.

[Missouri_Mike]

Schumer Declared If the GOP Plays By Same Rules The House Dems Did, They're 'Engaged In A Cover Up'

Pure bullshit. Name just ONE relavant witness Democrats did not want to interview.

Republicans want to to have a testimony of everyone EXCEPT ANYONE DIRECTLY INVOLVED with the Ukrainian drug deal Trump is accused of.

The whistlegossip.

Whistleblower IS NOT A DIRECT WITNESS to anything. He was not on the call and had absolutely no role in dealing with Ukrainians.

A common theme with all of your so called witnesses. Not one saw a damn thing.

 

[blackhawk]

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Pure bullshit. Name just ONE relavant witness Democrats did not want to interview.

Republicans want to to have a testimony of everyone EXCEPT ANYONE DIRECTLY INVOLVED with the Ukrainian drug deal Trump is accused of.

You first name one relevant witness at the inquiry? GO__________

All of them.

There was just ONE fact witness that was relevant.. Sondland.. Everyone else was blatant character assassins, liares , and conjecture.....

Sondland amended his testimony and Yermak disputed Sondlands amended testimony

When did Yermak testify?
Oh wait, they didn’t.

Yermak could have said nothing
Why don't they call him as a fact witness?

 

[colfax_m]

You first name one relevant witness at the inquiry? GO__________

All of them.

There was just ONE fact witness that was relevant.. Sondland.. Everyone else was blatant character assassins, liares , and conjecture.....

Sondland amended his testimony and Yermak disputed Sondlands amended testimony

When did Yermak testify?
Oh wait, they didn’t.

Yermak could have said nothing
Why don't they call him as a fact witness?

What does Trump do to people that don’t defend him enough?

Ukraine is in a tough spot.

 

[Leo123]

The key to understanding the disingenuous nature of the OP is House Repubs wanted to turn the inquiry in to Kabuki theater by introducing witnesses irrelevant to the matter at hand, Trump's extortion of Ukraine. Schumer wants the opposite. He wants witness testimony from people like Bolton, Mulvaney, Perry, Pompeo, Giuliani who can add substantive testimony for the record.
See the difference?

Schumer does not want witnesses that would expose the corruption of the Obama Whitehouse and Biden's treasonous use of taxpayers dollars to bail out his son Hunter. That is what their 'impeachment' is all about.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

All of them.

There was just ONE fact witness that was relevant.. Sondland.. Everyone else was blatant character assassins, liares , and conjecture.....

Sondland amended his testimony and Yermak disputed Sondlands amended testimony

When did Yermak testify?
Oh wait, they didn’t.

Yermak could have said nothing
Why don't they call him as a fact witness?

What does Trump do to people that don’t defend him enough?

Ukraine is in a tough spot.

That's a weak response Yermak could have said nothing Trump get's impeached lol do you have anything better?

 

[rightwinger]

How does the GOP justify coordinating the proceedings with the accused?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How does the GOP justify coordinating the proceedings with the accused?

The same way Schiff assisted the whistleblower with his statement

 

[Billy_Bob]

How does the GOP justify coordinating the proceedings with the accused?

Tell me again what crime it is that was included in the articles?

 

[georgephillip]

Pure bullshit. Name just ONE relavant witness Democrats did not want to interview.

Republicans want to to have a testimony of everyone EXCEPT ANYONE DIRECTLY INVOLVED with the Ukrainian drug deal Trump is accused of.

The whistlegossip.

That's one....Now GTFO.

but how do you envision this will actually help him in his defense of the two charges in the articles of impeachment he is being tried for...?

In the words of Forrest Gump sorry if republicans ruined your impeachment party.
Now if yall had credible evidence it might have gone somewhere lol

In the words of Forrest Gump sorry if republicans ruined your impeachment party.
Now if yall had credible evidence it might have gone somewhere lol

Trump blocked the individuals and documents that might have provided "credible evidence" from the American public during the House investigations.

Will Senate Republicans serve the same function in Trump's upcoming trial?

What are Republicans afraid of?

you have a wild imagination it must be that TDS

you have a wild imagination it must be that TDS

Maybe it's all those "ridiculous" subpoenas?

Trump Vows Stonewall of ‘All’ House Subpoenas, Setting Up Fight Over Powers

"WASHINGTON — The Trump administration escalated its defiance of Congress on Wednesday, as the Justice Department refused to let an official testify on Capitol Hill and President Trump vowed to fight what he called a 'ridiculous' subpoena ordering a former top aide to appear before lawmakers.

"'We’re fighting all the subpoenas,' Mr. Trump told reporters outside the White House. 'These aren’t, like, impartial people. The Democrats are trying to win 2020.'"

Maybe Putin will testify at Trump's upcoming trial?

 

[Oddball]

Schumer Declared If the GOP Plays By Same Rules The House Dems Did, They're 'Engaged In A Cover Up'

Pure bullshit. Name just ONE relavant witness Democrats did not want to interview.

Republicans want to to have a testimony of everyone EXCEPT ANYONE DIRECTLY INVOLVED with the Ukrainian drug deal Trump is accused of.

The whistlegossip.

That's one....Now GTFO.

but how do you envision this will actually help him in his defense of the two charges in the articles of impeachment he is being tried for...?

Not the question.

Thanks for playing.

 

[Oddball]

How does the GOP justify coordinating the proceedings with the accused?

Tell me again what crime it is that was included in the articles?

Obstruction of Hillary from the White House.

 

[Oddball]

The whistlegossip.

That's one....Now GTFO.

but how do you envision this will actually help him in his defense of the two charges in the articles of impeachment he is being tried for...?

In the words of Forrest Gump sorry if republicans ruined your impeachment party.
Now if yall had credible evidence it might have gone somewhere lol

In the words of Forrest Gump sorry if republicans ruined your impeachment party.
Now if yall had credible evidence it might have gone somewhere lol

Trump blocked the individuals and documents that might have provided "credible evidence" from the American public during the House investigations.

Will Senate Republicans serve the same function in Trump's upcoming trial?

What are Republicans afraid of?

you have a wild imagination it must be that TDS

you have a wild imagination it must be that TDS

Maybe it's all those "ridiculous" subpoenas?

Trump Vows Stonewall of ‘All’ House Subpoenas, Setting Up Fight Over Powers

"WASHINGTON — The Trump administration escalated its defiance of Congress on Wednesday, as the Justice Department refused to let an official testify on Capitol Hill and President Trump vowed to fight what he called a 'ridiculous' subpoena ordering a former top aide to appear before lawmakers.

"'We’re fighting all the subpoenas,' Mr. Trump told reporters outside the White House. 'These aren’t, like, impartial people. The Democrats are trying to win 2020.'"

Maybe Putin will testify at Trump's upcoming trial?

Schitt and Nads had no right to them...If they did have a right to them, they could have sued and won.

Suck it.

 

[SAYIT]

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'
Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'


View attachment 295109
Bwuhahahahahaha......


View attachment 295108

.

Democrats in the House offered Trump an opportunity to provide fact witnesses and documents and the life-long pathological liar/con man refused to comply.

Why would Trump refuse the upcoming opportunity of a Senate trial to testify UNDER OATH in his own defense?

Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?

Trump impeachment: What's next in full House vote, Senate trial
One of the most hotly debated points could focus on the lack of a Judiciary Committee hearing with witnesses chosen by Republicans. The absence of the hearing fuels Republican complaints the process is unfair and partisan. Such a hearing is promised in the House rules, but not the timing. Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., chose not to schedule one before voting.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Wants the Senate trial to be limited to only what the House presented. He says that’s only fair. He’s an idiot.



it was just on TV. I will add link as soon as it becomes available.

Thank Heaven he's not a majority in the Senate or this nation would be in serious trouble. /whew!

This nation is in trouble, elected officials take an oath that their loyalty is to the Constitution and the people of this country. Unfortunately Republicans in the Senate their loyalty is to Trump, Mitch McConnell and Lindsay Graham have sold this country out.

 

[WillowTree]

Wants the Senate trial to be limited to only what the House presented. He says that’s only fair. He’s an idiot.



it was just on TV. I will add link as soon as it becomes available.

Thank Heaven he's not a majority in the Senate or this nation would be in serious trouble. /whew!

This nation is in trouble, elected officials take an oath that their loyalty is to the Constitution and the people of this country. Unfortunately Republicans in the Senate their loyalty is to Trump, Mitch McConnell and Lindsay Graham have sold this country out.

Nope! Sorry bud. The Demon Rats sold this country out.

 

[The Original Tree]

Schummer and The Democrats should get Nothing Nothing Nothing Nothing.

They denied Due process, they used secret witness and false testimony.

Both The FBI, FISA, and The House of Representatives Violated The President’s Civil Rights, and there is now a Criminal Investigation in to all of this is under way!

Nothing should be done until that is over! Nothing until the indictments and the investigation is complete!

They manufactured fictitious crimes that do not
Exist in US Code.

They refused cross Examination of witnesses, and refused To allow The Whistleblower to be cross examined.

Fuck Chuck Schummer. I hope he chokes on his boyfriend’s Cock!

And Fuck Comey’s Lying Apology! He knew exactly what was going on. He filed the False Affidavits in FISA!

The Democrats can Choke on the big Turd they lied!

Fuck Lying Schiff too, lying just ass off about FISA just like Comey.

They knew. Nunes Reported it and Schiff issued a Rebuttal Full of lies way back then.

 

[22lcidw]

Wants the Senate trial to be limited to only what the House presented. He says that’s only fair. He’s an idiot.



it was just on TV. I will add link as soon as it becomes available.



here is link.

I agree with him.

Harry Reid was a true SOB.

 

[georgephillip]

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'
Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'


View attachment 295109
Bwuhahahahahaha......


View attachment 295108

.

Democrats in the House offered Trump an opportunity to provide fact witnesses and documents and the life-long pathological liar/con man refused to comply.

Why would Trump refuse the upcoming opportunity of a Senate trial to testify UNDER OATH in his own defense?

Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?

Trump impeachment: What's next in full House vote, Senate trial
One of the most hotly debated points could focus on the lack of a Judiciary Committee hearing with witnesses chosen by Republicans. The absence of the hearing fuels Republican complaints the process is unfair and partisan. Such a hearing is promised in the House rules, but not the timing. Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., chose not to schedule one before voting.

Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?

Which Republican witnesses were denied an opportunity to testify in House proceedings? How does their alleged absence justify a Senate trial devoid of all witness testimony? Couldn't Trump clear this up by personally testifying UNDER OATH in front of 200 million viewers?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Schumer dreamed he'd enjoy the same freedom Reid had, but fate intervened, and McConnell brushes him off like a busboy.