Schumer's pipe dream, a trial with.....you know.....evidence.

[skookerasbil]

LOL.....**** Schumer. Our turn!

We get to make the rules.....time to bring the bumpy! Whistleblower.....Schiff.....Comey.....drag all their asses up there. Frag their asses.

The worm turns starting this week!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

In the words of Forrest Gump sorry if republicans ruined your impeachment party.
Now if yall had credible evidence it might have gone somewhere lol

In the words of Forrest Gump sorry if republicans ruined your impeachment party.
Now if yall had credible evidence it might have gone somewhere lol

Trump blocked the individuals and documents that might have provided "credible evidence" from the American public during the House investigations.

Will Senate Republicans serve the same function in Trump's upcoming trial?

What are Republicans afraid of?

you have a wild imagination it must be that TDS

you have a wild imagination it must be that TDS

Maybe it's all those "ridiculous" subpoenas?

Trump Vows Stonewall of ‘All’ House Subpoenas, Setting Up Fight Over Powers

"WASHINGTON — The Trump administration escalated its defiance of Congress on Wednesday, as the Justice Department refused to let an official testify on Capitol Hill and President Trump vowed to fight what he called a 'ridiculous' subpoena ordering a former top aide to appear before lawmakers.

"'We’re fighting all the subpoenas,' Mr. Trump told reporters outside the White House. 'These aren’t, like, impartial people. The Democrats are trying to win 2020.'"

Maybe Putin will testify at Trump's upcoming trial?

I don't blame him why give credibility to a Schiff Sham

I don't blame him why give credibility to a Schiff Sham

Will you blame Trump if he doesn't testify in his own defense during Moscow Mitch's upcoming Senate circus?

I'll get pissed if he does

 

[SAYIT]

Here’s how this works you Commie piece of Shit.

You called your witnesses in an extremely Partisan DemTard House Committee Hearing where Republicans were out numbered 24-17.

That Hearing that was Grotesque example of Abusing Civil Rights. You could not even charge The President with a real crime despite your giving The Middle Finger to Due Process.

So this goes to The Senate and *** Schummer can pound Salt up his Homo Ass.

The GOP will call their witnesses and their witnesses ONLY and you will STFU and like it.

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'


View attachment 295109
Bwuhahahahahaha......


View attachment 295108

.

Democrats in the House offered Trump an opportunity to provide fact witnesses and documents and the life-long pathological liar/con man refused to comply.

Why would Trump refuse the upcoming opportunity of a Senate trial to testify UNDER OATH in his own defense?

Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?

Trump impeachment: What's next in full House vote, Senate trial
One of the most hotly debated points could focus on the lack of a Judiciary Committee hearing with witnesses chosen by Republicans. The absence of the hearing fuels Republican complaints the process is unfair and partisan. Such a hearing is promised in the House rules, but not the timing. Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., chose not to schedule one before voting.

Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?

Which Republican witnesses were denied an opportunity to testify in House proceedings? How does their alleged absence justify a Senate trial devoid of all witness testimony? Couldn't Trump clear this up by personally testifying UNDER OATH in front of 200 million viewers?

Yanno, there's a criminal probe underway at the DOJ that could accomplish as much or more of what the Senate would in an impeachment trial. In fact, those who have been informed they are targets or have reason to believe they are or will be targets would have a legit excuse to take the 5th Amendment. A Senate trial may - for good reason - be short and sweet.

BTW, the USSC has deigned to consider some pending cases regarding executive privilege and the limits of congressional subpoena power which will directly effect the 2nd article of impeachment ... that of obstruction of congress for the WH failure to comply with demands. All that remains of the articles for the Senate to consider is the first one - "Trump is a mean poopy-head" - so there's that.

 

[georgephillip]

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'
Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'


View attachment 295109
Bwuhahahahahaha......


View attachment 295108

.

Democrats in the House offered Trump an opportunity to provide fact witnesses and documents and the life-long pathological liar/con man refused to comply.

Why would Trump refuse the upcoming opportunity of a Senate trial to testify UNDER OATH in his own defense?

Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?

Trump impeachment: What's next in full House vote, Senate trial
One of the most hotly debated points could focus on the lack of a Judiciary Committee hearing with witnesses chosen by Republicans. The absence of the hearing fuels Republican complaints the process is unfair and partisan. Such a hearing is promised in the House rules, but not the timing. Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., chose not to schedule one before voting.

Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?

Which Republican witnesses were denied an opportunity to testify in House proceedings? How does their alleged absence justify a Senate trial devoid of all witness testimony? Couldn't Trump clear this up by personally testifying UNDER OATH in front of 200 million viewers?

So you have no prob with Fat J-Nads ignoring House rules, denying the Repubs the op to call their witnesses while presenting only Dem ones? Why am I not surprised.

Democrats are traitors ... every stinkin' one of 'em.

So you have no prob with Fat J-Nads ignoring House rules, denying the Repubs the op to call their witnesses while presenting only Dem ones? Why am I not surprised.

Why weren't you outraged when Trump refused to send relevant individuals and documents subpoenaed by House Democrats?

Will you be surprised if Trump is too cowardly to testify in his own defense in the Senate?

 

[Leo123]

Trumps Justice Department is free to investigate Obama any time they want......what are they waiting for?

They're doing it now.

 

[The Original Tree]

Citizens Arrest
Citizens Arrest
Citizens Arrest!

The Democrat Partisan Impeachment is about as Serious as this. And now these lying son of a bitches are claiming they have to impeach Trump because of some future crime he may commit in the future.

How does the GOP justify coordinating the proceedings with the accused?

Yeah, how dare they allow him to mount a defense.

Moron.

 

[Nostra]

In the words of Forrest Gump sorry if republicans ruined your impeachment party.
Now if yall had credible evidence it might have gone somewhere lol

In the words of Forrest Gump sorry if republicans ruined your impeachment party.
Now if yall had credible evidence it might have gone somewhere lol

Trump blocked the individuals and documents that might have provided "credible evidence" from the American public during the House investigations.

Will Senate Republicans serve the same function in Trump's upcoming trial?

What are Republicans afraid of?

you have a wild imagination it must be that TDS

you have a wild imagination it must be that TDS

Maybe it's all those "ridiculous" subpoenas?

Trump Vows Stonewall of ‘All’ House Subpoenas, Setting Up Fight Over Powers

"WASHINGTON — The Trump administration escalated its defiance of Congress on Wednesday, as the Justice Department refused to let an official testify on Capitol Hill and President Trump vowed to fight what he called a 'ridiculous' subpoena ordering a former top aide to appear before lawmakers.

"'We’re fighting all the subpoenas,' Mr. Trump told reporters outside the White House. 'These aren’t, like, impartial people. The Democrats are trying to win 2020.'"

Maybe Putin will testify at Trump's upcoming trial?

I don't blame him why give credibility to a Schiff Sham

I don't blame him why give credibility to a Schiff Sham

Will you blame Trump if he doesn't testify in his own defense during Moscow Mitch's upcoming Senate circus?

Why would Trump testify?

 

[The Original Tree]

Were you outraged when you were given a cavity search over spitting on The Sidewalk?

Oh never mind, I forgot you like that kind of stuff.

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'
Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'


View attachment 295109
Bwuhahahahahaha......


View attachment 295108

.

Democrats in the House offered Trump an opportunity to provide fact witnesses and documents and the life-long pathological liar/con man refused to comply.

Why would Trump refuse the upcoming opportunity of a Senate trial to testify UNDER OATH in his own defense?

Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?

Trump impeachment: What's next in full House vote, Senate trial
One of the most hotly debated points could focus on the lack of a Judiciary Committee hearing with witnesses chosen by Republicans. The absence of the hearing fuels Republican complaints the process is unfair and partisan. Such a hearing is promised in the House rules, but not the timing. Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., chose not to schedule one before voting.

Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?

Which Republican witnesses were denied an opportunity to testify in House proceedings? How does their alleged absence justify a Senate trial devoid of all witness testimony? Couldn't Trump clear this up by personally testifying UNDER OATH in front of 200 million viewers?

So you have no prob with Fat J-Nads ignoring House rules, denying the Repubs the op to call their witnesses while presenting only Dem ones? Why am I not surprised.

Democrats are traitors ... every stinkin' one of 'em.

So you have no prob with Fat J-Nads ignoring House rules, denying the Repubs the op to call their witnesses while presenting only Dem ones? Why am I not surprised.

Why weren't you outraged when Trump refused to send relevant individuals and documents subpoenaed by House Democrats?

Will you be surprised if Trump is too cowardly to testify in his own defense in the Senate?

 

[georgephillip]

The Democrats get Nothing since they gave nothing in their clown show witch trial in The House. **** anything Chuck Schummer wants.

How 'bout some first-person testimony from the heroic Donald J Trump at Moscow Mitch's upcoming "trial"?

 

[Nostra]

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'
Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'


View attachment 295109
Bwuhahahahahaha......


View attachment 295108

.

Democrats in the House offered Trump an opportunity to provide fact witnesses and documents and the life-long pathological liar/con man refused to comply.

Why would Trump refuse the upcoming opportunity of a Senate trial to testify UNDER OATH in his own defense?

Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?

Trump impeachment: What's next in full House vote, Senate trial
One of the most hotly debated points could focus on the lack of a Judiciary Committee hearing with witnesses chosen by Republicans. The absence of the hearing fuels Republican complaints the process is unfair and partisan. Such a hearing is promised in the House rules, but not the timing. Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., chose not to schedule one before voting.

Incorrect. Fat J-Nads refused to allow Repub witnesses as required by House rules. WTF was Fatman so afraid of?

Which Republican witnesses were denied an opportunity to testify in House proceedings? How does their alleged absence justify a Senate trial devoid of all witness testimony? Couldn't Trump clear this up by personally testifying UNDER OATH in front of 200 million viewers?

So you have no prob with Fat J-Nads ignoring House rules, denying the Repubs the op to call their witnesses while presenting only Dem ones? Why am I not surprised.

Democrats are traitors ... every stinkin' one of 'em.

So you have no prob with Fat J-Nads ignoring House rules, denying the Repubs the op to call their witnesses while presenting only Dem ones? Why am I not surprised.

Why weren't you outraged when Trump refused to send relevant individuals and documents subpoenaed by House Democrats?

Will you be surprised if Trump is too cowardly to testify in his own defense in the Senate?

Trump challenged Congressional subpoenas in court, as our system was laid out in the Constitution.

Weird how the Constitution triggers you Dimwinger crayon eaters, huh?

 

[edthecynic]

Sondland made this offer of a quid pro quo clear to Yermak that day in Warsaw. “Following this meeting, Ambassador Sondland pulled aside President Zelensky’s advisor, Mr. Yermak, to explain that the hold on security assistance was conditioned on the public announcement of the Burisma/Biden and the 2016 election interference investigations,” the report states.

Yermak disputes this. “Gordon and I were never alone together,” he said when TIME asked about the Warsaw meeting. “We bumped into each other in the hallway next to the escalator, as I was walking out.”

Was Yermak under oath when he said that?
NO!
And notice he didn't deny what Sondland said about Tramp's Quid Pro Quo, he only denied being alone with Sondland.
Remember the Right brag that they lie to the media!!!!!

 

[The Original Tree]

No reason for The President to testify if The Left cannot even find a crime in US Code to charge him with.

 

[The Original Tree]

Citizens Arrest!

The Democrats get Nothing since they gave nothing in their clown show witch trial in The House. **** anything Chuck Schummer wants.

How 'bout some first-person testimony from the heroic Donald J Trump at Moscow Mitch's upcoming "trial"?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Sondland made this offer of a quid pro quo clear to Yermak that day in Warsaw. “Following this meeting, Ambassador Sondland pulled aside President Zelensky’s advisor, Mr. Yermak, to explain that the hold on security assistance was conditioned on the public announcement of the Burisma/Biden and the 2016 election interference investigations,” the report states.

Yermak disputes this. “Gordon and I were never alone together,” he said when TIME asked about the Warsaw meeting. “We bumped into each other in the hallway next to the escalator, as I was walking out.”

Was Yermak under oath when he said that?
NO!
And notice he didn't deny what Sondland said about Tramp's Quid Pro Quo, he only denied being alone with Sondland.
Remember the Right brag that they lie to the media!!!!!

Yermak could have remained silent but he didn't

 

[edthecynic]

Yermak could have said nothing
Why don't they call him as a fact witness?

A better question is: Why didn't the lying scum GOP list him as a witness they wanted to testify????

 

[georgephillip]

No, we think you are a dumbass because we are about to **** your party 10 Ways till Sunday.

That Hearing that was Grotesque example of Abusing Civil Rights. You could not even charge The President with a real crime despite your giving The Middle Finger to Due Process.

The President refused to take advantage of due process when he refused to provide individuals and documents to the House proceedings you are WHINING about.

Will you think Trump's a coward if he doesn't testify in his own defense at his upcoming trial?

No, we think you are a dumbass because we are about to **** your party 10 Ways till Sunday.

With or without witnesses in the Senate trial?

Why are you afraid to demand Trump testify in his own defense?

 

[SAYIT]

In the words of Forrest Gump sorry if republicans ruined your impeachment party.
Now if yall had credible evidence it might have gone somewhere lol

In the words of Forrest Gump sorry if republicans ruined your impeachment party.
Now if yall had credible evidence it might have gone somewhere lol

Trump blocked the individuals and documents that might have provided "credible evidence" from the American public during the House investigations.

Will Senate Republicans serve the same function in Trump's upcoming trial?

What are Republicans afraid of?

you have a wild imagination it must be that TDS

you have a wild imagination it must be that TDS

Maybe it's all those "ridiculous" subpoenas?

Trump Vows Stonewall of ‘All’ House Subpoenas, Setting Up Fight Over Powers

"WASHINGTON — The Trump administration escalated its defiance of Congress on Wednesday, as the Justice Department refused to let an official testify on Capitol Hill and President Trump vowed to fight what he called a 'ridiculous' subpoena ordering a former top aide to appear before lawmakers.

"'We’re fighting all the subpoenas,' Mr. Trump told reporters outside the White House. 'These aren’t, like, impartial people. The Democrats are trying to win 2020.'"

Maybe Putin will testify at Trump's upcoming trial?

I don't blame him why give credibility to a Schiff Sham

I don't blame him why give credibility to a Schiff Sham

Will you blame Trump if he doesn't testify in his own defense during Moscow Mitch's upcoming Senate circus?

Why would the POTUS waste his time or give the Hysterical House Dem silliness the respect? Article #2 is already a USSC matter and Senate Repubs will have no prob booting article #1 (Trump is a mean poopy-head).

Supreme Court ruling pulls rug out from under article of impeachment

 

[The Original Tree]

We’ll Call Schiff, Zaid, Ciaramella and Joe and Hunter Biden for that.

The Democrats get Nothing since they gave nothing in their clown show witch trial in The House. **** anything Chuck Schummer wants.

How 'bout some first-person testimony from the heroic Donald J Trump at Moscow Mitch's upcoming "trial"?

The Democrats get Nothing since they gave nothing in their clown show witch trial in The House. **** anything Chuck Schummer wants.

How 'bout some first-person testimony from the heroic Donald J Trump at Moscow Mitch's upcoming "trial"?

 

[edthecynic]

Schumer does not want witnesses that would expose the corruption of the Obama Whitehouse and Biden's treasonous use of taxpayers dollars to bail out his son Hunter.

There is no such witness, as you well know!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yermak could have said nothing
Why don't they call him as a fact witness?

A better question is: Why didn't the lying scum GOP list him as a witness they wanted to testify????

He's not needed lol must suck to have your hopes up to have your president removed and all you get to do is melt like a snowflake lol