I understand if you don't want to examine the facts. They tend to make MAGAists uncomfortable.
The 2022 election for the House of Representatives was so close1 that if any number of things had gone differently, Democrats might have kept their majority. And one of the biggest things that affected the battle for the House was redistricting — the decennial redrawing of congressional districts’ lines to account for the results of the 2020 census.
But was the impact of redistricting significant enough to swing the House to the GOP? As I wrote in June, the 2021-22 redistricting cycle didn’t radically change the partisanship of the national House map, so I mostly agree with those who say redistricting didn’t cost Democrats the House. But at the same time, those who say Republicans won only because they gerrymandered are also technically correct. How can both things be true? Allow me to explain.
The 2022 election for the House of Representatives was so close that if any number of things had gone differently, Democrats might have kept their majority. And…
fivethirtyeight.com
Gerrymandering happens on both sides of of the aisle.
Key States Where Democrats Have Tried Gerrymandering
1. Maryland
Democrats drew highly skewed congressional maps favoring their party, especially the infamous 3rd District, which looked like a “broken-winged pterodactyl.”
Legal result: In 2022, a Maryland judge struck down the congressional map, saying it was an “extreme partisan gerrymander” that violated the state constitution.
Goal: Try to eliminate one of the last remaining Republican-held districts in the state.
2. New York
What happened: In 2022, New York Democrats drew a map expected to give them 22 out of 26 congressional seats.
Legal result: The state’s highest court struck down the map, saying it violated the state’s constitutional ban on partisan gerrymandering.
Effect: A court-drawn map was used in 2022, which led to Republicans flipping key seats.
3. Illinois
What happened: Democrats redrew maps after the 2020 Census that eliminated Republican districts and packed GOP voters together.
Criticism: The maps were called “brutal” and “surgical” by political analysts due to how aggressively they minimized Republican influence.
Result: Democrats retained a large advantage in both congressional and legislative seats.
4. California (More subtle)
What happened: Though redistricting is done by an independent commission, critics say Democrats influenced the process behind the scenes, including through coordinated public comments and political lobbying.
Impact: Maps generally favored Democrats, though not as egregiously as in other states.
5. Oregon
What happened: Democrats were accused of drawing congressional lines to favor their party after the state gained a 6th seat.
Result: Critics called the new 6th District a gerrymander designed to ensure another Democratic win. Republicans sued, but the state Supreme Court allowed the maps to stand.
Legal & Political Fallout
Courts have increasingly struck down Democratic gerrymanders, especially when state constitutions contain anti-gerrymandering clauses (like in NY and MD).
Despite criticism, both parties attempt to draw favorable lines when they control the redistricting process.