Sanders Tweets 'How Many Yachts Do Billionaires Need? How Many Cars?

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I admire success. Only liberals admire failure.

It has nothing to do with being scum. It has to do with your inability to become one of those scums. If you did have the ability, you would do it in a second as any one of us would.

I could never understand this jealousy of successful people by the left. Tell me why are wall street bankers scum, and not actors or actresses, Apple and Microsoft computers, sports figures and Hollywood? After all, they make just as much money (or more) with much less education than wall street bankers.

Yeah, this is the funny part. It's a worldview thing I guess.
I am so far from jealous of these people it is unbelievable. You think like Trump "I am rich, I [think] I'm successful, ergo I must a nice guy and everybody must like me ergo everybody must want to be me".

No. It doesn't work like that. Wall St types are just leeches.

What do Hollywood types give us? Laughter. Sadness. Scare the shit out of us. Entertain us. Oh, and if their pictures or shows fail, they go down the gurgler. Just ask Dana Plato, or Erin Moran, or any other failed star whose life has ended in the gutter. Who on Wall St went to prison after the GFC? None. Who still kept their bonuses? And what do they bring to the table.

You somehow think that if somebody is rich, they are somehow more worthy. A better person. Somebody worth admiring. Some are. Some aren't. One of the most famous poor people I know of is Mother Teresa. She is worth more than all the Wall St leeches put together.

I admire a lot of rich people. Buffet. Gates. Spielberg. Winfrey. A whole raft of people. Don't mistake my disdain for that middle-aged bonds trader worth a couple of hundred million who has given not a single cent to the betterment of humanity, all the while living in a 10-bedroom mansion when only two people live, as me not liking success. I love success. I just don't follow it blindly, or believe that being rich = hard work. Trump hasn't worked a day in his life...he makes money of his father's good fortune, and nothing but a loud mouth braggart who has given the world nothing but gauche, over-the-top gold-laden casinos and shitty reality shows. And if you want to admire that, good for you. I'm not buying his snake oil.

The rich more worthy? This is obviously true in a capitalist system to get rich other people have to buy your stuff and not buy other people's stuff they buy your stuff because they are free and like it better and have determined that it increases the quality of their life how would you like to live in a society where people entrusted with raising your standard of living we're not rewarded for doing so and therefore did not have any interest in raising your standard of living. This is why 120 million people slowly died in the USSR and red China. You need to learn humility before God and before rich people and before Republican capitalism. yes they are more worthy or worth more because other people have decided that by buying their products over any other products that they might have bought with the same money do you understand now?

 

[Pogo]

I admire success. Only liberals admire failure.

It has nothing to do with being scum. It has to do with your inability to become one of those scums. If you did have the ability, you would do it in a second as any one of us would.

I could never understand this jealousy of successful people by the left. Tell me why are wall street bankers scum, and not actors or actresses, Apple and Microsoft computers, sports figures and Hollywood? After all, they make just as much money (or more) with much less education than wall street bankers.

Yeah, this is the funny part. It's a worldview thing I guess.
I am so far from jealous of these people it is unbelievable. You think like Trump "I am rich, I [think] I'm successful, ergo I must a nice guy and everybody must like me ergo everybody must want to be me".

No. It doesn't work like that. Wall St types are just leeches.

What do Hollywood types give us? Laughter. Sadness. Scare the shit out of us. Entertain us. Oh, and if their pictures or shows fail, they go down the gurgler. Just ask Dana Plato, or Erin Moran, or any other failed star whose life has ended in the gutter. Who on Wall St went to prison after the GFC? None. Who still kept their bonuses? And what do they bring to the table.

You somehow think that if somebody is rich, they are somehow more worthy. A better person. Somebody worth admiring. Some are. Some aren't. One of the most famous poor people I know of is Mother Teresa. She is worth more than all the Wall St leeches put together.

I admire a lot of rich people. Buffet. Gates. Spielberg. Winfrey. A whole raft of people. Don't mistake my disdain for that middle-aged bonds trader worth a couple of hundred million who has given not a single cent to the betterment of humanity, all the while living in a 10-bedroom mansion when only two people live, as me not liking success. I love success. I just don't follow it blindly, or believe that being rich = hard work. Trump hasn't worked a day in his life...he makes money of his father's good fortune, and nothing but a loud mouth braggart who has given the world nothing but gauche, over-the-top gold-laden casinos and shitty reality shows. And if you want to admire that, good for you. I'm not buying his snake oil.

The rich more worthy? This is obviously true in a capitalist system to get rich other people have to buy your stuff and not buy other people's stuff they buy your stuff because they are free and like it better and have determined that it increases the quality of their life how would you like to live in a society where people entrusted with raising your standard of living we're not rewarded for doing so and therefore did not have any interest in raising your standard of living. This is why 120 million people slowly died in the USSR and red China. You need to learn humility before God and before rich people and before Republican capitalism. yes they are more worthy or worth more because other people have decided that by buying their products over any other products that they might have bought with the same money do you understand now?

:::snore:::

Let's cut it to the chase. The rich are "more worthy" only in a commodity-fetish culture, where accumulation of money is a value thing in itself. A culture that literally worships the Religion of Money. It's that simple. There's no other reason a person who has accumulated (or inherited) enough money would go on accumulating more that he can't spend.

And number two, capitalism was around waaaaaaaaaay before "Republicans" were invented in 1854. Capitalism in fact is how we got slaves here. They didn't do that for free.

 

[Weatherman2020]

View attachment 122629

Twitterers respond with how many houses do you need?
Once again, the lack of self awareness of the left is mind boggling.

Sanders Asks How Many Yachts Billionaires Need, Twitter Asks How Many Houses He Needs

One of those homes was inherited by his wife. He is a senator. It wouldn't be weird to purchase two.

Hilarious watching the left make excuses for the socialist who owns three homes while attacking other people for having too much.

 

[Pogo]

View attachment 122629

Twitterers respond with how many houses do you need?
Once again, the lack of self awareness of the left is mind boggling.

Sanders Asks How Many Yachts Billionaires Need, Twitter Asks How Many Houses He Needs

One of those homes was inherited by his wife. He is a senator. It wouldn't be weird to purchase two.

It's the height of irony that when Rump inherits a hundred million from his father (who scammed it off the government), they fall on their knees and drool -- yet when Sanders' wife inherits a house from her dead parents, they scream bloody murder.

There might not be enough psychiatrist's couches to accommodate that sort of delusion.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I admire success. Only liberals admire failure.

It has nothing to do with being scum. It has to do with your inability to become one of those scums. If you did have the ability, you would do it in a second as any one of us would.

I could never understand this jealousy of successful people by the left. Tell me why are wall street bankers scum, and not actors or actresses, Apple and Microsoft computers, sports figures and Hollywood? After all, they make just as much money (or more) with much less education than wall street bankers.

Yeah, this is the funny part. It's a worldview thing I guess.
I am so far from jealous of these people it is unbelievable. You think like Trump "I am rich, I [think] I'm successful, ergo I must a nice guy and everybody must like me ergo everybody must want to be me".

No. It doesn't work like that. Wall St types are just leeches.

What do Hollywood types give us? Laughter. Sadness. Scare the shit out of us. Entertain us. Oh, and if their pictures or shows fail, they go down the gurgler. Just ask Dana Plato, or Erin Moran, or any other failed star whose life has ended in the gutter. Who on Wall St went to prison after the GFC? None. Who still kept their bonuses? And what do they bring to the table.

You somehow think that if somebody is rich, they are somehow more worthy. A better person. Somebody worth admiring. Some are. Some aren't. One of the most famous poor people I know of is Mother Teresa. She is worth more than all the Wall St leeches put together.

I admire a lot of rich people. Buffet. Gates. Spielberg. Winfrey. A whole raft of people. Don't mistake my disdain for that middle-aged bonds trader worth a couple of hundred million who has given not a single cent to the betterment of humanity, all the while living in a 10-bedroom mansion when only two people live, as me not liking success. I love success. I just don't follow it blindly, or believe that being rich = hard work. Trump hasn't worked a day in his life...he makes money of his father's good fortune, and nothing but a loud mouth braggart who has given the world nothing but gauche, over-the-top gold-laden casinos and shitty reality shows. And if you want to admire that, good for you. I'm not buying his snake oil.

The rich more worthy? This is obviously true in a capitalist system to get rich other people have to buy your stuff and not buy other people's stuff they buy your stuff because they are free and like it better and have determined that it increases the quality of their life how would you like to live in a society where people entrusted with raising your standard of living we're not rewarded for doing so and therefore did not have any interest in raising your standard of living. This is why 120 million people slowly died in the USSR and red China. You need to learn humility before God and before rich people and before Republican capitalism. yes they are more worthy or worth more because other people have decided that by buying their products over any other products that they might have bought with the same money do you understand now?

:::snore:::

Let's cut it to the chase. The rich are "more worthy" only in a commodity-fetish culture, where accumulation of money is a value thing in itself. A culture that literally worships the Religion of Money. It's that simple. There's no other reason a person who has accumulated (or inherited) enough money would go on accumulating more that he can't spend.

And number two, capitalism was around waaaaaaaaaay before "Republicans" were invented in 1854. Capitalism in fact is how we got slaves here. They didn't do that for free.

People don't worship money in a capitalist society they worship the things money can buy like food clothing shelter healthcare. The more you can supply these things to needy people the higher your place in heaven will be in should be. The removal of this culture in the USSR and Red China caused 120 million to slowly start to death. Do you understand?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I admire success. Only liberals admire failure.

It has nothing to do with being scum. It has to do with your inability to become one of those scums. If you did have the ability, you would do it in a second as any one of us would.

I could never understand this jealousy of successful people by the left. Tell me why are wall street bankers scum, and not actors or actresses, Apple and Microsoft computers, sports figures and Hollywood? After all, they make just as much money (or more) with much less education than wall street bankers.

Yeah, this is the funny part. It's a worldview thing I guess.
I am so far from jealous of these people it is unbelievable. You think like Trump "I am rich, I [think] I'm successful, ergo I must a nice guy and everybody must like me ergo everybody must want to be me".

No. It doesn't work like that. Wall St types are just leeches.

What do Hollywood types give us? Laughter. Sadness. Scare the shit out of us. Entertain us. Oh, and if their pictures or shows fail, they go down the gurgler. Just ask Dana Plato, or Erin Moran, or any other failed star whose life has ended in the gutter. Who on Wall St went to prison after the GFC? None. Who still kept their bonuses? And what do they bring to the table.

You somehow think that if somebody is rich, they are somehow more worthy. A better person. Somebody worth admiring. Some are. Some aren't. One of the most famous poor people I know of is Mother Teresa. She is worth more than all the Wall St leeches put together.

I admire a lot of rich people. Buffet. Gates. Spielberg. Winfrey. A whole raft of people. Don't mistake my disdain for that middle-aged bonds trader worth a couple of hundred million who has given not a single cent to the betterment of humanity, all the while living in a 10-bedroom mansion when only two people live, as me not liking success. I love success. I just don't follow it blindly, or believe that being rich = hard work. Trump hasn't worked a day in his life...he makes money of his father's good fortune, and nothing but a loud mouth braggart who has given the world nothing but gauche, over-the-top gold-laden casinos and shitty reality shows. And if you want to admire that, good for you. I'm not buying his snake oil.

The rich more worthy? This is obviously true in a capitalist system to get rich other people have to buy your stuff and not buy other people's stuff they buy your stuff because they are free and like it better and have determined that it increases the quality of their life how would you like to live in a society where people entrusted with raising your standard of living we're not rewarded for doing so and therefore did not have any interest in raising your standard of living. This is why 120 million people slowly died in the USSR and red China. You need to learn humility before God and before rich people and before Republican capitalism. yes they are more worthy or worth more because other people have decided that by buying their products over any other products that they might have bought with the same money do you understand now?

:::snore:::

Let's cut it to the chase. The rich are "more worthy" only in a commodity-fetish culture, where accumulation of money is a value thing in itself. A culture that literally worships the Religion of Money. It's that simple. There's no other reason a person who has accumulated (or inherited) enough money would go on accumulating more that he can't spend.

And number two, capitalism was around waaaaaaaaaay before "Republicans" were invented in 1854. Capitalism in fact is how we got slaves here. They didn't do that for free.

What pure bigotry to suggest capitalism and slavery are related when you had slavery for 10,000 years in every century on every continent in fact capitalism discourages slavery and other negative interactions between people because it is all about pleasing other people if you don't please your workers and customers more than anyone else on earth you are driven into bankruptcy it encourages love not hate

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

View attachment 122629

Twitterers respond with how many houses do you need?
Once again, the lack of self awareness of the left is mind boggling.

Sanders Asks How Many Yachts Billionaires Need, Twitter Asks How Many Houses He Needs

One of those homes was inherited by his wife. He is a senator. It wouldn't be weird to purchase two.

It's the height of irony that when Rump inherits a hundred million from his father (who scammed it off the government), they fall on their knees and drool -- yet when Sanders' wife inherits a house from her dead parents, they scream bloody murder.

There might not be enough psychiatrist's couches to accommodate that sort of delusion.

There is no irony because Republicans are perfectly content with parents leaving money to their children where as Democrats want to steal your estate and spend it on your behalf so that you don't wasted it on your beloved children

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I admire success. Only liberals admire failure.

It has nothing to do with being scum. It has to do with your inability to become one of those scums. If you did have the ability, you would do it in a second as any one of us would.

I could never understand this jealousy of successful people by the left. Tell me why are wall street bankers scum, and not actors or actresses, Apple and Microsoft computers, sports figures and Hollywood? After all, they make just as much money (or more) with much less education than wall street bankers.

Yeah, this is the funny part. It's a worldview thing I guess.
I am so far from jealous of these people it is unbelievable. You think like Trump "I am rich, I [think] I'm successful, ergo I must a nice guy and everybody must like me ergo everybody must want to be me".

No. It doesn't work like that. Wall St types are just leeches.

What do Hollywood types give us? Laughter. Sadness. Scare the shit out of us. Entertain us. Oh, and if their pictures or shows fail, they go down the gurgler. Just ask Dana Plato, or Erin Moran, or any other failed star whose life has ended in the gutter. Who on Wall St went to prison after the GFC? None. Who still kept their bonuses? And what do they bring to the table.

You somehow think that if somebody is rich, they are somehow more worthy. A better person. Somebody worth admiring. Some are. Some aren't. One of the most famous poor people I know of is Mother Teresa. She is worth more than all the Wall St leeches put together.

I admire a lot of rich people. Buffet. Gates. Spielberg. Winfrey. A whole raft of people. Don't mistake my disdain for that middle-aged bonds trader worth a couple of hundred million who has given not a single cent to the betterment of humanity, all the while living in a 10-bedroom mansion when only two people live, as me not liking success. I love success. I just don't follow it blindly, or believe that being rich = hard work. Trump hasn't worked a day in his life...he makes money of his father's good fortune, and nothing but a loud mouth braggart who has given the world nothing but gauche, over-the-top gold-laden casinos and shitty reality shows. And if you want to admire that, good for you. I'm not buying his snake oil.

The rich more worthy? This is obviously true in a capitalist system to get rich other people have to buy your stuff and not buy other people's stuff they buy your stuff because they are free and like it better and have determined that it increases the quality of their life how would you like to live in a society where people entrusted with raising your standard of living we're not rewarded for doing so and therefore did not have any interest in raising your standard of living. This is why 120 million people slowly died in the USSR and red China. You need to learn humility before God and before rich people and before Republican capitalism. yes they are more worthy or worth more because other people have decided that by buying their products over any other products that they might have bought with the same money do you understand now?

:::snore:::

Let's cut it to the chase. The rich are "more worthy" only in a commodity-fetish culture, where accumulation of money is a value thing in itself. A culture that literally worships the Religion of Money. It's that simple. There's no other reason a person who has accumulated (or inherited) enough money would go on accumulating more that he can't spend.

And number two, capitalism was around waaaaaaaaaay before "Republicans" were invented in 1854. Capitalism in fact is how we got slaves here. They didn't do that for free.

No reason to accumulate money? That's like saying there's no reason to continue selling medicine once you've cured the first million people notice how stupid a liberal will be? The more people sell medicine the more liberals get jealous because they have nothing to sell

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I admire success. Only liberals admire failure.

It has nothing to do with being scum. It has to do with your inability to become one of those scums. If you did have the ability, you would do it in a second as any one of us would.

I could never understand this jealousy of successful people by the left. Tell me why are wall street bankers scum, and not actors or actresses, Apple and Microsoft computers, sports figures and Hollywood? After all, they make just as much money (or more) with much less education than wall street bankers.

Yeah, this is the funny part. It's a worldview thing I guess.
I am so far from jealous of these people it is unbelievable. You think like Trump "I am rich, I [think] I'm successful, ergo I must a nice guy and everybody must like me ergo everybody must want to be me".

No. It doesn't work like that. Wall St types are just leeches.

What do Hollywood types give us? Laughter. Sadness. Scare the shit out of us. Entertain us. Oh, and if their pictures or shows fail, they go down the gurgler. Just ask Dana Plato, or Erin Moran, or any other failed star whose life has ended in the gutter. Who on Wall St went to prison after the GFC? None. Who still kept their bonuses? And what do they bring to the table.

You somehow think that if somebody is rich, they are somehow more worthy. A better person. Somebody worth admiring. Some are. Some aren't. One of the most famous poor people I know of is Mother Teresa. She is worth more than all the Wall St leeches put together.

I admire a lot of rich people. Buffet. Gates. Spielberg. Winfrey. A whole raft of people. Don't mistake my disdain for that middle-aged bonds trader worth a couple of hundred million who has given not a single cent to the betterment of humanity, all the while living in a 10-bedroom mansion when only two people live, as me not liking success. I love success. I just don't follow it blindly, or believe that being rich = hard work. Trump hasn't worked a day in his life...he makes money of his father's good fortune, and nothing but a loud mouth braggart who has given the world nothing but gauche, over-the-top gold-laden casinos and shitty reality shows. And if you want to admire that, good for you. I'm not buying his snake oil.

The rich more worthy? This is obviously true in a capitalist system to get rich other people have to buy your stuff and not buy other people's stuff they buy your stuff because they are free and like it better and have determined that it increases the quality of their life how would you like to live in a society where people entrusted with raising your standard of living we're not rewarded for doing so and therefore did not have any interest in raising your standard of living. This is why 120 million people slowly died in the USSR and red China. You need to learn humility before God and before rich people and before Republican capitalism. yes they are more worthy or worth more because other people have decided that by buying their products over any other products that they might have bought with the same money do you understand now?

:::snore:::

Let's cut it to the chase. The rich are "more worthy" only in a commodity-fetish culture, where accumulation of money is a value thing in itself.

The rich are more worthy or worth more because they have things to sell that everybody wants to buy more than other things you are jealous because you have nothing to sell and nothing to make you worthy

 

[JoeNormal]

Here is a guy who wants to be your President who says "You can't have it all."

Sorry, but we want it all. Ambition is what made America the greatest nation in human history.

Spoken by someone who apparently has no idea that there are nature-imposed limits. That's the problem with America - stupid people like you are able to procreate.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Here is a guy who wants to be your President who says "You can't have it all."

Sorry, but we want it all. Ambition is what made America the greatest nation in human history.

Spoken by someone who apparently has no idea that there are nature-imposed limits. That's the problem with America - stupid people like you are able to procreate.

If there are nature impose limits why did you fail to give us your best example?

 

[JoeNormal]

I disagree with Sanders...As long as they pay their taxes and workers then they should have a thousand with all I care.

It isn't about being rich that is the problem! The problem is treasonous outsourcing, tax offshoring and ******* over their workers.

They wouldn't be rich enough to buy a thousand houses without treasonous outsourcing, tax offshoring and ******* over their workers.

 

[JoeNormal]

Here is a guy who wants to be your President who says "You can't have it all."

Sorry, but we want it all. Ambition is what made America the greatest nation in human history.

Spoken by someone who apparently has no idea that there are nature-imposed limits. That's the problem with America - stupid people like you are able to procreate.

If there are nature impose limits why did you fail to give us your best example?

If I had time, I could go on all day but two that should be apparent to even the most uninformed are that our aquifers are being consumed much more quickly that they can regenerate and our oil consumption will exhaust the supply withing decades. Short term thinking is what American ambition does best.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Here is a guy who wants to be your President who says "You can't have it all."

Sorry, but we want it all. Ambition is what made America the greatest nation in human history.

Spoken by someone who apparently has no idea that there are nature-imposed limits. That's the problem with America - stupid people like you are able to procreate.

If there are nature impose limits why did you fail to give us your best example?

If I had time, I could go on all day but two that should be apparent to even the most uninformed are that our aquifers are being consumed much more quickly that they can regenerate and our oil consumption will exhaust the supply withing decades. Short term thinking is what American ambition does best.

Goofy liberal has not read it we just discovered enough oil for hundreds of years and we already have substitutes if need be this is a perfect example of how stupid a liberal is

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I disagree with Sanders...As long as they pay their taxes and workers then they should have a thousand with all I care.

It isn't about being rich that is the problem! The problem is treasonous outsourcing, tax offshoring and ******* over their workers.

They wouldn't be rich enough to buy a thousand houses without treasonous outsourcing, tax offshoring and ******* over their workers.

Nobody wants to offshore they have to do it because of liberal tax and regulatory policy if they want to survive but you don't make more money by moving offshore. Do you understand that your competitors can move offshore too thus your competitive position and your profitability is not improved. You have learned this 124 times must we go for 125?

 

[JoeNormal]

Here is a guy who wants to be your President who says "You can't have it all."

Sorry, but we want it all. Ambition is what made America the greatest nation in human history.

Spoken by someone who apparently has no idea that there are nature-imposed limits. That's the problem with America - stupid people like you are able to procreate.

If there are nature impose limits why did you fail to give us your best example?

If I had time, I could go on all day but two that should be apparent to even the most uninformed are that our aquifers are being consumed much more quickly that they can regenerate and our oil consumption will exhaust the supply withing decades. Short term thinking is what American ambition does best.

Goofy liberal has not read it we just discovered enough oil for hundreds of years and we already have substitutes if need be this is a perfect example of how stupid a liberal is

Provide a credible link to that.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I disagree with Sanders...As long as they pay their taxes and workers then they should have a thousand with all I care.

It isn't about being rich that is the problem! The problem is treasonous outsourcing, tax offshoring and ******* over their workers.

They wouldn't be rich enough to buy a thousand houses without treasonous outsourcing, tax offshoring and ******* over their workers.

The pure beauty of Republican capitalism is that you cannot screw over your workers you have to offer them the best jobs in the best pay possible or they will move on to those who do offer them better pay and better jobs do you understand this basic?

 

[PK1]

what's wrong with a yacht in Hawaii, one in San Francisco, and one in Miami?

I think Jesus, if he inherited lots of money, would keep only one (1) yacht, if any, and use his other funds to help the less fortunate.
I'm not religious, but I understand ethics and the golden rule.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

what's wrong with a yacht in Hawaii, one in San Francisco, and one in Miami?

I think Jesus, if he inherited lots of money, would keep only one (1) yacht, if any, and use his other funds to help the less fortunate.
I'm not religious, but I understand ethics and the golden rule.

Buying yachts does help the less fortunate they get jobs making them selling them transporting them fixing them working on them etc. etc.capitalism is the greatest social welfare program in history. Chyna just switch to it and instantly illuminated 40% of all the poverty on the planet

 

[g5000]

If I design a better mousetrap so I can make a lot of money, is that greed? If so, how is that bad?

No. And No.

So if I buy six yachts with the money I made from my mousetrap, why does Bernie Sanders think that's bad?