Why'd you attribute it to Joe_Penalty?
Actually, I didn't. It's the person that quoted me (and changed my post) that did it. That's against the rules by the way. Sorry about the confusion, but some idiots on here do that.
Back to the gays...............
Anyone heard that Washington DC is going to legalize gay marriage? I also think that "don't ask, don't tell" needs to be repealed. Matter of fact, most of our allies allow gays to serve openly in their military (Britain, Canada, Israel, etc).
Nobody has been able to give me a satisfactory answer by the way........why is it that gay marriage and partnerships threaten straight people? Is it because they are insecure with their own sexuality? Is it because they think they have the right to something, and because of their own confused ideas about it (sex and marriage, see the latest DC scandals for that), they think that they have to protect it from people that will **** it up, or........worse yet..........show the straight bigots how wrong they've been?
Legalize gay marriage, repeal don't ask don't tell.
And this is coming from a straight man who served 20 years in the military!
1.
Gay marriage, once accepted would give homosexuals (more) access to the NEA and possibly the new healthcare requirements (to be mandated by the gov, shortly). It will be used by "radicals/extremists" to push the homosexual lifestyle onto children (their future "victims" of seduction) as perfectly "acceptable". (please notice that I did not include all homosexuals in that statement) Doing this would reduce the gene pool/available breeding stock (if it is true that homosexuals are only attracted to their sex, and would not be able to contribute to making children "naturally". (I know, your arguement, some couples go to great lengths to have children) If this did happen and homosexual couples chose to have children using artificial and medical assistance, healthcare costs would increase exponetially.
This is a direct threat to the well being of families. People that are blessed with children want those children to grow and become productive in society as well as having families of their own. If those same children are "indoctrinated" into believing homosexuality is a good thing, it could end families permanently (no more children from that line, naturally).
It will be harder for families to protect their children from influences they feel would not help their children develop to become "productive".
2.
"Typically", homosexual communities are not family oriented. The public "celebrations" are events most "family" oriented people avoid like the plague. If homosexual partnerships became "socially legal/acceptable", there would be more "homosexual" communities where immorality, lewdness, and perversity would be on public display non-stop. "Those communities" would become magnets for crimes and violence that the taxpayers (especially the taxpayers trying to earn a living to raise their families in peace) would be forced to pay, due to the new-found legitimacy of the neighborhoods, the police would not be able to do their jobs without "sensitivity" training, and when they finally got to the community, harrassment from people that want to behave in a lawless manner, since they pushed "their" way of life onto society. It would corrupt society at an accelerated rate and reduce the standard of living for every citizen (resources would have to be used on peacekeeping, increased medical costs and increase utility costs for communities).
3.
Children with homosexual parents would be more numerous. Given the immoral nature of homosexuals, it will be extremely hard to raise children in a "secure" environment. How can children trust a parent that pretends they are something they are not (the opposite sex)? How can a child feel confident in who they are, if they grow up around people that still haven't figured it out and send mixed signals about integrity? The mental health costs for these children could become astronomical.