RWs: Doesn't it bother you the GOP will do absolutely nothing about these issues?

[SassyIrishLass]

Yeah? Just who has run Detroit/Chicago/St Louis for in some cases FOUR DECADES.

You are just parroting some of the laziest talking points of the DNC.

List 4cities that are doing well and we will see who runs them.

How about San fran, Boston , Seattle , New York .?

Houston, Dallas, Miami, Atlanta

Is that your republican list ? Great . What do we want to compare ? Crime stats? Poverty ? Education ?

How about comparing the murder rate?

Fine . atlanta and Miami are up there in murder rates .

Miami and Atlanta are ran by democrats, Timmy. I warned you this would happen

 

[Timmy]

List of United States cities by crime rate (2014) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here Ya go . Click on "murder n manslaughter" stat.

Atlanta miami and Houston all rank over Boston San Fran and Seattle

 

[SassyIrishLass]

List of United States cities by crime rate (2014) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here Ya go . Click on "murder n manslaughter" stat.

Atlanta miami and Houston all rank over Boston San Fran and Seattle

Democrats Run America's Ten Poorest Cities - Eagle Rising

 

[Timmy]

List 4cities that are doing well and we will see who runs them.

How about San fran, Boston , Seattle , New York .?

Houston, Dallas, Miami, Atlanta

Is that your republican list ? Great . What do we want to compare ? Crime stats? Poverty ? Education ?

How about comparing the murder rate?

Fine . atlanta and Miami are up there in murder rates .

Miami and Atlanta are ran by democrats, Timmy. I warned you this would happen

Miami mayor is a republican .

You tell me you list of republican cities then.

 

[Timmy]

List of United States cities by crime rate (2014) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here Ya go . Click on "murder n manslaughter" stat.

Atlanta miami and Houston all rank over Boston San Fran and Seattle

Democrats Run America's Ten Poorest Cities - Eagle Rising

Answer my question ! List your top republican cities.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

List of United States cities by crime rate (2014) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here Ya go . Click on "murder n manslaughter" stat.

Atlanta miami and Houston all rank over Boston San Fran and Seattle

Of all those cities, how many are run by Republicans?

 

[rdean]

1) Campaign finance reform (they of course helped corrupt it)

2) Our crumbling infrastructure system that ranks among the worst in the developed world

3) Childhood poverty that ranks the worst in the developed world

4) Wall Street corruption and other white collar crime

5) Aiding the shrinking middle class and stopping all income gains from going to the top earners.

The GOP is only the party of doing nothing unless it involves cutting taxes for the top earners or protecting white collar crime.

Democrats are addressing all of the issues above.

American Infrastructure Report Card | Society of Civil Engineers

NCCP | Child Poverty

Corruption on Wall Street still growing by the day

Nope.

 

[blackhawk]

S.S.D.D.

 

[martybegan]

1) Campaign finance reform (they of course helped corrupt it)

2) Our crumbling infrastructure system that ranks among the worst in the developed world

3) Childhood poverty that ranks the worst in the developed world

4) Wall Street corruption and other white collar crime

5) Aiding the shrinking middle class and stopping all income gains from going to the top earners.

The GOP is not only the party of doing nothing unless it involves cutting taxes for the top earners or protecting white collar crime.

Democrats are addressing all of the issues above.

American Infrastructure Report Card | Society of Civil Engineers

NCCP | Child Poverty

Corruption on Wall Street still growing by the day

1) Campaign finance reform always dies because the side pushing for it always seeks to keep their underground money flowing while denying it to the other side.

2) The same people crying for infrastructure work are the same ones who demand a 10,000 page Environmental Impact Statement, and are related to the NIMBY people who sue anytime something is about to be built.

3) Maybe because throwing money at the problem vis a vis WIC, welfare, and all sorts of other incentives to be piss poor parents isn't workin.

4) Government corruption and the public sector bureaucracy costs us far more $$ than any wall street type.

5) Money re-distribution just goes to the people in #4 above, not to anyone in the "middle class".

Democrats have the same solution every time, more taxes, more government, less freedom.

1) Do you have proof of this? Of course not.

2) The same people? Who? Either way this is way besides the point.

3) You don't even know the actual statistics on those welfare programs.

4) Do you have proof of this? Of course not.

5) No one is talking about re-distribution.

1) Human nature is proof enough

2) it's the main point, but it doesn't fit your narrative so you ignore it.

3) Neither do you, you just sit there and propose throwing other people's money at the problem

4) It's common sense.

5) Yes, you are.

 

[Timmy]

Conservatives want more military spending and walls on a 1200 mile border .

That's going to lower the deficit ?

 

[Timmy]

Still no list of republican cities to compare too? What a shock ?

And I mean a real city , not some leafy rich suburb . Need at least 2 pro sports teams!

 

[Billy000]

1) Campaign finance reform (they of course helped corrupt it)

2) Our crumbling infrastructure system that ranks among the worst in the developed world

3) Childhood poverty that ranks the worst in the developed world

4) Wall Street corruption and other white collar crime

5) Aiding the shrinking middle class and stopping all income gains from going to the top earners.

The GOP is not only the party of doing nothing unless it involves cutting taxes for the top earners or protecting white collar crime.

Democrats are addressing all of the issues above.

American Infrastructure Report Card | Society of Civil Engineers

NCCP | Child Poverty

Corruption on Wall Street still growing by the day

1) Campaign finance reform always dies because the side pushing for it always seeks to keep their underground money flowing while denying it to the other side.

2) The same people crying for infrastructure work are the same ones who demand a 10,000 page Environmental Impact Statement, and are related to the NIMBY people who sue anytime something is about to be built.

3) Maybe because throwing money at the problem vis a vis WIC, welfare, and all sorts of other incentives to be piss poor parents isn't workin.

4) Government corruption and the public sector bureaucracy costs us far more $$ than any wall street type.

5) Money re-distribution just goes to the people in #4 above, not to anyone in the "middle class".

Democrats have the same solution every time, more taxes, more government, less freedom.

1) Do you have proof of this? Of course not.

2) The same people? Who? Either way this is way besides the point.

3) You don't even know the actual statistics on those welfare programs.

4) Do you have proof of this? Of course not.

5) No one is talking about re-distribution.

1) Human nature is proof enough

2) it's the main point, but it doesn't fit your narrative so you ignore it.

3) Neither do you, you just sit there and propose throwing other people's money at the problem

4) It's common sense.

5) Yes, you are.

83% households on food stamps have at least one dependent living there.

The average household on food stamps gets $133 per person.

The average income of a household on food stamps is $733 per MONTH.

Obviously this isn't enough to alleviate childhood poverty.

 

[martybegan]

1) Campaign finance reform (they of course helped corrupt it)

2) Our crumbling infrastructure system that ranks among the worst in the developed world

3) Childhood poverty that ranks the worst in the developed world

4) Wall Street corruption and other white collar crime

5) Aiding the shrinking middle class and stopping all income gains from going to the top earners.

The GOP is not only the party of doing nothing unless it involves cutting taxes for the top earners or protecting white collar crime.

Democrats are addressing all of the issues above.

American Infrastructure Report Card | Society of Civil Engineers

NCCP | Child Poverty

Corruption on Wall Street still growing by the day

1) Campaign finance reform always dies because the side pushing for it always seeks to keep their underground money flowing while denying it to the other side.

2) The same people crying for infrastructure work are the same ones who demand a 10,000 page Environmental Impact Statement, and are related to the NIMBY people who sue anytime something is about to be built.

3) Maybe because throwing money at the problem vis a vis WIC, welfare, and all sorts of other incentives to be piss poor parents isn't workin.

4) Government corruption and the public sector bureaucracy costs us far more $$ than any wall street type.

5) Money re-distribution just goes to the people in #4 above, not to anyone in the "middle class".

Democrats have the same solution every time, more taxes, more government, less freedom.

1) Do you have proof of this? Of course not.

2) The same people? Who? Either way this is way besides the point.

3) You don't even know the actual statistics on those welfare programs.

4) Do you have proof of this? Of course not.

5) No one is talking about re-distribution.

1) Human nature is proof enough

2) it's the main point, but it doesn't fit your narrative so you ignore it.

3) Neither do you, you just sit there and propose throwing other people's money at the problem

4) It's common sense.

5) Yes, you are.

83% households on food stamps have at least one dependent living there.

The average household on food stamps gets $133 per person.

The average income of a household on food stamps is $733 per MONTH.

Obviously this isn't enough to alleviate childhood poverty.

So the solution is to throw more money at it? Subsidize poor life decisions even more?

 

[Billy000]

1) Campaign finance reform (they of course helped corrupt it)

2) Our crumbling infrastructure system that ranks among the worst in the developed world

3) Childhood poverty that ranks the worst in the developed world

4) Wall Street corruption and other white collar crime

5) Aiding the shrinking middle class and stopping all income gains from going to the top earners.

The GOP is not only the party of doing nothing unless it involves cutting taxes for the top earners or protecting white collar crime.

Democrats are addressing all of the issues above.

American Infrastructure Report Card | Society of Civil Engineers

NCCP | Child Poverty

Corruption on Wall Street still growing by the day

1) Campaign finance reform always dies because the side pushing for it always seeks to keep their underground money flowing while denying it to the other side.

2) The same people crying for infrastructure work are the same ones who demand a 10,000 page Environmental Impact Statement, and are related to the NIMBY people who sue anytime something is about to be built.

3) Maybe because throwing money at the problem vis a vis WIC, welfare, and all sorts of other incentives to be piss poor parents isn't workin.

4) Government corruption and the public sector bureaucracy costs us far more $$ than any wall street type.

5) Money re-distribution just goes to the people in #4 above, not to anyone in the "middle class".

Democrats have the same solution every time, more taxes, more government, less freedom.

1) Do you have proof of this? Of course not.

2) The same people? Who? Either way this is way besides the point.

3) You don't even know the actual statistics on those welfare programs.

4) Do you have proof of this? Of course not.

5) No one is talking about re-distribution.

1) Human nature is proof enough

2) it's the main point, but it doesn't fit your narrative so you ignore it.

3) Neither do you, you just sit there and propose throwing other people's money at the problem

4) It's common sense.

5) Yes, you are.

83% households on food stamps have at least one dependent living there.

The average household on food stamps gets $133 per person.

The average income of a household on food stamps is $733 per MONTH.

Obviously this isn't enough to alleviate childhood poverty.

So the solution is to throw more money at it? Subsidize poor life decisions even more?

If the minimum wage won't be raised and the earned income tax credit won't expand and increase, then yeah, we have to increase food stamps spending.

Take your pick.

 

[martybegan]

1) Campaign finance reform always dies because the side pushing for it always seeks to keep their underground money flowing while denying it to the other side.

2) The same people crying for infrastructure work are the same ones who demand a 10,000 page Environmental Impact Statement, and are related to the NIMBY people who sue anytime something is about to be built.

3) Maybe because throwing money at the problem vis a vis WIC, welfare, and all sorts of other incentives to be piss poor parents isn't workin.

4) Government corruption and the public sector bureaucracy costs us far more $$ than any wall street type.

5) Money re-distribution just goes to the people in #4 above, not to anyone in the "middle class".

Democrats have the same solution every time, more taxes, more government, less freedom.

1) Do you have proof of this? Of course not.

2) The same people? Who? Either way this is way besides the point.

3) You don't even know the actual statistics on those welfare programs.

4) Do you have proof of this? Of course not.

5) No one is talking about re-distribution.

1) Human nature is proof enough

2) it's the main point, but it doesn't fit your narrative so you ignore it.

3) Neither do you, you just sit there and propose throwing other people's money at the problem

4) It's common sense.

5) Yes, you are.

83% households on food stamps have at least one dependent living there.

The average household on food stamps gets $133 per person.

The average income of a household on food stamps is $733 per MONTH.

Obviously this isn't enough to alleviate childhood poverty.

So the solution is to throw more money at it? Subsidize poor life decisions even more?

If the minimum wage won't be raised and the earned income tax credit won't expand and increase, then yeah, we have to increase food stamps spending.

Take your pick.

Again, subsidizing poor life decisions. it hasn't worked for the past 50 years, but with JUST A BIT MORE money, it's SURE to work!!!!!!

 

[Dovahkiin]

Some members of the GOP want to shift the focus to poverty, like Paul Ryan.

 

[Billy000]

1) Do you have proof of this? Of course not.

2) The same people? Who? Either way this is way besides the point.

3) You don't even know the actual statistics on those welfare programs.

4) Do you have proof of this? Of course not.

5) No one is talking about re-distribution.

1) Human nature is proof enough

2) it's the main point, but it doesn't fit your narrative so you ignore it.

3) Neither do you, you just sit there and propose throwing other people's money at the problem

4) It's common sense.

5) Yes, you are.

83% households on food stamps have at least one dependent living there.

The average household on food stamps gets $133 per person.

The average income of a household on food stamps is $733 per MONTH.

Obviously this isn't enough to alleviate childhood poverty.

So the solution is to throw more money at it? Subsidize poor life decisions even more?

If the minimum wage won't be raised and the earned income tax credit won't expand and increase, then yeah, we have to increase food stamps spending.

Take your pick.

Again, subsidizing poor life decisions. it hasn't worked for the past 50 years, but with JUST A BIT MORE money, it's SURE to work!!!!!!

Tell me, what exactly should be done when we live in an economy where higher paying jobs are greatly outnumbered by low paying jobs thus making the former extremely competitive among millions of people?

 

[martybegan]

1) Human nature is proof enough

2) it's the main point, but it doesn't fit your narrative so you ignore it.

3) Neither do you, you just sit there and propose throwing other people's money at the problem

4) It's common sense.

5) Yes, you are.

83% households on food stamps have at least one dependent living there.

The average household on food stamps gets $133 per person.

The average income of a household on food stamps is $733 per MONTH.

Obviously this isn't enough to alleviate childhood poverty.

So the solution is to throw more money at it? Subsidize poor life decisions even more?

If the minimum wage won't be raised and the earned income tax credit won't expand and increase, then yeah, we have to increase food stamps spending.

Take your pick.

Again, subsidizing poor life decisions. it hasn't worked for the past 50 years, but with JUST A BIT MORE money, it's SURE to work!!!!!!

Tell me, what exactly should be done when we live in an economy where higher paying jobs are greatly outnumbered by low paying jobs thus making the former extremely competitive among millions of people?

1) Get rid of all the illegals competing for said low paying jobs, thus making labor more scarce

2) Make people realize that a fast food $8 an hour job isn't a career, and have them WORK (gasp) to improve themselves.

3) Stop subsidizing bad behavior and poor life choices.

 

[HenryBHough]

Simple answer:

NO.

 

[Billy000]

83% households on food stamps have at least one dependent living there.

The average household on food stamps gets $133 per person.

The average income of a household on food stamps is $733 per MONTH.

Obviously this isn't enough to alleviate childhood poverty.

So the solution is to throw more money at it? Subsidize poor life decisions even more?

If the minimum wage won't be raised and the earned income tax credit won't expand and increase, then yeah, we have to increase food stamps spending.

Take your pick.

Again, subsidizing poor life decisions. it hasn't worked for the past 50 years, but with JUST A BIT MORE money, it's SURE to work!!!!!!

Tell me, what exactly should be done when we live in an economy where higher paying jobs are greatly outnumbered by low paying jobs thus making the former extremely competitive among millions of people?

1) Get rid of all the illegals competing for said low paying jobs, thus making labor more scarce

2) Make people realize that a fast food $8 an hour job isn't a career, and have them WORK (gasp) to improve themselves.

3) Stop subsidizing bad behavior and poor life choices.

1) Do you really think employers are going to pay more just because illegals are out of the country? No way. The competition for higher wage jobs is already extremely high

2) Again you miss the point. Those shitty fast food jobs greatly outnumber higher wage positions. That means millions of people have no choice but to take those jobs.

3) That's just a stupid republican talking point. No one on welfare programs like food stamps makes even close to a comfortable living.