Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Liberal Lioness of The Supreme Court

[Wyatt earp]

Proof that bear513 is lying.

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG/pdf/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG-2-4-3-12.pdf

Stop lying.

Proof you are spinning this .


A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and: (1) compels the other person to participate: (A) by force; or (B) by threatening or placing the other person in fear that any person will imminently be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; (2) has substantially impaired the other person's power to appraise or control the conduct by administering or employing a drug or intoxicant without the knowledge or against the will of such other person, or by other means; or (3) the other person is, in fact, less than twelve years old."

No, YOU"RE lying by omission. You left this part out

As with her opinion that the rights of workers should be equal to that of employers, this shows that she was actually saying the law should treat men and women equally.

Ginsburg and her coauthor argue that the law should be rewritten to outlaw sexual abuse of any minor, male or female, by any person who is significantly older, male or female (thereby obviating the absurd possibility that a 13-year-old boy would be prosecuted for seducing a 15-year-old girl).

And the part that you posted in, in no way an endorsement of pedophilia

If we are debating about it...she is guilty as charged. All you are doing is defending her asinine behavior .

 

[Zander]

Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg takes off the gloves - CNNPolitics ​

As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."

Here is more:

This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America

On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."

As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."

Bottom line - She lost.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Ginsberg doesn't follow the constitution, and she is a left wing wacko.

Judge Ginsberg once said “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe(abortion) was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of”

She has never satisfactorily explained who the Left Wingers do not want “too many of”.
She sounds like a genocidal racist.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Proof that bear513 is lying.

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG/pdf/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG-2-4-3-12.pdf

Stop lying.

Proof you are spinning this .


A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and: (1) compels the other person to participate: (A) by force; or (B) by threatening or placing the other person in fear that any person will imminently be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; (2) has substantially impaired the other person's power to appraise or control the conduct by administering or employing a drug or intoxicant without the knowledge or against the will of such other person, or by other means; or (3) the other person is, in fact, less than twelve years old."

No, YOU"RE lying by omission. You left this part out

As with her opinion that the rights of workers should be equal to that of employers, this shows that she was actually saying the law should treat men and women equally.

Ginsburg and her coauthor argue that the law should be rewritten to outlaw sexual abuse of any minor, male or female, by any person who is significantly older, male or female (thereby obviating the absurd possibility that a 13-year-old boy would be prosecuted for seducing a 15-year-old girl).

And the part that you posted in, in no way an endorsement of pedophilia

bear513 hasn't read that in context. Nor has he read for the FACTS. bear513 always lies and always will.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Ginsberg doesn't follow the constitution, and she is a left wing wacko.

Judge Ginsberg once said “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe(abortion) was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of”

She has never satisfactorily explained who the Left Wingers do not want “too many of”.
She sounds like a genocidal racist.

It's working perfectly.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg takes off the gloves - CNNPolitics ​

As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."

Here is more:

This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America

On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."

As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."

Where are "worker's rights" in the U.S. Constitution? That sounds like Marxism

If you think that protecting worker rights is Marxism, it just shows that you have a piss poor understanding of Marxism

There may not be anything about workers rights in the body of the constitution or the amendment, but that does not mean that there are no constitutional protections. Case law is Constitutional law and carries the same weight as constitutionally enumerated rights

Selected Supreme Court Decisions

Finally, even if a right is not enumerated , and even if it has not been established by the courts as a binding precedent, it does not mean that it is not protected

Unenumerated rights in the Constitution
Unenumerated rights are legal rights inferred from other legal rights that are officiated in a retrievable form codified by law institutions, such as in written constitutions, but are not themselves expressly coded or "enumerated" among the explicit writ of the law.[1] Alternative terminology sometimes used are: implied rights, natural rights, ...
Unenumerated rights - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unenumerated_rights

Many rights that are bestowed upon people which can be taken for granted.Here is more:

Penumbras of the Constitution: charting the origins of the abolition of moral legislation
Any more questions?

That's crap. My copy of the Constitution has a Tenth Amendment that says if its not covered in the main body, then its up to the state

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Ginsberg doesn't follow the constitution, and she is a left wing wacko.

Judge Ginsberg once said “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe(abortion) was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of”

She has never satisfactorily explained who the Left Wingers do not want “too many of”.
She sounds like a genocidal racist.

TroglocratsRdumb wrote

“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe(abortion) was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of”

I can't find that quote and since you enclosed it with quote marks, you are stating that its a direct quote.

Please post a link to proof she said that.

Thanks.

Edited to add - please see the next post which shows the true quote and shows the RWNJs are lying by taking it out of context. SSDD

 

[Luddly Neddite]

As usual, RWNJs took this out of context so they could lie about her.

Here's the truth of this quote "“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe(abortion) was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of”

Justice Ginsburg Sets the Record Straight on Abortion and Population Control

Michael Gerson - Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Comments on Abortion in the New York Times

 

[Aba Incieni]

As usual, RWNJs took this out of context so they could lie about her.

Here's the truth of this quote "“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe(abortion) was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of”

Justice Ginsburg Sets the Record Straight on Abortion and Population Control

Michael Gerson - Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Comments on Abortion in the New York Times

It's just a koinky-dink that a certain segment of the population aborts at least 3X it's percentage of population.

 

[Syriusly]

God Bless her!!! If only we all could still have a brain on our shoulder at 85 years old! HOLY SMOKES!!!

She probably has a ghost writer framing up her arguments, after they wipe the drool from her chin. Let's face it. She falls asleep at the State of the Union addresses. Think she's completely present for oral arguments?

So you are not only a bigot towards gays- but also towards Americans of a certain age.

At least you are consistently a bigot.

 

[Syriusly]

Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg takes off the gloves - CNNPolitics ​

As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."

Here is more:

This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America

On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."

As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."

Loved the move about her.

Every woman who actually believes that women should have legal equal rights with men should see this movie- and find out just a little about how Ruth Bader Ginsberg helped ensure equal rights for women- by arguing for equal rights for men.

 

[Syriusly]

That ol RaT ***** can barely stay awake. She didn't write shit, her clerks did.

Of course her clerks wrote the decision. The poor woman sleeps while at the bench. She hasn't had a coherent thought in 15 years.

No surprise at all that our resident bigots are also bigots towards Americans in their 80's.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

As usual, RWNJs took this out of context so they could lie about her.

Here's the truth of this quote "“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe(abortion) was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of”

Justice Ginsburg Sets the Record Straight on Abortion and Population Control

Michael Gerson - Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Comments on Abortion in the New York Times

Judge Ginsberg had to back track and CYA. It was still an unsatisfactory explanation.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

She's so dynamic........

She just can't stand to look at Trump

Nah......

 

[Pilot1]

Hey, at least she's awake!

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.

TRANSLATION: The justice who cannot retire do to her politics and therefore is hanging on by her fingernails delivered a rambling rant because the majority refuses to legislate from the bench like in the good ol days...most know her anger isn't really just about this case, but what she sees as the direction of all future decisions that most assuredly makes the "hanging on" very distasteful and not worth hanging around just to continue losing to THE DON.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Shouldn't that old hag be in New Zealand by now?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

She has always fought for America and Americans.

Let me fix this for you:

"She has always fought America and Americans".

 

[Rustic]

Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg takes off the gloves - CNNPolitics ​

As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."

Here is more:

This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America

On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."

As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."

She sucks hairy ass...

 

[DigitalDrifter]

By the way, and speaking of the SCOTUS. Won't it be awesome if Kennedy retires this summer as many believe he will ?