Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Liberal Lioness of The Supreme Court

[EvilCat Breath]

That ol RaT ***** can barely stay awake. She didn't write shit, her clerks did.

Of course her clerks wrote the decision. The poor woman sleeps while at the bench. She hasn't had a coherent thought in 15 years.

 

[Pete7469]

I hope Trump replaces that hag with Ted Cruz.


.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Her own rabbi refers to her as "That Drunken Jew."

 

[Pete7469]

This is the first one of regressiveparasite's asinine cut/paste threads that isn't about fudge packer rights.

It's about time that ignorant piece of shit expanded his agitprop.


.

 

[blastoff]

Trump’s got a new RBG arm warming up in the bullpen.

 

[Silhouette]

God Bless her!!! If only we all could still have a brain on our shoulder at 85 years old! HOLY SMOKES!!!

She probably has a ghost writer framing up her arguments, after they wipe the drool from her chin. Let's face it. She falls asleep at the State of the Union addresses. Think she's completely present for oral arguments?

 

[rightwinger]

She is an inspirational justice

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg takes off the gloves - CNNPolitics ​

As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."

Here is more:

This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America

On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."

As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."

Where are "worker's rights" in the U.S. Constitution? That sounds like Marxism

If you think that protecting worker rights is Marxism, it just shows that you have a piss poor understanding of Marxism

There may not be anything about workers rights in the body of the constitution or the amendment, but that does not mean that there are no constitutional protections. Case law is Constitutional law and carries the same weight as constitutionally enumerated rights

Selected Supreme Court Decisions

Finally, even if a right is not enumerated , and even if it has not been established by the courts as a binding precedent, it does not mean that it is not protected

Unenumerated rights in the Constitution
Unenumerated rights are legal rights inferred from other legal rights that are officiated in a retrievable form codified by law institutions, such as in written constitutions, but are not themselves expressly coded or "enumerated" among the explicit writ of the law.[1] Alternative terminology sometimes used are: implied rights, natural rights, ...
Unenumerated rights - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unenumerated_rights

Many rights that are bestowed upon people which can be taken for granted.Here is more:

Penumbras of the Constitution: charting the origins of the abolition of moral legislation
Any more questions?

 

[Harry Dresden]

Justice Ginsburg follows the Constitution and its case law, as should every jurist.

Unfortunately there are far too many conservative jurists who refuse to respect the rule of law.

if you say so no reply....

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

There may not be anything about workers rights in the body of the constitution or the amendment, but that does not mean that there are no constitutional protections.

More accurately it does not preclude constitutional protections, as noted in the 9th Amendment.

Case law is Constitutional law and carries the same weight as constitutionally enumerated rights

Not quite. All case law and precedence do is reflect the attitude of the time in which they were created. They do not amend the Constitution. They can be revisited at any time, and held or dispensed with like any other law, often quite arbitrarily.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

ginsburgsnoozing

 

[Wyatt earp]

Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg takes off the gloves - CNNPolitics ​

As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."

Here is more:

This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America

On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."

As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

She's so dynamic........

She just can't stand to look at Trump

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg takes off the gloves - CNNPolitics ​

As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."

Here is more:

This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America

On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."

As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."

View attachment 194871

******* bullshit. When did she say that asshole?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg takes off the gloves - CNNPolitics ​

As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."

Here is more:

This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America

On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."

As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."

View attachment 194871

******* bullshit. When did she say that asshole?

Bullshit she wanted to lower the age of consent to 12 years old in 1974 .

 

[TheParser]

The dear lady is living proof that we need term limits for the House, the Senate, and -- above all -- the Supreme Court.

We should all be grateful that the presidency is already limited to two terms.

Of course, I shan't name him, but it would have been catastrophic -- IMHO -- if a certain recent president had won a third term.

 

[Wyatt earp]

The dear lady is living proof that we need term limits for the House, the Senate, and -- above all -- the Supreme Court.

We should all be grateful that the presidency is already limited to two terms.

Of course, I shan't name him, but it would have been catastrophic -- IMHO -- if a certain recent president had won a third term.

Not sure about the Supreme court, most people get wiser when they age .

 

[Luddly Neddite]

She has always fought for America and Americans.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg takes off the gloves - CNNPolitics ​

As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."

Here is more:

This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America

On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."

As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."

View attachment 194871

bear513

Yet another LIE from a LIAR.

Why can't RWNJs argue facts? This accusation is reprehensible. As are the comments above that she hates the constitution (this from a trumpanzee!!!!!!), that she's a Marxist (stupid, just stupid) and the rest of the RWNJ lies.

Please stop lying.

FACTS.

Why can't you ever state facts?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg takes off the gloves - CNNPolitics ​

As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."

Here is more:

This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America

On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."

As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."

View attachment 194871

bear513

Yet another LIE from a LIAR.

Why can't RWNJs argue facts? This accusation is reprehensible. As are the comments above that she hates the constitution (this from a trumpanzee!!!!!!), that she's a Marxist (stupid, just stupid) and the rest of the RWNJ lies.

Please stop lying.

FACTS.

Why can't you ever state facts?

Those are the facts, she was arguing in 1974 to lower the age of consent to 12 years old..



Truth hurts


No?