Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They deserved to be enslaved by Russia after WWII.
I guess it's the clicks.
Putin's views aren't a mystery, he's been saying the same thing for 20 years, and not just about Ukraine. Poland, the Baltics, etc
I think the time to complain about NATO nukes in Europe was about 1985, when there were thousands of them...
Today there is barely a handful, and they are not anywhere near the Russian borders.
The excuse that he had invade Ukraine to prevent NATO nukes on Russia's borders isn't rooted in reality.
www.theatlantic.com
Wrong.
All European nations are so socialist as to actually be communist.
And Russians have never been remotely communist, but always capitalists instead.
And Russia never attacked anyone.
It was Napoleon who invaded Russia, not the other way around.
Europe hated Slavs, not Russians, and it was the Polish Slavs they actually were referring to.
The Poles used Ukrainian (Cossack) cavalry and terrorized Europe for over 100 years.
Russia is xenophobic and kept to itself.
The colonial imperialists in Europe were first Spain, then later England and France, and finally the USA.
The closest the Russian came to be colonial imperialists was the Sino-Russo wars around 1900, with Japan.
it was done through international agreement and was not illegalWrong.
The Ukraine illegally was given large chunks of Russia, populated by ethnic Russians, and since the Ukraine Azov Battalion is murdering these ethnic Russians, the Ukraine is forfeit.
The Ukraine is almost half ethnic Russians, but Kyiv is entirely Ukrainian and prevents any ethnic Russian participation in government.
Combined with crimes like stealing Russian oil, violating treaties, trying to join NATO, etc., the Ukraine is forfeit.
It is like the Confederacy in the South. If you want to commit crimes, like murder and slavery, you forfeit any sovereignty.
And the Ukraine agreed to this Russian invasion in 1992, as terms of their treaty then that gave them independence.
The Ukraine agreed to NEVER try to join any alliance hostile to Russia.
And the Ukraine is not a single culture so should never be a single nation.
It is half Slavic Poles in the west, and half Slavic Russians in the east. They never got along and should never be one country. It was entirely the fault of Khrushchev, in 1955. That problem still needs to be fixed. The Ukraine needs to split off ALL provinces that are more than half ethnic Russian.
The Poles deserve to never be their own country due to what they did before WWI.
The countries Russia occupied needed rebuilding by Russia,
Nonsense. The Sprint was a 2-stage not 3, and was cancelled in 1976. Poland was still under the Soviet yoke.That is a lie.
The US already had put nukes in Poland, under the ridiculous claim they were ABMs to protect Poland from any missile attack from Iran.
The Sprint 3 stage missiles we put into Poland were actually just short range, tactical nukes.
And we only finally took them back out because of threats.
There were both strategic and tactical nukes in large numbers in Europe during the cold war.Wrong.
There were never lots of NATO nukes in Europe.
It was just England, France, and Spain who had them.
And they did not want a lot of them, making themselves more of a target.
armscontrolcenter.org
The USSR was hard on its citizens.I https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_communist_regimesqWhat did Russia EVER do that was harmful to anyone?
Like with China, Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, Syria, Afghanistan, Ukraine, etc.?
The US tried to illegal put dictators in power in all those cases, and Russia worked to defend the people, with nothing in return.
news.stanford.edu
Everybody hates Russia. For good reason. They murder women and children. They conduct genocide. They are killers. Nobody likes Russia.
In the terrible winter of 1932–33, brigades of Communist Party activists went house to house in the Ukrainian countryside, looking for food. The brigades were from Moscow, Kyiv, and Kharkiv, as well as villages down the road. They dug up gardens, broke open walls, and used long rods to poke up chimneys, searching for hidden grain. They watched for smoke coming from chimneys, because that might mean a family had hidden flour and was baking bread. They led away farm animals and confiscated tomato seedlings. After they left, Ukrainian peasants, deprived of food, ate rats, frogs, and boiled grass. They gnawed on tree bark and leather. Many resorted to cannibalism to stay alive. Some 4 million died of starvation.
Ukraine and the Words That Lead to Mass Murder
First comes the dehumanization. Then comes the killing.
All European nations are so socialist as to actually be communist.
That's why they joined NATO, because they love Russia and Commies.
Makes perfect sense now that you've explained it.
it was done through international agreement and was not illegal
Then the Russians don't deserve to be their own country due to what they did since the 1920s
Nah, they needed Russia to leave.
Countries joined NATO because of bribes,
When something is declared autocratically, against the will of the indigenous people, it is inherently illegal.
Wrong.
Russia did nothing "wrong" at all.
You simply have been reading false propaganda, from the evil sources who tried to install dictators in China, Korea, Vietnam, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Panama, Nicaragua, Grenada, Chile, Egypt, Syria, Libya, etc.
Which Russia willingly and peacefully did, once Russia felt their borders were secure.
Nonsense. The Sprint was a 2-stage not 3, and was cancelled in 1976. Poland was still under the Soviet yoke.
The system was never deployed outside US territory, and was limited to something like 17 US cities (by then it was called Sentinel, and included a long range missile called Spartan).
The concept of a nuclear ABM system never got past the development stage in the US, MIRV's made it impractical.
----------------
The 1997 Founding Act gave NATO assurances to Russia that there would not be nukes in new member States.
"The member States of NATO reiterate that they have no intention, no plan and no reason to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of new members, nor any need to change any aspect of NATO's nuclear posture or nuclear policy - and do not foresee any future need to do so. This subsumes the fact that NATO has decided that it has no intention, no plan, and no reason to establish nuclear weapon storage sites on the territory of those members, whether through the construction of new nuclear storage facilities or the adaptation of old nuclear storage facilities."
