Russia shuts mission to NATO in spy row retaliation

Baron

Platinum Member
Sep 19, 2008
13,912
6,546
370
Brooklyn, NYC
The next step is WWIII.


Russia said on Monday it would halt the activities of its diplomatic mission to NATO after the Western military alliance expelled eight Russians saying they were spies.
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov also said staff at NATO's military mission in Moscow would be stripped of their accreditation from Nov. 1, and the alliance's information office in the Russian capital would be shuttered.
"If NATO members have any urgent matters, they can contact our ambassador in Belgium on these questions," Lavrov told a news conference.

NATO said on Oct. 6 it had expelled eight members of Russia's mission to the alliance who it said were "undeclared Russian intelligence officers".


1*3XAJw3nmMThWvyT7oxp32A.png


iu

 
Russia said on Monday it would halt the activities of its diplomatic mission to NATO after the Western military alliance expelled eight Russians saying they were spies.
Let's just hope and pray the United States doesn't get dragged into this war, and if we are, not on the side of the Democrat EU and Democrat NATO.

Stop using "Western" as a code-word for Democrat. North is up, you're leftists on a map, and you stopped at the international date line.
 
Let's just hope and pray the United States doesn't get dragged into this war, and if we are, not on the side of the Democrat EU and Democrat NATO.

Stop using "Western" as a code-word for Democrat. North is up, you're leftists on a map, and you stopped at the international date line.

The problem is Russia has few time to evaluate an arisen threat.
For example a malfunction.
Less probably as 2 minutes
By the smallest spark or danger Russians missiles immediately fly to the West and the World as we know is gone
 
The next step is WWIII.


Russia said on Monday it would halt the activities of its diplomatic mission to NATO after the Western military alliance expelled eight Russians saying they were spies.
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov also said staff at NATO's military mission in Moscow would be stripped of their accreditation from Nov. 1, and the alliance's information office in the Russian capital would be shuttered.
"If NATO members have any urgent matters, they can contact our ambassador in Belgium on these questions," Lavrov told a news conference.

NATO said on Oct. 6 it had expelled eight members of Russia's mission to the alliance who it said were "undeclared Russian intelligence officers".


1*3XAJw3nmMThWvyT7oxp32A.png


iu
Russia does not want a head to head war against NATO countries, Putin knows they would lose in such an encounter.
 
The problem is Russia has few time to evaluate an arisen threat.
For example a malfunction.
Less probably as 2 minutes
By the smallest spark or danger Russians missiles immediately fly to the West and the World as we know is gone
Alaska was once part of Russia, and still plenty of Russians living here. It's possible if the United States govenment and military collapsed, Russia would take back Alaska, but they're probably not going to blow their comrades in Alaska off the map with a Tsar Bomba.
 
Russia does not want a head to head war against NATO countries, Putin knows they would lose in such an encounter.

One missile to Yellowstone and USA is gone






NATO shall be dissolved and idiot Biden get kick in his ass
 
Alaska was once part of Russia, and still plenty of Russians living here. It's possible if the United States govenment and military collapsed, Russia would take back Alaska, but they're probably not going to blow their comrades in Alaska off the map with a Tsar Bomba.

The problem is Russia ( and NATO) have very few time to evaluate a thereat now.
Around 1 or maximal 2 minutes.
Thereafter the red button gonna push
 
One missile to Yellowstone and USA is gone






NATO shall be dissolved and idiot Biden get kick in his ass

That would be suicide for Russia, almost every nation in the world would retaliate either conventionally or with their own nukes.
 
That would be suicide for Russia, almost every nation in the world would retaliate either conventionally or with their own nukes.

Russia has better missile defense systems not available in the West.
Therefore Turkey purchased them.

Think about Yellowstone

 
Russia has better missile defense systems not available in the West.
Therefore Turkey purchased them.

Think about Yellowstone


Obviously you have never heard of M.A.D. (Mutually Assured Destruction).......... There's a reason no one has used nukes. Of course your optimism concerning Russian missile systems is duly noted........ :rofl:
 
This is a performance. They constantly whip up the semblance of confrontation, and at the same time do not even make a difference between the United States and Europe, calling it the "West", in fact, Russia is pursuing a purely European policy, including a humane court and a moratorium on the death penalty, complete freedom of homosexuals, and the like. ... This is the left country, there are not even right-wing parties, only left-centrism and ultra-left
The Kremlin is now fully satisfied with US and NATO policies. Perhaps they were not satisfied with the presence of US troops in Afghanistan. But now this problem has been resolved.

Who they really don't like is Eastern Europe, especially Poland and the Czech Republic. They try not to even mention it. Russia is pursuing a policy of Europe's agent in Asia, pretending to be an Asian country.
 
Russia does not want a head to head war against NATO countries, Putin knows they would lose in such an encounter.
They don't need it. They win by politics. Now, by all indications, the United States has caved in to what the political circles of Europe and Moscow want, their real power, close to pro-British politics. The United States withdrew its troops from Afghanistan, the situation with the blacks is destabilized in the country, the left came to power, and the Republicans under Trump pursued a leftist policy. This is all in the hands of Europe, there is no visible victory for the United States. The fact that the US army is strong is only part of the question, the main thing is in whose hands it is.
 

Forum List

Back
Top